| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
On June 21 2013 10:38 Sabu113 wrote: Terran players bitching is a bit amusing with some of the rather... interesting design/balance choices blizzard made for the most successful race. Terran clearly isn't the most successful race at the moment. | ||
|
Shin_Gouki
United States313 Posts
| ||
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
On June 21 2013 10:38 Sabu113 wrote: Terran players bitching is a bit amusing with some of the rather... interesting design/balance choices blizzard made for the most successful race. Most successful should mean nothing as long as the end results is balanced, which it appears to be. | ||
|
Hattori_Hanzo
Singapore1229 Posts
On June 21 2013 10:43 Shin_Gouki wrote: As a zerg so far, this patch hasn't been bad. I'm already seeing warp prism play, but it only makes the prism a lil harder to kill. A couple of spores for static D, and you're good to go :o Yes, that's the whole point. >_< XvP need to learn to put at least one forward AA site (turret/spore/cannon) on their blind side past the mid-game. Further improving the state of the game for more action. Protoss can now do mid-game doom drops too! Blink all-in reinforced by WP gogogo! Edit:EMERGHERD, 10,000th post!!! *runs around room* | ||
|
GinDo
3327 Posts
| ||
|
Sabu113
United States11047 Posts
On June 21 2013 10:51 Bagi wrote: Most successful should mean nothing as long as the end results is balanced, which it appears to be. WoL was certainly not balanced for long stretches of time and it's still early doors. Generally speaking there a lot of overly simplistic mantras about waiting and buffing everything. The patch was granted because finally blizz thought that protoss was underperforming so no things weren't fantastic If you wanted to criticize design nexus cannon and the boost would be the first things to look at. Anyway don't want to take away too much of Rabiator's shtick. Just gonna dream for the day some inde developers decide to do an rts. edit: Damn that 3. | ||
|
xAdra
Singapore1858 Posts
On June 21 2013 10:36 GolemMadness wrote: Does anyone actually think that queens having 5 range instead of 3 is an issue right now? I believe we're talking about the patchzerg era, where the reasonable amount of balance was utterly upset and WoL left in a state of insane imbalance for it's last 6 months. 6 months is pretty significant (about a quarter to a fifth of WoL's lifespan) and from that we can see that Blizzard really doesn't have a good track record for responding fast. | ||
|
lorestarcraft
United States1049 Posts
On June 21 2013 11:20 Hattori_Hanzo wrote: Yes, that's the whole point. >_< XvP need to learn to put at least one forward AA site (turret/spore/cannon) on their blind side past the mid-game. Further improving the state of the game for more action. Protoss can now do mid-game doom drops too! Blink all-in reinforced by WP gogogo! Edit:EMERGHERD, 10,000th post!!! *runs around room* 1,000 posts? XD | ||
|
-Switch-
Canada506 Posts
On June 20 2013 07:06 Akusta wrote: Your argument is invalid. Which is better? 3+ heal to one unit? Or arbitrary instant troop deployment across the map from 30 production facilities? Rofl 30 production facilities. i guess we talkin 40 minutes in the game here. your argument is now invalid since everyone will have the warp prism speed at that point. This change doesn't even affect what you are talking about. | ||
|
Corrosive
Canada3741 Posts
cant click anything or type anything = cant log in SICKKKKKKKKK | ||
|
aSnowyDay
Canada9 Posts
On June 21 2013 10:36 GolemMadness wrote: Does anyone actually think that queens having 5 range instead of 3 is an issue right now? Well in WOL terran had crappy harass options in the early game vs zerg cause mass queens completely shut them down in HOTS terran has reapers and widow mines which are actually decent at harassing zerg so the queen range doesn't really matter in HOTS | ||
|
AKomrade
United States582 Posts
On June 20 2013 07:04 Akusta wrote: Especially not 30 barracks with an option of either Marines/Marauder for deployment. Or Thors. Or Ghosts. Or Banshees. | ||
|
Faveokatro
80 Posts
| ||
digmouse
China6329 Posts
| ||
|
n0ise
3452 Posts
looooolzzz | ||
|
convention
United States622 Posts
On June 21 2013 14:33 n0ise wrote: it's fine it's not like P had the best harass options late anyway looooolzzz This has absolutely no effect on late game harass by protoss. This is entirely a midgame harass option that protoss now has. | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
On June 21 2013 12:06 xAdra wrote: I believe we're talking about the patchzerg era, where the reasonable amount of balance was utterly upset and WoL left in a state of insane imbalance for it's last 6 months. 6 months is pretty significant (about a quarter to a fifth of WoL's lifespan) and from that we can see that Blizzard really doesn't have a good track record for responding fast. That was mostly because of infestors, not queens. Sure, the queens allowed them to more safely get to that point, but with infestors like they are now it wouldn't have been such an issue. | ||
|
Jacmert
Canada1709 Posts
YESSSS!  In the words of the wise Mazda boy:Zoom, zoom baby. Zoom zoom. | ||
|
faderedguy
Indonesia58 Posts
This has no effect whatsoever, only makes warp prism all ins better. Imo a 50/50 or 25/25 upgrade cost for warp prism speed would be better | ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5217 Posts
On June 21 2013 10:42 GolemMadness wrote: Terran clearly isn't the most successful race at the moment. Based on... what? Nothing? Because Aliguac shows Terran having a win rate of 53% versus Protoss and 54.4% versus Zerg. In fact, since HOTS was released, they haven't been below 50% in either indicator. http://aligulac.com/reports/ In fact, all of the same indicators that people like Ver pointed to (in his Lings of Liberty thread) that showed how good Zerg was at the end of WOL (despite Terran dominating the first 3/4's of WOL) now point to Terran doing the best. | ||
| ||
|
|
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
OSC
Replay Cast
The PondCast
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
HomeStory Cup
CSO Cup
BSL: ProLeague
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
