|
On August 15 2012 07:18 Rye. wrote:
screw you Sean Platt.
you've sold out.
flaws....
both players floating thousands.
looks like a gold league match.
no collosus.
no high templar.
no large use of widow mines.
no use of bio.
....
it goes on
I'm no longer buying hots. its gonna be bs.
rye
What an educated opinion. It only took one battle report and a million posts of speculation.
|
United Kingdom12022 Posts
On August 15 2012 07:18 Rye. wrote:
screw you Sean Platt.
you've sold out.
flaws....
both players floating thousands.
looks like a gold league match.
no collosus.
no high templar.
no large use of widow mines.
no use of bio.
....
it goes on
I'm no longer buying hots. its gonna be bs.
rye
It probably is a gold league match... They're not pros.
|
On August 15 2012 07:25 Big J wrote:
Wow... If scrappy Battle Reports actually can get rid of angry kids playing SC2...
PLEASE POST MORE OF THEM BLIZZARD!!!
Keep enjoying your shit. I'll eat my lovely lobster.
|
On August 15 2012 07:47 wcr.4fun wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 07:25 Big J wrote:
Wow... If scrappy Battle Reports actually can get rid of angry kids playing SC2...
PLEASE POST MORE OF THEM BLIZZARD!!! Keep enjoying your shit. I'll eat my lovely lobster.
you've played BW for 4 months, don't lump yourself into the actual BW players.
|
On August 15 2012 07:51 nGBeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 07:47 wcr.4fun wrote:On August 15 2012 07:25 Big J wrote:
Wow... If scrappy Battle Reports actually can get rid of angry kids playing SC2...
PLEASE POST MORE OF THEM BLIZZARD!!! Keep enjoying your shit. I'll eat my lovely lobster. you've played BW for 4 months, don't lump yourself into the actual BW players.
You don't have to play BW to know that HotS is going to be shit.
|
On August 15 2012 07:53 Dalavita wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 07:51 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:47 wcr.4fun wrote:On August 15 2012 07:25 Big J wrote:
Wow... If scrappy Battle Reports actually can get rid of angry kids playing SC2...
PLEASE POST MORE OF THEM BLIZZARD!!! Keep enjoying your shit. I'll eat my lovely lobster. you've played BW for 4 months, don't lump yourself into the actual BW players. You don't have to play BW to know that HotS is going to be shit.
Yeah because judging a game before you actually play it makes a ton of sense right. Good thing blizzard kept 1 food roaches right?
|
On August 15 2012 07:55 nGBeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 07:53 Dalavita wrote:On August 15 2012 07:51 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:47 wcr.4fun wrote:On August 15 2012 07:25 Big J wrote:
Wow... If scrappy Battle Reports actually can get rid of angry kids playing SC2...
PLEASE POST MORE OF THEM BLIZZARD!!! Keep enjoying your shit. I'll eat my lovely lobster. you've played BW for 4 months, don't lump yourself into the actual BW players. You don't have to play BW to know that HotS is going to be shit. Yeah because judging a game before you actually play it makes a ton of sense right. Good thing blizzard kept 1 food roaches right?
I'm judging shitty A-move units by what they are, yes.
Also, what do you even mean by 1 food roaches? If you're trying to insinuate that war hounds will be good once the stats are sorted out, then no, no they won't. They'll be an a-move unit with an automatic missile lock-on for mechanical units regardless of if they have 250 or 275 hp, 2 supply or 3 supply.
|
On August 15 2012 07:56 Dalavita wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 07:55 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:53 Dalavita wrote:On August 15 2012 07:51 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:47 wcr.4fun wrote:On August 15 2012 07:25 Big J wrote:
Wow... If scrappy Battle Reports actually can get rid of angry kids playing SC2...
PLEASE POST MORE OF THEM BLIZZARD!!! Keep enjoying your shit. I'll eat my lovely lobster. you've played BW for 4 months, don't lump yourself into the actual BW players. You don't have to play BW to know that HotS is going to be shit. Yeah because judging a game before you actually play it makes a ton of sense right. Good thing blizzard kept 1 food roaches right? I'm judging shitty A-move units by what they are, yes. Also, what do you even mean by 1 food roaches? If you're trying to insinuate that war hounds will be good once the stats are sorted out, then no, no they won't.
I'm saying roaches were 1 food before they were changed because... GASP people played the game!?!?!?!
A-move units? you're a fucking parrot. Lots of games (WC3 had dispel) have abilities that are auto casting, but the best (PRO PLAYERS) wont be using autocast, I mean really you're just making bad assumptions. How do you even know the warhound will be in the game? You don't and your whining is just uneeded, wait to whine when the game comes out. You have probably never played the game, or balanced a game, or coded a game. You have 0 credibility to be judging their work.
edit: You saw 2 gold level players playing awful and you're basing the game on that? What a fucking riot.
|
On August 15 2012 07:59 nGBeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 07:56 Dalavita wrote:On August 15 2012 07:55 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:53 Dalavita wrote:On August 15 2012 07:51 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:47 wcr.4fun wrote:On August 15 2012 07:25 Big J wrote:
Wow... If scrappy Battle Reports actually can get rid of angry kids playing SC2...
PLEASE POST MORE OF THEM BLIZZARD!!! Keep enjoying your shit. I'll eat my lovely lobster. you've played BW for 4 months, don't lump yourself into the actual BW players. You don't have to play BW to know that HotS is going to be shit. Yeah because judging a game before you actually play it makes a ton of sense right. Good thing blizzard kept 1 food roaches right? I'm judging shitty A-move units by what they are, yes. Also, what do you even mean by 1 food roaches? If you're trying to insinuate that war hounds will be good once the stats are sorted out, then no, no they won't. I'm saying roaches were 1 food before they were changed because... GASP people played the game!?!?!?! A-move units? you're a fucking parrot. Lots of games (WC3 had dispel) have abilities that are auto casting, but the best (PRO PLAYERS) wont be using autocast, I mean really you're just making bad assumptions. How do you even know the warhound will be in the game? You don't and your whining is just uneeded, wait to whine when the game comes out. You have probably never played the game, or balanced a game, or coded a game. You have 0 credibility to be judging their work. edit: You saw 2 gold level players playing awful and you're basing the game on that? What a fucking riot.
a colossus will always will be colossus. some people would rather have reaver where its effectiveness vary depending on the player. judging a unit like colossus does not need waiting for it to be tested. just saying, its perfectly reasonable to criticize something that is obvious. and if any changes can be made its great for people to speak up before its too late.
|
On August 15 2012 07:59 nGBeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 07:56 Dalavita wrote:On August 15 2012 07:55 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:53 Dalavita wrote:On August 15 2012 07:51 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:47 wcr.4fun wrote:On August 15 2012 07:25 Big J wrote:
Wow... If scrappy Battle Reports actually can get rid of angry kids playing SC2...
PLEASE POST MORE OF THEM BLIZZARD!!! Keep enjoying your shit. I'll eat my lovely lobster. you've played BW for 4 months, don't lump yourself into the actual BW players. You don't have to play BW to know that HotS is going to be shit. Yeah because judging a game before you actually play it makes a ton of sense right. Good thing blizzard kept 1 food roaches right? I'm judging shitty A-move units by what they are, yes. Also, what do you even mean by 1 food roaches? If you're trying to insinuate that war hounds will be good once the stats are sorted out, then no, no they won't. I'm saying roaches were 1 food before they were changed because... GASP people played the game!?!?!?! A-move units? you're a fucking parrot. Lots of games (WC3 had dispel) have abilities that are auto casting, but the best (PRO PLAYERS) wont be using autocast, I mean really you're just making bad assumptions. How do you even know the warhound will be in the game? You don't and your whining is just uneeded, wait to whine when the game comes out. You have probably never played the game, or balanced a game, or coded a game. You have 0 credibility to be judging their work.
Are you actually retarded? I'm bitching based on the battle report. The war hound was in the battle report. Do you want me to not bitch because there's a chance it won't be in the game? That is the most backwards logic I've ever heard. If anything it's my bitching that will cause it to get shafted from the game.
Also, parrot? I'm the OG whiner when it comes to A-move units. I was calling terran being turned into A-move shit the first time they showcased the units, and I'm satisfied to say that I wasn't wrong in any way.
The thing that bothers me isn't even the automatic mechanical seeking missile, which although retarded, is a meh issue. It's that the unit itself is just something you mass and move out with no micro required. You box your army and move out and it'll do its job fine.
Also, your 1 food roach example still doesn't make sense. Learn the difference between unit design and unit stats. The roach is still a roach, 1 food or 2 food.
Edit: Also, I've played Blizzard games since Warcraft 2. HotS won't be the first game they're screwing up with bad decisions. I'm far too experienced with Blizzard for the wait and see approach to be even remotely acceptable at this stage.
|
blizard i know is too late to give tips because you guys almost done HoTS.
TIPS:
What unit types would add more amazing micros and kill the mindless deathballs?
1-Lurker (why? like baneling the enemy needs to split to receive less damage)
2-Reaver (you need to drop this unit and the enemy have time to react against the big damage)
3-Vessel (defensive matrix could use against banelings and colossus to tank more damage)
yea they are old units but you guys can follow this logic to make a better new units who change this game to a better game to watch, isnt just about skills is about the people watching something better to the eyes.
|
On August 15 2012 08:04 Dalavita wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 07:59 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:56 Dalavita wrote:On August 15 2012 07:55 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:53 Dalavita wrote:On August 15 2012 07:51 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:47 wcr.4fun wrote:On August 15 2012 07:25 Big J wrote:
Wow... If scrappy Battle Reports actually can get rid of angry kids playing SC2...
PLEASE POST MORE OF THEM BLIZZARD!!! Keep enjoying your shit. I'll eat my lovely lobster. you've played BW for 4 months, don't lump yourself into the actual BW players. You don't have to play BW to know that HotS is going to be shit. Yeah because judging a game before you actually play it makes a ton of sense right. Good thing blizzard kept 1 food roaches right? I'm judging shitty A-move units by what they are, yes. Also, what do you even mean by 1 food roaches? If you're trying to insinuate that war hounds will be good once the stats are sorted out, then no, no they won't. I'm saying roaches were 1 food before they were changed because... GASP people played the game!?!?!?! A-move units? you're a fucking parrot. Lots of games (WC3 had dispel) have abilities that are auto casting, but the best (PRO PLAYERS) wont be using autocast, I mean really you're just making bad assumptions. How do you even know the warhound will be in the game? You don't and your whining is just uneeded, wait to whine when the game comes out. You have probably never played the game, or balanced a game, or coded a game. You have 0 credibility to be judging their work. Are you actually retarded? I'm bitching based on the battle report. The war hound was in the battle report. Do you want me to not bitch because there's a chance it won't be in the game? That is the most backwards logic I've ever heard. If anything it's my bitching that will cause it to get shafted from the game. Also, parrot? I'm the OG whiner when it comes to A-move units. I was calling terran being turned into A-move shit the first time they showcased the units, and I'm satisfied to say that I wasn't wrong in any way. The thing that bothers me isn't even the automatic mechanical seeking missile, which although retarded, is a meh issue. It's that the unit itself is just something you mass and move out with no micro required. You box your army and move out and it'll do its job fine. Also, your 1 food roach example still doesn't make sense. Learn the difference between unit design and unit stats. The roach is still a roach, 1 food or 2 food. Edit: Also, I've played Blizzard games since Warcraft 2. HotS won't be the first game they're screwing up with bad decisions. I'm far too experienced with Blizzard for the wait and see approach to be even remotely acceptable at this stage.
Yeah you're basing you're argument off of nothing. Blizzard said that these units might not back it past beta, but again you're backward logic was based off of 1 game by 2 gold level players. Until I see GSL quality players playing HoTS I will reserve judgement.
So you're one of those guy on ladder who whines about A-Moving units? No it cant be you're fault just 1aing bio balls right?
I would really like to see someone winning with a pure warhound army vs any competent (Read: Non-gold league) player.
The example was that it can be changed, not because of any other reason. Blizzard found out that a 1 food roach was stupid and changed it, it they find that a unit is also stupid it will be removed.
And I've been playing Blizzard games just as long, and I don't care how many times blizzard breaks SC2, aslong as it gets to a good stage, if they let the game "develop" we will go 4 years of blizzard not touching WC3 while a stale metagame, stale map pool, and allowing hackers to run rampant destroy the game and scene.
|
On August 15 2012 08:12 nGBeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 08:04 Dalavita wrote:On August 15 2012 07:59 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:56 Dalavita wrote:On August 15 2012 07:55 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:53 Dalavita wrote:On August 15 2012 07:51 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 07:47 wcr.4fun wrote:On August 15 2012 07:25 Big J wrote:
Wow... If scrappy Battle Reports actually can get rid of angry kids playing SC2...
PLEASE POST MORE OF THEM BLIZZARD!!! Keep enjoying your shit. I'll eat my lovely lobster. you've played BW for 4 months, don't lump yourself into the actual BW players. You don't have to play BW to know that HotS is going to be shit. Yeah because judging a game before you actually play it makes a ton of sense right. Good thing blizzard kept 1 food roaches right? I'm judging shitty A-move units by what they are, yes. Also, what do you even mean by 1 food roaches? If you're trying to insinuate that war hounds will be good once the stats are sorted out, then no, no they won't. I'm saying roaches were 1 food before they were changed because... GASP people played the game!?!?!?! A-move units? you're a fucking parrot. Lots of games (WC3 had dispel) have abilities that are auto casting, but the best (PRO PLAYERS) wont be using autocast, I mean really you're just making bad assumptions. How do you even know the warhound will be in the game? You don't and your whining is just uneeded, wait to whine when the game comes out. You have probably never played the game, or balanced a game, or coded a game. You have 0 credibility to be judging their work. Are you actually retarded? I'm bitching based on the battle report. The war hound was in the battle report. Do you want me to not bitch because there's a chance it won't be in the game? That is the most backwards logic I've ever heard. If anything it's my bitching that will cause it to get shafted from the game. Also, parrot? I'm the OG whiner when it comes to A-move units. I was calling terran being turned into A-move shit the first time they showcased the units, and I'm satisfied to say that I wasn't wrong in any way. The thing that bothers me isn't even the automatic mechanical seeking missile, which although retarded, is a meh issue. It's that the unit itself is just something you mass and move out with no micro required. You box your army and move out and it'll do its job fine. Also, your 1 food roach example still doesn't make sense. Learn the difference between unit design and unit stats. The roach is still a roach, 1 food or 2 food. Edit: Also, I've played Blizzard games since Warcraft 2. HotS won't be the first game they're screwing up with bad decisions. I'm far too experienced with Blizzard for the wait and see approach to be even remotely acceptable at this stage. Yeah you're basing you're argument off of nothing. Blizzard said that these units might not back it past beta, but again you're backward logic was based off of 1 game by 2 gold level players. Until I see GSL quality players playing HoTS I will reserve judgement. So you're one of those guy on ladder who whines about A-Moving units? No it cant be you're fault just 1aing bio balls right? I would really like to see someone winning with a pure warhound army vs any competent (Read: Non-gold league) player. The example was that it can be changed, not because of any other reason. Blizzard found out that a 1 food roach was stupid and changed it, it they find that a unit is also stupid it will be removed. And I've been playing Blizzard games just as long, and I don't care how many times blizzard breaks SC2, aslong as it gets to a good stage, if they let the game "develop" we will go 4 years of blizzard not touching WC3 while a stale metagame, stale map pool, and allowing hackers to run rampant destroy the game and scene.
You honestly think they units that form their core design for HotS and are being shown off at every opportunity...won't make it past beta?
What will the game be, then? WoL with a campaign where kerrigan unlocks russian doll banelings?
Get a grip, dude. They have a schedule to release the game and make money at a certain time, whether or not all the ideas going into it are complete trash. Even if it bugs you, smart people are going to offer their criticism because it's the only way we can hope to end up with a halfway decent game at the end.
As for the 'pure warhound' argument: that seems to be the GOAL of the unit by design. Why should you need to position tanks if you can just take a bunch of beefed up marauders and clown on every protoss unit that isnt the zealot/DT/HT? I don't see people answering this with anything but "I haven't used it yet myself so I can't say" ...which kinda indicates that you're not cut out for this debate in the first place. Go back to the cave until beta 
|
TL forums are a joke. Everything has to be viewed in a hysterical fashion with plenty of hyperbole thrown around. Everything is the WORST or the BEST EVER.
It's a battle report showing a couple bad players messing around in a build that is nowhere close to retail. Read that again.
To everyone saying "Fuck this, I'm leaving to play _____" -- ok, then. Enjoy your game and don't let the door hit you on the way out. All the money, all the players (BW and otherwise), and all the tournaments will be formed around HotS.
I will be there, playing, spectating, and having a blast. I have a sneaking suspicion I won't be alone.
|
Blizzard is incorporating a lot of A-move units but people are forgetting the new dynamics added into the game that are not A-move. The problem seems to be that a lot of their initial plans fell through as they began trying to achieve balance, the roach being the best example of this falling from what was supposed to be a lower-hp massable unit that regenerated quickly to a hulking a-move unit. In fact they added quick a few abilities to almost every unit (Marauders have slow), it just sucks that a lot of their attempts to add interesting dynamics to units failed. There is almost no unit in the game that is just pure A-move, almost every unit has an ability. A lot of what makes the game seem easier is actually the ball-of-death problem and better unit AI and it seems like Blizzard hasn't really been able to find an answer to that. A lot of people are bashing on Blizzard but it's not an easy problem to solve. Putting back old units in the game is not necessarily the answer (better A.I will make spider mines less effective for example. Similarly with scourges and other interesting units).
|
On August 15 2012 08:16 yeastiality wrote:You honestly think they units that form their core design for HotS and are being shown off at every opportunity...won't make it past beta? What will the game be, then? WoL with a campaign where kerrigan unlocks russian doll banelings? Get a grip, dude. They have a schedule to release the game and make money at a certain time, whether or not all the ideas going into it are complete trash. Even if it bugs you, smart people are going to offer their criticism because it's the only way we can hope to end up with a halfway decent game at the end. As for the 'pure warhound' argument: that seems to be the GOAL of the unit by design. Why should you need to position tanks if you can just take a bunch of beefed up marauders and clown on every protoss unit that isnt the zealot/DT/HT? I don't see people answering this with anything but "I haven't used it yet myself so I can't say" ...which kinda indicates that you're not cut out for this debate in the first place. Go back to the cave until beta
I'm repeating what blizzard said, don't be so dumb.
Smart people, rofl forum warriors are nothing more than forum warriors. When you talk like a low diamond player (A-Moving units), you're not smart. Every unit has a core in the build.
Rofl if you think the goal of the warhound is to mass 200/200 and win you're being senile. Really I think you need to go back and look at the design Blizzard had in mind lolololol. I play protoss and I can't stop laughing than you actually thing a max warhound army is going to break the game oh man!
"Debate" more like a bunch of whiny teenagers who don't have any background in game design, or have any high level play under their hands get to vent about stuff they have no idea, yeah good "debate"
|
I wanted to like this, I really did. I assumed everyone here was going overboard. I wanted to watch that and then point out all the things I actually thought were cool.
Turns out there were none. That was absolutely disgusting. I don't want the units they're giving me (except the core, obviously), and I can't believe they've taken the most interesting and positional composition in the game and made it even more a-move than a colo deathball. Holy heck.
In all seriousness, why are they putting these out? Literally nobody in the SC2 community is going to watch this and go "wow! cool! I want this game!" The absolute best response they can hope for is people saying "You haven't played it! And maybe they'll fix it!"
And yet that happened last time as well, and they didn't change a single thing that was a problem.
........man. This has really got me worried.
|
On August 15 2012 08:23 nGBeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 08:16 yeastiality wrote:You honestly think they units that form their core design for HotS and are being shown off at every opportunity...won't make it past beta? What will the game be, then? WoL with a campaign where kerrigan unlocks russian doll banelings? Get a grip, dude. They have a schedule to release the game and make money at a certain time, whether or not all the ideas going into it are complete trash. Even if it bugs you, smart people are going to offer their criticism because it's the only way we can hope to end up with a halfway decent game at the end. As for the 'pure warhound' argument: that seems to be the GOAL of the unit by design. Why should you need to position tanks if you can just take a bunch of beefed up marauders and clown on every protoss unit that isnt the zealot/DT/HT? I don't see people answering this with anything but "I haven't used it yet myself so I can't say" ...which kinda indicates that you're not cut out for this debate in the first place. Go back to the cave until beta I'm repeating what blizzard said, don't be so dumb. Smart people, rofl forum warriors are nothing more than forum warriors. When you talk like a low diamond player (A-Moving units), you're not smart. Every unit has a core in the build. Rofl if you think the goal of the warhound is to mass 200/200 and win you're being senile. Really I think you need to go back and look at the design Blizzard had in mind lolololol. I play protoss and I can't stop laughing than you actually thing a max warhound army is going to break the game oh man! "Debate" more like a bunch of whiny teenagers who don't have any background in game design, or have any high level play under their hands get to vent about stuff they have no idea, yeah good "debate"
"I'm repeating what blizzard said, don't be so dumb. "
Blizzard has come out and said that they want the warhound and battle hellion to be A-move units because the rest of the terran army is so micro intensive. They also implemented war hounds because they wanted something to deal with siege tank lines in TvT, which is why the missiles even go for mechanical units. So not only are they screwing up the awesomeness that is TvT, they're also screwing up the awesomeness that is the high skill ceiling of Terran, and they're doing all of this BY DESIGN.
How thick are you, seriously.
|
On August 15 2012 08:23 nGBeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 08:16 yeastiality wrote:You honestly think they units that form their core design for HotS and are being shown off at every opportunity...won't make it past beta? What will the game be, then? WoL with a campaign where kerrigan unlocks russian doll banelings? Get a grip, dude. They have a schedule to release the game and make money at a certain time, whether or not all the ideas going into it are complete trash. Even if it bugs you, smart people are going to offer their criticism because it's the only way we can hope to end up with a halfway decent game at the end. As for the 'pure warhound' argument: that seems to be the GOAL of the unit by design. Why should you need to position tanks if you can just take a bunch of beefed up marauders and clown on every protoss unit that isnt the zealot/DT/HT? I don't see people answering this with anything but "I haven't used it yet myself so I can't say" ...which kinda indicates that you're not cut out for this debate in the first place. Go back to the cave until beta I'm repeating what blizzard said, don't be so dumb. Smart people, rofl forum warriors are nothing more than forum warriors. When you talk like a low diamond player (A-Moving units), you're not smart. Every unit has a core in the build. Rofl if you think the goal of the warhound is to mass 200/200 and win you're being senile. Really I think you need to go back and look at the design Blizzard had in mind lolololol. I play protoss and I can't stop laughing than you actually thing a max warhound army is going to break the game oh man! "Debate" more like a bunch of whiny teenagers who don't have any background in game design, or have any high level play under their hands get to vent about stuff they have no idea, yeah good "debate"
Maxed out warhounds will stomp on everything protoss has except air. Don't believe me? Go try the hots custom in the current sc2 where everything has the same stats as the current build. They fuck up immortals as bad as marines do.
|
On August 15 2012 08:26 Dalavita wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2012 08:23 nGBeast wrote:On August 15 2012 08:16 yeastiality wrote:You honestly think they units that form their core design for HotS and are being shown off at every opportunity...won't make it past beta? What will the game be, then? WoL with a campaign where kerrigan unlocks russian doll banelings? Get a grip, dude. They have a schedule to release the game and make money at a certain time, whether or not all the ideas going into it are complete trash. Even if it bugs you, smart people are going to offer their criticism because it's the only way we can hope to end up with a halfway decent game at the end. As for the 'pure warhound' argument: that seems to be the GOAL of the unit by design. Why should you need to position tanks if you can just take a bunch of beefed up marauders and clown on every protoss unit that isnt the zealot/DT/HT? I don't see people answering this with anything but "I haven't used it yet myself so I can't say" ...which kinda indicates that you're not cut out for this debate in the first place. Go back to the cave until beta I'm repeating what blizzard said, don't be so dumb. Smart people, rofl forum warriors are nothing more than forum warriors. When you talk like a low diamond player (A-Moving units), you're not smart. Every unit has a core in the build. Rofl if you think the goal of the warhound is to mass 200/200 and win you're being senile. Really I think you need to go back and look at the design Blizzard had in mind lolololol. I play protoss and I can't stop laughing than you actually thing a max warhound army is going to break the game oh man! "Debate" more like a bunch of whiny teenagers who don't have any background in game design, or have any high level play under their hands get to vent about stuff they have no idea, yeah good "debate" "I'm repeating what blizzard said, don't be so dumb. " Blizzard has come out and said that they want the warhound and battle hellion to be A-move units because the rest of the terran army is so micro intensive. They also implemented war hounds because they wanted something to deal with siege tank lines in TvT, which is why the missiles even go for mechanical units. So not only are they screwing up the awesomeness that is TvT, they're also screwing up the awesomeness that is the high skill ceiling of Terran, and they're doing all of this BY DESIGN. How thick are you, seriously.
so, you're saying that if tank lines can be broken that it destroys the skill ceiling? what?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
