|
On September 02 2011 09:59 Karak wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 09:50 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:42 Spacekyod wrote: I scanned the first three pages and didn't see any response to SSG, but i am also very curious about this to. In the U.S. at least, how does this prize money splitting work out in the way of taxes? Expect the tournament to report the total amount of the prize winnings for first place as being paid to the first place player. If winner's tax return doesn't report the amount of income reported to the IRS by the tournament, they get IRS to deal with. Those who think there is no way to prove it can pay attention to this. You guys really have to just stop guessing at what the answers to these questions are. Please do a little googling!
You think I'm guessing ? LOL at googling for an answer ...
|
On September 02 2011 10:05 Kaitlin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 09:53 SKtheAnathema wrote:On September 02 2011 09:50 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:42 Spacekyod wrote: I scanned the first three pages and didn't see any response to SSG, but i am also very curious about this to. In the U.S. at least, how does this prize money splitting work out in the way of taxes? Expect the tournament to report the total amount of the prize winnings for first place as being paid to the first place player. If winner's tax return doesn't report the amount of income reported to the IRS by the tournament, they get IRS to deal with. Those who think there is no way to prove it can pay attention to this. first place just has second place pitch into the taxes and reports the same income? 1st 50k 2nd 20k 70k * tax split between 2 people seems easy to figure out I had begun to write a more detailed explanation of how this entire scenario could blow up if the IRS got involved, but I deleted it because if people want to do this shit, then so be it. Just be aware that the IRS offers 10% reward of taxes and penalties collected on information provided for people not paying taxes. Allegations like this pop up on forums and any one person could see an opportunity to drop a dime to the IRS, as there really is no reason not to and they get 10% of any collection. Long story short of the part I deleted: This "deal making" situation results in either a player not reporting what the tournament reported that they won, or the second place player having an influx of cash which he is not reporting to the IRS (since first place would have paid taxes on it). Any followup investigation would inevitably lead to the IRS contacting the tournament to figure things out. If this activity is against the tournament rules, they can follow up with whatever consequences were agreed upon in entering the tournament, including requiring repayment of the prize money, potentially.
I don't think this is accurate at all. There's no reason players couldn't privately file 5754s (or whatever forms are applicable) and have no issues.
If deal-making is explicitly against the tournament rules, it creates an interesting legal situation I'd have to think more about (if the tournament had evidence of deal-making), but it would be hard to a) imagine a tournament making such a rule or b) finding out or ) actually taking legal action as a result.
Furthermore, I see no reason why the IRS would care as long as the proper forms are filed. They are unlikely to even notice at all, obviously.
|
8748 Posts
On September 02 2011 09:54 aksfjh wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 09:38 coL.Minigun wrote:On September 02 2011 09:33 Kaitlin wrote: To Fayth and Minigun and any other "pros" that seem to think this is fine:
Do your team sponsors care all ALL about tournament results of the players they are investing in ? Are such results not posted on your team websites, and cited as your "credentials" for such things as providing coaching or doing promotional videos for whatever products your sponsors have?
You guys don't see a problem with SC2 credentials being little more than titles in professional wrestling ? Who says they still aren't trying to win? Just because two players agree to split the winnings, doesn't mean they play bad. If I were to split with a player I was going up against, I would still try my hardest, to get that #1 spot for my team or w/e. You'll play your hardest until you feel beat. There's no desperation factor. Especially if there is no desire to please fans, there will be no resilience in the match. We don't need more Idra games where players leave at the first sign of defeat. it's definitely not all about the prize money though. for example, if a non-korean won MLG Orlando, the $5k would be nothing compared to the increase in salary and exposure he'd get for winning a tournament with so many good koreans. mlg has one of the highest glory:money ratios atm, so it's a bit of an exception, but concept is still very true.
|
On September 02 2011 10:08 Brainling wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 10:05 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:53 SKtheAnathema wrote:On September 02 2011 09:50 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:42 Spacekyod wrote: I scanned the first three pages and didn't see any response to SSG, but i am also very curious about this to. In the U.S. at least, how does this prize money splitting work out in the way of taxes? Expect the tournament to report the total amount of the prize winnings for first place as being paid to the first place player. If winner's tax return doesn't report the amount of income reported to the IRS by the tournament, they get IRS to deal with. Those who think there is no way to prove it can pay attention to this. first place just has second place pitch into the taxes and reports the same income? 1st 50k 2nd 20k 70k * tax split between 2 people seems easy to figure out I had begun to write a more detailed explanation of how this entire scenario could blow up if the IRS got involved, but I deleted it because if people want to do this shit, then so be it. Just be aware that the IRS offers 10% reward of taxes and penalties collected on information provided for people not paying taxes. Allegations like this pop up on forums and any one person could see an opportunity to drop a dime to the IRS, as there really is no reason not to and they get 10% of any collection. Long story short of the part I deleted: This "deal making" situation results in either a player not reporting what the tournament reported that they won, or the second place player having an influx of cash which he is not reporting to the IRS (since first place would have paid taxes on it). Any followup investigation would inevitably lead to the IRS contacting the tournament to figure things out. If this activity is against the tournament rules, they can follow up with whatever consequences were agreed upon in entering the tournament, including requiring repayment of the prize money, potentially. Did you even read what Karak said about poker tournaments? This is all facilitated, above board, with the blessing of the IRS (with proper forms). It doesn't HAVE to be illegal, or against the IRS's rules, it only becomes that when people whine about situation they can't possibly understand (because they don't make their living in a pot variant game).
To answer your question, no I hadn't read his answer about poker tournaments, as our posts passed in the ether. However, this is NOT poker. If the SC2 tournament is not okay with such splitting, it's not at all the same. These very documents you guys cite are the very proof that sink your ship.
|
On September 02 2011 10:09 Kaitlin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 09:59 Karak wrote:On September 02 2011 09:50 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:42 Spacekyod wrote: I scanned the first three pages and didn't see any response to SSG, but i am also very curious about this to. In the U.S. at least, how does this prize money splitting work out in the way of taxes? Expect the tournament to report the total amount of the prize winnings for first place as being paid to the first place player. If winner's tax return doesn't report the amount of income reported to the IRS by the tournament, they get IRS to deal with. Those who think there is no way to prove it can pay attention to this. You guys really have to just stop guessing at what the answers to these questions are. Please do a little googling! You think I'm guessing ? LOL at googling for an answer ...
I'm just saying your opinion (on that issue) is completely incorrect and uninformed. I've filed many returns based on this, I have accountants handle many of the details and I also am, as is prob obv from my prior posts, in the legal industry. While I am not a tax expert, there is a plethora of well-written guides on how to handle tax situations for horse/backer/chops written by many capable CPAs/tax attorneys if you simply google it. I'm friends with several tax attorneys who deal with these situations all the time and can ask them what the proper forms are if you really want to know.
|
On September 02 2011 09:54 aksfjh wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 09:38 coL.Minigun wrote:On September 02 2011 09:33 Kaitlin wrote: To Fayth and Minigun and any other "pros" that seem to think this is fine:
Do your team sponsors care all ALL about tournament results of the players they are investing in ? Are such results not posted on your team websites, and cited as your "credentials" for such things as providing coaching or doing promotional videos for whatever products your sponsors have?
You guys don't see a problem with SC2 credentials being little more than titles in professional wrestling ? Who says they still aren't trying to win? Just because two players agree to split the winnings, doesn't mean they play bad. If I were to split with a player I was going up against, I would still try my hardest, to get that #1 spot for my team or w/e. You'll play your hardest until you feel beat. There's no desperation factor. Especially if there is no desire to please fans, there will be no resilience in the match. We don't need more Idra games where players leave at the first sign of defeat.
99% of the people would still play their hardest
|
I'd love to see more interesting games, which I'm sure would result, if both players are relaxing a bit.
For example, you might see a mothership- we all love seeing them, but since they're not competitive, they're never made. If some of the pressure is off, then we might start seeing that, and other interesting stratagies. (Can you imagine how epic multiple nukes would be in a finals?)
|
On September 02 2011 10:11 Kaitlin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 10:08 Brainling wrote:On September 02 2011 10:05 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:53 SKtheAnathema wrote:On September 02 2011 09:50 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:42 Spacekyod wrote: I scanned the first three pages and didn't see any response to SSG, but i am also very curious about this to. In the U.S. at least, how does this prize money splitting work out in the way of taxes? Expect the tournament to report the total amount of the prize winnings for first place as being paid to the first place player. If winner's tax return doesn't report the amount of income reported to the IRS by the tournament, they get IRS to deal with. Those who think there is no way to prove it can pay attention to this. first place just has second place pitch into the taxes and reports the same income? 1st 50k 2nd 20k 70k * tax split between 2 people seems easy to figure out I had begun to write a more detailed explanation of how this entire scenario could blow up if the IRS got involved, but I deleted it because if people want to do this shit, then so be it. Just be aware that the IRS offers 10% reward of taxes and penalties collected on information provided for people not paying taxes. Allegations like this pop up on forums and any one person could see an opportunity to drop a dime to the IRS, as there really is no reason not to and they get 10% of any collection. Long story short of the part I deleted: This "deal making" situation results in either a player not reporting what the tournament reported that they won, or the second place player having an influx of cash which he is not reporting to the IRS (since first place would have paid taxes on it). Any followup investigation would inevitably lead to the IRS contacting the tournament to figure things out. If this activity is against the tournament rules, they can follow up with whatever consequences were agreed upon in entering the tournament, including requiring repayment of the prize money, potentially. Did you even read what Karak said about poker tournaments? This is all facilitated, above board, with the blessing of the IRS (with proper forms). It doesn't HAVE to be illegal, or against the IRS's rules, it only becomes that when people whine about situation they can't possibly understand (because they don't make their living in a pot variant game). To answer your question, no I hadn't read his answer about poker tournaments, as our posts passed in the ether. However, this is NOT poker. If the SC2 tournament is not okay with such splitting, it's not at all the same. These very documents you guys cite are the very proof that sink your ship.
Do you have any authority or sources to back up your claims? Harrah's EXPLICITLY does not facilitate chops for WSOP events, however WSOP chops are very common and raise no tax flags or legal hot water for those involved. I really think you are just throwing out baseless conjecture unless you know something I don't. (And if that's the case, I'd very much appreciate being able to learn about it).
And like I said before, if an SC2 tournament EXPLICITLY makes a rule against deal-making, that raises some interesting questions/situations, but I see no reason why this would get anyone in tax trouble with the IRS. The IRS couldn't care less.
|
United States4796 Posts
On September 02 2011 07:49 bkrow wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 07:41 x6Paramore wrote: i deal make all the time in local LAN tournaments that include cash..
my room mate and i are of almost equal skill, depending on the day of the week. do i want to create a competitive environment between myself and him? absolutely not. are we the top 2 players in that tournament? probably we are.
when we get to the finals and its me vs him, we just say, hey, lets just split the money and have a good time. nobody is out to get first place, so whoever wins our 6 pool vs 6 pool can take the pride as long as the profits are equally split.
what 1st place and 2nd place talk about, what they do with their money, and how they play the match out, is really none of your fucking business. ^_^ cheers.
edit: for anyone saying that it diminishes the competitive level, get over it, we worked hard enough to be #1 and #2. we don't need that extra inch to ruin friendships and prevent it from being fun for however i enjoy handling the situation. While that sounds just lovely for a local LAN tournament that has no implications for anyone - sure i couldn't care less. But when you realise that SC2 isn't just about you and your roommate, or how "hard" you may have worked to get to the finals, you'll see that it does matter. The only reason you are getting paid to play a computer game is because of the thousands of fans the generous sponsors. If they knew you had decided to split the money and weren't going to play properly, i imagine the tournament organisers would be pretty mad as would the fans and the sponsors. The example in the OP lead to a 1 base carrier rush and your example included 6 pool vs 6 pool - you have effectively destroyed the finals for everyone watching. Can you imagine something like for Mvp vs CoCa at MLG? Maybe you should think a little bit less about yourself and a little bit more about the community.
Everything I can say echoes bkrow.
|
If I wanted to watch the WWE I'd watch the WWE.
|
On September 02 2011 10:10 Karak wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 10:05 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:53 SKtheAnathema wrote:On September 02 2011 09:50 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:42 Spacekyod wrote: I scanned the first three pages and didn't see any response to SSG, but i am also very curious about this to. In the U.S. at least, how does this prize money splitting work out in the way of taxes? Expect the tournament to report the total amount of the prize winnings for first place as being paid to the first place player. If winner's tax return doesn't report the amount of income reported to the IRS by the tournament, they get IRS to deal with. Those who think there is no way to prove it can pay attention to this. first place just has second place pitch into the taxes and reports the same income? 1st 50k 2nd 20k 70k * tax split between 2 people seems easy to figure out I had begun to write a more detailed explanation of how this entire scenario could blow up if the IRS got involved, but I deleted it because if people want to do this shit, then so be it. Just be aware that the IRS offers 10% reward of taxes and penalties collected on information provided for people not paying taxes. Allegations like this pop up on forums and any one person could see an opportunity to drop a dime to the IRS, as there really is no reason not to and they get 10% of any collection. Long story short of the part I deleted: This "deal making" situation results in either a player not reporting what the tournament reported that they won, or the second place player having an influx of cash which he is not reporting to the IRS (since first place would have paid taxes on it). Any followup investigation would inevitably lead to the IRS contacting the tournament to figure things out. If this activity is against the tournament rules, they can follow up with whatever consequences were agreed upon in entering the tournament, including requiring repayment of the prize money, potentially. I don't think this is accurate at all. There's no reason players couldn't privately file 5754s (or whatever forms are applicable) and have no issues. If deal-making is explicitly against the tournament rules, it creates an interesting legal situation I'd have to think more about (if the tournament had evidence of deal-making), but it would be hard to a) imagine a tournament making such a rule or b) finding out or ) actually taking legal action as a result.
Furthermore, I see no reason why the IRS would care as long as the proper forms are filed. They are unlikely to even notice at all, obviously.
The IRS wouldn't care, per se, as long as they get the proper amount of taxes collected. They are unlikely to notice, as long as some asshole looking for a 10% reward or who doesn't like a particular player (one of the two who split the $$) doesn't make them aware.
If players complete such "proper forms" to report it to the IRS, does this not put a dent in the "nobody will ever find out" theory ?
As for the bolded part, why is it hard to imagine a "TOURNAMENT" having a rule against pre-arranged prize splitting ? As far as taking legal action, MLG has already banned players from competing in tournaments, and teams have dropped players for this very thing. MLG has a reputation to uphold to their sponsors and they simply cannot allow their 1st place prize that they promote to be known as a sham. FFS, why not ask Sundance how he feels about all this ?
|
Match fixing is bad because it erases the competition aspect of sports so outside organizations can make money through gambling.
Deal making is no where near this level. Consider this, if the top 8 all made the same amount of money the player who placed first will still earn more than anyone else because he could use his fame to gain more sponsors, get more people to watch their stream, charge more for coaching, get a higher salary(if/when most team get salaries), and so on. It would be idiotic for a player to make a deal and decide to throw games because their loosing far more than just tournament winnings.
|
|
On September 02 2011 10:13 Karak wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 10:11 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 10:08 Brainling wrote:On September 02 2011 10:05 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:53 SKtheAnathema wrote:On September 02 2011 09:50 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:42 Spacekyod wrote: I scanned the first three pages and didn't see any response to SSG, but i am also very curious about this to. In the U.S. at least, how does this prize money splitting work out in the way of taxes? Expect the tournament to report the total amount of the prize winnings for first place as being paid to the first place player. If winner's tax return doesn't report the amount of income reported to the IRS by the tournament, they get IRS to deal with. Those who think there is no way to prove it can pay attention to this. first place just has second place pitch into the taxes and reports the same income? 1st 50k 2nd 20k 70k * tax split between 2 people seems easy to figure out I had begun to write a more detailed explanation of how this entire scenario could blow up if the IRS got involved, but I deleted it because if people want to do this shit, then so be it. Just be aware that the IRS offers 10% reward of taxes and penalties collected on information provided for people not paying taxes. Allegations like this pop up on forums and any one person could see an opportunity to drop a dime to the IRS, as there really is no reason not to and they get 10% of any collection. Long story short of the part I deleted: This "deal making" situation results in either a player not reporting what the tournament reported that they won, or the second place player having an influx of cash which he is not reporting to the IRS (since first place would have paid taxes on it). Any followup investigation would inevitably lead to the IRS contacting the tournament to figure things out. If this activity is against the tournament rules, they can follow up with whatever consequences were agreed upon in entering the tournament, including requiring repayment of the prize money, potentially. Did you even read what Karak said about poker tournaments? This is all facilitated, above board, with the blessing of the IRS (with proper forms). It doesn't HAVE to be illegal, or against the IRS's rules, it only becomes that when people whine about situation they can't possibly understand (because they don't make their living in a pot variant game). To answer your question, no I hadn't read his answer about poker tournaments, as our posts passed in the ether. However, this is NOT poker. If the SC2 tournament is not okay with such splitting, it's not at all the same. These very documents you guys cite are the very proof that sink your ship. Do you have any authority or sources to back up your claims? Harrah's EXPLICITLY does not facilitate chops for WSOP events, however WSOP chops are very common and raise no tax flags or legal hot water for those involved. I really think you are just throwing out baseless conjecture unless you know something I don't. (And if that's the case, I'd very much appreciate being able to learn about it). And like I said before, if an SC2 tournament EXPLICITLY makes a rule against deal-making, that raises some interesting questions/situations, but I see no reason why this would get anyone in tax trouble with the IRS. The IRS couldn't care less.
Authority or sources to back up which claim ? That SC2 is not poker ?
|
I guess it depends on whether the players are still going to have a genuine final; obviously its never going to be 100% genuine becuase you are going to win cash either way, but the idea isn't too bad (if it didn't effect the amount of effort put in by either player).
As a side note, why is TT1 such a fucking troll? He is about as relevant as a burnt out 80's disco act and still proceeds to chat shit constantly on TL like anyone actually cares what he has to say? Why can't everyone just chill the fuck out and get on with their lives.
|
well, there is a lot of money on the line, but SC is still a game. and i think the purpose of games should be to form friendship, not greed or envy.
from what i see here on TL and on livestreams and tournaments, most pros don't play the game for money. they play because they love the game and the community. it takes such a long time and so much commitment to get "to the money", you really have to care about the game and the community or you would have never reached the finals of a major tournament. do any of you think there is "hate" between any players? there may be rivalry and some vexing, but i think thats it. (i could bring some football (for you americans: soccer!) analogies, where most of the time fans are taking losses more serious than the professionals.
nobody has a chance of preventing deal making, all we can do is hope that players still give their best, because being #1 or #2 is not just 80k $ vs 40k $, its also about respect from the community, proving yourself that you are the best and so on. once these "non-monetary" factors are lost, everything will be BS. price pools don't matter that much. i don't want to see arrogant bricks winning and taking all the money. i want to see players who fight it out to the last, and compliment their friends on their wins. its the spirit that counts. as a wise man one said: "no gg, no skill."
edit out some bad language
|
In some ways this reminds me of the constant debate that is going on about "spoiling" match results, and not watching live games vs. replays.
I don't understand how so many people's enjoyment of the game is based on such arbitrary and trivial things. If its a good game, if the casters are hyped, if the players are skilled, etc, it is a good game, no matter what. Being a pro gamer is a hard way to make a living - salaries are low, compared to almost any other occupation, even at the highest level. I am always in favor of a more even prize spread. Everybody's got to eat. Whats the correlation between prize money and excitement? For me, next to nothing. See: awesome reddit tourney, epic IPL. I didn't follow NASL, because it was amateur, with an enormous cash prize.
This is probably going to happen, nomatter what. Why not make it official, contractual, if players both agree? Players would be bound to the prize agreement (and not be thieves like Fenix - allegedly) but also (hopefully) bound to honestly delivering straight up competition (unlike TT1 - and honestly what he did doesn't even make sense).
|
On September 02 2011 10:11 Karak wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2011 10:09 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:59 Karak wrote:On September 02 2011 09:50 Kaitlin wrote:On September 02 2011 09:42 Spacekyod wrote: I scanned the first three pages and didn't see any response to SSG, but i am also very curious about this to. In the U.S. at least, how does this prize money splitting work out in the way of taxes? Expect the tournament to report the total amount of the prize winnings for first place as being paid to the first place player. If winner's tax return doesn't report the amount of income reported to the IRS by the tournament, they get IRS to deal with. Those who think there is no way to prove it can pay attention to this. You guys really have to just stop guessing at what the answers to these questions are. Please do a little googling! You think I'm guessing ? LOL at googling for an answer ... I'm just saying your opinion (on that issue) is completely incorrect and uninformed. I've filed many returns based on this, I have accountants handle many of the details and I also am, as is prob obv from my prior posts, in the legal industry. While I am not a tax expert, there is a plethora of well-written guides on how to handle tax situations for horse/backer/chops written by many capable CPAs/tax attorneys if you simply google it. I'm friends with several tax attorneys who deal with these situations all the time and can ask them what the proper forms are if you really want to know.
Fantastic. But I'm not talking about poker. I'm talking about Starcraft 2. All of your posts about poker are irrelevant to SC2 if such activity is OK in the poker world and not in the SC2 world. The very fact that you have cited that written documents are prepared that provide evidence of such an agreement should make one realize that proof it out there.
edit: I mean, seriously guys, there is another thread about MLG placing restrictive rules on where team sponsorships can be shown on shirts. You think MLG sponsors, presuming they are behind this, don't care about prize pool splitting ?
|
On September 02 2011 10:22 Trowa127 wrote: I guess it depends on whether the players are still going to have a genuine final; obviously its never going to be 100% genuine becuase you are going to win cash either way, but the idea isn't too bad (if it didn't effect the amount of effort put in by either player).
As a side note, why is TT1 such a fucking troll? He is about as relevant as a burnt out 80's disco act and still proceeds to chat shit constantly on TL like anyone actually cares what he has to say? Why can't everyone just chill the fuck out and get on with their lives. This site would be a graveyard if only "relevant" progamers can post here.
And people listen to him because, whether or not he's shown good results lately, he's still an insider on the pro-scene.
|
I'm almost positive that I read something that said 4K.Grubby & 4K.ToD were in the finals of a decent sized pot of $$$$ and they agreed to split the winnings for 1st and 2nd place. I honestly don't think this is a big deal at all as long as it's done between teammates.
You practice together, might be best online friends, might live together, might both have to give a certain % of the winnings to the team anyways.
|
|
|
|