• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 14:12
CET 20:12
KST 04:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !4Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15
StarCraft 2
General
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win Did they add GM to 2v2? RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview
Tourneys
RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1: Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress
Brood War
General
How Rain Became ProGamer in Just 3 Months FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [BSL21] RO8 Bracket & Prediction Contest BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO8 - Day 2 - Sunday 21:00 CET [ASL20] Grand Finals
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1549 users

[Rant]/[D] Witch Hunting and 'eSports' - Page 17

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 53 Next
windsupernova
Profile Joined October 2010
Mexico5280 Posts
May 07 2012 18:41 GMT
#321
On May 08 2012 03:39 gogatorsfoster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:32 Terrafros wrote:
Naniwa's case went too far.

Orb's case went too far.

Destiny's case was proper.


In the first two, the team was not contacted. In the third, it was. If a team chooses not to listen to the fans, then they can go to the sponsors instead. This was not a case of immediate contact with the sponsors, Quantic chose to ignore the complaints about Destiny's behaviour, and thus, their sponsors got involved.


A lot of people keep saying that quantic did nothing, the whole ordeal happened over the course of 3 days max. And you can bet people didnt wait to e-mail sponsors in the first place. I feel like if you really feel the need to pitchfork you should at least give the team a week or even 5 days. The team cant instantly fire someone they have to decide if it is justified or not.


Team"We are looking into this claims"

Doesn't seems it takes a week to do this.
"Its easy, just trust your CPU".-Boxer on being good at games
B.I.G.
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
3251 Posts
May 07 2012 18:41 GMT
#322
we should have an e-sports inquisition. then when a nerd gets thrown in front of judge artosis and found guilty, king tasteless will appear on the big screen and give them the worst possible sentence: "take away their ladder points and bring them to me". khaldor should be the executioner... epiiiiic
HorsemasterK
Profile Joined August 2010
United States606 Posts
May 07 2012 18:42 GMT
#323
On May 08 2012 03:41 windsupernova wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:39 gogatorsfoster wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:32 Terrafros wrote:
Naniwa's case went too far.

Orb's case went too far.

Destiny's case was proper.


In the first two, the team was not contacted. In the third, it was. If a team chooses not to listen to the fans, then they can go to the sponsors instead. This was not a case of immediate contact with the sponsors, Quantic chose to ignore the complaints about Destiny's behaviour, and thus, their sponsors got involved.


A lot of people keep saying that quantic did nothing, the whole ordeal happened over the course of 3 days max. And you can bet people didnt wait to e-mail sponsors in the first place. I feel like if you really feel the need to pitchfork you should at least give the team a week or even 5 days. The team cant instantly fire someone they have to decide if it is justified or not.


Team"We are looking into this claims"

Doesn't seems it takes a week to do this.


Especially when this is a pattern of behavior, and one that started BEFORE he even joined the team. They can't claim ignorance on this one.
Ripper41
Profile Joined July 2011
284 Posts
May 07 2012 18:42 GMT
#324
On May 08 2012 03:41 windsupernova wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:39 gogatorsfoster wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:32 Terrafros wrote:
Naniwa's case went too far.

Orb's case went too far.

Destiny's case was proper.


In the first two, the team was not contacted. In the third, it was. If a team chooses not to listen to the fans, then they can go to the sponsors instead. This was not a case of immediate contact with the sponsors, Quantic chose to ignore the complaints about Destiny's behaviour, and thus, their sponsors got involved.


A lot of people keep saying that quantic did nothing, the whole ordeal happened over the course of 3 days max. And you can bet people didnt wait to e-mail sponsors in the first place. I feel like if you really feel the need to pitchfork you should at least give the team a week or even 5 days. The team cant instantly fire someone they have to decide if it is justified or not.


Team"We are looking into this claims"

Doesn't seems it takes a week to do this.

how in the world would you know
Terrafros
Profile Joined May 2011
Netherlands194 Posts
May 07 2012 18:42 GMT
#325
On May 08 2012 03:41 B.I.G. wrote:
we should have an e-sports inquisition. then when a nerd gets thrown in front of judge artosis and found guilty, king tasteless will appear on the big screen and give them the worst possible sentence: "take away their ladder points and bring them to me". khaldor should be the executioner... epiiiiic

I'd get GSL premium for this.
HorsemasterK
Profile Joined August 2010
United States606 Posts
May 07 2012 18:42 GMT
#326
On May 08 2012 03:41 B.I.G. wrote:
we should have an e-sports inquisition. then when a nerd gets thrown in front of judge artosis and found guilty, king tasteless will appear on the big screen and give them the worst possible sentence: "take away their ladder points and bring them to me". khaldor should be the executioner... epiiiiic


I support this kind of tribunal.
windsupernova
Profile Joined October 2010
Mexico5280 Posts
May 07 2012 18:43 GMT
#327
On May 08 2012 03:35 Dosey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:31 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
[quote]

Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:


you may find it hard to believe. But people lose jobs over matter such as this in real life.

Not by people who is set on destroying someone's career but because such behaviour is just unaccepted in real life.

Real life is all about whether or not you like someone, and if you dont, take away their livelihood and the livelihood everyone related to them?

WTF is this? An extremist mob family?


Real life is about learning to live in society and knowing that there are some behaviors that are not acceptable atm. And again I ask who else got fired except the ones involved?

Stop with the strawmen its getting annoying.
"Its easy, just trust your CPU".-Boxer on being good at games
Fubi
Profile Joined March 2011
2228 Posts
May 07 2012 18:44 GMT
#328
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:35 Dosey wrote:
Then why not contact Quantic, let them know about the issue and in the message you can put your threat (because we all know you like to feel important with your threats) that if you don't see some sort of response you WILL go to the sponsor and force their hand? Wouldn't that be just as effective?

How is it that this has devolved from an actual discussion, to the whistle blowers going into semantics of the wording used by the OP...?

Guess they have to get their win in one way or another.


Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?
windsupernova
Profile Joined October 2010
Mexico5280 Posts
May 07 2012 18:45 GMT
#329
On May 08 2012 03:42 Ripper41 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:41 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:39 gogatorsfoster wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:32 Terrafros wrote:
Naniwa's case went too far.

Orb's case went too far.

Destiny's case was proper.


In the first two, the team was not contacted. In the third, it was. If a team chooses not to listen to the fans, then they can go to the sponsors instead. This was not a case of immediate contact with the sponsors, Quantic chose to ignore the complaints about Destiny's behaviour, and thus, their sponsors got involved.


A lot of people keep saying that quantic did nothing, the whole ordeal happened over the course of 3 days max. And you can bet people didnt wait to e-mail sponsors in the first place. I feel like if you really feel the need to pitchfork you should at least give the team a week or even 5 days. The team cant instantly fire someone they have to decide if it is justified or not.


Team"We are looking into this claims"

Doesn't seems it takes a week to do this.

how in the world would you know


I just wrote it :D

I can do it again.

"We are looking into this claims"

Hell I'll even add more in:

"We at X team value your opinion, we will be looking into this claims and talk with the people involved"

That at least should buy them time no?
"Its easy, just trust your CPU".-Boxer on being good at games
crocodile
Profile Joined February 2011
United States615 Posts
May 07 2012 18:48 GMT
#330
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:35 Dosey wrote:
Then why not contact Quantic, let them know about the issue and in the message you can put your threat (because we all know you like to feel important with your threats) that if you don't see some sort of response you WILL go to the sponsor and force their hand? Wouldn't that be just as effective?

How is it that this has devolved from an actual discussion, to the whistle blowers going into semantics of the wording used by the OP...?

Guess they have to get their win in one way or another.


Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.


User was warned for this post
Master League Terran. Huge fan of Quantic Gaming and ROOTDestiny
Eventine
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
United States307 Posts
May 07 2012 18:48 GMT
#331
(apologies if stated already, but didn't go through all 16 pages)

At some point, the community needs to decide what eSports is and what it will be. There are conversations about it going "mainstream", to tv, maybe what BW was in Korea. I don't see this as a likely scenario (I'm not sure that audience outside of our current group will be interested, the game is probably too complex) But if that is where the community wants to see Sc2 go, then we do need more professionalism from players. It's fine to add a bit of trash talk here and there for entertainment purposes. It needs to be more vanilla (not just in terms of racist language, but also cursing). The mainstream sponsors will require a degree of conduct from their players. Players need more maturity, they need to understand what is acceptable behavior and what is not (teams need to get them there)

And the community will need to hold their own to a greater standard. The issue with emailing sponsors is how the sponsors will look at the entire scene. I like activism, this community should hold its own to greater standards. But there needs to be recognition that actions have consequences. In recent months, we've seen two examples of these witch-hunts involving outside organizations. If companies become wary about being involved, that's the end of any hope of Sc2 going mainstream. We need to adopt the mentality of being the greatest ambassadors of eSports to the outside world while being critical while inside.

And finally, community members need more maturity as well. This was a great thread. It offers great opportunities for discussion. Instead, half the posts here are people adding nothing to the conversation, people with egotistical attitudes, people arguing over silly points with one another. None of this helps to build a stronger community. Perhaps it's just time, but everyone in eSports needs to grow up. I'm just not sure they will.
You are everything, I never knew, I always wanted.
HorsemasterK
Profile Joined August 2010
United States606 Posts
May 07 2012 18:50 GMT
#332
On May 08 2012 03:48 crocodile wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
[quote]

Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.


call the whaaaambulance.

esports is killed on a daily basis, and somehow manages to revive itself. If you think esports can't persist without racist/homophobic/sexist language, I feel really bad for you.
crocodile
Profile Joined February 2011
United States615 Posts
May 07 2012 18:53 GMT
#333
On May 08 2012 03:50 HorsemasterK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:48 crocodile wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
[quote]

Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.


call the whaaaambulance.

esports is killed on a daily basis, and somehow manages to revive itself. If you think esports can't persist without racist/homophobic/sexist language, I feel really bad for you.

E-Sports can't persist if every time someone makes a racist/homophobic/sexist comment, somebody calls up the sponsors. If you can't understand that, you've got a severe mental handicap.

User was warned for this post
Master League Terran. Huge fan of Quantic Gaming and ROOTDestiny
windsupernova
Profile Joined October 2010
Mexico5280 Posts
May 07 2012 18:55 GMT
#334
On May 08 2012 03:48 Eventine wrote:
......

And the community will need to hold their own to a greater standard. The issue with emailing sponsors is how the sponsors will look at the entire scene. I like activism, this community should hold its own to greater standards. But there needs to be recognition that actions have consequences. In recent months, we've seen two examples of these witch-hunts involving outside organizations. If companies become wary about being involved, that's the end of any hope of Sc2 going mainstream. We need to adopt the mentality of being the greatest ambassadors of eSports to the outside world while being critical while inside.

.....


Good post BTW. The thing is how does e mailing sponsors about NOT wanting racist language in our content talks badly about the community?

I think its much more grown up for the community to speak up and talk about stuff they don't like than "keeping things internal".
"Its easy, just trust your CPU".-Boxer on being good at games
Fubi
Profile Joined March 2011
2228 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-07 18:56:21
May 07 2012 18:55 GMT
#335
On May 08 2012 03:48 crocodile wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
[quote]

Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.

Where does it say that everyone is entitled to put all their effort into growing e-sport? Sure some of us do it out of our love for the game, and that is GREAT. But none of us are getting paid for doing so or anything (hell some of us are paying for these services), we are not ENTITLED to do anything to make it grow. You have to realize this is an entertainment industry first and foremost, and there are bound to be people that are simply watching this for their own entertainment. And how exactly are they a piece of shit human being for doing what this market is intended to do?

Secondly, if it's killing e-sport, then it is ultimately these players using racial slurs that are killing e-sport. Your argument is like saying if Kobe Bryant caught being racist in public and someone complained to the board of director of NBA and got him suspended, it is the complainers fault and they're killing the basketball scene? That logic makes no sense.
absalom86
Profile Joined April 2010
Iceland1770 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-07 18:59:08
May 07 2012 18:57 GMT
#336
Here's a clip on " mob mentality " from Darren Brown. I think this clip is very fitting to this subject and people should watch it to gain insight into the psychology which drives these witch hunts.

The entire episode is before this, but this is the very end of the experiment and the most meaningful to this subject:

Thief @ #teamliquid @ Quakenet
Dosey
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4505 Posts
May 07 2012 18:59 GMT
#337
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:46 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:44 windsupernova wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:35 Dosey wrote:
Then why not contact Quantic, let them know about the issue and in the message you can put your threat (because we all know you like to feel important with your threats) that if you don't see some sort of response you WILL go to the sponsor and force their hand? Wouldn't that be just as effective?

How is it that this has devolved from an actual discussion, to the whistle blowers going into semantics of the wording used by the OP...?

Guess they have to get their win in one way or another.


Stop with the strawman arguments. Not all people who complain do it to "feel important". And Lol Whistle blowers? Really?

All I see you is using strawman arguments.


Then why even go to the sponsor? Why not do as I suggested? Why defend your "right" to go to the sponsor?


Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?


Do you realize how ridiculous and utterly self-important this sounds? "I don't think you deserve a job because you are racist so I am going to do everything in my power to make sure you dont have a job" You are aware that your statements are more hate-filled than the offender, correct? He has a RIGHT to be racist if he wants to be racist (not that he is). Guess what? The KKK could set up shop right outside your front yard and there isn't a damn thing you could do about it so long as they have a legal permit. It is their right. Your reasoning has got to be the most intolerant bigoted thing I've ever read... and it disgusts me.
HorsemasterK
Profile Joined August 2010
United States606 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-07 19:00:34
May 07 2012 18:59 GMT
#338
On May 08 2012 03:53 crocodile wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:50 HorsemasterK wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:48 crocodile wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
[quote]

Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.


call the whaaaambulance.

esports is killed on a daily basis, and somehow manages to revive itself. If you think esports can't persist without racist/homophobic/sexist language, I feel really bad for you.

E-Sports can't persist if every time someone makes a racist/homophobic/sexist comment, somebody calls up the sponsors. If you can't understand that, you've got a severe mental handicap.


Not to continue to state the obvious but.... maybe they shouldn't make racist/homophobic/sexist comments? Most of the world knows this is unacceptable, I don't understand why some people are trying to make arguments for why it should be ok in esports. Are we trying to create a new paradigm in which we can be as hurtful as we want?
Fubi
Profile Joined March 2011
2228 Posts
May 07 2012 19:00 GMT
#339
On May 08 2012 03:53 crocodile wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2012 03:50 HorsemasterK wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:48 crocodile wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:44 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:29 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:26 Fubi wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:21 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 03:03 Govou wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:56 Dosey wrote:
On May 08 2012 02:50 windsupernova wrote:
[quote]

Because going to the sponsor is the only real way we have to really pressure a team over an issue?


So the threat to report them to a sponsor wouldn't work? How so? They obviously know you are serious.

Fact is, if it is solved internally after your initial threat, there is no major backlash and you dont feel the importance that you feel now. All eyes are on you and your ilk because you had a hand in the current incident. You now feel important.

If you send a quiet e-mail to quantic about Destiny and he is barred from the next event and doesnt stream for a month... people just assume he went MIA. You can't come to the forums and announce

"IT WAS ME MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH I SHUT DOWN THAT IGNORANT PRICK I DID IT IT WAS MEEEEEEEEE"


your whole argument is wrong because you believe people do this to feel they are important.

please try again


Then at least try to answer the simple question I have asked multiple times with no valid answer.

Why not report it to the team with your threats and demand a response? Why go directly to the sponsors?

And for the one who said "How do you know that we didn't go to the team first?" Are you blind? The proof is everywhere. eG was BLINDSIDED by this and that is fact. The quantic manager himself has posted in this thread stating they should have came to him first and not gone to the sponsors. Another situation proving they went around the team directly toward the sponsor.

Because sponsors are the ones that are directly paying them. Also, this helps to make sure teams be more careful in the future when picking players; shouldn't simply pick players just because they are popular, as some of the popularity could of came from being infamous.

Either way, the people had every rights to do so.


So it boils down to the fact that you didn't want such a person employed. You wanted his career ended because he is such a racist piece of shit? You wanted to teach their team a lesson by putting the entire team at risk for one persons mistake? "They lose their livelihood if they dont comply, THAT oughta teach them!!!"

Makes sense :roll:

Yes, it boils down to the fact that people didn't want such a racist person employed. They didn't want a "racist piece of shit" getting paid to be racist. And they wanted to teach teams a lesson so that in the future, they are clean of such racism within our e-sport community.

Yes, you are correct. So what's the problem?

The problem is that you're killing e-sports. If you don't have a problem with that, there's nothing to discuss other than that you're a piece of shit and nobody wants you in our community.


call the whaaaambulance.

esports is killed on a daily basis, and somehow manages to revive itself. If you think esports can't persist without racist/homophobic/sexist language, I feel really bad for you.

E-Sports can't persist if every time someone makes a racist/homophobic/sexist comment, somebody calls up the sponsors. If you can't understand that, you've got a severe mental handicap.

E-sports can't exist period if there are professionals continuously making racist/homophobic/sexist comments in public. No entertainment or sports industry will ever have any racist comments on a public show, ever (well unless of course, it's a movie with racism as a central theme). Why should E-sport be any different?
cost2010
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany46 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-07 19:02:50
May 07 2012 19:01 GMT
#340
you go to a sponsor and tell him "Now I like you less than before you started sponsoring a SC2 team"

the only logical conclusion that a sponsor can draw is that sponsoring e-sports teams is a minefield - and that if he doesn't invest crazy amounts of effort searching for just the right team with just the right players (with perfect histories which have to be vetted) he'll not just end up wasting his marketing dollars, no, he'll actually get a negative ROI on them.

A sponsor is looking for easy exposure of his brand with a minimum of effort on his part - he does not want to have to become an expert on the politics and emotional state of the SC2 community before sending the first cheque.

Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 53 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV 2025
13:00
Playoffs
MaNa vs ShoWTimELIVE!
Nice vs Creator
WardiTV1843
TaKeTV 460
IndyStarCraft 260
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 260
UpATreeSC 102
BRAT_OK 93
JuggernautJason50
MindelVK 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 18341
Calm 1806
EffOrt 411
Horang2 358
Dewaltoss 119
actioN 89
Hyun 56
ggaemo 30
Aegong 16
soO 16
[ Show more ]
Sacsri 6
Mong 4
Dota 2
Gorgc5956
qojqva3372
singsing3007
Counter-Strike
fl0m1257
chrisJcsgo79
Other Games
FrodaN1913
Beastyqt735
ceh9391
DeMusliM146
KnowMe131
RotterdaM110
C9.Mang0101
QueenE80
Trikslyr76
rGuardiaN45
Livibee38
Mew2King37
nookyyy 28
OptimusSC25
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 51
• Reevou 18
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 34
• Michael_bg 2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV660
League of Legends
• TFBlade977
Other Games
• imaqtpie1218
• Shiphtur261
Upcoming Events
WardiTV 2025
15h 49m
ByuN vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
OSC
18h 49m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 14h
WardiTV 2025
1d 15h
SC Evo League
1d 17h
Ladder Legends
1d 23h
BSL 21
2 days
Sziky vs Dewalt
eOnzErG vs Cross
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Ladder Legends
2 days
BSL 21
3 days
StRyKeR vs TBD
Bonyth vs TBD
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Offline Finals
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.