but just a bit more of a glare and it all made sense hehe :-), the format seems pretty good imo.

and lol @the "simple" explanation that really made my day

AnxiousHippo

Australia1451 Posts

October 27 2011 20:35 GMT

#306

Thanks for the translation!

Hall0wed

United States8486 Posts

October 27 2011 20:40 GMT

#307

Gonna have to wait and see this in action. Should be good though, less safety means more and better practice.

windsupernova

Mexico5280 Posts

October 27 2011 20:52 GMT

#308

Awwww, but now getting code S will be much easier.

I won't be able to laugh at foreigners if they don't get Code S

Good change overall

itkovian

United States1763 Posts

October 27 2011 20:55 GMT

#309

Uhh, wow. Really complex, but I think I like it from what I can understand. It sounds like the code s players will be rotating more and it will be easier to get new rising talent into Code S, so thats good.

Kamikiri

United States1319 Posts

October 27 2011 20:56 GMT

#310

I love it, this looks amazing! The simplified version of it really made it clear to me how this whole system works.

jmbthirteen

United States10734 Posts

October 27 2011 20:58 GMT

#311

Very interesting. Certainly will be more turnover. I wish they played out all of Code A though.

jmbthirteen

United States10734 Posts

October 27 2011 20:58 GMT

#312

On October 28 2011 05:52 windsupernova wrote:
Awwww, but now getting code S will be much easier.

I won't be able to laugh at foreigners if they don't get Code S

Good change overall

and falling out of Code S will be much easier.

TemplarCo.

Mexico2870 Posts

October 27 2011 21:01 GMT

#313

Confusing just like GomTV likes to be but a good format to be honest. GomTV may have outdone themselves again!

Oreo7

United States1647 Posts

October 27 2011 21:02 GMT

#314

On October 28 2011 03:10 roymarthyup wrote:
i made a thread a while ago almost outlining how a new system such as this would be great for the GSL, however one problem

in my thread i said that it would make it way more exciting if the top2 code a players, after advancing far enough, could somehow get placed into the code S ro2 with the top4 code S players. then you play a new ro4 with 2 Code S players and 2 Code A players and have a nice fun underdog/favorite matchup and then you might get the possibility of some Code A player running through everything and winning the tournament

that would be a exciting possibility but this format doesnt allow this sadly

Thats stupid. People would intentionally drop to Code A to play the easier tourney and it invalidates the 3rd/4th placing Code S players.

Dreadwolf

Canada220 Posts

October 27 2011 21:09 GMT

#315

Hahaha i loved the chobo explanation good thing i wasnt drinking anything.

Too_MuchZerg

Finland2818 Posts

October 27 2011 21:09 GMT

#316

Interesting staying in Code A is much easier... all you need to do is win 1 BO3 and you are freerolling to Code S for that season. If compared previous seasons you have two chance to get to Code S (three if you get MLG spot)

Zeke50100

United States2220 Posts

October 27 2011 21:12 GMT

#317

International players can win a few Bo3's and qualify for Code S in the very next season? Awesome :D I feel like a Code A tournament past the Ro24 could still be held for seeding purposes, though. 4 groups of 3, top 2 players advance to Ro8, and boom, you get a Code A tournament. I still like the new format, though.

theMiNUS

United States333 Posts

October 27 2011 21:19 GMT

#318

i love this format, as it really shows how both code A and S are the same tournament, while getting rid of the code S bottleneck

On_Slaught

United States12190 Posts

October 27 2011 21:21 GMT

#319

I actually really like the new format. It's more like a real tournament and is a better test of skill.

Falling

Canada11363 Posts

October 27 2011 21:28 GMT

#320

Hm, I'm not sure about this. I definitely think change was needed, but I think it's a bit too volatile until next year when they can get rid of best of ones. Best of ones makes everything way too volatile and need to go. I'm happy they're looking at it for next year as I can understand it would be difficult to change right away.

However, even if with a best 3's, I still think their ought to be a little more protection for the previous GSL winner, runner up and possibly semi-finalists (later seed or something.) But if they do go best of 3 for the group stages, then I think I could get behind this.