The content is a little over-dramatic but the players are quite enthusiastic.
Might be time to break out the

and if it gets boring there is always
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/R1CH/Happy2.gif)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/R1CH/Happy2.gif)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/R1CH/Happy2.gif)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/R1CH/Happy2.gif)
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
June 03 2011 04:41 GMT
#24741
The content is a little over-dramatic but the players are quite enthusiastic. Might be time to break out the ![]() and if it gets boring there is always ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
Avs
Korea (North)857 Posts
June 03 2011 04:42 GMT
#24742
I would like State of the Game to be represented by people who's opinions are neutrally balanced and debated with integrity and fairness. Jon Stewart jokes to keep it interesting helps, but let's not go overboard. Otherwise the "show" will never be anything more than what it is now, and either it will be eclipsed by esports/starcraft 2, or just never take off. | ||
mattjkim
United States34 Posts
June 03 2011 04:50 GMT
#24743
On June 03 2011 13:39 kedinik wrote: Show nested quote + On June 03 2011 13:21 mattjkim wrote: Welcome to America, we're fucking awesome and able to speak freely. There will always be a faggot who will get offended, nothing wrong with that, which hopefully leads to a intellectual conversation. Understand the use of context and be less of a sensitive cunt or be prepared to have your brain hole raped in todays society, niggas. You are so admirably real. Unless I guess there were any gay or black guys in the room and you had to say this out loud. And you clearly already feel too uncomfortable even typing out nigger instead of nigga, even in this ridiculous little dramatic post on a practically anonymous website. thanks? or unless i guess who says nigger anymore i prefer "nigga" must be a west coast thing. you know my name, come at me bro. | ||
StarStruck
25339 Posts
June 03 2011 04:54 GMT
#24744
On June 03 2011 13:42 Avs wrote: Hi, I would like State of the Game to be represented by people who's opinions are neutrally balanced and debated with integrity and fairness. Jon Stewart jokes to keep it interesting helps, but let's not go overboard. Otherwise the "show" will never be anything more than what it is now, and either it will be eclipsed by esports/starcraft 2, or just never take off. Wait, what? Who are you? o-O | ||
Wren
United States745 Posts
June 03 2011 05:02 GMT
#24745
On June 03 2011 10:59 DMK 87 wrote: hey Does anyone know where to find that 5 min promovideo they talked about? The one where Idra apparently said f**k Huk or sth... There is Star Nation: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=228737 (this is probably the one they were referencing) but also My Life for Aiur: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=228494 (which also contains a quick shot of the "Fuck you" IdrA left for Huk). | ||
Harrow
United States245 Posts
June 03 2011 05:03 GMT
#24746
On June 03 2011 12:38 masterchip27 wrote: If you're not asking for censorship, then do you still think it is wrong for me to use the term "rape" describing a game with a friend who takes 0 offense to it and is not misogynist? If you think it's wrong, then it sure sounds like you're asking for people to censor themselves, if not, then I'd tend to agree with you. One person can't ask another person to "censor themselves" since censorship involved some kind of governing or controlling body to impose a rule on expression. This isn't a debate about censorship and I wish people would stop trying to paint it as some kind of FREE SPEECH AMERICA FUCK YEAH thing. I don't think it should be illegal for you to say "dude I raped that protoss" to one guy in a room. It doesn't necessarily do any harm either, but I think more people should question their use of the word in a world in which one in six women are raped at least once in their lifetime (and one in 33 men). Rape is woefully prevalent and terrifyingly under-prosecuted, which indicates that somehow it's far more legitimized and taken far less seriously than it should be. That culture is the context and the debate is about whether or not we should be using words and concepts in a way that downplays their significance. Of COURSE context matters; if I climb into bed and whisper "rape" quietly into my pillow, no fairies cry. But if someone like Destiny broadcasts a rape joke to thousands of people, could he cause immediate and actual harm to a listener who happens to be a rape survivor with post-traumatic stress disorder and related psychological triggers? It's very possible. And if that isn't happening, is he playing his part in a culture that allows rape to happen too often and doesn't punish it frequently enough or harshly enough? Obviously I accept that that's debatable. But I say yes, to a small degree. And choosing a different fucking word is a pretty small price to pay to be safe. It's not like saying "rape" is an hilariously original joke at this point. | ||
Juke290
Egypt316 Posts
June 03 2011 06:39 GMT
#24747
For example, I was going to an old clan war thread to look for some information, and found this post on this page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=164034¤tpage=4 "Motbob you are retarded lol Criticizing someone's play IS 100% exactly what I JUST THIS THREAD said was fine. It was as fucking constructive as it gets. If I said "LOLOLOL SELECT SUCKS" I would be doing what that comment says. jesus fucking christ I shouldn't reply to this trash but I can't help it." Maybe I'm just alone in thinking part of this episode was very ironic/hypocritical. | ||
LagT_T
Argentina535 Posts
June 03 2011 06:46 GMT
#24748
| ||
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
June 03 2011 06:50 GMT
#24749
On June 03 2011 15:39 SSLPrism wrote: I thought the appropriate language talk was very hypocritical from some of the people involved, not just when they defended that certain words were ok while others werent, the fact that they've used the same terminology before. For example, I was going to an old clan war thread to look for some information, and found this post on this page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=164034¤tpage=4 "Motbob you are retarded lol Criticizing someone's play IS 100% exactly what I JUST THIS THREAD said was fine. It was as fucking constructive as it gets. If I said "LOLOLOL SELECT SUCKS" I would be doing what that comment says. jesus fucking christ I shouldn't reply to this trash but I can't help it." Maybe I'm just alone in thinking part of this episode was very ironic/hypocritical. I think that some people went too far in the past (just look at some of Day9's early casts) and slowly realize that using such childish immature swearing language actually doesnt make you a grown up adult. Trying to change your habits does take time, so only the future will tell if iNcontrol stops swearing (not even using it for those aggressive jokes he loves) and wasnt hypocritical or if he doesnt do it and was hypocritical. Personally I hope for the first. There are just some people who have realized the importance of language, while others dont care or want to be the 13 year old rebels who use "forbidden words" to make themselves sound more grown up. Well here is a hint: you dont sound more grown up, you just sound dumber than you might be. Just try it yourself ... dont use "shit" and "fuck" at all for a week and see how easy it is. It isnt if you were used to using those words reguarly, so it isnt a "flip the switch" thing. | ||
Juke290
Egypt316 Posts
June 03 2011 06:56 GMT
#24750
On June 03 2011 15:50 Rabiator wrote: Show nested quote + On June 03 2011 15:39 SSLPrism wrote: I thought the appropriate language talk was very hypocritical from some of the people involved, not just when they defended that certain words were ok while others werent, the fact that they've used the same terminology before. For example, I was going to an old clan war thread to look for some information, and found this post on this page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=164034¤tpage=4 "Motbob you are retarded lol Criticizing someone's play IS 100% exactly what I JUST THIS THREAD said was fine. It was as fucking constructive as it gets. If I said "LOLOLOL SELECT SUCKS" I would be doing what that comment says. jesus fucking christ I shouldn't reply to this trash but I can't help it." Maybe I'm just alone in thinking part of this episode was very ironic/hypocritical. I think that some people went too far in the past (just look at some of Day9's early casts) and slowly realize that using such childish immature swearing language actually doesnt make you a grown up adult. Trying to change your habits does take time, so only the future will tell if iNcontrol stops swearing (not even using it for those aggressive jokes he loves) and wasnt hypocritical or if he doesnt do it and was hypocritical. Personally I hope for the first. There are just some people who have realized the importance of language, while others dont care or want to be the 13 year old rebels who use "forbidden words" to make themselves sound more grown up. Well here is a hint: you dont sound more grown up, you just sound dumber than you might be. Just try it yourself ... dont use "shit" and "fuck" at all for a week and see how easy it is. It isnt if you were used to using those words reguarly, so it isnt a "flip the switch" thing. To respond to your last statement/question/proposition, I don't feel the need to change my vocabulary, I'm confident in saying shit, fuck, I'm also completely fine with others using "Rape" "Retard", because I just ignore it/block it out. Basically I'm confident in my vocabulary, you don't need random "intellectual words" and not curse to be a smart person, just be confident in the language you use. Theres absolutely no need to change your vocabulary to a 'false' vocabulary if that is not who you are, doing so would result in you being someone you truly aren't. | ||
svarog
46 Posts
June 03 2011 07:39 GMT
#24751
On June 03 2011 14:03 Harrow wrote: Show nested quote + On June 03 2011 12:38 masterchip27 wrote: If you're not asking for censorship, then do you still think it is wrong for me to use the term "rape" describing a game with a friend who takes 0 offense to it and is not misogynist? If you think it's wrong, then it sure sounds like you're asking for people to censor themselves, if not, then I'd tend to agree with you. One person can't ask another person to "censor themselves" since censorship involved some kind of governing or controlling body to impose a rule on expression. This isn't a debate about censorship and I wish people would stop trying to paint it as some kind of FREE SPEECH AMERICA FUCK YEAH thing. I don't think it should be illegal for you to say "dude I raped that protoss" to one guy in a room. It doesn't necessarily do any harm either, but I think more people should question their use of the word in a world in which one in six women are raped at least once in their lifetime (and one in 33 men). Rape is woefully prevalent and terrifyingly under-prosecuted, which indicates that somehow it's far more legitimized and taken far less seriously than it should be. That culture is the context and the debate is about whether or not we should be using words and concepts in a way that downplays their significance. Of COURSE context matters; if I climb into bed and whisper "rape" quietly into my pillow, no fairies cry. But if someone like Destiny broadcasts a rape joke to thousands of people, could he cause immediate and actual harm to a listener who happens to be a rape survivor with post-traumatic stress disorder and related psychological triggers? It's very possible. And if that isn't happening, is he playing his part in a culture that allows rape to happen too often and doesn't punish it frequently enough or harshly enough? Obviously I accept that that's debatable. But I say yes, to a small degree. And choosing a different fucking word is a pretty small price to pay to be safe. It's not like saying "rape" is an hilariously original joke at this point. I take issue with a lot of what you say here. I'd find it rather disturbing if you were whispering "rape" quietly into your pillow, and I'd have no problem if you used it publicly in a non-sexual context, or just like you used the word "fuck" at the end of your post. The reasoning that some rape victim might hear the word, get offended, hurt and suffer a psychological trigger event is idiotic in my opinion. This reasoning is equal to me saying that everybody that I know owns at least one pair of blue jeans, therefore there is high probability that rape victims have been raped by someone wearing a pair of blue jeans, and in conclusion we should all just not wear blue jeans in public. Destiny made a great point on how far you can go with this line of thought, what about "nuke", "kill", "massacre" etc? Hell, for a world war 2 survivor of the nazi camps I'd guess even the word "shower" can be traumatic if you go on this tangent of though. Context is all that mattters, words no matter what else they can describe are just there to put a point across. The context in which "rape" is being used in gaming for me coveys a very precise emotion of such an overwhelming victory that boosts your ego in a way only online gaming can. And saying that you raped or are going to rape someone in this context is far less disrespectfull or hurtfull to the individual than just blankly labeling them as an idiot. | ||
TuCraiN
United States16 Posts
June 03 2011 07:50 GMT
#24752
Destiny made a great point on how far you can go with this line of thought, what about "nuke", "kill", "massacre" etc? Hell, for a world war 2 survivor of the nazi camps I'd guess even the word "shower" can be traumatic if you go on this tangent of though. Although I agree with destiny as far is his point goes but this reasoning is falling down the slippery slope fallacy. | ||
svarog
46 Posts
June 03 2011 08:05 GMT
#24753
On June 03 2011 16:50 TuCraiN wrote: Show nested quote + Destiny made a great point on how far you can go with this line of thought, what about "nuke", "kill", "massacre" etc? Hell, for a world war 2 survivor of the nazi camps I'd guess even the word "shower" can be traumatic if you go on this tangent of though. Although I agree with destiny as far is his point goes but this reasoning is falling down the slippery slope fallacy. English is not my first language but if I understand you correctly you are saying that the argument is falling down the slippery slope fallacy because it does not acknowledge the possibility of middle ground? | ||
Juke290
Egypt316 Posts
June 03 2011 08:06 GMT
#24754
On June 03 2011 16:39 svarog wrote: Show nested quote + On June 03 2011 14:03 Harrow wrote: On June 03 2011 12:38 masterchip27 wrote: If you're not asking for censorship, then do you still think it is wrong for me to use the term "rape" describing a game with a friend who takes 0 offense to it and is not misogynist? If you think it's wrong, then it sure sounds like you're asking for people to censor themselves, if not, then I'd tend to agree with you. One person can't ask another person to "censor themselves" since censorship involved some kind of governing or controlling body to impose a rule on expression. This isn't a debate about censorship and I wish people would stop trying to paint it as some kind of FREE SPEECH AMERICA FUCK YEAH thing. I don't think it should be illegal for you to say "dude I raped that protoss" to one guy in a room. It doesn't necessarily do any harm either, but I think more people should question their use of the word in a world in which one in six women are raped at least once in their lifetime (and one in 33 men). Rape is woefully prevalent and terrifyingly under-prosecuted, which indicates that somehow it's far more legitimized and taken far less seriously than it should be. That culture is the context and the debate is about whether or not we should be using words and concepts in a way that downplays their significance. Of COURSE context matters; if I climb into bed and whisper "rape" quietly into my pillow, no fairies cry. But if someone like Destiny broadcasts a rape joke to thousands of people, could he cause immediate and actual harm to a listener who happens to be a rape survivor with post-traumatic stress disorder and related psychological triggers? It's very possible. And if that isn't happening, is he playing his part in a culture that allows rape to happen too often and doesn't punish it frequently enough or harshly enough? Obviously I accept that that's debatable. But I say yes, to a small degree. And choosing a different fucking word is a pretty small price to pay to be safe. It's not like saying "rape" is an hilariously original joke at this point. I take issue with a lot of what you say here. I'd find it rather disturbing if you were whispering "rape" quietly into your pillow, and I'd have no problem if you used it publicly in a non-sexual context, or just like you used the word "fuck" at the end of your post. The reasoning that some rape victim might hear the word, get offended, hurt and suffer a psychological trigger event is idiotic in my opinion. This reasoning is equal to me saying that everybody that I know owns at least one pair of blue jeans, therefore there is high probability that rape victims have been raped by someone wearing a pair of blue jeans, and in conclusion we should all just not wear blue jeans in public. Destiny made a great point on how far you can go with this line of thought, what about "nuke", "kill", "massacre" etc? Hell, for a world war 2 survivor of the nazi camps I'd guess even the word "shower" can be traumatic if you go on this tangent of though. Context is all that mattters, words no matter what else they can describe are just there to put a point across. The context in which "rape" is being used in gaming for me coveys a very precise emotion of such an overwhelming victory that boosts your ego in a way only online gaming can. And saying that you raped or are going to rape someone in this context is far less disrespectfull or hurtfull to the individual than just blankly labeling them as an idiot. I'm sorry if it seems like I'm ignoring your entire post, but are you kidding me? Calling someone a retard is not just labeling them an idiot, I honestly don't even want to go far into this subject. Clearly from your text it seems that you don't have a family member/close friend that suffers from mental retardation, why is it ok to label rape as offensive/shouldnt be used in a kiddingly way while retard is ok to joke around with? I hope you can open your mind to other aspects of the world, I myself have a close family member who suffers from the disease, and does his best to go on with his life. Where is context ok, is where I would respond to you. If the term 'rape' isnt allowed to be used around in a jokingly fashion then why is 'retard' or 'retarded' allowed to be used? Why is it ok for some to be defensive about the term/action rape, but not retard, or other forms of insults that have conveyed themselves into insults/jokes/modern language? Using retard is a FAR more offensive term to me, but I suppose that is because I have respect for those who weren't as well set off as the rest of us from birth, while rape is a violent, terrible act, having mental problems is such a tough challenge in life. | ||
svarog
46 Posts
June 03 2011 08:29 GMT
#24755
On June 03 2011 17:06 SSLPrism wrote: Show nested quote + On June 03 2011 16:39 svarog wrote: On June 03 2011 14:03 Harrow wrote: On June 03 2011 12:38 masterchip27 wrote: If you're not asking for censorship, then do you still think it is wrong for me to use the term "rape" describing a game with a friend who takes 0 offense to it and is not misogynist? If you think it's wrong, then it sure sounds like you're asking for people to censor themselves, if not, then I'd tend to agree with you. One person can't ask another person to "censor themselves" since censorship involved some kind of governing or controlling body to impose a rule on expression. This isn't a debate about censorship and I wish people would stop trying to paint it as some kind of FREE SPEECH AMERICA FUCK YEAH thing. I don't think it should be illegal for you to say "dude I raped that protoss" to one guy in a room. It doesn't necessarily do any harm either, but I think more people should question their use of the word in a world in which one in six women are raped at least once in their lifetime (and one in 33 men). Rape is woefully prevalent and terrifyingly under-prosecuted, which indicates that somehow it's far more legitimized and taken far less seriously than it should be. That culture is the context and the debate is about whether or not we should be using words and concepts in a way that downplays their significance. Of COURSE context matters; if I climb into bed and whisper "rape" quietly into my pillow, no fairies cry. But if someone like Destiny broadcasts a rape joke to thousands of people, could he cause immediate and actual harm to a listener who happens to be a rape survivor with post-traumatic stress disorder and related psychological triggers? It's very possible. And if that isn't happening, is he playing his part in a culture that allows rape to happen too often and doesn't punish it frequently enough or harshly enough? Obviously I accept that that's debatable. But I say yes, to a small degree. And choosing a different fucking word is a pretty small price to pay to be safe. It's not like saying "rape" is an hilariously original joke at this point. I take issue with a lot of what you say here. I'd find it rather disturbing if you were whispering "rape" quietly into your pillow, and I'd have no problem if you used it publicly in a non-sexual context, or just like you used the word "fuck" at the end of your post. The reasoning that some rape victim might hear the word, get offended, hurt and suffer a psychological trigger event is idiotic in my opinion. This reasoning is equal to me saying that everybody that I know owns at least one pair of blue jeans, therefore there is high probability that rape victims have been raped by someone wearing a pair of blue jeans, and in conclusion we should all just not wear blue jeans in public. Destiny made a great point on how far you can go with this line of thought, what about "nuke", "kill", "massacre" etc? Hell, for a world war 2 survivor of the nazi camps I'd guess even the word "shower" can be traumatic if you go on this tangent of though. Context is all that mattters, words no matter what else they can describe are just there to put a point across. The context in which "rape" is being used in gaming for me coveys a very precise emotion of such an overwhelming victory that boosts your ego in a way only online gaming can. And saying that you raped or are going to rape someone in this context is far less disrespectfull or hurtfull to the individual than just blankly labeling them as an idiot. I'm sorry if it seems like I'm ignoring your entire post, but are you kidding me? Calling someone a retard is not just labeling them an idiot, I honestly don't even want to go far into this subject. Clearly from your text it seems that you don't have a family member/close friend that suffers from mental retardation, why is it ok to label rape as offensive/shouldnt be used in a kiddingly way while retard is ok to joke around with? I hope you can open your mind to other aspects of the world, I myself have a close family member who suffers from the disease, and does his best to go on with his life. Where is context ok, is where I would respond to you. If the term 'rape' isnt allowed to be used around in a jokingly fashion then why is 'retard' or 'retarded' allowed to be used? Why is it ok for some to be defensive about the term/action rape, but not retard, or other forms of insults that have conveyed themselves into insults/jokes/modern language? Using retard is a FAR more offensive term to me, but I suppose that is because I have respect for those who weren't as well set off as the rest of us from birth, while rape is a violent, terrible act, having mental problems is such a tough challenge in life. I agree, calling someone idiot is far more dismissive and/or offensive than using the word rape to describe something. But look, noone is celebrating because of the fact that there are people with disabilities when they use such words to push a compeltely different point across. If I say that something/someone is retarded I am not making a case that they suffer from a mental disability (or whatever the politicaly correct term is) it isn't even a stab at mentally retarded people, it is a joke/stab at the other person's opinions or actions, and by coloring them to the extreme we can describe our thoughts and beliefs better. And this is the point that I am trying to make. If people need to change something, it is not the way they talk and what words they use but rather they should just learn to pay more attention to the context and intent of the post/discussion and not just rage off on the first word that out of context is derogatory. If this is acheived we get still to have colorfull use of words, interesting debates and mutual respect. And if we go down the road the SOTG crew suggested then we just ignore the issue alltogether, people will still find some other words to be outraged about, context will still be ignored and with that every point that you're trying to push across and explain gets lost due to semantics. | ||
DR.Ham
Netherlands621 Posts
June 03 2011 08:43 GMT
#24756
On June 03 2011 17:29 svarog wrote: Show nested quote + On June 03 2011 17:06 SSLPrism wrote: On June 03 2011 16:39 svarog wrote: On June 03 2011 14:03 Harrow wrote: On June 03 2011 12:38 masterchip27 wrote: If you're not asking for censorship, then do you still think it is wrong for me to use the term "rape" describing a game with a friend who takes 0 offense to it and is not misogynist? If you think it's wrong, then it sure sounds like you're asking for people to censor themselves, if not, then I'd tend to agree with you. One person can't ask another person to "censor themselves" since censorship involved some kind of governing or controlling body to impose a rule on expression. This isn't a debate about censorship and I wish people would stop trying to paint it as some kind of FREE SPEECH AMERICA FUCK YEAH thing. I don't think it should be illegal for you to say "dude I raped that protoss" to one guy in a room. It doesn't necessarily do any harm either, but I think more people should question their use of the word in a world in which one in six women are raped at least once in their lifetime (and one in 33 men). Rape is woefully prevalent and terrifyingly under-prosecuted, which indicates that somehow it's far more legitimized and taken far less seriously than it should be. That culture is the context and the debate is about whether or not we should be using words and concepts in a way that downplays their significance. Of COURSE context matters; if I climb into bed and whisper "rape" quietly into my pillow, no fairies cry. But if someone like Destiny broadcasts a rape joke to thousands of people, could he cause immediate and actual harm to a listener who happens to be a rape survivor with post-traumatic stress disorder and related psychological triggers? It's very possible. And if that isn't happening, is he playing his part in a culture that allows rape to happen too often and doesn't punish it frequently enough or harshly enough? Obviously I accept that that's debatable. But I say yes, to a small degree. And choosing a different fucking word is a pretty small price to pay to be safe. It's not like saying "rape" is an hilariously original joke at this point. I take issue with a lot of what you say here. I'd find it rather disturbing if you were whispering "rape" quietly into your pillow, and I'd have no problem if you used it publicly in a non-sexual context, or just like you used the word "fuck" at the end of your post. The reasoning that some rape victim might hear the word, get offended, hurt and suffer a psychological trigger event is idiotic in my opinion. This reasoning is equal to me saying that everybody that I know owns at least one pair of blue jeans, therefore there is high probability that rape victims have been raped by someone wearing a pair of blue jeans, and in conclusion we should all just not wear blue jeans in public. Destiny made a great point on how far you can go with this line of thought, what about "nuke", "kill", "massacre" etc? Hell, for a world war 2 survivor of the nazi camps I'd guess even the word "shower" can be traumatic if you go on this tangent of though. Context is all that mattters, words no matter what else they can describe are just there to put a point across. The context in which "rape" is being used in gaming for me coveys a very precise emotion of such an overwhelming victory that boosts your ego in a way only online gaming can. And saying that you raped or are going to rape someone in this context is far less disrespectfull or hurtfull to the individual than just blankly labeling them as an idiot. I'm sorry if it seems like I'm ignoring your entire post, but are you kidding me? Calling someone a retard is not just labeling them an idiot, I honestly don't even want to go far into this subject. Clearly from your text it seems that you don't have a family member/close friend that suffers from mental retardation, why is it ok to label rape as offensive/shouldnt be used in a kiddingly way while retard is ok to joke around with? I hope you can open your mind to other aspects of the world, I myself have a close family member who suffers from the disease, and does his best to go on with his life. Where is context ok, is where I would respond to you. If the term 'rape' isnt allowed to be used around in a jokingly fashion then why is 'retard' or 'retarded' allowed to be used? Why is it ok for some to be defensive about the term/action rape, but not retard, or other forms of insults that have conveyed themselves into insults/jokes/modern language? Using retard is a FAR more offensive term to me, but I suppose that is because I have respect for those who weren't as well set off as the rest of us from birth, while rape is a violent, terrible act, having mental problems is such a tough challenge in life. I agree, calling someone idiot is far more dismissive and/or offensive than using the word rape to describe something. But look, noone is celebrating because of the fact that there are people with disabilities when they use such words to push a compeltely different point across. If I say that something/someone is retarded I am not making a case that they suffer from a mental disability (or whatever the politicaly correct term is) it isn't even a stab at mentally retarded people, it is a joke/stab at the other person's opinions or actions, and by coloring them to the extreme we can describe our thoughts and beliefs better. And this is the point that I am trying to make. If people need to change something, it is not the way they talk and what words they use but rather they should just learn to pay more attention to the context and intent of the post/discussion and not just rage off on the first word that out of context is derogatory. If this is acheived we get still to have colorfull use of words, interesting debates and mutual respect. And if we go down the road the SOTG crew suggested then we just ignore the issue alltogether, people will still find some other words to be outraged about, context will still be ignored and with that every point that you're trying to push across and explain gets lost due to semantics. The problem with your line of thinking here is that calling someone retarded is 100% a slight against people who do suffer from mental retardation. You are using a term which refers to a specific group of people as the negative in your attack. I agree your obviously not meaning to be offensive to that group, but the fact is in your example you are. | ||
Blitz Beat
United States178 Posts
June 03 2011 08:50 GMT
#24757
On June 03 2011 17:06 SSLPrism wrote: Show nested quote + On June 03 2011 16:39 svarog wrote: On June 03 2011 14:03 Harrow wrote: On June 03 2011 12:38 masterchip27 wrote: If you're not asking for censorship, then do you still think it is wrong for me to use the term "rape" describing a game with a friend who takes 0 offense to it and is not misogynist? If you think it's wrong, then it sure sounds like you're asking for people to censor themselves, if not, then I'd tend to agree with you. One person can't ask another person to "censor themselves" since censorship involved some kind of governing or controlling body to impose a rule on expression. This isn't a debate about censorship and I wish people would stop trying to paint it as some kind of FREE SPEECH AMERICA FUCK YEAH thing. I don't think it should be illegal for you to say "dude I raped that protoss" to one guy in a room. It doesn't necessarily do any harm either, but I think more people should question their use of the word in a world in which one in six women are raped at least once in their lifetime (and one in 33 men). Rape is woefully prevalent and terrifyingly under-prosecuted, which indicates that somehow it's far more legitimized and taken far less seriously than it should be. That culture is the context and the debate is about whether or not we should be using words and concepts in a way that downplays their significance. Of COURSE context matters; if I climb into bed and whisper "rape" quietly into my pillow, no fairies cry. But if someone like Destiny broadcasts a rape joke to thousands of people, could he cause immediate and actual harm to a listener who happens to be a rape survivor with post-traumatic stress disorder and related psychological triggers? It's very possible. And if that isn't happening, is he playing his part in a culture that allows rape to happen too often and doesn't punish it frequently enough or harshly enough? Obviously I accept that that's debatable. But I say yes, to a small degree. And choosing a different fucking word is a pretty small price to pay to be safe. It's not like saying "rape" is an hilariously original joke at this point. I take issue with a lot of what you say here. I'd find it rather disturbing if you were whispering "rape" quietly into your pillow, and I'd have no problem if you used it publicly in a non-sexual context, or just like you used the word "fuck" at the end of your post. The reasoning that some rape victim might hear the word, get offended, hurt and suffer a psychological trigger event is idiotic in my opinion. This reasoning is equal to me saying that everybody that I know owns at least one pair of blue jeans, therefore there is high probability that rape victims have been raped by someone wearing a pair of blue jeans, and in conclusion we should all just not wear blue jeans in public. Destiny made a great point on how far you can go with this line of thought, what about "nuke", "kill", "massacre" etc? Hell, for a world war 2 survivor of the nazi camps I'd guess even the word "shower" can be traumatic if you go on this tangent of though. Context is all that mattters, words no matter what else they can describe are just there to put a point across. The context in which "rape" is being used in gaming for me coveys a very precise emotion of such an overwhelming victory that boosts your ego in a way only online gaming can. And saying that you raped or are going to rape someone in this context is far less disrespectfull or hurtfull to the individual than just blankly labeling them as an idiot. I'm sorry if it seems like I'm ignoring your entire post, but are you kidding me? Calling someone a retard is not just labeling them an idiot, I honestly don't even want to go far into this subject. Clearly from your text it seems that you don't have a family member/close friend that suffers from mental retardation, why is it ok to label rape as offensive/shouldnt be used in a kiddingly way while retard is ok to joke around with? I hope you can open your mind to other aspects of the world, I myself have a close family member who suffers from the disease, and does his best to go on with his life. Where is context ok, is where I would respond to you. If the term 'rape' isnt allowed to be used around in a jokingly fashion then why is 'retard' or 'retarded' allowed to be used? Why is it ok for some to be defensive about the term/action rape, but not retard, or other forms of insults that have conveyed themselves into insults/jokes/modern language? Using retard is a FAR more offensive term to me, but I suppose that is because I have respect for those who weren't as well set off as the rest of us from birth, while rape is a violent, terrible act, having mental problems is such a tough challenge in life. i agree with you personally to an extent. objectively, however, there is no way to rank which words are more offensive than others because its purely subjective. you say your piece to someone who was raped and they'll say otherwise. if you use the word "gay" or "faggot" as a slang in front of a truly homosexual individual and they'll find that more offensive than "retarded". the only way to clean this language problem up is to go to the two extremes: clean up ALL slang / derogatory language or allow for almost anything. there is no middle ground because where do you draw the line? you can't because the line is subjective to every individual. this is where incontrol becomes a total hypocrite and the origin of the shitstorm. as he is explaining his side, he uses words like fuck and the n word liberally. (not even destiny used the n word i believe, just him). he goes on to tell others to shut the fuck up and continues to use crude language. he implies that he's right and that everyone else should try to emulate his standards and tolerance levels as he disregards everyone elses. and with that, this shitstorm of perspectives and 'this is worse than this' starts as everyone else argues that their standards are better than everyone elses. by the way, i'm not saying rape > retard or retard > rape in terms of whats worse >_> they're both pretty bad | ||
![]()
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
June 03 2011 08:51 GMT
#24758
–verb (used with object) 1. to make slow; delay the development or progress of (an action, process, etc.); hinder or impede. The word "retarded" isn't solely used to describe people with mental retardation or disability. It can be used in other unrelated contexts as well. Can a better, less politically incorrect (seriously, I hate this PC bullshit, but I understand why people go with it) word be used? Yeah, sure. But just because someone uses the word "retard" or "retarded", doesn't mean they are talking about, insulting, disparaging, etc, the mentally handicapped. They COULD be using it in a contextually appropriate way. For example: "His strategy was retarded by that gas steal" I understand that people will RARELY, if ever, use the term retard correctly, but that doesn't mean that everyone who uses the word is an insensitive jerk. They may just know what the word means. But yeah some people really are jerks. Context context. | ||
DR.Ham
Netherlands621 Posts
June 03 2011 08:58 GMT
#24759
On June 03 2011 17:51 lichter wrote: retard –verb (used with object) 1. to make slow; delay the development or progress of (an action, process, etc.); hinder or impede. The word "retarded" isn't solely used to describe people with mental retardation or disability. It can be used in other unrelated contexts as well. Can a better, less politically incorrect (seriously, I hate this PC bullshit, but I understand why people go with it) word be used? Yeah, sure. But just because someone uses the word "retard" or "retarded", doesn't mean they are talking about, insulting, disparaging, etc, the mentally handicapped. They COULD be using it in a contextually appropriate way. For example: "His strategy was retarded by that gas steal" I understand that people will RARELY, if ever, use the term retard correctly, but that doesn't mean that everyone who uses the word is an insensitive jerk. They may just know what the word means. But yeah some people really are jerks. Context context. Very good point sir, but I think that when most people say that something is retarded, gay etc., they are meaning the more general negative versions of the word. I'm not saying don't use the words full stop, but that people should be mindful is all. Context and meaning are all important in most cases, obviously with some exceptions. | ||
flodeskum
Iceland1267 Posts
June 03 2011 09:02 GMT
#24760
On June 02 2011 17:19 Maliris wrote: Show nested quote + On June 02 2011 17:14 freetgy wrote: On June 02 2011 17:05 Maliris wrote: incontrol is definitely not on the same level as demuslim and idra, make all the excuses you want for him mlg says otherwise, but i guess that due to imbalance ![]() top4 mlg after cheesing everyone is the same as top8 in the GSL? Interesting ![]() Oh fuck off, I saw most of his matches at mlg. The one series people refer to is vs TLO but those games weren't cheesy at all. TLO should have scouted the damn pylon in his base and then he did a risky build on ST IIRC and lost to a strong push. Inc did really well at MLG and is clearly a very good player. Every single pro would agree that he is near the top in NA. This doesn't change when he says some stupid shit. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft: Brood War ggaemo Dota 2![]() Sea ![]() Larva ![]() Nal_rA ![]() Jaedong ![]() TY ![]() firebathero ![]() BeSt ![]() Mong ![]() EffOrt ![]() [ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH346 StarCraft: Brood War• davetesta24 • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s Dota 2 |
WardiTV European League
MaNa vs NightPhoenix
ByuN vs YoungYakov
ShoWTimE vs Nicoract
Harstem vs ArT
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs TBD
WardiTV European League
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs TBD
WardiTV European League
Wardi Open
[ Show More ] OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
|
|