EPTOn October 24 2012 13:42 babylon wrote:
... like what Jessica's been doing over Twitter?
... like what Jessica's been doing over Twitter?
well we all know Jessica is pretty unprofessional when it comes twitter lol
Crank and MMA's accounts regarding SlayerS - Page 98
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
DiuLaSing
Hong Kong225 Posts
well we all know Jessica is pretty unprofessional when it comes twitter lol | ||
|
geokilla
Canada8246 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:42 lichter wrote: Did Jessica directly (as in, she herself) reject the sponsorship, or did someone from SlayerS management (possibly J? or someone else) reject the offer according to her (supposed) directions? Seriously if people are going to be releasing info they need to be absolutely clear so there aren't any loopholes. How much more accurate do you have to get? He said Jessica rejected it. | ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:43 achan1058 wrote: Read the tweet. It was asked who rejected it, Jessica or J? The response was Jessica. Yes, but it could have been done by someone else according to Jessica's orders. Jessica's english isn't very good, and it was stated that manager J was in charge of the team's social media, some sponsorships and communication with foreign entities. So the info needs to be REALLY clear so no one can make any more excuses. Who were Razer talking to directly, and who specifically said no to the sponsorship. Because if it turns out Razer were talking to manager J then Jessica's story makes sense. But if it was Jessica directly, then she's got more explaining to do (omg do we even want this) (not on Jessica's side, I just want things to be really clear) | ||
|
dsousa
United States1363 Posts
Bad management is bad at managing. Its not like a sponsorship requires anything in return.... all MMA would have had to do was accept cash and continue to play SC2. So bad. Its hilarious that someone who mismanaged the team so badly would also mismanage her exit and misjudge the situation. This is all self inflicted by Jessica...... and she's so deserving of it. | ||
|
quickclickz
United States81 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:41 DiuLaSing wrote: what if Razor sponsorship offer at the period of time that Jessica no longer trust MMA? then it would make sense to deny it. That razor rep need to be more professional and responsible. this is pretty serious matter to just leave it to couple tweets...it affects alot people reputation. It doesn't matter. Was MMA still in a contract with Slayers at that time? Yes, is the manager's responsibility to either look at the best interests of their players or release them? Yes? This is pretty professional and responsible. Gives the facts and now it's the responsible and trustworthy Razer vs Jessica's words. GG | ||
|
DiuLaSing
Hong Kong225 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:47 dsousa wrote: Razer wants to give MMA money for simply doing what he does..... Jessica rejects it because they won't also give the deal to Boxer. Bad management is bad at managing. Its not like a sponsorship requires anything in return.... all MMA would have had to do was accept cash and continue to play SC2. So bad. Its hilarious that someone who mismanaged the team so badly would also mismanage her exit and misjudge the situation. I love train wrecks. stop jumping to the conclusion lol | ||
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
| ||
|
quickclickz
United States81 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:42 bduddy wrote: I'm not really invested in either side, so before jumping to conclusions I would like to know: Why did Jessica refuse the sponsorship? Did she think it was too little, did it conflict with one of Slayers' sponsors, was it a miscommunication of some kind, or what? Although I agree that she has not proven herself to be a good manager, she doesn't seem like she would just reject this sponsorship out of spite or whatever. Yet again, everyone should wait for the other side of the story before jumping to conclusions and rushing to attack the "other side"... She rejected a sponsorship and didn't tell MMA about the offer. Jessica is sitting here complaining about no sponsorship money. Do we really need to hear the other side and hear some more lies from jessica? | ||
|
DrakeFZX3
United States925 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:46 lichter wrote: Yes, but it could have been done by someone else according to Jessica's orders. Jessica's english isn't very good, and it was stated that manager J was in charge of the team's social media, some sponsorships and communication with foreign entities. So the info needs to be REALLY clear so no one can make any more excuses. Who were Razer talking to directly, and who specifically said no to the sponsorship. Because if it turns out Razer were talking to manager J then Jessica's story makes sense. But if it was Jessica directly, then she's got more explaining to do (omg do we even want this) (not on Jessica's side, I just want things to be really clear) Did you even read the tweet? They asked him who rejected it was it Manager J or Jessica. He said Jessica. | ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:42 bduddy wrote: I'm not really invested in either side, so before jumping to conclusions I would like to know: Why did Jessica refuse the sponsorship? Did she think it was too little, did it conflict with one of Slayers' sponsors, was it a miscommunication of some kind, or what? Although I agree that she has not proven herself to be a good manager, she doesn't seem like she would just reject this sponsorship out of spite or whatever. Yet again, everyone should wait for the other side of the story before jumping to conclusions and rushing to attack the "other side"... Trivia: Boxer was sponsored by Razer on Feb. 14, 2011. MMA heard from J on Feb. 15, 2012 about the sponsorship problem. Boxer is (afaik) no longer sponsored by Razer. The personal sponsorship was not forwarded. (This was confirmed by the Tweet actually, as someone asked if it was rejected or forwarded or what, and he said rejected.) | ||
|
DiuLaSing
Hong Kong225 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:47 quickclickz wrote: It doesn't matter. Was MMA still in a contract with Slayers at that time? Yes, is the manager's responsibility to either look at the best interests of their players or release them? Yes? This is pretty professional and responsible. Gives the facts and now it's the responsible and trustworthy Razer vs Jessica's words. GG What if it was after MMA demands or express that he wants to leave? you gotta be the nicest person to say yes. | ||
|
quickclickz
United States81 Posts
You know, in this world there's something called beyond a reasonable doubt. There's also something called circumstantial evidence which by itself is useless. However given Jessica's year of history and evidence in the last 2 weeks, I can say without a reasonable doubt Jessica ruined the experience of the players and ruined the team. | ||
|
dsousa
United States1363 Posts
People keep saying that to me, but I keep being proven right. Check the MMA being demoted thread... I said over and over that there was no good reason for that other than him wanting to leave the team. Everyone jumped on me, saying don't jump to conclusions..... now its been proven true. | ||
|
JAWS_
Brazil61 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:42 bduddy wrote: I'm not really invested in either side, so before jumping to conclusions I would like to know: Why did Jessica refuse the sponsorship? Did she think it was too little, did it conflict with one of Slayers' sponsors, was it a miscommunication of some kind, or what? Although I agree that she has not proven herself to be a good manager, she doesn't seem like she would just reject this sponsorship out of spite or whatever. Yet again, everyone should wait for the other side of the story before jumping to conclusions and rushing to attack the "other side"... Can't you see nobody is attacking the other side? Jessica attacked the players, that included MMA, MMA made a statement the conflicted to everything Jessica said and some people didn't belived in him, Razor just did its part on confirming MMA history that envolved them, we are just defending this guy reputation. | ||
|
achan1058
1091 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:48 NovemberstOrm wrote: Jessica just tweeted not sure if related but from what chrome translator translated is she was talking about a chris Can somebody translate this? | ||
|
quickclickz
United States81 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:49 DiuLaSing wrote: What if it was after MMA demands or express that he wants to leave? you gotta be the nicest person to say yes. Then if you don't say yes, you better do whatever you can to look at the best interests of the player. If you keep the title as their manager, then you keep the responsibilities. Anything less of this is unprofessional and Jessica is in the wrong here, regardless of the reason for why Jessica kept him on the team. | ||
|
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:48 DrakeFZX3 wrote: Did you even read the tweet? They asked him who rejected it was it Manager J or Jessica. He said Jessica. It's still vague enough that Jessica (or whoever else) can wiggle out of it. =/ | ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
On October 24 2012 13:49 DiuLaSing wrote: What if it was after MMA demands or express that he wants to leave? you gotta be the nicest person to say yes. Uhh, no, you just gotta be a professional manager who is doing your job to say, "Yes." Otherwise, that would be vindictive, petty, and unprofessional. | ||
|
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
A few more were made mentioning manager J | ||
|
DrakeFZX3
United States925 Posts
| ||
| ||
