EPTSeason 6 Lock Incoming - Page 5
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Tobberoth
Sweden6375 Posts
| ||
|
Zheryn
Sweden3653 Posts
On March 28 2012 14:02 Dissonance23 wrote: I hope they force cross only Antiga and Entombed if they leave them in. I hope so too. It's pretty retarded that a protoss can warp in right at a zergs third from a pylon in their main base. | ||
|
robih
Austria1086 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
I also read 50 people complain about the length of the seasons, but not a single one gave a good argument. In the contrary, they complained and then said it was good because there would be new maps... /sigh | ||
|
NerfrA
Thailand46 Posts
| ||
|
Tommylew
Wales2717 Posts
| ||
|
oGoZenob
France1503 Posts
On March 28 2012 10:54 mell0w wrote: Woah wait, didn't the season just start? my thoughts exactly. I played like 2 games this season | ||
|
bluQ
Germany1724 Posts
On March 28 2012 17:48 Koshi wrote: Shattered temple out. Got the most downvotes on EU, NA and KR. I also read 50 people complain about the length of the seasons, but not a single one gave a good argument. In the contrary, they complained and then said it was good because there would be new maps... /sigh Do we need to give a better arugment that we don't have enough time to enjoy a season like this? Blizzard always says they want to attract casuals. The shorter seasons are contra to this. | ||
|
UmbeXCII
Italy69 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On March 28 2012 18:45 bluQ wrote: Do we need to give a better arugment that we don't have enough time to enjoy a season like this? Blizzard always says they want to attract casuals. The shorter seasons are contra to this. 2 months isn't enough time to enjoy a season? How do you even enjoy a season? How does that work? You don't make any sense, how does the length of a season makes it more enjoyable for casuals? If you have a bonus pool now, it wont get better if the season takes longer, so your ranking is meaningless. You will even get more bonus pool. If you think that you play irregularly and will be able to burn a 400 bonus pool after accumulating it for 3 months, than I just laugh. If you can't burn a bonus pool every 2 months, you won't do it every 4 months. Actually, for casuals it is better to have really short season, so when they decide to go for a good amount of games in a weekend, they might hit that 0 bonus pool and see their true ranking, and become "competitive" ranked for that period. Casuals can decide to be competitive every even season. I am just interested in why so many people say that the seasons are too short. Complaining to complain? I am a casual player myself, haven't been under 100 bonus pool at the end for the last 5 seasons, currently I have probably a bonus pool >200. But I don't see any reason to complain about the length. On the contrary, next season I might be competitive in the start again, because the bonus pool goes up to fast for a casual as me. | ||
|
Tobberoth
Sweden6375 Posts
On March 28 2012 18:45 bluQ wrote: Do we need to give a better arugment that we don't have enough time to enjoy a season like this? Blizzard always says they want to attract casuals. The shorter seasons are contra to this. In what way, how can you not enjoy a season just because it's only 2 months long? You don't have enough time to play in 2 full months? What's your argument? | ||
|
bluQ
Germany1724 Posts
On March 28 2012 19:08 Koshi wrote: 2 months isn't enough time to enjoy a season? How do you even enjoy a season? How does that work? You don't make any sense, how does the length of a season makes it more enjoyable for casuals? If you have a bonus pool now, it wont get better if the season takes longer, so your ranking is meaningless. You will even get more bonus pool. If you think that you play irregularly and will be able to burn a 400 bonus pool after accumulating it for 3 months, than I just laugh. If you can't burn a bonus pool every 2 months, you won't do it every 4 months. Actually, for casuals it is better to have really short season, so when they decide to go for a good amount of games in a weekend, they might hit that 0 bonus pool and see their true ranking, and become "competitive" ranked for that period. Casuals can decide to be competitive every even season. I am just interested in why so many people say that the seasons are too short. Complaining to complain? I am a casual player myself, haven't been under 100 bonus pool at the end for the last 5 seasons, currently I have probably a bonus pool >200. But I don't see any reason to complain about the length. On the contrary, next season I might be competitive in the start again, because the bonus pool goes up to fast for a casual as me. I gave you an answer and you can't accept it. Either its out of ignorancy or maybe for the cause of bashing? I have a life to live and friends and stuff. Not everything circles around sc2 for me. So two month ARE too short for me to say "Hey this was a succesful season". Maybe some people around the internet can't really get the fact that when the new season is out it sometimes happens I first start playing about a week after its been released. So for people who aren't 100% dedicated to SC2 and laddering its pretty hard to enjoy a season. And I play alot of customs with friends too because I like the social factor which again cuts into the lengths of seasons. If you now want to argue "Yea but seasons don't mean anything" then I want to shove it up your throat again because if thats a fact then why we even have them. And maybe you guys could start reading the posts before even some semi-pros/pros complain about the length of a season. So are you just bashing for the sake of bashing? On March 28 2012 19:24 Tobberoth wrote: You don't have enough time to play in 2 full months? I am amazed by your reading comprehension THAT's exactly what i stated in my post. Edit: I need to pick this one up If you can't burn a bonus pool every 2 months, you won't do it every 4 months. Do you work buddy? It really seems to me you are some guy studying or going to school. Now get all the bad thoughts out of your mind, meditate a bit, and think about it: If i have about 4 days a month where i can play 8 hours SC2 straight. It would mean i play about 32 hours a month which then translate into 64 hours a Season as it is. For me it feels that 64 hours are too few to get up the ranks and have fun in a season which includes a progress. If i have now +32 hours because it is 1 Month longer it means for me 33% MORE. Is that nothing? I don't care about bonuspool, I care about the concept of having a seasonal ladder. That concept should evolve around seeing progression in every season. This isn't happening for me because they are too short. | ||
|
vanhio
Niue1017 Posts
| ||
|
Lorch
Germany3711 Posts
| ||
|
Twelve12
Australia268 Posts
On March 28 2012 17:41 Zheryn wrote: I hope so too. It's pretty retarded that a protoss can warp in right at a zergs third from a pylon in their main base. haha totally did not know this  time to go try it out | ||
|
Lyter
United Kingdom2145 Posts
| ||
|
wells
France4 Posts
| ||
|
bluQ
Germany1724 Posts
On March 28 2012 19:39 Lyter wrote: Why the fuck are people hating on the short seasons? Its great, keeps the map pool somewhat fresh Mappools normally have very few to do with a season  You could rotate maps each week. But yea thats the only positive thing i can get out of short seasons. | ||
|
GeNeSiDe
United Kingdom354 Posts
| ||
|
MrTortoise
1388 Posts
am also bored of antiga tbh short seasons are good ... because they are synominous with new maps for blizzz. I think you are confusing personal preference with the objective reasons I get why youd like longer seasons ... but tbh i dont really give a crap abotu season length because i hardly play and dont care about what league im in. Christ after 2 weeks of not playing its hard enough remembering all your timings as it is. | ||
| ||
