• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 02:49
CET 08:49
KST 16:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2
Community News
BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion5Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)16Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 105
StarCraft 2
General
Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets When will we find out if there are more tournament SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list?
Tourneys
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Fantasy's Q&A video BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Potential ASL qualifier breakthroughs? BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion
Tourneys
[BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Physical Exercise (HIIT) Bef…
TrAiDoS
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1749 users

Bug with attack rate BC and reaper

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
Dgotto
Profile Joined February 2012
Russian Federation210 Posts
July 17 2012 06:07 GMT
#1
Hi all!
For some days I test various terran's units ingame for their DPS and... I found that the attack rate of Battlecruiser and Reaper are lower than that in their tooltips.
Tests were done in "Unit test map" at "Faster" game speed.

At first, I will explain the method of calculation (sample test):
target - full HP and shields Nexus without any upgrades for armor or shields.
attacker - Marauder without any upgrades for attack or stimpack. Base damage = 20, attack cooldown = 1.5 seconds.

Nexus doesn't have any shield armor, so Marauder will hit for full 20 damage every 1.5 seconds until shields ends (from 1000 to 0). The calculations are 1000/20*1,5=50*1,5=75 seconds.

And then I test it ingame:
Start (8:00) - http://s019.radikal.ru/i600/1207/4a/2d945839128f.jpg
End (9:15) - http://s59.radikal.ru/i163/1207/60/9d9b6a45ae42.jpg

As you can see from screenshot 2 it takes exactly 75 seconds (as calculated before). So, go next!

Battlecruiser test:
#1 - Air-to-ground attack:
Base damage is 8 to ground, and tooltip says attack rate is 0.23 sec. But on teamliquid wiki there is more detailed information (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Battlecruiser). It says 0.225 sec (I check it with SC2Editor - 0.225).

target - Nexus with +3 graded shields.
attacker - Battlecruiser w/o grades for attack.
The point of calculation - the time needed to destroy 1000 shields.

Ingame test:
Start (34:20) - http://s015.radikal.ru/i333/1207/63/3d0ad5dc665c.jpg
End (35:18) - http://s017.radikal.ru/i428/1207/9b/7f077a53dbca.jpg

The test was done in 58 seconds, but BK hit one extra time. There are 1000/(8-3)=200 hits needed to remove shields, and 1 extra attack was done, so 201 attack in 58 seconds.
Time between attacks - 58/201=0,288557 seconds. That's far from stated 0.225 seconds. The difference is felt.
DPS of Battlecruiser is 8/0.225=35.55 (rounded up to 35.6 on teamliquid wiki).
Real DPS of Battlecruiser is 8/0,288557=27.72. That's 22% lower.
DPS per limit is 27.72/6=4,62... so low. Stimpacked marine deals 6*1,5/0,86=10,46 dps!

#2 - Air-to-air attack:
target - Battlecruiser with +2 armor grades, it totaly has 2+3=5 armor.
attacker - Battlecruiser without attack grades, damage =6 and the attack rate is the same = 0.225.
The purpose of the test - damage BCruiser up to 50 HP.

Start (34:10) - http://s61.radikal.ru/i174/1207/38/cf44b28912c8.jpg
End (36:34) - http://s015.radikal.ru/i333/1207/0f/b404adf9e07c.jpg

The time needed - 144 seconds.
Number of attacks done = (550-51)/(6-5)=499/1=499.
Time between attacks = 144/499=0,288557! It's equal to previous test's result!
DPS (for 0.225 attack rate) - 6/0,225=26,66
Real DPS - 6 /0,288557 =20,7931
20,7931/26,66=0,7799 - 22% lower dps, again.

Reaper test:
Attack to structures (with bombs):
target - Nexus w/o any grades.
attacker - Reaper, 30 damage to structures, 1.8 seconds attack cooldown from game tooltip.
The purpose of the test - damage shields for 990 points. 990/30=33 attacks done.

Start (2:00) - http://s48.radikal.ru/i120/1207/60/cd88dce53c1c.jpg
End (3:09) - http://s019.radikal.ru/i604/1207/b3/a8a6f6a34c60.jpg

It takes 69 seconds. Time between attacks - 69/33=2,09. One more time it's not as in tooltips!
DPS (for 1.8 attack rate) - 30/1,8=16,66
Real DPS - 30/2,09=14,35.
14,35/16,66=0,8613. ~14% lower from stated amount.

Some words after
The difference between reference and test data can not be explained by random +/-1 second or +/-1 attack. This affect results a little! Tests of other terran units grants perfectly matching values or very close ones to the stated data.

So, the main question - are there bugs or wrong tooltips?
© Glucodav (http://eu.battle.net/sc2/ru/forum/topic/4941225803)
PS Sorry for any mistakes in English
mrtomjones
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada4020 Posts
July 17 2012 06:09 GMT
#2
Did you test every unit or just those?
Malpractice.248
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States734 Posts
July 17 2012 06:12 GMT
#3
You should draw up a conclusion, and maybe format it better.
Otherwise, this is interesting results >.>
JustPassingBy
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
10776 Posts
July 17 2012 06:13 GMT
#4
Well, the bomb is a special attack, so it does not fall under the rule of the regular attack speed. no clue with the bc.
Malpractice.248
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States734 Posts
July 17 2012 06:15 GMT
#5
On July 17 2012 15:13 JustPassingBy wrote:
Well, the bomb is a special attack, so it does not fall under the rule of the regular attack speed. no clue with the bc.

Reg attack for reaper is 1.1
Nade is 1.8
FrozenFrotie
Profile Joined January 2011
Singapore156 Posts
July 17 2012 06:16 GMT
#6
I'm surprised this was only discovered 2 years after the release of sc2. Thanks.
-FoX
Profile Joined November 2010
United States479 Posts
July 17 2012 06:24 GMT
#7
Wow, if these numbers are accurate that's insane. 22% less DPS than stated? That's a huge disparity. Hopefully we can have some other people check on the numbers/method and see if this is valid.
Jarree
Profile Joined January 2012
Finland1004 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 06:27:15
July 17 2012 06:24 GMT
#8
So you discovered BC is even more shit than it's supposed to be?

But joking aside, is bc "balanced" around the stats, or actual game play dps? Because if those calculations are correct, -22% is a huge difference.

edit: i mean lets say those calculations are correct. How would Blizzard correct the problem. Increase the real attack speed to match the stats, or change the stated attack speed of the unit.
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
July 17 2012 06:26 GMT
#9
Interestingly, the random attack delay maximum amount is higher for these weapons than most weapons. Not sure if this is to blame, but it certainly could be. Most weapons have a random delay maximum of 0.125, while BCs have 0.1875.

Reaper's anti-structure, however, is more interesting. It has a random delay maximum of 0.5 (very big) but also a random delay minumum of 0.1, a positive number. Most weapons, including that of BCs, has a minimum delay of -0.0625.

You could add anywhere from -0.0625 to 0.125 to the time between attacks for a regular weapon. A BC should average to be a higher because it's between -0.0625 and 0.1875. The reapers, though, don't even have a chance to fire as fast as they should because you will always add at least 0.1, with as much as 0.5.

all's fair in love and melodies
Dgotto
Profile Joined February 2012
Russian Federation210 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 06:42:00
July 17 2012 06:26 GMT
#10
On July 17 2012 15:09 mrtomjones wrote:
Did you test every unit or just those?

Yes, all terran units(without sidge tank) have been tested, incorrect results are only bс and reaper
Moka
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada942 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 06:32:02
July 17 2012 06:27 GMT
#11
That is insteresting! Have you tried on other units than the Nexus for the reaper and the Ground to Ground attack for the battlecruiser? Maybe the Nexus has a hidden armor value, or the upgrades grants more than +3 in a hidden way, it would be very weird though Or have maybe the Maurauder do a dps test against a +3 shield Nexus, because for the maurauder you did it without shield upgrades, but for the others, you did
ヾ(@⌒_⌒@)ノ
Zariel
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia1285 Posts
July 17 2012 06:33 GMT
#12
Here's what you can do. Get a unit, modify it's attack speed and damage identical to a reaper or a BC, run the tester, see the difference.
sup
Dgotto
Profile Joined February 2012
Russian Federation210 Posts
July 17 2012 06:35 GMT
#13
Tests were also the СС, results are the same
ranjutan
Profile Joined November 2010
United States636 Posts
July 17 2012 06:35 GMT
#14
O_O
I have to assume Blizzard knew about this but failed to update the tooltips.... but that seems terrible... even worse if they had no idea though D:
http://i53.tinypic.com/1r3j0p.gif
BioTech
Profile Joined March 2011
Australia264 Posts
July 17 2012 06:36 GMT
#15
So basically BCs are even worse than we think! They need a buff, theyre useless!
I actually played the original WarCraft - Orcs v Humans back in 1995!
Flamingo777
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1190 Posts
July 17 2012 06:38 GMT
#16
This is a very interesting find.. I hope someone can use the map editor to modify the BC to see what it should function as. To be honest, the unit needs a buff. This is even coming from a zerg. x.x
kazie
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
258 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 07:27:54
July 17 2012 06:40 GMT
#17
you're completely disregarding the random attack delay. BC and reaper D8 are the only 2 attacks that have a different random attack delay from the default. real attack speed of a BC is 0.1625 to 0.4125 which is 0.2875 average
probably same with d8.

oh nvm i see you mentioned random delay at the end. the problem here is that the random delay doesnt average 0. also it is pretty small compared to majority of the units' attack speeds. BC is an extreme case because of its small attack speed value and bigger random delay resulting in a big disparity between the base value and the real value. same with D8 because of its special huge random delays
pmp10
Profile Joined April 2012
3380 Posts
July 17 2012 06:49 GMT
#18
On July 17 2012 15:40 kazie wrote:
you're completely disregarding the random attack delay. BC and reaper D8 are the only 2 attacks that have a different random attack delay from the default. real attack speed of a BC is 0.1625 to 0.4125 which is 0.2875 average
probably same with d8.

That doesn't change the problem that tooltip states incorrect values.
Nachtwind
Profile Joined June 2011
Germany1130 Posts
July 17 2012 07:05 GMT
#19
I hope the unit test map has nexus shield in fight regen disabled
then this would be an awesome thread for the bnet forum to get answeres from the staffs
invisible tetris level master
kazie
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
258 Posts
July 17 2012 07:19 GMT
#20
On July 17 2012 15:49 pmp10 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2012 15:40 kazie wrote:
you're completely disregarding the random attack delay. BC and reaper D8 are the only 2 attacks that have a different random attack delay from the default. real attack speed of a BC is 0.1625 to 0.4125 which is 0.2875 average
probably same with d8.

That doesn't change the problem that tooltip states incorrect values.

tooltips are correct in that blizzard chose to state base values, and that random delays are public knowledge. you can disagree with their decision i guess.

only thing i would say needs to be changed is liquipedia. it should at least have an attack speed page explaining the matter. if op went to another wiki like sc2pod, he would have known the cause of this.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
All-Star Invitational
03:00
Day 2
herO vs Reynor
WardiTV1267
WinterStarcraft735
PiGStarcraft550
BRAT_OK 237
IndyStarCraft 227
3DClanTV 115
EnkiAlexander 82
IntoTheiNu 13
LiquipediaDiscussion
AI Arena Tournament
20:00
Swiss - Round 2
Laughngamez YouTube
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft735
PiGStarcraft550
BRAT_OK 237
IndyStarCraft 227
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 9703
Shuttle 1716
EffOrt 780
Pusan 338
ggaemo 318
Larva 315
firebathero 111
Hyun 87
ZergMaN 48
yabsab 34
[ Show more ]
ajuk12(nOOB) 26
Sharp 17
Sacsri 12
Models 4
Dota 2
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 794
C9.Mang0514
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King83
Other Games
summit1g7370
minikerr27
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2001
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 24
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt601
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2h 11m
OSC
4h 11m
Shameless vs NightMare
YoungYakov vs MaNa
Nicoract vs Jumy
Gerald vs TBD
Creator vs TBD
BSL 21
12h 11m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs XuanXuan
eOnzErG vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs DuGu
Dewalt vs Bonyth
IPSL
12h 11m
Dewalt vs Sziky
Replay Cast
1d 1h
Wardi Open
1d 4h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 9h
The PondCast
3 days
Big Brain Bouts
5 days
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1: W4
Big Gabe Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
OSC Championship Season 13
SC2 All-Star Inv. 2025
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W5
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.