EPTHow StarCraft 2 Battle.Net will be perfect. - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
ExCeLLos
United States17 Posts
| ||
|
Pred8oar
Germany281 Posts
On July 18 2011 19:23 Stromming wrote: Are we talking about the same blizzard? Because the Blizzard I know made the greatest games I've played, and they do seem to care a whole lot. Blizzard is a shitty company that makes great games. | ||
|
Silu
Finland165 Posts
On July 18 2011 21:43 Morfildur wrote: Why do people want the chat do use the full window? Do you want to go back to only being allowed in one channel at a time? The same reason people browse TL in a fullscreen browser instead of a 5cm x 5cm window. | ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
The most insightful conculsion is always along the lines of: Though it may be evil, blizzard certainly isn't stupid and has definatley already drafted/researched such changes to Battle.net 2, and has done so probably better than most OPs in the forums. For whatever reason they have as yet decided not to implement them, probably with a combination in mind of priority technical issues (battle.net takes way to long to load up a profile) and financial incentives: they want to have more UI to sell with coming expansions. Blizzard isn't studpid and, with all due respect, the OP isn't a genius. | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/fRVge.png) | ||
|
Diks
Belgium1880 Posts
On July 19 2011 00:07 tree.hugger wrote: Via Skee: lol this is awesome. This is BNet 2.0 BNet should also give the possibility to play some BO3, BO5 or BO7. And I would LOVE to have some BO3 ladder games, it will open a great new field in the ladder metagame. | ||
|
teapot
United Kingdom266 Posts
Before SC2 was released i was buzzing with anticipation of real innovation, biggish things like; integrating waaaghtv type client for tournaments and so on; smallish things like tabbed channels. The thought that they would not even add clan support never crossed my mind. I mean who could be stupid enough to leave that out? + Show Spoiler + Greg Canessa | ||
|
LinGz
Dominican Republic23 Posts
| ||
|
fickazzz
Germany152 Posts
| ||
|
EliteReplay
Dominican Republic913 Posts
On July 18 2011 14:56 spacebob42 wrote: This would be great, maybe it could be a toggled option in the party settings? (think changing loot mechanics in WoW) i like this too, good post lingz  | ||
|
Alexl
288 Posts
I agree on the rest tho and also: I really wish they'd implement bo1/3/5/7 feature for custom games, it would make tournaments so much easier | ||
|
rivera
Chile83 Posts
On July 19 2011 09:15 Alexl wrote: I have to disagree with the chat thing, I think being to be on severak channels at the same time is awesome. I think both options can work together... | ||
|
rkffhk
474 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
dacthehork
United States2000 Posts
To compete with Dota 2 / valves upcoming steam features Inbuilt coaching options Inbuilt replays you can watch with friends, alter camera angles, change game speed (basically tools to make really good videos). Inbuilt spectating for unlimited viewers. Dota TV will allow anyone to watch any public game, with caster support (ingame) at whatever resolution they want. Basically you can watch dota tournament matches ingame, with inbuilt delay to stop cheating, with inbuilt casting instead of using 3rd party streams. This spectator feature also allows you to search by rank/race/name/clan and watch public games of your choice to learn the game or follow a player/team. Interactive guides/tutorials Reconnection No Map hacking (only send what is needed) architecture . International play support, with optimized server locations etc for long distance matches. | ||
|
DNA61289
United States665 Posts
| ||
|
slicknav
1409 Posts
| ||
|
JiYan
United States3668 Posts
| ||
|
Maynarde
Australia1286 Posts
On July 19 2011 11:22 slicknav wrote: pretty much all they have to do is take the good things from BW and the good things from WC3 and you have a near perfect online experience. It does kinda baffle the mind thinking about why this wasn't the approach in the first place. | ||
|
Pobearo
United States351 Posts
On July 19 2011 11:19 DNA61289 wrote: Where's the facebook integration? Google+ integration! Get with the times! | ||
|
reneg
United States859 Posts
haha oh my god, that would be INCREDIBLE. I feel like a huge part of the page is wasted on having a hydralisk, or a marine, or a zealot, or a random planet just sitting there. I mean, they're really nice looking pictures, but by and large, they're completely ornamental. I'd prefer the join game to be smaller, and to just roll from there | ||
| ||
