|
On June 06 2012 10:44 dvorakftw wrote:
What SniXSniPe did here is close to what I wanted someone to do with the Spades fiasco. This is much clearer than the mass confusion of the CatZ/Illusion attempt. For me the most obvious moment of blink hack is 14;57 of the second game where a stalker goes forward into lings
Agreed. This case seems much more cut and dry comparatively. The blink micro was extremely obvious.
|
It's going to be embarrassing at WCS when everyone finds out he can't play without hacks...
|
On June 06 2012 10:47 FeUerFlieGe wrote:
It's going to be embarrassing at WCS when everyone finds out he can't play without hacks...
Be even better if he just demolishes everyone without the hacks.
|
I wonder if this guy remembers what building you make the Observer out of.
|
I don't think this guy is gonna show, he'll get too much shit from players/fans.
|
On June 06 2012 10:48 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 10:47 FeUerFlieGe wrote:
It's going to be embarrassing at WCS when everyone finds out he can't play without hacks... Be even better if he just demolishes everyone without the hacks.
If he were that good, he wouldn't need to hack in the first place.
|
On June 06 2012 10:48 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 10:47 FeUerFlieGe wrote:
It's going to be embarrassing at WCS when everyone finds out he can't play without hacks... Be even better if he just demolishes everyone without the hacks.
Eh, I highly doubt that will happen. ^^
|
Yes Fueled and ilikeredheads (I like them too  ) but it'd be great if he hacked and used that for a handicap...
|
On June 06 2012 10:22 Defacer wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 10:13 las91 wrote:On June 06 2012 10:09 Defacer wrote:On June 06 2012 10:00 Soma.bokforlag wrote:innocent until proven guilty.. its all circumstantial.. bla bla bla.. sad to see invites being based on ladderposition  should be a better system In this case, the evidence isn't circumstantial or debatable at all. God, people on this board ... Read... the... goddamn... OP. And while you're at it watch the replays, then tell us that it's "circumstantial" T.T I'm not being sarcastic. We're not even disagreeing. Learn to read.
Yeah I meant to quote you out... sorry T.T
|
Where is my invite?? sigh...
|
but it'd be great if he hacked and used that for a handicap...
What would be great is if they made him play with his units at 50% health. Chances are more than likely that he hacked to get into this, make up for it by doing that!
|
|
|
he's still going to the event. I was talking with HRG's manager about being recruited. HRG doesn't know. Manager gets off work at 10pst, I'll let him know about this.
|
On June 06 2012 08:04 iNcontroL wrote:
PS: He is one of the absolute most BM people on the ladder.. a distant 2nd to hacking sure but hacking AND being a dick about it at the same time? Usually those people know not to show up to a lan.. I think we should verify that stigma.
i think inc is threatening this hacker guy
|
On June 06 2012 10:53 Fueled wrote:What would be great is if they made him play with his units at 50% health. Chances are more than likely that he hacked to get into this, make up for it by doing that!
I meant like... he was just so good that he could only slow down to a "mortal," level by hacking and then lifting his hands off the keyboard.
|
Obviously a hacker. Shame we can't really do anything about it.
|
More drama, already, really? Dayum.
That Spades thread opened awesome can of worms, are we going to see analysis threads of how/why someone they think is hacking on daily basis now? I cba going over replays/videos with already new case, but I hope this guy really hacked and he gets his ass out of competition, I can't believe he got invited by Blizzard - that's such a fail. Meh.
Anyway, I am just sad people who were rooting for violence didn't get temp ban instead of warning.
|
On June 06 2012 08:17 Psychobabas wrote:
Dear OP,
I don't understand. Every day in society I see people who couldn't care less about other people. Couldn't care less about his neighbor the unemployed, the disabled, even the thief. Somebody shouts "help" and people pretend they don't hear. Boss threatens them with illegal unpaid overtime and they nod silently.
But now I see so much enthusiasm about a hacker across the ocean playing a RTS.
How come I see so much interest to set things right. Why isn't this attitude reflected even as a small percentage in every day living?
I really wonder about this. You never hear about similar things like this in the "real world". It's all about mind your own business. I'm genuinely puzzled. Is it the safety of the internet? What is it?
I definitely agree. Sometimes there is a bit of a double standard here but of course it might be overreactions. When people do something wrong IRL, there are tons of people defending the person. Yet on the internet it's the opposite.
Two reasons:
1. The Bystander Effect works both ways - if no one is helping, no one helps. But if some are, everyone helps. In terms of the latter, it doesn't matter if it's negative or positive. For example if a riot starts (like the recent ones in Europe) and it's for some cause, people will join it (and it can spread out of control sometimes).
2. It's the internet.
Well I'm glad mods are warning people who are suggesting threats of violence (even in a joking manner).
Sadly cheating happens all the time in sports. Yes the penalities should be strict (like lifetime ban) but it shouldn't be too crazy or too strict. And of course threats of violence is a bit too much (even if joking or venting). This reminds me of that *"staged" C.S. LAN cheating video where they smashed a PC of a cheater.
*Edit - It wasn't real, so no worries guys (one part I remember is at the end everyone gathered around and started joking about how the person who cheated had some really good computer parts that they'd like to try to salvage).
The problem isn't that though, the problem is that these types of things get out of control. Sometimes people do it (like lets take that C.S. computer smashing example), but yet it spreads to other people. Sometimes people will then start doing it on innocent people or (well people who are accused of hacking but not proven). Not only that, that's a very threatening thing to do a person (smash their PC) and it can lead to violence).
Point is that type of attitude can spread quickly (for example the recent riots in Europe).
Of course take note I am taking worse case scenerios where the problem becomes huge. Point is, we should avoid this altogether.
Anyway, the evidence is definitely clear (blink stalkers). Not much to do but try to get Blizzard and tournament organizers to acknowledge the issue.
|
On June 06 2012 10:14 Telcontar wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 10:09 Caihead wrote:
TL mods need to start permenantly banning people for threats of violence and irresponsible use of force / assault. This is just getting out of hand. Just because someone else committed a crime and has not yet recieved trial and punishment doesn't give any person the right to say things like this, especially when threats of violence and force are crimes in themselves regardless of how irrelevant or "ironic" the comment is. And backseat moderating isn't welcome either. They will do whatever they see fit.
I almost always disagree with backseat moderating but threats of violence is absolutely unacceptable in any circumstance.
|
Well, he was just brought on to WCS as a filler. If anything, him normally map hacking just makes him more of a filler and even easier to beat
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
