• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:33
CEST 20:33
KST 03:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver2[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915
Community News
StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon74Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?172Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism
Tourneys
RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament KSL Week #92 IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? ASL22 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Broodwar Prediction Market
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group C [ASL22] Ro16 Group B [ASL22] Ro16 Group A Escore Tournament - Season 3
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Diablo IV Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8268 users

Patch 1.1 Is Coming 09.22 - Page 21

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 19 20 21 22 23 37 Next All
Chuiu
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
3470 Posts
September 20 2010 22:46 GMT
#401
R.I.P. Siege Tank
♞
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
September 20 2010 22:46 GMT
#402
On September 21 2010 07:30 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:25 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:15 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
No, I think its way too hard to fast expand due to the fact 400 minerals seem very expensive in the early game of starcraft 2. In starcraft 1 400 minerals did not seem as much of an expensive thing, thus promoted fast expands/multiple-bases/longer games, but also promoted more all-ins, which, overall, made starcraft 1 a much less-limited game and more exciting.

5 minerals seems just like a number blizzard randomly picked because 5 is a nice number. I see hundreds of thousands reasons why they should change it back to 8 minerals/trip. + increase vespene rate to something too.


Maybe because they said with the increased pathing/worker AI the 5 minerals per trip generates the same income as 8 minerals per trip in BW? Do you even remember how slow the mining was in BW? I suggest you play it again.

No. 5 minerals does not generate same as 8 minerals. In sc1, early-game-workers were much more valuable than in sc2 because they gathered 3 more minerals per trip (early game, mining efficiency was 100%, until u get 2+ workers per patch)... Which allowed people to get more tech slightly faster or expo more safely.


Go away and stop spewing nonsense, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're full of it.
MangoTango
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States3670 Posts
September 20 2010 22:48 GMT
#403
On September 21 2010 07:09 ecomania wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:06 tieya wrote:
mine banelings will die a little bit slower to tanks tomorrow

it is a good time


Banelings are armored, so they will still receive the same amount of damage from tanks.


Careful--People have been tempbanned for less incorrect posts.
"One fish, two fish, red fish, BLUE TANK!" - Artosis
theqat
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States2856 Posts
September 20 2010 22:48 GMT
#404
On September 21 2010 07:45 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
double units? I would only have 400 minerals less in units. With more minerals in the game.. it wont be as big of a deal than with 5minerals/trip.


That's a gross oversimplification. You had to spend money for workers and units on the Nexus/CC/Hatch, while the other guy didn't, so he's got a much bigger mining time and production time advantage than just "400 minerals."
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-20 22:55:12
September 20 2010 22:52 GMT
#405
On September 21 2010 07:46 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:30 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:25 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:15 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
No, I think its way too hard to fast expand due to the fact 400 minerals seem very expensive in the early game of starcraft 2. In starcraft 1 400 minerals did not seem as much of an expensive thing, thus promoted fast expands/multiple-bases/longer games, but also promoted more all-ins, which, overall, made starcraft 1 a much less-limited game and more exciting.

5 minerals seems just like a number blizzard randomly picked because 5 is a nice number. I see hundreds of thousands reasons why they should change it back to 8 minerals/trip. + increase vespene rate to something too.


Maybe because they said with the increased pathing/worker AI the 5 minerals per trip generates the same income as 8 minerals per trip in BW? Do you even remember how slow the mining was in BW? I suggest you play it again.

No. 5 minerals does not generate same as 8 minerals. In sc1, early-game-workers were much more valuable than in sc2 because they gathered 3 more minerals per trip (early game, mining efficiency was 100%, until u get 2+ workers per patch)... Which allowed people to get more tech slightly faster or expo more safely.


Go away and stop spewing nonsense, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're full of it.

It is worth noting that the value of early expansions is slightly diminished in SC2 because of the worker pathing issues. In SC1, having a fully saturated base diminishes the per-worker mining efficiency, because having a lot of workers clutters the mineral line, and increases the average time each worker has to spend making rounds to each patch. Because of this, spreading out your workers between 2 bases increases not only the number of workers you have available from the extra CC/Hatch/Nexus production, but also the mining rate of each worker (because with 2 bases, you have much less clutter). This effect still exists in SC2, but is lessened dramatically due to the improved worker pathing.
Moderator
TheSpaceMaggot
Profile Joined September 2010
United States14 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-20 23:05:30
September 20 2010 23:02 GMT
#406
On September 21 2010 07:52 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:46 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:30 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:25 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:15 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
No, I think its way too hard to fast expand due to the fact 400 minerals seem very expensive in the early game of starcraft 2. In starcraft 1 400 minerals did not seem as much of an expensive thing, thus promoted fast expands/multiple-bases/longer games, but also promoted more all-ins, which, overall, made starcraft 1 a much less-limited game and more exciting.

5 minerals seems just like a number blizzard randomly picked because 5 is a nice number. I see hundreds of thousands reasons why they should change it back to 8 minerals/trip. + increase vespene rate to something too.


Maybe because they said with the increased pathing/worker AI the 5 minerals per trip generates the same income as 8 minerals per trip in BW? Do you even remember how slow the mining was in BW? I suggest you play it again.

No. 5 minerals does not generate same as 8 minerals. In sc1, early-game-workers were much more valuable than in sc2 because they gathered 3 more minerals per trip (early game, mining efficiency was 100%, until u get 2+ workers per patch)... Which allowed people to get more tech slightly faster or expo more safely.


Go away and stop spewing nonsense, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're full of it.

It is worth noting that the value of early expansions is slightly diminished in SC2 because of the worker pathing issues. In SC1, having a fully saturated base diminishes the per-worker mining efficiency, because having a lot of workers clutters the mineral line, and increases the average time each worker has to spend making rounds to each patch. Because of this, spreading out your workers between 2 bases increases not only the number of workers you have available from the extra CC/Hatch/Nexus production, but also the mining rate of each worker (because with 2 bases, you have much less clutter). This effect still exists in SC2, but is lessened dramatically due to the improved worker pathing.

I agree, which is probably 1 underlooked reason why starcraft 1 economical play worked so well. But I also think getting 5 minerals/trip is another reason that makes economical play not as good as it was in sc1.
FuzzyLord
Profile Joined September 2010
253 Posts
September 20 2010 23:05 GMT
#407
Chat channels would be nice. And an improved friend system. i think the character code system is really annoying :/
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
September 20 2010 23:21 GMT
#408
On September 21 2010 07:52 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:46 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:30 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:25 FabledIntegral wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:15 TheSpaceMaggot wrote:
No, I think its way too hard to fast expand due to the fact 400 minerals seem very expensive in the early game of starcraft 2. In starcraft 1 400 minerals did not seem as much of an expensive thing, thus promoted fast expands/multiple-bases/longer games, but also promoted more all-ins, which, overall, made starcraft 1 a much less-limited game and more exciting.

5 minerals seems just like a number blizzard randomly picked because 5 is a nice number. I see hundreds of thousands reasons why they should change it back to 8 minerals/trip. + increase vespene rate to something too.


Maybe because they said with the increased pathing/worker AI the 5 minerals per trip generates the same income as 8 minerals per trip in BW? Do you even remember how slow the mining was in BW? I suggest you play it again.

No. 5 minerals does not generate same as 8 minerals. In sc1, early-game-workers were much more valuable than in sc2 because they gathered 3 more minerals per trip (early game, mining efficiency was 100%, until u get 2+ workers per patch)... Which allowed people to get more tech slightly faster or expo more safely.


Go away and stop spewing nonsense, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're full of it.

It is worth noting that the value of early expansions is slightly diminished in SC2 because of the worker pathing issues. In SC1, having a fully saturated base diminishes the per-worker mining efficiency, because having a lot of workers clutters the mineral line, and increases the average time each worker has to spend making rounds to each patch. Because of this, spreading out your workers between 2 bases increases not only the number of workers you have available from the extra CC/Hatch/Nexus production, but also the mining rate of each worker (because with 2 bases, you have much less clutter). This effect still exists in SC2, but is lessened dramatically due to the improved worker pathing.


I was commenting more so on his comment that 5 was a completely random, arbitrary number that was picked, when Blizzard in fact gave an explicit reason for why it was chosen. On top of that, the aggressive posting nature was in response to the watered down dumb statement of "5 minerals does not generate same as 8 minerals," which is warping what I said, although you could add "in SC1" for the former and "for SC2" for the latter, which would be in line with Blizzard reasoning.
theBullFrog
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States515 Posts
September 20 2010 23:23 GMT
#409
On September 21 2010 07:16 robocup30 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 07:09 ecomania wrote:
On September 21 2010 07:06 tieya wrote:
mine banelings will die a little bit slower to tanks tomorrow

it is a good time


Banelings are armored, so they will still receive the same amount of damage from tanks.


Banelings are neither armored nor light, just biological.

and also have 30 hp.
thebullfrog
asdd
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
228 Posts
September 21 2010 04:28 GMT
#410
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?
I
Reason.SC2
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada1047 Posts
September 21 2010 04:31 GMT
#411
On September 21 2010 13:28 Kolu wrote:
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?



This has gotta be a troll right?
Wolf
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Korea (South)3290 Posts
September 21 2010 04:31 GMT
#412
On September 21 2010 13:28 Kolu wrote:
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?


You may have seen the original post:


On September 18 2010 07:05 bleen wrote:
The first feature and balance patch release for StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty will be available next Wednesday September 22, 2010, between 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. CEST. You can read all about our plans for patch 1.1 in the Situation Report (http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/554901#blog).

source:
eu http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/566440828
us http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/785430#blog

Commentatorhttp://twitter.com/proxywolf
TL+ Member
greycubed
Profile Joined May 2010
United States615 Posts
September 21 2010 04:31 GMT
#413
On September 21 2010 13:28 Kolu wrote:
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?
I'd wager 99% of the people who have seen this thread do.

Hint- even if they saw the thread when it was only one post long.
http://i.imgur.com/N3ujB.png
asdd
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
228 Posts
September 21 2010 04:37 GMT
#414
LOL. Sorry guys, I saw that a few days ago but totally forgot about it. Facepalm.
I
vectorix108
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States4633 Posts
September 21 2010 04:38 GMT
#415
hmm this patch will be very interesting. cant wait
Aka XephyR/Shaneyesss
Eazypeezy
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada54 Posts
September 21 2010 06:37 GMT
#416
Is it true that there will be a ladder Reset with the patch? sorry if this is stupid question but I couldnt find it on the website Just a few people mentioning it in the forum here.
fucken eh
Lunares
Profile Joined May 2010
United States909 Posts
September 21 2010 06:41 GMT
#417
I don't care about the actual patch so much as I want to get my hands on the real patch notes since i want to know what's in them...
ZomgTossRush
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1041 Posts
September 21 2010 06:41 GMT
#418
On September 21 2010 13:31 wrgrbl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 13:28 Kolu wrote:
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?
I'd wager 99% of the people who have seen this thread do.

Hint- even if they saw the thread when it was only one post long.



If you start up sc2 it states its going to have some downtime. I am assuming thats when its going to be. If i recall, Pacific time 5 am to 11 am.
Coaching for 1v1 and Team games at Gosucoaching.com
.syL
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany85 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-21 06:44:48
September 21 2010 06:44 GMT
#419
On September 21 2010 13:31 Wolf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 13:28 Kolu wrote:
Anyone have any clue what time this patch will come out?


You may have seen the original post:


Show nested quote +
On September 18 2010 07:05 bleen wrote:
The first feature and balance patch release for StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty will be available next Wednesday September 22, 2010, between 5 a.m. and 11 a.m. CEST. You can read all about our plans for patch 1.1 in the Situation Report (http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/554901#blog).

source:
eu http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/566440828
us http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/785430#blog


The question might not be as stupid as it looks, since the US post reads:

The first feature and balance patch release for StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty will be available next Tuesday, September 21. The maintenance period will begin at 5:00 a.m. and last until approximately 11:00 a.m. PDT.
Pekkz
Profile Joined June 2009
Norway1505 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-21 07:24:13
September 21 2010 07:23 GMT
#420
Patch should come out within 11 hours in the us?
Prev 1 19 20 21 22 23 37 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BlizzCon
18:30
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
IdrA vs MC
TaKeTV 148
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 907
Tasteless 714
mouzHeroMarine 395
IndyStarCraft 227
BRAT_OK 84
Railgan 2
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 24379
Calm 3343
Shuttle 1039
Artosis 624
Mini 161
firebathero 150
Bonyth 101
Dewaltoss 101
Sea.KH 40
CosmosSc2 36
[ Show more ]
Mong 29
Trap 19
sSak 19
Dota 2
qojqva3501
canceldota49
febbydoto29
Counter-Strike
byalli224
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox431
Mew2King117
C9.Mang062
Chillindude11
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu464
MindelVK13
Other Games
Grubby5547
Liquid`RaSZi2326
summit1g1994
fl0m1182
singsing916
B2W.Neo596
Mlord474
mouzStarbuck337
Hui .143
XaKoH 104
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2598
StarCraft 2
StarCraft2087
Other Games
EGCTV1437
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 821
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm629
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 549
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH334
• EnkiAlexander 81
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 13
• Azhi_Dahaki9
• Pr0nogo 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3010
• masondota2774
Other Games
• Shiphtur241
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
15h 27m
Light vs JyJ
Soulkey vs hero
WardiTV Weekly
16h 27m
Monday Night Weeklies
21h 27m
Afreeca Starleague
1d 15h
Snow vs Shinee
Shine vs EffOrt
GSL
1d 16h
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
KCM Race Survival
3 days
[ Show More ]
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
GSL
6 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
6 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - TRS
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.