Moon vs Artosis - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
gihan84
United States10 Posts
| ||
|
Rojam
Germany234 Posts
On March 02 2010 22:25 Artosis wrote: oh does replay not start on right speed? oops. and this was played on the asian server. moon does NOT play on the us server. It's not the moon from US beta obviously, but are you certain it's the real moon Artosis ? It's really hard to believe right now ![]() | ||
|
Zurles
United Kingdom1659 Posts
| ||
|
oob
Sweden630 Posts
| ||
|
Artosis
United States2140 Posts
| ||
|
fabiano
Brazil4644 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
|
mmp
United States2130 Posts
| ||
|
PfiliTehDwarf
Germany66 Posts
| ||
|
Jarvs
Australia639 Posts
Regardless, nice win by Artosis. | ||
|
HalfAmazing
Netherlands402 Posts
| ||
|
Eeevil
Netherlands359 Posts
Second long game I see played where Terran isn't Mueling like mad but goes for defense. BTW, WTF do those terran turrets shoot, Peanuts ? The disregard the Z player had for those things was appalling. Hopefully damage done will be lowered across all races so that turrets have more time to actually provide support. (not to mention all those spontaneously combusting armies in battles)) | ||
|
DorF
Sweden961 Posts
| ||
|
iFU.pauline
France1695 Posts
| ||
|
Lefnui
United States753 Posts
On March 03 2010 01:33 paulinepain wrote: i played vs moon it took me 10min to take him down, and i really suck, w3 players got serious issue with speed and expanding, they aren't a threat at all. But i have to give credit that they are good at surrounding unit LLLLL>>>OOO>>>>>LLLLL Which is why Warcraft III players are at the top of many divisions, right? And I'd like to see you against Kiwi. | ||
|
Jarvs
Australia639 Posts
On March 03 2010 01:33 paulinepain wrote: i played vs moon it took me 10min to take him down, and i really suck, w3 players got serious issue with speed and expanding, they aren't a threat at all. But i have to give credit that they are good at surrounding unit LLLLL>>>OOO>>>>>LLLLL You're kidding right? Do I really need to name all the war3 players that are doing exceptionally well in the beta? | ||
|
Ahzz
Finland780 Posts
On March 03 2010 01:50 Jarvs wrote: You're kidding right? Do I really need to name all the war3 players that are doing exceptionally well in the beta? Do I need to start naming how many times more SC gamers there are who are doing FAR better in the beta? | ||
|
wintergt
Belgium1335 Posts
On March 03 2010 01:33 paulinepain wrote: i played vs moon it took me 10min to take him down, and i really suck, w3 players got serious issue with speed and expanding, they aren't a threat at all. But i have to give credit that they are good at surrounding unit LLLLL>>>OOO>>>>>LLLLL let me guess you played vs the fake moon on the US server and not the real one on the Asian server.LLOOOLL | ||
|
SwaY-
Dominican Republic463 Posts
| ||
|
Orlandu
China2450 Posts
On March 03 2010 01:58 Ahzz wrote: Do I need to start naming how many times more SC gamers there are who are doing FAR better in the beta? Why would you try to encourage an irrelevant (and ignorant) debate like that? Clearly there are War3 players at the very top (KiWiKaKi for example), so your statement is obviously wrong and biased, but aside from that, it's also pretty clear that the playing field is pretty level right now. Even if it wasn't, there are a multitude of reasons why such an argument is silly right now. Why are people always looking to fight about the games? The guy you quoted wasn't even saying anything negative about StarCraft players, he was just responding to a guy who clearly hasn't read the thread and is just wanting to cause trouble. | ||
| ||
