• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:24
CET 09:24
KST 17:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down14ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League64Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.167
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development Evil Geniuses - shutting down How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands
External Content
Mutation # 548 Shining Bright The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train
Brood War
General
Rollback Netcode in Brood War [Recap] 0-6 Defeat for Mong's Team Bot on ladder Young Players Tournament Announced by SOOP Starcraft player cRuZa Passed away.
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [BSL23] RO24 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0 2v2v2v2 Tournament
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7272 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 620

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 618 619 620 621 622 1266 Next
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
July 30 2013 15:26 GMT
#12381
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out
NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
July 30 2013 15:26 GMT
#12382
On July 31 2013 00:24 Decendos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:22 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:20 bo1b wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.

how is 32-24 reasonable? Thats 62% lol


To him it is. lol. "Zergs start the game with 2 drones? Sounds fair to me"


WCG KR is 10:6 which again is 63%.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/World_Cyber_Games_2013/Qualifiers/Korea

all the above stats combined that means 106/163 = 65% winrate on the highest levels and 163 games is definetly enough to tell 65% is broken.



http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=226236

Good read
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
July 30 2013 15:27 GMT
#12383
I guess at this point we can only wait for the overall results, though I'm pretty certain zerg won't be doing too hot. That said I don't think they will be doing as badly as the numbers suggest.
NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-30 15:27:56
July 30 2013 15:27 GMT
#12384
On July 31 2013 00:26 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out



Are you really comparing hitman here when talking about Flash / INnoVation? :x Read what I linked above
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
Rhaegal
Profile Blog Joined July 2013
United States678 Posts
July 30 2013 15:28 GMT
#12385
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?
http://www.twitch.tv/agonysc
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland27464 Posts
July 30 2013 15:29 GMT
#12386
On July 31 2013 00:28 Rhaegal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?

?
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
TL+ Member
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
July 30 2013 15:32 GMT
#12387
On July 31 2013 00:29 Wombat_NI wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:28 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?

?

Apparently not agreeing with the predictions invalidates the recorded results.
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-30 15:33:08
July 30 2013 15:32 GMT
#12388
On July 31 2013 00:28 Rhaegal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?


You pick a tournament and I'll see if I'll agree to it. We can use whatever you prefer.
keglu
Profile Joined June 2011
Poland485 Posts
July 30 2013 15:33 GMT
#12389
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%
Seems very broken to me.


For July (T-Z)
WCS Korea(Premier, challanger, qualifier ) 22-22
IEM shanghai qualifier 29–34
WCG qualifier 49-46
Proleague 8-3
GSTL: 9:2

Total 117-107 - 52,2%
Seems slighty Terran favoured to me.

Also whats te point using winrates from before last patch (unless you are saying that hellbats do not have effect on the matchup.)
Rhaegal
Profile Blog Joined July 2013
United States678 Posts
July 30 2013 15:35 GMT
#12390
On July 31 2013 00:32 bo1b wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:29 Wombat_NI wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:28 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
[quote]

No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?

?

Apparently not agreeing with the predictions invalidates the recorded results.



Recording showmatches, master league players, and the most random things you could think of is not something I want taking part in a winrate graph.
http://www.twitch.tv/agonysc
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
July 30 2013 15:35 GMT
#12391
On July 31 2013 00:26 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out


Wow he didn't even remove the losses and just removed the wins? LOL wow...I'm speechless. This is a new low... corrupting the data to support his views.
keglu
Profile Joined June 2011
Poland485 Posts
July 30 2013 15:37 GMT
#12392
On July 31 2013 00:35 Rhaegal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:32 bo1b wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:29 Wombat_NI wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:28 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:16 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:09 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
[quote]

I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




winrates come on in a couple days. They will be 50% just like last month ^^


Okay, want to make a bet? If they are 50%, I will volunteer to be banned. If they aren't 50%, you never make another post in the designed balance thread ever again.



Will you be using shitty aligulac or TLPD?

?

Apparently not agreeing with the predictions invalidates the recorded results.



Recording showmatches, master league players, and the most random things you could think of is not something I want taking part in a winrate graph.



There is no other source unless you wanna collect data yourself.

NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
July 30 2013 15:41 GMT
#12393
On July 31 2013 00:35 GhostOwl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:26 Big J wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out


Wow he didn't even remove the losses and just removed the wins? LOL wow...I'm speechless. This is a new low... corrupting the data to support his views.


I did the same for SoulKey -_-
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
July 30 2013 15:41 GMT
#12394
On July 31 2013 00:27 NarutO wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:26 Big J wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out



Are you really comparing hitman here when talking about Flash / INnoVation? :x Read what I linked above


no I'm not, but the statistical method you are using is applied to make a statistic more robust against outliers.
And you apply it by cutting down the same amount of top (the best x=2 Terrans) and bottom (x=2 Zergs) outliers.

You could use a different method where you set x as number of games won and then cut out everyone top/bottom with games won greater than x. Which in case you want to cut soulkey means x=6, but then you'd have to cut Fantasy as well as he has also 6 TvZ wins.


Basically, cutting Flash/Soulkey/Innovation alone is arbitrary. Though that wasn't even my point originally. My point was that you also have to cut losses. The hitman comment was just to invoke a real statistical methode.
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
July 30 2013 15:44 GMT
#12395
On July 31 2013 00:41 NarutO wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:35 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:26 Big J wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them + Soulkey it would be 32-24 which is actually quiet reasonable even though in favor of Terran.

If you keep SoulKey its 32-29. This is not about faking statistics, but making a point that those two are exceptionally good in the match up and thus make the balance look false. If you get back at sAviOr and call broodwar imbalanced, because in his prime he ruled supreme over Terran on even the worst Zerg maps... well, keep argueing then, but do it with another person because I prefer some sense in a discussion and no insults.


Well, that's not quite true. If you remove Flash/Innovation games, you also have to remove their losses which would make it 32-24. If you remove both of them and soulkey it's 31-20. If you remove the top2 terrans Flash/Innovation and the top2 zergs Soulkey/hitman it's 31-16. (at least according to the linked TLPD)

-just pointing this out


Wow he didn't even remove the losses and just removed the wins? LOL wow...I'm speechless. This is a new low... corrupting the data to support his views.


I did the same for SoulKey -_-


If you remove the wins from 2 good TvZ players and only remove the wins from 1 good ZvT player, of course the data is going to skew toward your favor. You have to do 1 good TvZ player and 1 good ZvT player. You can do 2 and 1 if you remove both their wins and losses which turns out to be 31-16...still shows how broken TvZ is.
Aiobhill
Profile Joined June 2013
Germany283 Posts
July 30 2013 15:47 GMT
#12396
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them...


That's cute. However if you work with statistics, you don't get to declare some data unadmissable without sound reasoning. That's lika guy from big tobacco saying "Look at how many old people die of Malaria and in car crashes" after defining cancer and heart attacks as outliers.

Interestingly what would be sound reasoning to exclude some data is that many of those games were played before the Hellbat patch. So while it does look T favored atm, it would make a lot of sense to not hurry further changes now, but let it settle several more weeks to a) let players adapt and b) simply have more numbers to crunch.
Axslav - apm70maphacks - tak3r
Rhaegal
Profile Blog Joined July 2013
United States678 Posts
July 30 2013 15:49 GMT
#12397
On July 31 2013 00:47 Aiobhill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them...


That's cute. However if you work with statistics, you don't get to declare some data unadmissable without sound reasoning. That's lika guy from big tobacco saying "Look at how many old people die of Malaria and in car crashes" after defining cancer and heart attacks as outliers.

Interestingly what would be sound reasoning to exclude some data is that many of those games were played before the Hellbat patch. So while it does look T favored atm, it would make a lot of sense to not hurry further changes now, but let it settle several more weeks to a) let players adapt and b) simply have more numbers to crunch.


I don't even know why you're still arguing, honestly. David Kim said Zerg has the highest winrate on ladder and he doesn't think TvZ is a problem...
http://www.twitch.tv/agonysc
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
July 30 2013 15:51 GMT
#12398
On July 31 2013 00:49 Rhaegal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:47 Aiobhill wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them...


That's cute. However if you work with statistics, you don't get to declare some data unadmissable without sound reasoning. That's lika guy from big tobacco saying "Look at how many old people die of Malaria and in car crashes" after defining cancer and heart attacks as outliers.

Interestingly what would be sound reasoning to exclude some data is that many of those games were played before the Hellbat patch. So while it does look T favored atm, it would make a lot of sense to not hurry further changes now, but let it settle several more weeks to a) let players adapt and b) simply have more numbers to crunch.


I don't even know why you're still arguing, honestly. David Kim said Zerg has the highest winrate on ladder and he doesn't think TvZ is a problem...


On ladder. I don't know how many times you keep saying this even though we've repeatedly TOLD you that ladder is from bronze to GM. Wow you're doing this on purpose
Rhaegal
Profile Blog Joined July 2013
United States678 Posts
July 30 2013 15:53 GMT
#12399
On July 31 2013 00:51 GhostOwl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:49 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:47 Aiobhill wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 21:06 Dwayn wrote:
A big step towards balance in ZvT would be if zerg could get it's 3/3 on lair.


No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them...


That's cute. However if you work with statistics, you don't get to declare some data unadmissable without sound reasoning. That's lika guy from big tobacco saying "Look at how many old people die of Malaria and in car crashes" after defining cancer and heart attacks as outliers.

Interestingly what would be sound reasoning to exclude some data is that many of those games were played before the Hellbat patch. So while it does look T favored atm, it would make a lot of sense to not hurry further changes now, but let it settle several more weeks to a) let players adapt and b) simply have more numbers to crunch.


I don't even know why you're still arguing, honestly. David Kim said Zerg has the highest winrate on ladder and he doesn't think TvZ is a problem...


On ladder. I don't know how many times you keep saying this even though we've repeatedly TOLD you that ladder is from bronze to GM. Wow you're doing this on purpose


So you want to buff a race that's doing the best on ladder. That makes sense to you?
http://www.twitch.tv/agonysc
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
July 30 2013 15:57 GMT
#12400
On July 31 2013 00:53 Rhaegal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2013 00:51 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:49 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:47 Aiobhill wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:12 NarutO wrote:
On July 31 2013 00:03 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:44 Rhaegal wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:39 GhostOwl wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:33 NarutO wrote:
On July 30 2013 23:13 GhostOwl wrote:
[quote]

No, this doesnt matter. The broken balance of TvZ comes from the cost efficiency and power of a well- microed bio ball with WM support. Equal engagements trades for T and Z hurts Zerg alot more cuz he loses gas while Terran only loses marines (easily replenished w mules and reactors) Medivacs get free escape button and WM are cheap to replenish.

@Naruro, quit pulling out win rates that support ur view while conviently ignoring the 65%-70% T favored TvZ balance data posted few pages ago


I pulled the winrates? Go look em up in WCG qualifier, lol.


Pulling does not mean making them up. I guess you have no idea how the word is used..just like how you have no idea what you're talking about when you keep trying to deny TvZ is broken



ZvT in WCG qualifier was 42-43 iirc, and just recently we have had Revial beat Polt and Life beat Bomber...

doesn't seem very "broken" to me.


http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3724_2012-2013_SPL/main

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3655_2013_GSTL_S1

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/hots/leagues/3975_2013_WCS_S2:_OSL

51-29 TvZ 63.8%

30-16 TvZ 65.2%

15-6 TvZ 71.4%

Seems very broken to me.




I did quote the WCG qualifier which you completely dismiss? Also I mentioned Flash and INnoVation as outstanding in the matchup , brining 19 of those 51 wins to Terran. If you would remove them...


That's cute. However if you work with statistics, you don't get to declare some data unadmissable without sound reasoning. That's lika guy from big tobacco saying "Look at how many old people die of Malaria and in car crashes" after defining cancer and heart attacks as outliers.

Interestingly what would be sound reasoning to exclude some data is that many of those games were played before the Hellbat patch. So while it does look T favored atm, it would make a lot of sense to not hurry further changes now, but let it settle several more weeks to a) let players adapt and b) simply have more numbers to crunch.


I don't even know why you're still arguing, honestly. David Kim said Zerg has the highest winrate on ladder and he doesn't think TvZ is a problem...


On ladder. I don't know how many times you keep saying this even though we've repeatedly TOLD you that ladder is from bronze to GM. Wow you're doing this on purpose


So you want to buff a race that's doing the best on ladder. That makes sense to you?


You only balance based on top progamer data and tournaments, not based on which race of silver players are dominating.

That's like saying "silver level Zergs have a hard time injecting larva and spreading creep so lets change the Zerg race so that both is done automatically"
Prev 1 618 619 620 621 622 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 36m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1864
firebathero 734
Mind 460
Larva 267
Hyuk 198
Leta 190
Barracks 136
Killer 107
Mong 105
Stork 95
[ Show more ]
scan(afreeca) 78
Shinee 56
ToSsGirL 50
Free 40
Shine 35
Bale 32
NaDa 23
ZergMaN 21
Yoon 20
yabsab 17
Movie 6
zelot 6
Counter-Strike
Sick58
Other Games
summit1g10613
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL12440
Other Games
gamesdonequick1118
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 14
[ Show 8 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
FEL
1h 36m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1h 36m
Replay Cast
14h 36m
WardiTV Weekly
1d 3h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4 days
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
5 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSC
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.