• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:02
CET 16:02
KST 00:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy7ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool48Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win42026 KungFu Cup Announcement6BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled12
StarCraft 2
General
Potential Updates Coming to the SC2 CN Server What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open RSL Season 4 announced for March-April WardiTV Team League Season 10
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat Mutation # 516 Specter of Death
Brood War
General
Soulkey's decision to leave C9 BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Gypsy to Korea How much money terran looses from gas steal? mca64Launcher - New Version with StarCraft: Remast
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group B 2026 Changsha Offline Cup
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Cricket [SPORT] 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1591 users

[Rant]/[D] Witch Hunting and 'eSports' - Page 17

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 53 Next
windsupernova
Profile Joined October 2010
Mexico5280 Posts
May 07 2012 18:41 GMT
#321
On May 08 2012 03:39 gogatorsfoster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:32 Terrafros wrote:
Naniwa's case went too far.

Orb's case went too far.

Destiny's case was proper.


In the first two, the team was not contacted. In the third, it was. If a team chooses not to listen to the fans, then they can go to the sponsors instead. This was not a case of immediate contact with the sponsors, Quantic chose to ignore the complaints about Destiny's behaviour, and thus, their sponsors got involved.


A lot of people keep saying that quantic did nothing, the whole ordeal happened over the course of 3 days max. And you can bet people didnt wait to e-mail sponsors in the first place. I feel like if you really feel the need to pitchfork you should at least give the team a week or even 5 days. The team cant instantly fire someone they have to decide if it is justified or not.


Team"We are looking into this claims"

Doesn't seems it takes a week to do this.
"Its easy, just trust your CPU".-Boxer on being good at games
B.I.G.
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
3251 Posts
May 07 2012 18:41 GMT
#322
we should have an e-sports inquisition. then when a nerd gets thrown in front of judge artosis and found guilty, king tasteless will appear on the big screen and give them the worst possible sentence: "take away their ladder points and bring them to me". khaldor should be the executioner... epiiiiic
HorsemasterK
Profile Joined August 2010
United States606 Posts
May 07 2012 18:42 GMT
#323
On May 08 2012 03:41 windsupernova wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:39 gogatorsfoster wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:32 Terrafros wrote:
Naniwa's case went too far.

Orb's case went too far.

Destiny's case was proper.


In the first two, the team was not contacted. In the third, it was. If a team chooses not to listen to the fans, then they can go to the sponsors instead. This was not a case of immediate contact with the sponsors, Quantic chose to ignore the complaints about Destiny's behaviour, and thus, their sponsors got involved.


A lot of people keep saying that quantic did nothing, the whole ordeal happened over the course of 3 days max. And you can bet people didnt wait to e-mail sponsors in the first place. I feel like if you really feel the need to pitchfork you should at least give the team a week or even 5 days. The team cant instantly fire someone they have to decide if it is justified or not.


Team"We are looking into this claims"

Doesn't seems it takes a week to do this.


Especially when this is a pattern of behavior, and one that started BEFORE he even joined the team. They can't claim ignorance on this one.
Ripper41
Profile Joined July 2011
284 Posts
May 07 2012 18:42 GMT
#324
On May 08 2012 03:41 windsupernova wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:39 gogatorsfoster wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:32 Terrafros wrote:
Naniwa's case went too far.

Orb's case went too far.

Destiny's case was proper.


In the first two, the team was not contacted. In the third, it was. If a team chooses not to listen to the fans, then they can go to the sponsors instead. This was not a case of immediate contact with the sponsors, Quantic chose to ignore the complaints about Destiny's behaviour, and thus, their sponsors got involved.


A lot of people keep saying that quantic did nothing, the whole ordeal happened over the course of 3 days max. And you can bet people didnt wait to e-mail sponsors in the first place. I feel like if you really feel the need to pitchfork you should at least give the team a week or even 5 days. The team cant instantly fire someone they have to decide if it is justified or not.


Team"We are looking into this claims"

Doesn't seems it takes a week to do this.

how in the world would you know
Terrafros
Profile Joined May 2011
Netherlands194 Posts
May 07 2012 18:42 GMT
#325
On May 08 2012 03:41 B.I.G. wrote:
we should have an e-sports inquisition. then when a nerd gets thrown in front of judge artosis and found guilty, king tasteless will appear on the big screen and give them the worst possible sentence: "take away their ladder points and bring them to me". khaldor should be the executioner... epiiiiic

I'd get GSL premium for this.
HorsemasterK
Profile Joined August 2010
United States606 Posts
May 07 2012 18:42 GMT
#326
On May 08 2012 03:41 B.I.G. wrote:
we should have an e-sports inquisition. then when a nerd gets thrown in front of judge artosis and found guilty, king tasteless will appear on the big screen and give them the worst possible sentence: "take away their ladder points and bring them to me". khaldor should be the executioner... epiiiiic


I support this kind of tribunal.
windsupernova
Profile Joined October 2010
Mexico5280 Posts
May 07 2012 18:43 GMT
#327
On May 08 2012 03:35 Dosey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:31 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
[quote]

Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:


you may find it hard to believe. But people lose jobs over matter such as this in real life.

Not by people who is set on destroying someone's career but because such behaviour is just unaccepted in real life.

Real life is all about whether or not you like someone, and if you dont, take away their livelihood and the livelihood everyone related to them?

WTF is this? An extremist mob family?


Real life is about learning to live in society and knowing that there are some behaviors that are not acceptable atm. And again I ask who else got fired except the ones involved?

Stop with the strawmen its getting annoying.
"Its easy, just trust your CPU".-Boxer on being good at games
Fubi
Profile Joined March 2011
2228 Posts
May 07 2012 18:44 GMT
#328
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:35 Dosey wrote:
Then why not contact Quantic, let them know about the issue and in the message you can put your threat (because we all know you like to feel important with your threats) that if you don't see some sort of response you WILL go to the sponsor and force their hand? Wouldn't that be just as effective?

How is it that this has devolved from an actual discussion, to the whistle blowers going into semantics of the wording used by the OP...?

Guess they have to get their win in one way or another.


Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?
windsupernova
Profile Joined October 2010
Mexico5280 Posts
May 07 2012 18:45 GMT
#329
On May 08 2012 03:42 Ripper41 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:41 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:39 gogatorsfoster wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:32 Terrafros wrote:
Naniwa's case went too far.

Orb's case went too far.

Destiny's case was proper.


In the first two, the team was not contacted. In the third, it was. If a team chooses not to listen to the fans, then they can go to the sponsors instead. This was not a case of immediate contact with the sponsors, Quantic chose to ignore the complaints about Destiny's behaviour, and thus, their sponsors got involved.


A lot of people keep saying that quantic did nothing, the whole ordeal happened over the course of 3 days max. And you can bet people didnt wait to e-mail sponsors in the first place. I feel like if you really feel the need to pitchfork you should at least give the team a week or even 5 days. The team cant instantly fire someone they have to decide if it is justified or not.


Team"We are looking into this claims"

Doesn't seems it takes a week to do this.

how in the world would you know


I just wrote it :D

I can do it again.

"We are looking into this claims"

Hell I'll even add more in:

"We at X team value your opinion, we will be looking into this claims and talk with the people involved"

That at least should buy them time no?
"Its easy, just trust your CPU".-Boxer on being good at games
crocodile
Profile Joined February 2011
United States615 Posts
May 07 2012 18:48 GMT
#330
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:35 Dosey wrote:
Then why not contact Quantic, let them know about the issue and in the message you can put your threat (because we all know you like to feel important with your threats) that if you don't see some sort of response you WILL go to the sponsor and force their hand? Wouldn't that be just as effective?

How is it that this has devolved from an actual discussion, to the whistle blowers going into semantics of the wording used by the OP...?

Guess they have to get their win in one way or another.


Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.


User was warned for this post
Master League Terran. Huge fan of Quantic Gaming and ROOTDestiny
Eventine
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
United States307 Posts
May 07 2012 18:48 GMT
#331
(apologies if stated already, but didn't go through all 16 pages)

At some point, the community needs to decide what eSports is and what it will be. There are conversations about it going "mainstream", to tv, maybe what BW was in Korea. I don't see this as a likely scenario (I'm not sure that audience outside of our current group will be interested, the game is probably too complex) But if that is where the community wants to see Sc2 go, then we do need more professionalism from players. It's fine to add a bit of trash talk here and there for entertainment purposes. It needs to be more vanilla (not just in terms of racist language, but also cursing). The mainstream sponsors will require a degree of conduct from their players. Players need more maturity, they need to understand what is acceptable behavior and what is not (teams need to get them there)

And the community will need to hold their own to a greater standard. The issue with emailing sponsors is how the sponsors will look at the entire scene. I like activism, this community should hold its own to greater standards. But there needs to be recognition that actions have consequences. In recent months, we've seen two examples of these witch-hunts involving outside organizations. If companies become wary about being involved, that's the end of any hope of Sc2 going mainstream. We need to adopt the mentality of being the greatest ambassadors of eSports to the outside world while being critical while inside.

And finally, community members need more maturity as well. This was a great thread. It offers great opportunities for discussion. Instead, half the posts here are people adding nothing to the conversation, people with egotistical attitudes, people arguing over silly points with one another. None of this helps to build a stronger community. Perhaps it's just time, but everyone in eSports needs to grow up. I'm just not sure they will.
You are everything, I never knew, I always wanted.
HorsemasterK
Profile Joined August 2010
United States606 Posts
May 07 2012 18:50 GMT
#332
On May 08 2012 03:48 crocodile wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
[quote]

Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.


call the whaaaambulance.

esports is killed on a daily basis, and somehow manages to revive itself. If you think esports can't persist without racist/homophobic/sexist language, I feel really bad for you.
crocodile
Profile Joined February 2011
United States615 Posts
May 07 2012 18:53 GMT
#333
On May 08 2012 03:50 HorsemasterK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:48 crocodile wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
[quote]

Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.


call the whaaaambulance.

esports is killed on a daily basis, and somehow manages to revive itself. If you think esports can't persist without racist/homophobic/sexist language, I feel really bad for you.

E-Sports can't persist if every time someone makes a racist/homophobic/sexist comment, somebody calls up the sponsors. If you can't understand that, you've got a severe mental handicap.

User was warned for this post
Master League Terran. Huge fan of Quantic Gaming and ROOTDestiny
windsupernova
Profile Joined October 2010
Mexico5280 Posts
May 07 2012 18:55 GMT
#334
On May 08 2012 03:48 Eventine wrote:
......

And the community will need to hold their own to a greater standard. The issue with emailing sponsors is how the sponsors will look at the entire scene. I like activism, this community should hold its own to greater standards. But there needs to be recognition that actions have consequences. In recent months, we've seen two examples of these witch-hunts involving outside organizations. If companies become wary about being involved, that's the end of any hope of Sc2 going mainstream. We need to adopt the mentality of being the greatest ambassadors of eSports to the outside world while being critical while inside.

.....


Good post BTW. The thing is how does e mailing sponsors about NOT wanting racist language in our content talks badly about the community?

I think its much more grown up for the community to speak up and talk about stuff they don't like than "keeping things internal".
"Its easy, just trust your CPU".-Boxer on being good at games
Fubi
Profile Joined March 2011
2228 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-07 18:56:21
May 07 2012 18:55 GMT
#335
On May 08 2012 03:48 crocodile wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
[quote]

Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.

Where does it say that everyone is entitled to put all their effort into growing e-sport? Sure some of us do it out of our love for the game, and that is GREAT. But none of us are getting paid for doing so or anything (hell some of us are paying for these services), we are not ENTITLED to do anything to make it grow. You have to realize this is an entertainment industry first and foremost, and there are bound to be people that are simply watching this for their own entertainment. And how exactly are they a piece of shit human being for doing what this market is intended to do?

Secondly, if it's killing e-sport, then it is ultimately these players using racial slurs that are killing e-sport. Your argument is like saying if Kobe Bryant caught being racist in public and someone complained to the board of director of NBA and got him suspended, it is the complainers fault and they're killing the basketball scene? That logic makes no sense.
absalom86
Profile Joined April 2010
Iceland1770 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-07 18:59:08
May 07 2012 18:57 GMT
#336
Here's a clip on " mob mentality " from Darren Brown. I think this clip is very fitting to this subject and people should watch it to gain insight into the psychology which drives these witch hunts.

The entire episode is before this, but this is the very end of the experiment and the most meaningful to this subject:

Thief @ #teamliquid @ Quakenet
Dosey
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4505 Posts
May 07 2012 18:59 GMT
#337
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:35 Dosey wrote:
Then why not contact Quantic, let them know about the issue and in the message you can put your threat (because we all know you like to feel important with your threats) that if you don't see some sort of response you WILL go to the sponsor and force their hand? Wouldn't that be just as effective?

How is it that this has devolved from an actual discussion, to the whistle blowers going into semantics of the wording used by the OP...?

Guess they have to get their win in one way or another.


Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?


Do you realize how ridiculous and utterly self-important this sounds? "I don't think you deserve a job because you are racist so I am going to do everything in my power to make sure you dont have a job" You are aware that your statements are more hate-filled than the offender, correct? He has a RIGHT to be racist if he wants to be racist (not that he is). Guess what? The KKK could set up shop right outside your front yard and there isn't a damn thing you could do about it so long as they have a legal permit. It is their right. Your reasoning has got to be the most intolerant bigoted thing I've ever read... and it disgusts me.
HorsemasterK
Profile Joined August 2010
United States606 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-07 19:00:34
May 07 2012 18:59 GMT
#338
On May 08 2012 03:53 crocodile wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:50 HorsemasterK wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:48 crocodile wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
[quote]

Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.


call the whaaaambulance.

esports is killed on a daily basis, and somehow manages to revive itself. If you think esports can't persist without racist/homophobic/sexist language, I feel really bad for you.

E-Sports can't persist if every time someone makes a racist/homophobic/sexist comment, somebody calls up the sponsors. If you can't understand that, you've got a severe mental handicap.


Not to continue to state the obvious but.... maybe they shouldn't make racist/homophobic/sexist comments? Most of the world knows this is unacceptable, I don't understand why some people are trying to make arguments for why it should be ok in esports. Are we trying to create a new paradigm in which we can be as hurtful as we want?
Fubi
Profile Joined March 2011
2228 Posts
May 07 2012 19:00 GMT
#339
On May 08 2012 03:53 crocodile wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:50 HorsemasterK wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:48 crocodile wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
[quote]

Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.


call the whaaaambulance.

esports is killed on a daily basis, and somehow manages to revive itself. If you think esports can't persist without racist/homophobic/sexist language, I feel really bad for you.

E-Sports can't persist if every time someone makes a racist/homophobic/sexist comment, somebody calls up the sponsors. If you can't understand that, you've got a severe mental handicap.

E-sports can't exist period if there are professionals continuously making racist/homophobic/sexist comments in public. No entertainment or sports industry will ever have any racist comments on a public show, ever (well unless of course, it's a movie with racism as a central theme). Why should E-sport be any different?
cost2010
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany46 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-07 19:02:50
May 07 2012 19:01 GMT
#340
you go to a sponsor and tell him "Now I like you less than before you started sponsoring a SC2 team"

the only logical conclusion that a sponsor can draw is that sponsoring e-sports teams is a minefield - and that if he doesn't invest crazy amounts of effort searching for just the right team with just the right players (with perfect histories which have to be vetted) he'll not just end up wasting his marketing dollars, no, he'll actually get a negative ROI on them.

A sponsor is looking for easy exposure of his brand with a minimum of effort on his part - he does not want to have to become an expert on the politics and emotional state of the SC2 community before sending the first cheque.

Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 53 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
12:00
King of the Hill #242
Liquipedia
WardiTV Team League
12:00
Group A
BASILISK vs Team Liquid
WardiTV770
IndyStarCraft 132
Rex90
3DClanTV 55
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
elazer 158
ProTech139
IndyStarCraft 132
Rex 90
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 35225
Calm 4119
Sea 2914
Mini 1164
Horang2 891
EffOrt 746
firebathero 420
ggaemo 398
BeSt 339
Snow 310
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 224
Soma 209
Rush 159
Shuttle 155
Backho 91
hero 81
sSak 70
Pusan 64
Barracks 52
HiyA 50
Shinee 47
Sea.KH 46
[sc1f]eonzerg 41
Noble 31
Free 26
Hm[arnc] 22
Shine 21
Bale 19
Rock 19
zelot 16
soO 14
Terrorterran 12
ivOry 8
eros_byul 0
Dota 2
Gorgc6739
BananaSlamJamma401
Counter-Strike
fl0m1061
markeloff217
Other Games
singsing2003
B2W.Neo718
hiko703
shoxiejesuss360
DeMusliM271
crisheroes248
Lowko247
Hui .232
KnowMe197
Fuzer 170
Mew2King91
QueenE85
ArmadaUGS55
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick546
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 191
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 16
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis2769
• TFBlade933
Upcoming Events
OSC
2h 58m
Replay Cast
8h 58m
WardiTV Team League
20h 58m
Big Brain Bouts
1d 1h
Fjant vs SortOf
YoungYakov vs Krystianer
Reynor vs HeRoMaRinE
RSL Revival
1d 18h
Cure vs Zoun
herO vs Rogue
WardiTV Team League
1d 20h
Platinum Heroes Events
1d 23h
BSL
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs Maru
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
WardiTV Team League
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Light vs Calm
Royal vs Mind
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
OSC
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Rush vs PianO
Flash vs Speed
Replay Cast
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-25
WardiTV Winter 2026
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
NationLESS Cup
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

2026 Changsha Offline CUP
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.