EPTI didn't think the community was this violent.
Maphacker invited to WCS USA Qualifiers @ MLG - Page 12
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Keytar
Canada156 Posts
I didn't think the community was this violent. | ||
|
Ghostface_Killa
United States168 Posts
On June 06 2012 10:21 Caihead wrote: There's a reason why threats of force regardless of rather it occurs are considered criminal offenses, I very much doubt people would actually go to that point either, but it's about the principle of the matter. Do you honestly want to see people get away with posting things like this on TL regardless of the context? Do you actually care about the integrity of the community? I'm very calm, excluding people from being able to participate in an online community when they aren't contributing to it and are infact ruining the integrity of the dialogue on it is completely logical. Actually you're wrong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio gg no re | ||
|
cydereal
United States193 Posts
On June 06 2012 08:04 iNcontroL wrote: Problem is tickets are booked and I doubt they will act on this... I think it's just important that we make sure he knows he isn't welcome and choose to mock him continuously  PS: He is one of the absolute most BM people on the ladder.. a distant 2nd to hacking sure but hacking AND being a dick about it at the same time? Usually those people know not to show up to a lan.. I think we should verify that stigma. If only there were a large, intimidating progamer who is attending MLG Anaheim to welcome him... | ||
|
vnlegend
United States1389 Posts
| ||
|
tnud
Sweden2233 Posts
On June 06 2012 10:25 cydereal wrote: If only there were a large, intimidating progamer who is attending MLG Anaheim to welcome him... I propose a face painting to go with that: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/N9fZQ.jpg) | ||
|
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
On June 06 2012 10:24 Ghostface_Killa wrote: Actually you're wrong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio gg no re What is the purpose of replying with a court decision only applicable with in one country, is subject to future changes of law and rulings, when the principle of the matter still stands as well as TL being an international community that we can individually monitor with out the jurisdiction of that court? America passed an act which allows for the invasion of Hague if an american / corporate body is being held trial at the international criminal court, does that mean it makes invasion of foreign bodies legitimate or morally plausible? Fundamentally it's morally wrong, arguing on the basis of tactics and historical occurences has no moral significance. | ||
|
Boyo
United States226 Posts
On June 06 2012 10:20 VirgilSC2 wrote: I'm interested in seeing who his roommate is for WCS. The players don't have individual rooms, so he can't hide in his room all day if he decides to take the flight and not show up at MLG. It's a shame that someone else who deserves it probably can't take his spot now though  I'm his roommate | ||
|
Zenislev
United States280 Posts
| ||
|
skatbone
United States1005 Posts
On June 06 2012 10:02 Haiq343 wrote: The Blink hack isn't circumstantial. It's impossible to blink individual stalkers while selecting a group legitimately. That seems pretty cut and dried to me. Well, there is one circumstance where it is possible. If you have been blinking stalkers individuals so some are on cooldown and then you select all your stalkers and blink, only those not on cooldown will blink. I'm not saying this is what he is doing. But, under this particular circumstance, it is possible to blink only some of the stalkers--and potentially only one stalker if all the others are on cooldown. A slight and tangential clarification... | ||
|
MorNin
United States443 Posts
Throw a party in your room, INVITE ALL THE PEOPLE!!! lol | ||
|
Phanekim
United States777 Posts
On June 06 2012 09:52 Mesha wrote: Zack giving an interview! Wow he even looks douchey enough to hack. ew. | ||
|
eXigent.
Canada2419 Posts
On June 06 2012 10:30 Zenislev wrote: Shouldn't the player or the team be allowed to respond to this post before we decide to go kill the guy? Do we know the replay files are legit and not tampered with? Could the stalkers being selected during blinking be a bug? These lynchings are hilarious... there's a reason vigilante justice is illegal. I hope the moderators lock this thread and any others like it. If you have evidence someone hacked submit it to blizzard, their team, or the tournament organizers. Rallying a lynch mob is neither constructive nor fair to the accused. You must obviously not be familiar AT ALL with the replays, and this player in general. Yet of course you gotta add in your 2cents like it matters, when clearly everyone knows this guy openly maphacks etc. There are lots of replays showcasing this blatant hacking, and to say it might not be true is downright uninformed on your behalf. At the very least do some damn research before trying to defend a blatant hacker. Jesus. | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
I am merely saying he should not be made to feel welcome BECAUSE he is an obnoxious hacker who has literally been granted entry to something that someone legit should have gotten. He will play, he will lose and we should laugh accordingly. but the end of the day the bigger concern should be that we need blizzard to be a bit more informed with their invites. Avilo cried when he qualified, this shit REALLY matters to players and can make or break their careers. Wasting time/space on someone who doesn't give a fuck and actually actively makes this game worse for other people is a huge step backwards. | ||
|
Jumbled
1543 Posts
On June 06 2012 10:30 Zenislev wrote: Shouldn't the player or the team be allowed to respond to this post before we decide to go kill the guy? Do we know the replay files are legit and not tampered with? Could the stalkers being selected during blinking be a bug? These lynchings are hilarious... there's a reason vigilante justice is illegal. I hope the moderators lock this thread and any others like it. If you have evidence someone hacked submit it to blizzard, their team, or the tournament organizers. Rallying a lynch mob is neither constructive nor fair to the accused. While I strongly believe in not condemning players over an accusation, micro cheats like the blink hack are about as conclusive as it gets. It takes more than a bug to replicate that. | ||
|
pileopoop
Canada317 Posts
On June 06 2012 10:30 Zenislev wrote: Shouldn't the player or the team be allowed to respond to this post before we decide to go kill the guy? Do we know the replay files are legit and not tampered with? Could the stalkers being selected during blinking be a bug? These lynchings are hilarious... there's a reason vigilante justice is illegal. I hope the moderators lock this thread and any others like it. If you have evidence someone hacked submit it to blizzard, their team, or the tournament organizers. Rallying a lynch mob is neither constructive nor fair to the accused. Blizzard, their team, and tournament organizers are unreliable. He most likely uses a map hack and definitely use a Blink hack. | ||
|
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
| ||
|
RusHXceL
United States1004 Posts
| ||
|
skeptic916
United States17 Posts
| ||
|
TenJin`Lucian
Costa Rica158 Posts
On June 06 2012 08:11 Zaphid wrote: Ladies and gentlemen, grab your pitchforks! Made my day. | ||
|
JitnikoVi
Russian Federation396 Posts
we simply move past this and anticipate the moment when they get fired or quit, or in this case.. get banned, or leave the sc2 scene | ||
| ||
