• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:41
CEST 12:41
KST 19:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy3Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3
Community News
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)8BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13
StarCraft 2
General
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 3
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 26639 users

StarCraft II: The Balancing Act - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next All
VorcePA
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
United States1102 Posts
November 16 2010 06:35 GMT
#81
On November 16 2010 15:07 MaD.pYrO wrote:
A nerf to High Templar would be pure garbage - the choice between High Templar or Colossus is pretty tough right now at best, if HT were to be nerfed Colossus would just be the only choice - and i don't know about you, but i like having a choice.

The main issue seems to be that terran is balanced about going bio, and just as in BW i just can't see bio winning over storm, even considering how "bad" storm is now in regards to it's BW counterpart.


Both need to be nerfed. Colossus are a staple in every single match up. Storm, like it was in the early days of Starcraft, is too powerful for the energy, currently. What ended up happening in SC1 is they ended up lowering the damage and increasing the length of the spell. I don't think a damage reduction is really necessary here, as a Terran player, but increasing the length of the spell so that damage doesn't happen so quickly would be a change in the right direction.

But with both of these units now more reasonable, toss would never really be able to compete with the other two races, because they aren't strong until they have 1 of the 2 (and not always then, either). Gateway units need a buff of some kind, but that's a nightmare to think about without ruining one of their 3 match ups. For instance, any early game buff would inevitably lead to protoss 4-warp gating each other again.
Shitposting
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
November 16 2010 06:38 GMT
#82
Buff first, nerf later. =(

Any tweaks to Protoss will be uncompensated nerfs, that's how Blizzard treats its red-headed stepchild.
The more you know, the less you understand.
VenerableSpace
Profile Joined May 2010
United States463 Posts
November 16 2010 06:44 GMT
#83
these types of threads are starting to annoy me so im gonna rant with impulsive thoughts.

Firstly these statistics are meaningless and i dont understand why the global statistics was even mentioned.

Its like stating that 85% of the population would have trouble driving a F1 car properly. Is there something wrong with the F1 car that makes it so hard to drive? do the designers have to make changes to make it easier to steer?

well 85% of the population doesnt have the SKILL to drive a F1 car, so the statistic is meaningless. You need to take into consideration testing the car with the best drivers in the circuit and make changes based upon that.

Same analogy can be used for any sport with any sort of equipment or skill.

Would you compare golf clubs/tennis racquets using random weekend golf/tennis enthusiasts? performance wise you would test with skilled golfers.

Same thing applies in sc2, the race is the equipment/tool being utilized by the player, why would you consider bronze->plat/low diamond at ALL. One could go to the extreme and say keeping track of the statistics at these levels is a waste of resources (not saying it I believe it is, but its a valid argument).

Everyone knows what blizzard is trying to do is balance the game at all levels, thats like trying to create one set of rules which the professionals AS well as the weekend enthusiasts all use. that is literally not possible for the majority of sports. Have you played <insert sport> with your friends on saturday or sundays and you guys add your own rules or change the rules to keep things fair? well thats what the lower leagues need to keep them balanced while blizzard balances the top flight.

I would like to lower leagues playing with a different patch to orient them more towards casual gaming and have the higher ones with the competitive patch.

This type of balance is even being shown in soccer, with additional goal line refs in some europa/CL leagues whilst not being used in teir 2 in England, or even some Tier 1 leagues around the world.

Mr.Pyro
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Denmark959 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-16 06:48:13
November 16 2010 06:47 GMT
#84
On November 16 2010 15:35 VorcePA wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 16 2010 15:07 MaD.pYrO wrote:
A nerf to High Templar would be pure garbage - the choice between High Templar or Colossus is pretty tough right now at best, if HT were to be nerfed Colossus would just be the only choice - and i don't know about you, but i like having a choice.

The main issue seems to be that terran is balanced about going bio, and just as in BW i just can't see bio winning over storm, even considering how "bad" storm is now in regards to it's BW counterpart.


Both need to be nerfed. Colossus are a staple in every single match up. Storm, like it was in the early days of Starcraft, is too powerful for the energy, currently. What ended up happening in SC1 is they ended up lowering the damage and increasing the length of the spell. I don't think a damage reduction is really necessary here, as a Terran player, but increasing the length of the spell so that damage doesn't happen so quickly would be a change in the right direction.

But with both of these units now more reasonable, toss would never really be able to compete with the other two races, because they aren't strong until they have 1 of the 2 (and not always then, either). Gateway units need a buff of some kind, but that's a nightmare to think about without ruining one of their 3 match ups. For instance, any early game buff would inevitably lead to protoss 4-warp gating each other again.


Actually the Colossus being staple is pretty situational - you aren't really well off going Colossi against a muta zerg for example.

If you increase the length of Storm casting - noone will use Storm because Colossus will become the better choice for the sole purpose that stimmed units dodge storm but they don't dodge colossus.
P⊧[1]<a>[2]<a>[3]<a>tt | P ≝ 1.a.2.a.3.a.P
wolfe
Profile Joined March 2010
United States761 Posts
November 16 2010 06:52 GMT
#85
Well well, to be honest I did not see this coming at all. Zergs are definitely doing a lot better than they were previous so we'll have to see what other tweaks are needed.

The most problematic match up it seems is TvP atm. Like what's been mentioned earlier, Protoss is either too strong or too weak and after playing quite a bit on the ladder I have to agree. Sometimes I'm just completely smashed in the face by their army composition other times I can 1a through them with ease. Obviously, my games aren't any indication of anything, but it's just how I feel.

A rebalancing of the race is needed. Also another thing I want is something done to the Terran lategame which I feel is vastly inferior to the other two races, but whatever that's just me.
Swift as the wind, felt before noticed.
KevinIX
Profile Joined October 2009
United States2472 Posts
November 16 2010 06:54 GMT
#86
Looks like P>T>Z>P all over again. Good old Brood War.
Liquid FIGHTING!!!
Logros
Profile Joined September 2010
Netherlands9913 Posts
November 16 2010 07:09 GMT
#87
Oh gawd, if blizzard looks at this and starts nerfing P even more then we'll have 0 Protoss in the next GSL.
Dommk
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia4865 Posts
November 16 2010 07:28 GMT
#88
On November 16 2010 15:35 VorcePA wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 16 2010 15:07 MaD.pYrO wrote:
A nerf to High Templar would be pure garbage - the choice between High Templar or Colossus is pretty tough right now at best, if HT were to be nerfed Colossus would just be the only choice - and i don't know about you, but i like having a choice.

The main issue seems to be that terran is balanced about going bio, and just as in BW i just can't see bio winning over storm, even considering how "bad" storm is now in regards to it's BW counterpart.


Both need to be nerfed. Colossus are a staple in every single match up. Storm, like it was in the early days of Starcraft, is too powerful for the energy, currently. What ended up happening in SC1 is they ended up lowering the damage and increasing the length of the spell. I don't think a damage reduction is really necessary here, as a Terran player, but increasing the length of the spell so that damage doesn't happen so quickly would be a change in the right direction.

But with both of these units now more reasonable, toss would never really be able to compete with the other two races, because they aren't strong until they have 1 of the 2 (and not always then, either). Gateway units need a buff of some kind, but that's a nightmare to think about without ruining one of their 3 match ups. For instance, any early game buff would inevitably lead to protoss 4-warp gating each other again.


Increasing the length of the Spell would end up hurting Protoss more, with the way Terrans kite, it isn't uncommon to see Zealots and Stalkers catch the tail end of the storms as Terran move back. Increasing the length would hurt Toss quite a bit.
Barca
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States418 Posts
November 16 2010 07:49 GMT
#89
On November 16 2010 14:57 Sadist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 16 2010 14:56 Logo wrote:
On November 16 2010 14:55 Sadist wrote:
On November 16 2010 14:52 Tripal wrote:
On November 16 2010 14:37 Sadist wrote:
On November 16 2010 14:17 Knutzi wrote:
well since were all just trying too waste some time while spamming f5 on the gsl qualifier i think il post some retarded sugestions on how too help protoss

1.make it possible too chronoboost on a pylon giving the chronoboosted pylon stealth detection for a short while making it possible too skip robotics and not instantly lose against stealth.

2.stalkers get 2+ damage against armored per uppgrade instead of 1, small buff but i think it would help a littlebit against speed roaches and marauders

3. make achrons massive.

4. reduce the research time and mana cost for hallucination, this would help protoss with scouting options early on


obviously after this protoss probably would need a nerf on the collosus and sentry as these two units are just stupid good


P doesnt lose to cloaked banshees with FE with a good build. Robo comes up in time


But the fact that you [b]MUST/b] build the thing removes the possibility of going stargate tech or templar tech early on without losing to banshee.



So what, its the same thing as PvP in bw. I dont see the problem with "having" to go robo tech. If you really wanna go templar or stargate, get cannons.


With 7 range and 8(?) vision I wouldn't recommend trying to rely on cannons vs the 6 range banshees. It's probably cheaper to build the robo.



Exactly, if you want to FE quit bitching and build the robo. Its not like it slows you down anyway. You can go templar tech after that if you really want to.


Looking at the different races, Protoss has the worst detection there is. Zerg can easily make an overseer once they get lair - easily before any invisibad units show up - and Terran 's are in a very similar position as Protoss, except they have scans. Terrans CAN go 3 rax against toss because a scan can save them from a DT, or they'd have to 1-1-1 all the time (which is viable in it's own self).

Imagine there were no scans, Terrans would be FORCED to get a raven just in case there is a DT. In the same manner, Protoss are FORCED to get an obs just in case there is a banshee. And sure, ravens are 'higher tech' than obs but be aware that DT's are 'higher tech' than banshees, too.

Turrets and cannons shouldn't be a part of this conversation, if you need to throw up static defenses then the invisible units are doing their job; giving your opponent map control and time for him to macro as you waste money on defenses. You lose to any good player.

Don't even get me started on why I need a Robo Bay (200/200) to get observer speed, the only way they will keep up with banshees. Man, oh man.

I'm not QQing here, I just disagree with your argument is all.
- I hate threads that end with "Thoughts?" -
Mr.Pyro
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Denmark959 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-16 08:00:10
November 16 2010 07:59 GMT
#90
On November 16 2010 16:49 Barca wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 16 2010 14:57 Sadist wrote:
On November 16 2010 14:56 Logo wrote:
On November 16 2010 14:55 Sadist wrote:
On November 16 2010 14:52 Tripal wrote:
On November 16 2010 14:37 Sadist wrote:
On November 16 2010 14:17 Knutzi wrote:
well since were all just trying too waste some time while spamming f5 on the gsl qualifier i think il post some retarded sugestions on how too help protoss

1.make it possible too chronoboost on a pylon giving the chronoboosted pylon stealth detection for a short while making it possible too skip robotics and not instantly lose against stealth.

2.stalkers get 2+ damage against armored per uppgrade instead of 1, small buff but i think it would help a littlebit against speed roaches and marauders

3. make achrons massive.

4. reduce the research time and mana cost for hallucination, this would help protoss with scouting options early on


obviously after this protoss probably would need a nerf on the collosus and sentry as these two units are just stupid good


P doesnt lose to cloaked banshees with FE with a good build. Robo comes up in time


But the fact that you [b]MUST/b] build the thing removes the possibility of going stargate tech or templar tech early on without losing to banshee.



So what, its the same thing as PvP in bw. I dont see the problem with "having" to go robo tech. If you really wanna go templar or stargate, get cannons.


With 7 range and 8(?) vision I wouldn't recommend trying to rely on cannons vs the 6 range banshees. It's probably cheaper to build the robo.



Exactly, if you want to FE quit bitching and build the robo. Its not like it slows you down anyway. You can go templar tech after that if you really want to.


Looking at the different races, Protoss has the worst detection there is. Zerg can easily make an overseer once they get lair - easily before any invisibad units show up - and Terran 's are in a very similar position as Protoss, except they have scans. Terrans CAN go 3 rax against toss because a scan can save them from a DT, or they'd have to 1-1-1 all the time (which is viable in it's own self).

Imagine there were no scans, Terrans would be FORCED to get a raven just in case there is a DT. In the same manner, Protoss are FORCED to get an obs just in case there is a banshee. And sure, ravens are 'higher tech' than obs but be aware that DT's are 'higher tech' than banshees, too.

Turrets and cannons shouldn't be a part of this conversation, if you need to throw up static defenses then the invisible units are doing their job; giving your opponent map control and time for him to macro as you waste money on defenses. You lose to any good player.

Don't even get me started on why I need a Robo Bay (200/200) to get observer speed, the only way they will keep up with banshees. Man, oh man.

I'm not QQing here, I just disagree with your argument is all.


I think observers should build a little faster - observers are so tough to lose because you have no time to reproduce them when making Colossi. I'd be happy with getting the Observatory back if i can get cheap fast building observers again :p
P⊧[1]<a>[2]<a>[3]<a>tt | P ≝ 1.a.2.a.3.a.P
Zerksys
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States569 Posts
November 16 2010 08:06 GMT
#91
On November 16 2010 15:44 VenerableSpace wrote:
I would like to lower leagues playing with a different patch to orient them more towards casual gaming and have the higher ones with the competitive patch.

This type of balance is even being shown in soccer, with additional goal line refs in some europa/CL leagues whilst not being used in teir 2 in England, or even some Tier 1 leagues around the world.



I don't think that would be the best idea for the community. If you want to build an online community, then the best thing to do is keep it all one single game with the same rules throughout the leagues. If you make it so that bronze leaguers are forced to play at a certain patch with alltogether different rules, then they'll start to feel alienated and mad that they can't play the same game that the higher up pros play. It's also one of the things that attracts people to start watching starcraft. Starcraft has so many spectators because people enjoy watching the things others (pros) can do with the same tools that they are given.

The type of change you're talking about (if you want to use an analogy) is analogous with changing the game of American Football so that everyone who does not play for a high school team must play with a round ball instead of the familiar elliptical shape with tapered ends. The reasoning behind it would be the same, "people who don't know how to throw a football would be better suited to playing this version of the game."
What's that probe doing there? It's a scout. You mean one of those flying planes? No....
cocosoft
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden1068 Posts
November 16 2010 08:11 GMT
#92
Europe looks most balanced.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
sylverfyre
Profile Joined May 2010
United States8298 Posts
November 16 2010 08:13 GMT
#93
On November 16 2010 13:45 Raiden X wrote:
Zealot Charge personally is a joke compared to old Zealot Speed.

So i caught up to you wack once and you walk away. Then i have to w8 another minute to wack again. With Speedlots Zealots could actually keep up with kiting units such as Hydras with speed.

The Zealots has good DPS. IT just never uses it because it can't reach anything. Melee is useless without speed upgrades.

Any Zerg can vouch how useless Lings are without Speed


Incorrect, go check your facts. Zealot charge ALSO has a passive movespeed buff, putting them up among the faster ground units, in addition to the charge ability.
Chaosvuistje
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands2581 Posts
November 16 2010 08:21 GMT
#94
Having just recently changed to protoss for funsies ( damn those zvz's, couldn't take it anymore ), I can safely say that its easier for protoss to beat zerg than it is vice versa at my diamond level ( 1650 when mained zerg, 1560 when protoss ). I can just go some random push and do significant damage, and even when I expand I'm almost always even on his drones with my probes.

I'm not completely biased though. ZvP is my worst match up since people started to expand and then push. And I'm not really sure how to combat it effectively. I'm not in favour of any balance work right now. I think its pretty ok for the moment.
KingAce
Profile Joined September 2010
United States471 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-16 08:29:06
November 16 2010 08:26 GMT
#95
The problem with protoss like some have said is the design. The most powerful race gets warp gate tech very early in the game, right off the bat that made it very OP and cheesy with all kinds BS timing attacks. So Blizzard has nerfed the living hell out of them. Because a lot of lower skilled players cried about the cheese and the timing attacks which still happen to date, protoss has gotten the short end of the stick.

Yet these nerfs have done nothing to improve protoss' standard builds. Gateway units suck ass, the sentry is a great unit, but protoss unlike other races can't afford unit compositions early on. Getting that much stuff means sacrificing an army for tech. So toss' options are to kill you with a timing attack, fail but get ahead, or survive until he gets colossus and HT.

I think what needs to be done for protoss, is moving warp gate tech to the robo or twilight c, and moving the sentry to the robo. Then buffing the Stalker's attack and hit points, and reducing the zealot build time.

Buff the stalker get rid of the Immortal, I never liked that unit anyway.
"You're defined by the WORST of your group..." Bill Burr
link0
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1071 Posts
November 16 2010 08:44 GMT
#96
Remove warp gates. Then buff Gateway unit strength.
http://www.justin.tv/link0 - Gosu.Linko - http://www.facebook.com/link0
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
November 16 2010 08:49 GMT
#97
Protoss does not need to be nerfed, it needs to be fixed. Protoss is the only race that you can't try anything fancy. You can only play one way, but that one way is pretty damn strong. I think changing the way storm works would be a benefit, but also allow other units to be more viable as well.
xzidez
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden147 Posts
November 16 2010 09:24 GMT
#98
Obviously noone here have looked at the multiplayer-panel from blizzcon. While on these numbers it looks like P is strong its quite the difference. In the koreas top-diamond PvT is 40-60% in favor of terran..

This is what buggs blizzard, because on lower levels PvT is acceptable while on higher levels terran just rolls protoss... This could also be your explaination to why every T feels confident vs P in GSL and you hardly see any protosses at the end of the tournament. And the games of PvT you have seen is almost all cheese from the protoss, since they cant really compete with a standard game against marine / marauder mass drops.
Sadist
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States7215 Posts
November 16 2010 09:30 GMT
#99
On November 16 2010 18:24 xzidez wrote:
Obviously noone here have looked at the multiplayer-panel from blizzcon. While on these numbers it looks like P is strong its quite the difference. In the koreas top-diamond PvT is 40-60% in favor of terran..

This is what buggs blizzard, because on lower levels PvT is acceptable while on higher levels terran just rolls protoss... This could also be your explaination to why every T feels confident vs P in GSL and you hardly see any protosses at the end of the tournament. And the games of PvT you have seen is almost all cheese from the protoss, since they cant really compete with a standard game against marine / marauder mass drops.



not anymore. updated stats. try reading the op
How do you go from where you are to where you want to be? I think you have to have an enthusiasm for life. You have to have a dream, a goal and you have to be willing to work for it. Jim Valvano
Cocoabean
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada90 Posts
November 16 2010 09:33 GMT
#100
Statistics and numbers don't always tell the whole story. And in some cases, they're downright pointless.

See: Hockey +/- stat. A defenseman with a +32 rating that leads the league in that category does not mean that he is good.

Likewise, a 50:50 win loss ratio between X:X race can also mean absolutely *nothing* when you talk about gameplay balance.
www.twitch.tv/cocoabeans
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 19m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 254
ProTech67
MindelVK 26
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 7255
firebathero 2160
Hyuk 882
Stork 261
EffOrt 248
Zeus 235
Mini 234
Light 145
PianO 141
ToSsGirL 93
[ Show more ]
sorry 81
JulyZerg 78
Dewaltoss 76
Killer 69
ZerO 56
Rush 45
Nal_rA 29
Barracks 28
zelot 24
HiyA 15
SilentControl 10
sSak 8
Hm[arnc] 6
Noble 5
ivOry 5
Dota 2
XcaliburYe595
420jenkins542
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K939
shoxiejesuss822
allub179
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0364
Other Games
singsing1643
Happy463
Nina125
Lowko103
XaKoH 90
QueenE28
ZerO(Twitch)7
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream4109
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream4049
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 31
lovetv 4
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2119
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
19m
HiGhDrA vs Nicoract
MaNa vs HiGhDrA
HiGhDrA vs Reynor
Nicoract vs Reynor
MaNa vs Nicoract
MaNa vs Reynor
MaxPax vs Spirit
Krystianer vs Spirit
OSC
2h 19m
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
8h 19m
Korean StarCraft League
16h 19m
SOOP
22h 19m
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
23h 19m
WardiTV Invitational
1d
Cheesadelphia
1d 4h
CSO Cup
1d 6h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 7h
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
[ Show More ]
GSL Code S
1d 21h
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 23h
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
4 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.