EPTAlso does this effect apm building units or is it only control groups?
APM measurements changes in 1.4.0 - Page 11
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
KCrazy
United States278 Posts
Also does this effect apm building units or is it only control groups? | ||
|
Kambing
United States1176 Posts
On August 27 2011 02:40 KCrazy wrote: Do this many people really think pros spam just to look cool? It'd be really sad if that's true.. Also does this effect apm building units or is it only control groups? It affects any changes to what you are currently selecting. The third example in the OP illustrates this. There is no difference between selecting a unit and a building. The only thing that has changed is that a string of selection changes only count as a single action. | ||
|
windsupernova
Mexico5280 Posts
You guys do know that the people in charge of UI are not in charge of Balance? This reminds me on how people complained when Blizzard changed the upgrade icons for coloured ones. if you APM spam to warm up this won´t affect you anyways. | ||
|
Turo
Canada333 Posts
If anything this just encourages me to play faster! | ||
|
RivalryRedux
United States173 Posts
| ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10381 Posts
| ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On August 27 2011 00:53 Zeke50100 wrote: "How many fruits have you eaten" Choose one of the following: "I've eaten apple, orange, and banana" OR "I've eaten 7 apples, 3 oranges, and 16 bananas, so 26 fruits in total" That's what I'm saying. As for the time issue, instead of saying Blizzard should change APM and multiply it by 1.38, they should instead make Faster the default option. It's a much neater change, because it doesn't involve applying the calculations to standardize the value for every game speed. Odd, that's exactly what I and others have said. Don't really get why you arguing same point with the same people oO | ||
|
BlitzerSC
Italy8800 Posts
On August 27 2011 02:40 KCrazy wrote: Do this many people really think pros spam just to look cool? It'd be really sad if that's true.. Also does this effect apm building units or is it only control groups? Well, who cares ! They can still spam if they want. The APM tab will show now the TRUE ( almost ) apm of a player  | ||
|
Blackk
South Africa226 Posts
| ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
| ||
|
Meta
United States6228 Posts
Edit: I'm still going to spam, and so are the pros that spam, because that's just how we play the game. Why would you let this change affect the way you play? | ||
|
windsupernova
Mexico5280 Posts
On August 27 2011 02:56 Blackk wrote: At the end of the day the only thing that matters is who gets the ladder points. But tasteless is going to steal them anyways  | ||
|
TheRPGAddict
United States1403 Posts
| ||
|
TheRPGAddict
United States1403 Posts
On August 26 2011 22:43 gillon wrote: This, the tapping "spam" is actually a necessity and it factors into one's skill and gameplay and thus should be counted. Retarded change, blizzard is saying that useful actions aren't actually useful. The spam is not just spam. It gives overview over production. | ||
|
Dharmok
Netherlands57 Posts
On August 27 2011 03:04 TheRPGAddict wrote: This, the tapping "spam" is actually a necessity and it factors into one's skill and gameplay and thus should be counted. I completely agree as well. Tapping is necessary, without you will never be able to macro efficiently. If in addition to APM they want to introduce an eAPM statistic, I'm all for that. Both are interesting facts to measure your grasp of the game and to analyse your improvement from replay to replay. | ||
|
KCrazy
United States278 Posts
On August 27 2011 02:54 BlitzerSC wrote: Well, who cares ! They can still spam if they want. The APM tab will show now the TRUE ( almost ) apm of a player well that depends on what you would consider an action. If you hotkey buildings to check upgrade progress, shouldn't checking those be considered an action? I mean in the end it doesn't matter, people will do that anyways but i just dont see why people assume that pros would purposely spam and tire themselves out without a good reason to! | ||
|
TheRealPaciFist
United States1049 Posts
224455224455 ? I trust that's either 12 or 6 actions, rather than just 1 | ||
|
Markwerf
Netherlands3728 Posts
| ||
|
Kambing
United States1176 Posts
On August 27 2011 03:16 TheRealPaciFist wrote: How about 224455224455 ? I trust that's either 12 or 6 actions, rather than just 1 See the OP. On live that's 12 actions. On the PTR, that's 1. At the start of the game on the PTR, your APM will probably be 0 after your initial split because you won't be able to do any meaningful actions (unless you drone stack). | ||
|
Fraidnot
United States824 Posts
| ||
| ||
