• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:39
CEST 11:39
KST 18:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League34Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.164Rollback Netcode in Brood War1295.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202624Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0
StarCraft 2
General
No more sc2 streamers on team liquid? Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.16 Server Blocker SCII needs to put more weight on strategy and tact Terran AddOns placement
Tourneys
WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 548 Shining Bright The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train
Brood War
General
Making an Online Broodwar Manager Game [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Rollback Netcode in Brood War Hands of Pluto
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [ASL22] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2v2v2v2 Tournament
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread The Chess Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
How Much Genes Contribute to…
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9924 users

Progamers selling account leveling services - Page 15

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 32 Next All
megid
Profile Joined November 2011
Brazil142 Posts
July 16 2012 16:18 GMT
#281
Well, maybe when a silver or a bronze leaguer comes to TL and post some opinion about the game the ppl needs to be more friendly.
What i see is: "- Oh man, u r not masters, so u r not in a DECENT lvl, sry, go post in another forum."
So...this ppl thinks if they get some better league they will have more e-penis to express their opinion. Sorry guys, but this forum indirectly is encouraging this type of service. Think about it
HappyTimePANDA
Profile Joined March 2012
United States167 Posts
July 16 2012 16:28 GMT
#282
On July 17 2012 01:07 Cubu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2012 01:06 Prox wrote:
On July 17 2012 01:03 Cubu wrote:
Wow if naama doesn't do anything about this, i will have no respect for him. I remember a while back, select was doing this and the community raised concerns about it and in he admitted his mistake and stopped leveling other people's accounts for money.


I think what you mean is:
Wow if this thread doesn't shape up, i will have no respect for all the people accusing Naama without solid proof for no apparent reason.

Read the OP please.


Except even if he is, I don't think most of the community cares. This is just another "smurf" account (which no one complains about smurfs) that ends up earning them some extra money. I think the people acting like this matters and is a big deal are in the minority.
Violet | Leenock | Life | Symbol | Jaedong | DRG
ensign_lee
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1178 Posts
July 16 2012 16:31 GMT
#283
If the free market supports progamers leveling accounts, I personally don't have a problem with it. Whoever pays for it will never be able to play 1v1s on it without getitng stomped, so why do I care? For a stupid orange star?
Harbinger631
Profile Joined September 2010
United States376 Posts
July 16 2012 16:33 GMT
#284
This isn't wrong to do and doesn't hurt anyone. The OPs reasons that they do hurt people aren't very good. Aspiring pros trying to break into the scene can't use grandmaster league as a show of accomplishment because it isn't one. What they need are replays demonstrating ability against skilled opponents, not a league. All of his other reasons are conjectures that people who buy leveling are people who hack. Well then, go after the hacking, not against non-hacking.

Krejven
Profile Joined August 2010
Sweden105 Posts
July 16 2012 16:35 GMT
#285
GM is just full of smurfs anyway. A few extra won't hurt. They are cheating the ladder, not the game.

The Blizzard ladder is irrelevent anyway since the best way to get noticed as an up and coming player is to do well in an tournament.
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-FoX
Profile Joined November 2010
United States479 Posts
July 16 2012 16:36 GMT
#286
After thoroughly reading the OP I still don't see any issue with account leveling. Unless you want players like Naama to give up pro-gaming this is something a lot of pro-gamers have to do. Not every pro can be winning tournaments and getting money and many don't play for salary leaving them with 0 income. I think the only people who have problems with this are high masters players thinking "damn if only there weren't smurfs and accounts that are leveled, then I'd have a shot at grandmasters," which I think is god awful reasoning to call a player like Naama out on.
aRyuujin
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States5049 Posts
July 16 2012 16:40 GMT
#287
i have no problem with it. It basically acts like a smurf for the pro, and its a way for them to make money. Keep trucking naama
can i get my estro logo back pls
Roxor9999
Profile Joined December 2011
Netherlands771 Posts
July 16 2012 16:43 GMT
#288
On July 17 2012 01:40 aRyuujin wrote:
i have no problem with it. It basically acts like a smurf for the pro, and its a way for them to make money. Keep trucking naama

Yeah he beat mvp at HSC he's better now then ever before.
ptrpb
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada753 Posts
July 16 2012 16:43 GMT
#289
yeah
pro gamer gets more practice and money, people who play the person who receives the account later get free wins assuming they got overlevelled
MBAACC | SG | shit at fighting games
uikos
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States132 Posts
July 16 2012 16:43 GMT
#290
To those who don't care, let me ask you this: How is this /any/ different from paying someone to take your SATs for you? It's vaguely similar to become a professional gamer. There are many different ways to get exposure in the Starcraft scene, and one of the ways is to work your way to becoming GM. At the very least, it gives local recognition.

Regarding the SAT-analogy: YES, there's a smart kid who probably deserves to have more money. YES, these tests don't really mean much anyways (we all know kids who are extremely brilliant but just didn't score well on the SATs). YES, only idiots would pay for a service like this. YES, these tests are only a fraction of what you need to achieve your goal (in the case of Starcraft: becoming profession. In the case of education: getting into a good college). And YES, a lot of us (college-kids) have thought about tutoring high school kids for quick-money, and we just need to wave our SAT scores around to convince others we're a qualified tutor.

But would you really not mind if this was a common phenomeon?
And if you do (and I'll imagine that most of us would mind), how is selling GM accounts that drastically different from offering to take someone else's SAT? Is it ridicious to want a more legitimate Starcraft ladder?

I (obviously) don't know how an ideal GM system would be implemented (with updating, and MMR-decay and whatnot). But that being said, takes one mindset to say "An ideal GM is hard to make," and a completely different mindset to say "Well the GM system is broken anyways, so who the fuck cares?" And I seriously hope that everyone who said they were part of the latter truely meant to say they were part of the former.
I'm in love with Hero~
Roxor9999
Profile Joined December 2011
Netherlands771 Posts
July 16 2012 16:45 GMT
#291
On July 17 2012 01:43 uikos wrote:
To those who don't care, let me ask you this: How is this /any/ different from paying someone to take your SATs for you? It's vaguely similar to become a professional gamer. There are many different ways to get exposure in the Starcraft scene, and one of the ways is to work your way to becoming GM. At the very least, it gives local recognition.

Regarding the SAT-analogy: YES, there's a smart kid who probably deserves to have more money. YES, these tests don't really mean much anyways (we all know kids who are extremely brilliant but just didn't score well on the SATs). YES, only idiots would pay for a service like this. YES, these tests are only a fraction of what you need to achieve your goal (in the case of Starcraft: becoming profession. In the case of education: getting into a good college). And YES, a lot of us (college-kids) have thought about tutoring high school kids for quick-money, and we just need to wave our SAT scores around to convince others we're a qualified tutor.

But would you really not mind if this was a common phenomeon?
And if you do (and I'll imagine that most of us would mind), how is selling GM accounts that drastically different from offering to take someone else's SAT? Is it ridicious to want a more legitimate Starcraft ladder?

I (obviously) don't know how an ideal GM system would be implemented (with updating, and MMR-decay and whatnot). But that being said, takes one mindset to say "An ideal GM is hard to make," and a completely different mindset to say "Well the GM system is broken anyways, so who the fuck cares?" And I seriously hope that everyone who said they were part of the latter truely meant to say they were part of the former.

Because nobody cares about your ladder rank except for yourself.
-FoX
Profile Joined November 2010
United States479 Posts
July 16 2012 16:46 GMT
#292
On July 17 2012 01:43 uikos wrote:
To those who don't care, let me ask you this: How is this /any/ different from paying someone to take your SATs for you? It's vaguely similar to become a professional gamer. There are many different ways to get exposure in the Starcraft scene, and one of the ways is to work your way to becoming GM. At the very least, it gives local recognition.

Regarding the SAT-analogy: YES, there's a smart kid who probably deserves to have more money. YES, these tests don't really mean much anyways (we all know kids who are extremely brilliant but just didn't score well on the SATs). YES, only idiots would pay for a service like this. YES, these tests are only a fraction of what you need to achieve your goal (in the case of Starcraft: becoming profession. In the case of education: getting into a good college). And YES, a lot of us (college-kids) have thought about tutoring high school kids for quick-money, and we just need to wave our SAT scores around to convince others we're a qualified tutor.

But would you really not mind if this was a common phenomeon?
And if you do (and I'll imagine that most of us would mind), how is selling GM accounts that drastically different from offering to take someone else's SAT? Is it ridicious to want a more legitimate Starcraft ladder?

I (obviously) don't know how an ideal GM system would be implemented (with updating, and MMR-decay and whatnot). But that being said, takes one mindset to say "An ideal GM is hard to make," and a completely different mindset to say "Well the GM system is broken anyways, so who the fuck cares?" And I seriously hope that everyone who said they were part of the latter truely meant to say they were part of the former.


The difference here is that SAT scores are permanent, GM status is only going to last these people maybe 2 weeks at most? It's an entirely different concept honestly. This comparison doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Also comparing the legitimacy of a student's educational record with that of a player's gaming status? I don't think the two are on nearly the same level of significance.
By.Pato
Profile Joined March 2010
Costa Rica52 Posts
July 16 2012 16:46 GMT
#293
On July 16 2012 16:41 Le BucheRON wrote:
having someone level your account is just sad. Stupid and sad. That's all. No big deal.

true it's just patetic but nothing more, why anyone will care. And the only thing will make me hate progamers will be match fixing :s
ilbh
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil1606 Posts
July 16 2012 16:56 GMT
#294
there are people legitimately struggling to get into GM and there is also a Blizzard tournament for GM players.

so, how is it not a big deal?
Part of the inhumanity of the computer is that, once it is competently programmed and working smoothly, it is completely honest.
Silvanel
Profile Blog Joined March 2003
Poland4769 Posts
July 16 2012 16:59 GMT
#295
Just to voice an opinion, this is bad and should be punished. Not acceptable practice from so called "PROgamers".
Pathetic Greta hater.
Prplppleatr
Profile Joined May 2011
United States1518 Posts
July 16 2012 17:01 GMT
#296
I agree, for the most part, with OP.

To condone this simply because pro gamers are underpaid is ludicrous.

Poll please, would like to know more opinions.
🥇 Prediction Contest - Mess with the best, die like the rest.
Dfgj
Profile Joined May 2008
Singapore5922 Posts
July 16 2012 17:05 GMT
#297
On July 17 2012 01:45 Roxor9999 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 17 2012 01:43 uikos wrote:
To those who don't care, let me ask you this: How is this /any/ different from paying someone to take your SATs for you? It's vaguely similar to become a professional gamer. There are many different ways to get exposure in the Starcraft scene, and one of the ways is to work your way to becoming GM. At the very least, it gives local recognition.

Regarding the SAT-analogy: YES, there's a smart kid who probably deserves to have more money. YES, these tests don't really mean much anyways (we all know kids who are extremely brilliant but just didn't score well on the SATs). YES, only idiots would pay for a service like this. YES, these tests are only a fraction of what you need to achieve your goal (in the case of Starcraft: becoming profession. In the case of education: getting into a good college). And YES, a lot of us (college-kids) have thought about tutoring high school kids for quick-money, and we just need to wave our SAT scores around to convince others we're a qualified tutor.

But would you really not mind if this was a common phenomeon?
And if you do (and I'll imagine that most of us would mind), how is selling GM accounts that drastically different from offering to take someone else's SAT? Is it ridicious to want a more legitimate Starcraft ladder?

I (obviously) don't know how an ideal GM system would be implemented (with updating, and MMR-decay and whatnot). But that being said, takes one mindset to say "An ideal GM is hard to make," and a completely different mindset to say "Well the GM system is broken anyways, so who the fuck cares?" And I seriously hope that everyone who said they were part of the latter truely meant to say they were part of the former.

Because nobody cares about your ladder rank except for yourself.

Not true, a lot of people look at ladder rank as a measure of ability.

How many times have people said 'X caster sucks, they're only in Y league'?
Toadvine
Profile Joined November 2010
Poland2234 Posts
July 16 2012 17:06 GMT
#298
On July 17 2012 01:43 uikos wrote:
To those who don't care, let me ask you this: How is this /any/ different from paying someone to take your SATs for you? It's vaguely similar to become a professional gamer. There are many different ways to get exposure in the Starcraft scene, and one of the ways is to work your way to becoming GM. At the very least, it gives local recognition.

Regarding the SAT-analogy: YES, there's a smart kid who probably deserves to have more money. YES, these tests don't really mean much anyways (we all know kids who are extremely brilliant but just didn't score well on the SATs). YES, only idiots would pay for a service like this. YES, these tests are only a fraction of what you need to achieve your goal (in the case of Starcraft: becoming profession. In the case of education: getting into a good college). And YES, a lot of us (college-kids) have thought about tutoring high school kids for quick-money, and we just need to wave our SAT scores around to convince others we're a qualified tutor.

But would you really not mind if this was a common phenomeon?
And if you do (and I'll imagine that most of us would mind), how is selling GM accounts that drastically different from offering to take someone else's SAT? Is it ridicious to want a more legitimate Starcraft ladder?

I (obviously) don't know how an ideal GM system would be implemented (with updating, and MMR-decay and whatnot). But that being said, takes one mindset to say "An ideal GM is hard to make," and a completely different mindset to say "Well the GM system is broken anyways, so who the fuck cares?" And I seriously hope that everyone who said they were part of the latter truely meant to say they were part of the former.


Come on now, that comparison is beyond silly. Even if GM were an accurate representation of the Top200 players on a given server (which it isn't), there'd still be smurfs, shared accounts, and a bunch of other stuff that never comes into play with standardized tests. Go on sc2ranks, and take a look at Korean GM, you'll see barcode players making up about half of it, and a lot of these accounts are shared between a whole team for the purpose of anonymous practice. The ladder has no integrity in the way that you and a bunch of other people would want it to, and you don' gain recognition by getting into GM. You gain recognition by placing high in online tournaments - that's how a ton of good European players began their career, the likes of Nerchio and Stephano included.

So yeah, I really don't care if this becomes a common phenomenon (which I doubt it will), and as a mid-Masters player on EU, I don't feel as if it particularly affects me. I'm actually somewhat happy to be able to play against pros levelling up their smurfs occasionally.
"There are always some Eskimos ready to instruct the Congolese on how to cope with heat waves." - S.J.Lec
Roxor9999
Profile Joined December 2011
Netherlands771 Posts
July 16 2012 17:12 GMT
#299
On July 17 2012 01:56 ilbh wrote:
there are people legitimately struggling to get into GM and there is also a Blizzard tournament for GM players.

so, how is it not a big deal?

Which tournament is there for gm players?
HappyTimePANDA
Profile Joined March 2012
United States167 Posts
July 16 2012 17:15 GMT
#300
On July 17 2012 01:43 uikos wrote:
To those who don't care, let me ask you this: How is this /any/ different from paying someone to take your SATs for you? It's vaguely similar to become a professional gamer. There are many different ways to get exposure in the Starcraft scene, and one of the ways is to work your way to becoming GM. At the very least, it gives local recognition.

Regarding the SAT-analogy: YES, there's a smart kid who probably deserves to have more money. YES, these tests don't really mean much anyways (we all know kids who are extremely brilliant but just didn't score well on the SATs). YES, only idiots would pay for a service like this. YES, these tests are only a fraction of what you need to achieve your goal (in the case of Starcraft: becoming profession. In the case of education: getting into a good college). And YES, a lot of us (college-kids) have thought about tutoring high school kids for quick-money, and we just need to wave our SAT scores around to convince others we're a qualified tutor.

But would you really not mind if this was a common phenomeon?
And if you do (and I'll imagine that most of us would mind), how is selling GM accounts that drastically different from offering to take someone else's SAT? Is it ridicious to want a more legitimate Starcraft ladder?

I (obviously) don't know how an ideal GM system would be implemented (with updating, and MMR-decay and whatnot). But that being said, takes one mindset to say "An ideal GM is hard to make," and a completely different mindset to say "Well the GM system is broken anyways, so who the fuck cares?" And I seriously hope that everyone who said they were part of the latter truely meant to say they were part of the former.


Nope, still don't care. Ladder ranking is, has always been, and will always be for that level of player, pointless. What teams are looking at your name being on GM? They will want to test you, watch replays, see you in tournaments. For overall scene recognition being on GM gets you nothing either, you have to get your name out with stream and tournaments. So really it is just for you to feel good about yourself, but Smurf accounts knock you out anyways. If you truly deserve to be in GM then you will be
Violet | Leenock | Life | Symbol | Jaedong | DRG
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 32 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 22m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2255
Bisu 990
Larva 678
Stork 355
Soma 335
Barracks 115
Yoon 113
Dewaltoss 98
Light 83
Killer 76
[ Show more ]
Rush 61
Shinee 46
Shine 40
Bale 33
ZerO 33
Aegong 29
soO 25
sorry 23
Hm[arnc] 20
ajuk12(nOOB) 4
Dota 2
canceldota13
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1478
shoxiejesuss592
kennyS487
Other Games
singsing1341
ceh9641
WinterStarcraft452
Pyrionflax193
ZerO(Twitch)5
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 55
• LUISG 34
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV264
• lizZardDota2249
League of Legends
• Rush1286
• Stunt906
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Weekly
1h 22m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 1h
PiGosaur Cup
1d 14h
The PondCast
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 22
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
IPSL Winter 2026-27
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Acropolis #5 - GSC
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.