• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:43
CEST 09:43
KST 16:43
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2910Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format10[IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend!0Weekly Cups (July 6 - 12): Protoss strike back5BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion8BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion8
StarCraft 2
General
Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format Weekly Cups (July 6 - 12): Protoss strike back Co-op Commander Guide: Kerrigan Serral wins HomeStory Cup 29 Is the larve respawn broken?
Tourneys
GSL CK #5 Race War WardiTV Summer Cup 2026 RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event HomeStory Cup 29 Vespene Cup #1 — $300+ USD, July 10
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family
Brood War
General
screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool Pros Debate: Zerg Unfairly Nerfed? (ASL S22 map) BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend! [ASL22] Wildcard Qualifier IPSL Spring 2026 Top 4!
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Summer Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Power Rank Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Tennis[sport] Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Experiences We Want and …
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 4452 users

Patch 1.1 Is Coming 09.22 - Page 21

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 19 20 21 22 23 37 Next All
Chuiu
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
3470 Posts
September 20 2010 22:46 GMT
#401
R.I.P. Siege Tank
♞
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
September 20 2010 22:46 GMT
#402
On September 21 2010 07:30 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:25 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:15 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
No, I think its way too hard to fast expand due to the fact 400 minerals seem very expensive in the early game of starcraft 2. In starcraft 1 400 minerals did not seem as much of an expensive thing, thus promoted fast expands/multiple-bases/longer games, but also promoted more all-ins, which, overall, made starcraft 1 a much less-limited game and more exciting.

5 minerals seems just like a number blizzard randomly picked because 5 is a nice number. I see hundreds of thousands reasons why they should change it back to 8 minerals/trip. + increase vespene rate to something too.


Maybe because they said with the increased pathing/worker AI the 5 minerals per trip generates the same income as 8 minerals per trip in BW? Do you even remember how slow the mining was in BW? I suggest you play it again.

No. 5 minerals does not generate same as 8 minerals. In sc1, early-game-workers were much more valuable than in sc2 because they gathered 3 more minerals per trip (early game, mining efficiency was 100%, until u get 2+ workers per patch)... Which allowed people to get more tech slightly faster or expo more safely.


Go away and stop spewing nonsense, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're full of it.
MangoTango
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States3670 Posts
September 20 2010 22:48 GMT
#403
On September 21 2010 07:09 ecomania wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:06 tieya wrote:
mine banelings will die a little bit slower to tanks tomorrow

it is a good time


Banelings are armored, so they will still receive the same amount of damage from tanks.


Careful--People have been tempbanned for less incorrect posts.
"One fish, two fish, red fish, BLUE TANK!" - Artosis
theqat
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States2856 Posts
September 20 2010 22:48 GMT
#404
On September 21 2010 07:45 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
double units? I would only have 400 minerals less in units. With more minerals in the game.. it wont be as big of a deal than with 5minerals/trip.


That's a gross oversimplification. You had to spend money for workers and units on the Nexus/CC/Hatch, while the other guy didn't, so he's got a much bigger mining time and production time advantage than just "400 minerals."
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-20 22:55:12
September 20 2010 22:52 GMT
#405
On September 21 2010 07:46 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:30 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:25 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:15 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
No, I think its way too hard to fast expand due to the fact 400 minerals seem very expensive in the early game of starcraft 2. In starcraft 1 400 minerals did not seem as much of an expensive thing, thus promoted fast expands/multiple-bases/longer games, but also promoted more all-ins, which, overall, made starcraft 1 a much less-limited game and more exciting.

5 minerals seems just like a number blizzard randomly picked because 5 is a nice number. I see hundreds of thousands reasons why they should change it back to 8 minerals/trip. + increase vespene rate to something too.


Maybe because they said with the increased pathing/worker AI the 5 minerals per trip generates the same income as 8 minerals per trip in BW? Do you even remember how slow the mining was in BW? I suggest you play it again.

No. 5 minerals does not generate same as 8 minerals. In sc1, early-game-workers were much more valuable than in sc2 because they gathered 3 more minerals per trip (early game, mining efficiency was 100%, until u get 2+ workers per patch)... Which allowed people to get more tech slightly faster or expo more safely.


Go away and stop spewing nonsense, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're full of it.

It is worth noting that the value of early expansions is slightly diminished in SC2 because of the worker pathing issues. In SC1, having a fully saturated base diminishes the per-worker mining efficiency, because having a lot of workers clutters the mineral line, and increases the average time each worker has to spend making rounds to each patch. Because of this, spreading out your workers between 2 bases increases not only the number of workers you have available from the extra CC/Hatch/Nexus production, but also the mining rate of each worker (because with 2 bases, you have much less clutter). This effect still exists in SC2, but is lessened dramatically due to the improved worker pathing.
Moderator
TheSpaceMaggot
Profile Joined September 2010
United States14 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-20 23:05:30
September 20 2010 23:02 GMT
#406
On September 21 2010 07:52 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:46 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:30 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:25 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:15 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
No, I think its way too hard to fast expand due to the fact 400 minerals seem very expensive in the early game of starcraft 2. In starcraft 1 400 minerals did not seem as much of an expensive thing, thus promoted fast expands/multiple-bases/longer games, but also promoted more all-ins, which, overall, made starcraft 1 a much less-limited game and more exciting.

5 minerals seems just like a number blizzard randomly picked because 5 is a nice number. I see hundreds of thousands reasons why they should change it back to 8 minerals/trip. + increase vespene rate to something too.


Maybe because they said with the increased pathing/worker AI the 5 minerals per trip generates the same income as 8 minerals per trip in BW? Do you even remember how slow the mining was in BW? I suggest you play it again.

No. 5 minerals does not generate same as 8 minerals. In sc1, early-game-workers were much more valuable than in sc2 because they gathered 3 more minerals per trip (early game, mining efficiency was 100%, until u get 2+ workers per patch)... Which allowed people to get more tech slightly faster or expo more safely.


Go away and stop spewing nonsense, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're full of it.

It is worth noting that the value of early expansions is slightly diminished in SC2 because of the worker pathing issues. In SC1, having a fully saturated base diminishes the per-worker mining efficiency, because having a lot of workers clutters the mineral line, and increases the average time each worker has to spend making rounds to each patch. Because of this, spreading out your workers between 2 bases increases not only the number of workers you have available from the extra CC/Hatch/Nexus production, but also the mining rate of each worker (because with 2 bases, you have much less clutter). This effect still exists in SC2, but is lessened dramatically due to the improved worker pathing.

I agree, which is probably 1 underlooked reason why starcraft 1 economical play worked so well. But I also think getting 5 minerals/trip is another reason that makes economical play not as good as it was in sc1.
FuzzyLord
Profile Joined September 2010
253 Posts
September 20 2010 23:05 GMT
#407
Chat channels would be nice. And an improved friend system. i think the character code system is really annoying :/
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
September 20 2010 23:21 GMT
#408
On September 21 2010 07:52 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:46 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:30 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:25 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:15 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
No, I think its way too hard to fast expand due to the fact 400 minerals seem very expensive in the early game of starcraft 2. In starcraft 1 400 minerals did not seem as much of an expensive thing, thus promoted fast expands/multiple-bases/longer games, but also promoted more all-ins, which, overall, made starcraft 1 a much less-limited game and more exciting.

5 minerals seems just like a number blizzard randomly picked because 5 is a nice number. I see hundreds of thousands reasons why they should change it back to 8 minerals/trip. + increase vespene rate to something too.


Maybe because they said with the increased pathing/worker AI the 5 minerals per trip generates the same income as 8 minerals per trip in BW? Do you even remember how slow the mining was in BW? I suggest you play it again.

No. 5 minerals does not generate same as 8 minerals. In sc1, early-game-workers were much more valuable than in sc2 because they gathered 3 more minerals per trip (early game, mining efficiency was 100%, until u get 2+ workers per patch)... Which allowed people to get more tech slightly faster or expo more safely.


Go away and stop spewing nonsense, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're full of it.

It is worth noting that the value of early expansions is slightly diminished in SC2 because of the worker pathing issues. In SC1, having a fully saturated base diminishes the per-worker mining efficiency, because having a lot of workers clutters the mineral line, and increases the average time each worker has to spend making rounds to each patch. Because of this, spreading out your workers between 2 bases increases not only the number of workers you have available from the extra CC/Hatch/Nexus production, but also the mining rate of each worker (because with 2 bases, you have much less clutter). This effect still exists in SC2, but is lessened dramatically due to the improved worker pathing.


I was commenting more so on his comment that 5 was a completely random, arbitrary number that was picked, when Blizzard in fact gave an explicit reason for why it was chosen. On top of that, the aggressive posting nature was in response to the watered down dumb statement of "5 minerals does not generate same as 8 minerals," which is warping what I said, although you could add "in SC1" for the former and "for SC2" for the latter, which would be in line with Blizzard reasoning.
theBullFrog
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States515 Posts
September 20 2010 23:23 GMT
#409
On September 21 2010 07:16 robocup30 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:09 ecomania wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:06 tieya wrote:
mine banelings will die a little bit slower to tanks tomorrow

it is a good time


Banelings are armored, so they will still receive the same amount of damage from tanks.


Banelings are neither armored nor light, just biological.

and also have 30 hp.
thebullfrog
asdd
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
228 Posts
September 21 2010 04:28 GMT
#410
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?
I
Reason.SC2
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada1047 Posts
September 21 2010 04:31 GMT
#411
On September 21 2010 13:28 Kolu wrote:
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?



This has gotta be a troll right?
Wolf
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Korea (South)3290 Posts
September 21 2010 04:31 GMT
#412
On September 21 2010 13:28 Kolu wrote:
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?


You may have seen the original post:


On September 18 2010 07:05 bleen wrote:
The first feature and balance patch release for StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty will be available next Wednesday September 22, 2010, between 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. CEST. You can read all about our plans for patch 1.1 in the Situation Report (http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/554901#blog).

source:
eu http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/566440828
us http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/785430#blog

Commentatorhttp://twitter.com/proxywolf
TL+ Member
greycubed
Profile Joined May 2010
United States615 Posts
September 21 2010 04:31 GMT
#413
On September 21 2010 13:28 Kolu wrote:
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?
I'd wager 99% of the people who have seen this thread do.

Hint- even if they saw the thread when it was only one post long.
http://i.imgur.com/N3ujB.png
asdd
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
228 Posts
September 21 2010 04:37 GMT
#414
LOL. Sorry guys, I saw that a few days ago but totally forgot about it. Facepalm.
I
vectorix108
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States4633 Posts
September 21 2010 04:38 GMT
#415
hmm this patch will be very interesting. cant wait
Aka XephyR/Shaneyesss
Eazypeezy
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada54 Posts
September 21 2010 06:37 GMT
#416
Is it true that there will be a ladder Reset with the patch? sorry if this is stupid question but I couldnt find it on the website Just a few people mentioning it in the forum here.
fucken eh
Lunares
Profile Joined May 2010
United States909 Posts
September 21 2010 06:41 GMT
#417
I don't care about the actual patch so much as I want to get my hands on the real patch notes since i want to know what's in them...
ZomgTossRush
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1041 Posts
September 21 2010 06:41 GMT
#418
On September 21 2010 13:31 wrgrbl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 13:28 Kolu wrote:
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?
I'd wager 99% of the people who have seen this thread do.

Hint- even if they saw the thread when it was only one post long.



If you start up sc2 it states its going to have some downtime. I am assuming thats when its going to be. If i recall, Pacific time 5 am to 11 am.
Coaching for 1v1 and Team games at Gosucoaching.com
.syL
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany85 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-21 06:44:48
September 21 2010 06:44 GMT
#419
On September 21 2010 13:31 Wolf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 13:28 Kolu wrote:
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?


You may have seen the original post:


Show nested quote +
On September 18 2010 07:05 bleen wrote:
The first feature and balance patch release for StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty will be available next Wednesday September 22, 2010, between 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. CEST. You can read all about our plans for patch 1.1 in the Situation Report (http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/554901#blog).

source:
eu http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/566440828
us http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/785430#blog


The question might not be as stupid as it looks, since the US post reads:

The first feature and balance patch release for StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty will be available next Tuesday, September 21. The maintenance period will begin at 5:00 a.m. and last until approximately 11:00 a.m. PDT.
Pekkz
Profile Joined June 2009
Norway1505 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-21 07:24:13
September 21 2010 07:23 GMT
#420
Patch should come out within 11 hours in the us?
Prev 1 19 20 21 22 23 37 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 17m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft719
StarCraft: Brood War
Mong 1114
Leta 376
Tasteless 279
sorry 42
Bale 27
ZergMaN 23
Dewaltoss 16
Noble 13
Sacsri 11
Dota 2
Fuzer 117
Counter-Strike
summit1g6271
m0e_tv499
ceh9433
Other Games
XaKoH 182
Sick133
RuFF_SC229
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2268
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 80
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2109
League of Legends
• Rush1203
• Stunt439
Other Games
• Scarra2186
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
2h 17m
Kung Fu Cup
3h 17m
Replay Cast
1d 1h
CrankTV Team League
1d 3h
Replay Cast
2 days
CrankTV Team League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
IPSL
3 days
Dragon vs Hawk
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
IPSL
4 days
Bonyth vs Ret
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

YSL S3
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E2

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W3
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 1
Escore Tournament S3: W4
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
Escore Tournament S3: W5
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E3
Logitech G Connect 2026
StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.