• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 00:55
CET 06:55
KST 14:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win3Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)35
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win StarCraft 2 not at the Esports World Cup 2026 Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey!
Tourneys
$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Potential Map Candidates BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Which foreign pros are considered the best? Gypsy to Korea
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Esports Advertising Shap…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1598 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 620

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 618 619 620 621 622 1266 Next
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
July 30 2013 15:26 GMT
#12381
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out
NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
July 30 2013 15:26 GMT
#12382
On July 31 2013 00:24 Decendos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:22 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:20 bo1b wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.

how is 32-24 reasonable? Thats 62% lol


To him it is. lol. "Zergs start the game with 2 drones? Sounds fair to me"


WCG KR is 10:6 which again is 63%.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/World_Cyber_Games_2013/Qualifiers/Korea

all the above stats combined that means 106/163 = 65% winrate on the highest levels and 163 games is definetly enough to tell 65% is broken.



http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=226236

Good read
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
July 30 2013 15:27 GMT
#12383
I guess at this point we can only wait for the overall results, though I'm pretty certain zerg won't be doing too hot. That said I don't think they will be doing as badly as the numbers suggest.
NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-30 15:27:56
July 30 2013 15:27 GMT
#12384
On July 31 2013 00:26 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out



Are you really comparing hitman here when talking about Flash / INnoVation? :x Read what I linked above
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
Rhaegal
Profile Blog Joined July 2013
United States678 Posts
July 30 2013 15:28 GMT
#12385
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?
http://www.twitch.tv/agonysc
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26225 Posts
July 30 2013 15:29 GMT
#12386
On July 31 2013 00:28 Rhaegal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?

?
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
July 30 2013 15:32 GMT
#12387
On July 31 2013 00:29 Wombat_NI wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:28 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?

?

Apparently not agreeing with the predictions invalidates the recorded results.
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-30 15:33:08
July 30 2013 15:32 GMT
#12388
On July 31 2013 00:28 Rhaegal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?


You pick a tournament and I'll see if I'll agree to it. We can use whatever you prefer.
keglu
Profile Joined June 2011
Poland485 Posts
July 30 2013 15:33 GMT
#12389
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%
Seems very broken to me.


For July (T-Z)
WCS Korea(Premier, challanger, qualifier ) 22-22
IEM shanghai qualifier 29–34
WCG qualifier 49-46
Proleague 8-3
GSTL: 9:2

Total 117-107 - 52,2%
Seems slighty Terran favoured to me.

Also whats te point using winrates from before last patch (unless you are saying that hellbats do not have effect on the matchup.)
Rhaegal
Profile Blog Joined July 2013
United States678 Posts
July 30 2013 15:35 GMT
#12390
On July 31 2013 00:32 bo1b wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:29 Wombat_NI wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:28 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
[quote]

No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?

?

Apparently not agreeing with the predictions invalidates the recorded results.



Recording showmatches, master league players, and the most random things you could think of is not something I want taking part in a winrate graph.
http://www.twitch.tv/agonysc
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
July 30 2013 15:35 GMT
#12391
On July 31 2013 00:26 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out


Wow he didn't even remove the losses and just removed the wins? LOL wow...I'm speechless. This is a new low... corrupting the data to support his views.
keglu
Profile Joined June 2011
Poland485 Posts
July 30 2013 15:37 GMT
#12392
On July 31 2013 00:35 Rhaegal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:32 bo1b wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:29 Wombat_NI wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:28 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
[quote]

I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?

?

Apparently not agreeing with the predictions invalidates the recorded results.



Recording showmatches, master league players, and the most random things you could think of is not something I want taking part in a winrate graph.



There is no other source unless you wanna collect data yourself.

NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
July 30 2013 15:41 GMT
#12393
On July 31 2013 00:35 GhostOwl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:26 Big J wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out


Wow he didn't even remove the losses and just removed the wins? LOL wow...I'm speechless. This is a new low... corrupting the data to support his views.


I did the same for SoulKey -_-
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
July 30 2013 15:41 GMT
#12394
On July 31 2013 00:27 NarutO wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:26 Big J wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out



Are you really comparing hitman here when talking about Flash / INnoVation? :x Read what I linked above


no I'm not, but the statistical method you are using is applied to make a statistic more robust against outliers.
And you apply it by cutting down the same amount of top (the best x=2 Terrans) and bottom (x=2 Zergs) outliers.

You could use a different method where you set x as number of games won and then cut out everyone top/bottom with games won greater than x. Which in case you want to cut soulkey means x=6, but then you'd have to cut Fantasy as well as he has also 6 TvZ wins.


Basically, cutting Flash/Soulkey/Innovation alone is arbitrary. Though that wasn't even my point originally. My point was that you also have to cut losses. The hitman comment was just to invoke a real statistical methode.
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
July 30 2013 15:44 GMT
#12395
On July 31 2013 00:41 NarutO wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:35 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:26 Big J wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out


Wow he didn't even remove the losses and just removed the wins? LOL wow...I'm speechless. This is a new low... corrupting the data to support his views.


I did the same for SoulKey -_-


If you remove the wins from 2 good TvZ players and only remove the wins from 1 good ZvT player, of course the data is going to skew toward your favor. You have to do 1 good TvZ player and 1 good ZvT player. You can do 2 and 1 if you remove both their wins and losses which turns out to be 31-16...still shows how broken TvZ is.
Aiobhill
Profile Joined June 2013
Germany283 Posts
July 30 2013 15:47 GMT
#12396
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them...


That's cute. However if you work with statistics, you don't get to declare some data unadmissable without sound reasoning. That's lika guy from big tobacco saying "Look at how many old people die of Malaria and in car crashes" after defining cancer and heart attacks as outliers.

Interestingly what would be sound reasoning to exclude some data is that many of those games were played before the Hellbat patch. So while it does look T favored atm, it would make a lot of sense to not hurry further changes now, but let it settle several more weeks to a) let players adapt and b) simply have more numbers to crunch.
Axslav - apm70maphacks - tak3r
Rhaegal
Profile Blog Joined July 2013
United States678 Posts
July 30 2013 15:49 GMT
#12397
On July 31 2013 00:47 Aiobhill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them...


That's cute. However if you work with statistics, you don't get to declare some data unadmissable without sound reasoning. That's lika guy from big tobacco saying "Look at how many old people die of Malaria and in car crashes" after defining cancer and heart attacks as outliers.

Interestingly what would be sound reasoning to exclude some data is that many of those games were played before the Hellbat patch. So while it does look T favored atm, it would make a lot of sense to not hurry further changes now, but let it settle several more weeks to a) let players adapt and b) simply have more numbers to crunch.


I don't even know why you're still arguing, honestly. David Kim said Zerg has the highest winrate on ladder and he doesn't think TvZ is a problem...
http://www.twitch.tv/agonysc
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
July 30 2013 15:51 GMT
#12398
On July 31 2013 00:49 Rhaegal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:47 Aiobhill wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them...


That's cute. However if you work with statistics, you don't get to declare some data unadmissable without sound reasoning. That's lika guy from big tobacco saying "Look at how many old people die of Malaria and in car crashes" after defining cancer and heart attacks as outliers.

Interestingly what would be sound reasoning to exclude some data is that many of those games were played before the Hellbat patch. So while it does look T favored atm, it would make a lot of sense to not hurry further changes now, but let it settle several more weeks to a) let players adapt and b) simply have more numbers to crunch.


I don't even know why you're still arguing, honestly. David Kim said Zerg has the highest winrate on ladder and he doesn't think TvZ is a problem...


On ladder. I don't know how many times you keep saying this even though we've repeatedly TOLD you that ladder is from bronze to GM. Wow you're doing this on purpose
Rhaegal
Profile Blog Joined July 2013
United States678 Posts
July 30 2013 15:53 GMT
#12399
On July 31 2013 00:51 GhostOwl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:49 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:47 Aiobhill wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them...


That's cute. However if you work with statistics, you don't get to declare some data unadmissable without sound reasoning. That's lika guy from big tobacco saying "Look at how many old people die of Malaria and in car crashes" after defining cancer and heart attacks as outliers.

Interestingly what would be sound reasoning to exclude some data is that many of those games were played before the Hellbat patch. So while it does look T favored atm, it would make a lot of sense to not hurry further changes now, but let it settle several more weeks to a) let players adapt and b) simply have more numbers to crunch.


I don't even know why you're still arguing, honestly. David Kim said Zerg has the highest winrate on ladder and he doesn't think TvZ is a problem...


On ladder. I don't know how many times you keep saying this even though we've repeatedly TOLD you that ladder is from bronze to GM. Wow you're doing this on purpose


So you want to buff a race that's doing the best on ladder. That makes sense to you?
http://www.twitch.tv/agonysc
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
July 30 2013 15:57 GMT
#12400
On July 31 2013 00:53 Rhaegal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:51 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:49 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:47 Aiobhill wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
[quote]

No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them...


That's cute. However if you work with statistics, you don't get to declare some data unadmissable without sound reasoning. That's lika guy from big tobacco saying "Look at how many old people die of Malaria and in car crashes" after defining cancer and heart attacks as outliers.

Interestingly what would be sound reasoning to exclude some data is that many of those games were played before the Hellbat patch. So while it does look T favored atm, it would make a lot of sense to not hurry further changes now, but let it settle several more weeks to a) let players adapt and b) simply have more numbers to crunch.


I don't even know why you're still arguing, honestly. David Kim said Zerg has the highest winrate on ladder and he doesn't think TvZ is a problem...


On ladder. I don't know how many times you keep saying this even though we've repeatedly TOLD you that ladder is from bronze to GM. Wow you're doing this on purpose


So you want to buff a race that's doing the best on ladder. That makes sense to you?


You only balance based on top progamer data and tournaments, not based on which race of silver players are dominating.

That's like saying "silver level Zergs have a hard time injecting larva and spreading creep so lets change the Zerg race so that both is done automatically"
Prev 1 618 619 620 621 622 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Cup
01:00
#66
SteadfastSC188
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 188
ProTech137
Nina 106
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 2882
GuemChi 1305
EffOrt 917
Shuttle 61
Yoon 26
Noble 26
Icarus 15
League of Legends
JimRising 798
C9.Mang0590
Counter-Strike
m0e_tv539
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor91
Other Games
summit1g7041
hungrybox940
WinterStarcraft428
monkeys_forever271
RuFF_SC295
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1273
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH197
• practicex 31
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra1669
• Lourlo877
• Stunt183
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
3h 5m
RongYI Cup
5h 5m
herO vs Solar
TriGGeR vs Maru
WardiTV Invitational
8h 5m
The PondCast
1d 3h
HomeStory Cup
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
HomeStory Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
HomeStory Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-26
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Rongyi Cup S3
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W6
Escore Tournament S1: W7
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
HSC XXVIII
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.