• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:25
CEST 06:25
KST 13:25
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-67SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-64PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August)11Neeb returns to progaming; rejoins ONSYDE17
StarCraft 2
General
State of the Game podcast archive? Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard" Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Neeb returns to progaming; rejoins ONSYDE SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 2/8
Tourneys
Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25) SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-6 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance
Brood War
General
[Personal Project Share] Terran Defense v0.60 ASL22 General Discussion Data needed BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-6 2v2v2v2 Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament - Season 3
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The Clem Fan Club INnoVation Fan Club The Scarlett Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
What is a Gamer?
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 4623 users

Beta Balance Update #10 - Page 62

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
1835 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 60 61 62 63 64 92 Next
Sapphire.lux
Profile Joined July 2010
Romania2620 Posts
December 20 2012 12:13 GMT
#1221
On December 20 2012 21:07 najreteip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2012 19:23 Gimmeurladderpoints wrote:
On December 20 2012 19:07 summerloud wrote:
On December 20 2012 18:36 Zombo Joe wrote:
On December 20 2012 18:32 phodacbiet wrote:
On December 20 2012 17:49 Scrubwave wrote:
On December 20 2012 17:22 Xanbatou wrote:
You guys need to to calm down. It's a beta and they are clearly testing numbers. Did you actually think the infestor nerf was final? Moreover, do you actually think any of the units right now are final? They are just tweaking numbers. Its obvious that fungal is a little too strong right now. I think if they just decrease the speed to like 12 or something, it should be fine.



Whoa, easy there, we don't want to overnerf infestors.


Yeah seriously, infestors are really underused atm if you nerf it even more no one will use it. I think David Kim should make Fungal kill everything in one hit and have same range as tempest since tempest are out ranging them! Then fungal will be balanced! But seriously... i think blizzard "internal testing team" plays WoW instead of testing sc2.


Dustin Browder himself did say his favorite thing to do is make WoW quests.

WoW quests aren't exactly known for being engaging through story and gameplay.


i didnt think my respect for DB could drop anymore before i read this... this guy is just too good to be true... hes like a movie villain at this point...

WoW quest: go and destroy 10 rocks for me


Starcraft, Legacy of the Void: Go and destroy ten rocks for me. Then build an expansion


This post shows how ignorant you really are!
Dustin Browder would never make you destroy rocks

Yes he does. You destroy rocks, and then other rocks with more HP appear.
Head Coach Park: "They should buff tanks!"
Sigmur
Profile Joined August 2010
Poland497 Posts
December 20 2012 12:15 GMT
#1222
He will just add a third resource: rocks.
Cost of CC: 400m 0g 50rocks
And you will get them dunno, from destroying them?
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
December 20 2012 12:23 GMT
#1223
On December 20 2012 21:15 Sigmur wrote:
He will just add a third resource: rocks.
Cost of CC: 400m 0g 50rocks
And you will get them dunno, from destroying them?


No, you will get 1 rock if you kill an enemy unit firing at rocks. Rocks will be placed in all expand locations, so each team plays a constant game of trying to destroy rocks while trying to stop the other from destroying rocks because both are required to expand.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Ameisenmann
Profile Joined April 2012
Albania296 Posts
December 20 2012 12:55 GMT
#1224
I've been thinking about an idea how fungal could be changed.

What if it would target the ground instead of units, and the root would be changed to a heavy slow effect that affects all units in the "fungaled" aread? Maybe it could then be adjusted in some other area to compensate. That would make fungal more of an area control ability, and obviously it would include more micro and positioning from both players.

Good idea or am I forgetting something terribly obvious?
Psychobabas
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
2531 Posts
December 20 2012 13:11 GMT
#1225
I just cant believe that Fungal still deals freeze instead of slow to a unit.

Its so fucking overpowered, pretty much instant death.

Even progamers streaming dont even bother trying to save whatever got fungaled and just carry on macroing/ doing other stuff. "Oh my medivacs got fungaled, well better try to secure the third now since no amount of splitting will can save them whatsoever."
Mysticesper
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1183 Posts
December 20 2012 13:42 GMT
#1226
I see three things:

1. remove energy upgrade
2. Make fungal unable to kill a unit (plague -> possibly more damage over a longer period of time too with this)
3. Make fungal a snare
4. possibly combine 2 and 3.


It's not so much fungal growth itself, it's the ability to chain fungals with pretty much a 100% success rate. I see David Kim's point, but it seems like a very convoluted way to put a bandaid over chain fungals.
_indigo_
Profile Joined August 2010
Slovenia171 Posts
December 20 2012 13:47 GMT
#1227
On December 20 2012 22:42 Mysticesper wrote:
I see three things:

1. remove energy upgrade
2. Make fungal unable to kill a unit (plague -> possibly more damage over a longer period of time too with this)
3. Make fungal a snare
4. possibly combine 2 and 3.


It's not so much fungal growth itself, it's the ability to chain fungals with pretty much a 100% success rate. I see David Kim's point, but it seems like a very convoluted way to put a bandaid over chain fungals.


Another possibility is to make fungal an AOE buff to own units for XY seconds.
I have seen it all, and everything is just as senseless as chasing the wind.
Ramiz1989
Profile Joined July 2012
12124 Posts
December 20 2012 13:50 GMT
#1228
On December 20 2012 20:07 Zombo Joe wrote:
Honestly the speed upgrade on medivacs sounds plain retarded. Just make it a direct movement speed upgrade instead of an ability gimmick.

Medivacs used to be a lot faster before they got nerfed early on WoL.

Mostly because the maps consisted of steppes of war.

By a lot faster, you mean 2,75 speed instead of 2,5?

Yeah, a lot faster...
"I've been to hell and back, and back to hell…and back. This time, I've brought Hell back with me."
winsonsonho
Profile Joined October 2012
Korea (South)143 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-20 13:57:00
December 20 2012 13:54 GMT
#1229
As much as I hate fungal, we need to remember that the infestor isn't going to be the all around amazing unit that it was in wol.. Those infested terran are never going to be the same again. The die more easily and upgrades don't help them. That's huge.

Fungal should still be strong in the same way that storm and emp are strong. However, I also agree with most that it shouldn't completely negate micro post-fungal. At least now it can be microed against before it lands. Also, because of the delay between casting and landing the spell, it makes it harder to get as many units accurately fungalled..

I rate maybe slightly more damage and a 70-80% slow would make a lot of people happier and would make chain fungalling slightly less potent. Another idea I've been thinking of is that fungal could initially stop movement, but then fungalled units slowly regain their speed over the duration of the spell. Thoughts anyone?
summerloud
Profile Joined March 2010
Austria1201 Posts
December 20 2012 14:00 GMT
#1230
what they should really do with fungal if they want it to fix mutas in zvz:

-fungal growth now instant again instead of projectile
-fungal growth casting range decreased to 8
-fungal growth can now be cast while burrowed
-fungal growth now slows units by 50% instead of rooting them
-fungal growth now grounds light air units, making them attackable by ground units, or outright killing them if caught over unpassable terrain

there, i fixed it. fungal now still shuts down phoenix, oracle and muta, helping zerg anti-air. at the same time fungal doesnt ruin the game any more



i would post it at the beta forum but im at work and paranoid blizzard mechanics insta-lock my account due to "suspicious activity" when i log into the forums from a different IP

i contacted blizzard support and got a reply along the line from a gamemaster stating he couldnt locate me in WoW (i have no wow account) and that any problems are due to mists of pandaria launch

the fuck...?
SnipedSoul
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada2158 Posts
December 20 2012 14:03 GMT
#1231
On December 20 2012 21:10 nucleo wrote:
so... build rocks to support foundations for expansion? (:


Show nested quote +
Mass Ghost = Mass HT > Mass Infestor

is this even serious? Oo
how so?


Those villainous SC2 players keep destroying our rocks. I have tasked you with stopping them.

Mass ghost probably can beat mass infestor. The problem is that ghosts are horrible against everything else whereas infestors are wtfbbq awesome against everything else.
Jumonji
Profile Joined May 2011
France60 Posts
December 20 2012 14:04 GMT
#1232
Indigo make a point here: The fact that fungal couldn't kill unit is quite good give him this "nerf" and a 9 range, a slight speed nerf and it's ok to me
Insoleet
Profile Joined May 2012
France1806 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-20 14:28:16
December 20 2012 14:27 GMT
#1233
On December 20 2012 22:47 _indigo_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2012 22:42 Mysticesper wrote:
I see three things:

1. remove energy upgrade
2. Make fungal unable to kill a unit (plague -> possibly more damage over a longer period of time too with this)
3. Make fungal a snare
4. possibly combine 2 and 3.


It's not so much fungal growth itself, it's the ability to chain fungals with pretty much a 100% success rate. I see David Kim's point, but it seems like a very convoluted way to put a bandaid over chain fungals.


Another possibility is to make fungal an AOE buff to own units for XY seconds.


I agree, the problem is the chainfungle because of the root.

Obviously they need to do a slow. I dont understand why they dont listen to the community...

Fungles which wouldnt kill units could be good too. They need to try the 2 different nerfs and see how it goes...
Kitaen
Profile Joined June 2011
Austria466 Posts
December 20 2012 14:53 GMT
#1234
make emp "dispell" fungal; could be justified by saying "electric shock causes roots to be shaken off" or smth like that

that would make the ghost a viable unit in tvz again
Umpteen
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United Kingdom1570 Posts
December 20 2012 14:54 GMT
#1235
It would be fun if fungal glued affected units together, but did not otherwise impede their movement (or maybe a mild slow). So if you fungaled two marines right next to each other they would have to move around in lockstep. If you fungaled two marines who were a distance apart, they wouldn't stick unless they got close to each other before the spell ended. The spell could last longer (although you could make the DPS part of the spell happen over the first 4 seconds).

That way you can use fungal to prevent splitting versus banelings, prevent movement through chokes (you're stuck in a big lump and can't fit through), glue marines to sieged tanks to stop them moving... lots of opportunities for cool stuff rather than *blork* - stuck in place no matter what. Fungaling an army right out in the open wouldn't lock them in place at all.
The existence of a food chain is inescapable if we evolved unsupervised, and inexcusable otherwise.
Insoleet
Profile Joined May 2012
France1806 Posts
December 20 2012 15:04 GMT
#1236
On December 20 2012 23:54 Umpteen wrote:
It would be fun if fungal glued affected units together, but did not otherwise impede their movement (or maybe a mild slow). So if you fungaled two marines right next to each other they would have to move around in lockstep. If you fungaled two marines who were a distance apart, they wouldn't stick unless they got close to each other before the spell ended. The spell could last longer (although you could make the DPS part of the spell happen over the first 4 seconds).

That way you can use fungal to prevent splitting versus banelings, prevent movement through chokes (you're stuck in a big lump and can't fit through), glue marines to sieged tanks to stop them moving... lots of opportunities for cool stuff rather than *blork* - stuck in place no matter what. Fungaling an army right out in the open wouldn't lock them in place at all.



OMG This is the best idea i've ever read about the fungle ! :D

Would be a so much more interesting spell !

NeonFox
Profile Joined January 2011
2373 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-20 15:12:16
December 20 2012 15:10 GMT
#1237
On December 20 2012 22:42 Mysticesper wrote:
I see three things:

1. remove energy upgrade
2. Make fungal unable to kill a unit (plague -> possibly more damage over a longer period of time too with this)
3. Make fungal a snare
4. possibly combine 2 and 3.


It's not so much fungal growth itself, it's the ability to chain fungals with pretty much a 100% success rate. I see David Kim's point, but it seems like a very convoluted way to put a bandaid over chain fungals.


The snare is the best way to go at it imo, coupled with a projectile with a speed between 10 and 15. The energy upgrade is pretty important, zergs need that midgame fungal, it's once they have 10 infestors rooting everything in place and that broodlord army that it becomes stupid.

I feel they are so close to finding the correct way, keep the projectile, make it slower than 15 speed and please, please try the snare everyone is asking for. At least try it, that's the point of a beta.
FeyFey
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany10114 Posts
December 20 2012 15:28 GMT
#1238
still would go for unchainable Fungal, most op spell should be hardest to use. And as long as commands are blocked while fungaled it will be hard to evade another fungal from hitting. Atleast for me it would make fungaling continuously or avoiding it interesting.

But I like blinking in Stalker teams to snipe Infestors and then doing a sidestep first. Fungal wasn't the real issue anyway, the biggest has been the Infested Terrans vs Toss. But that chain fungal outrange so much stuff and was way to easy to execute once you hit something makes the spell boring to watch, as it is almost impossible to stop the chain. And yeah in beat em ups it is awesome to have an unbeatable chains, but normally you can dodge the first punch and the opponent needs perfect timing to keep up. And when you see Zergs chain Fungal they often lose around 5-10ish damage, so far from perfect hehe.

Wish they would get rid of the lock for issuing commands while fungaled.
Rollora
Profile Joined February 2012
2450 Posts
December 20 2012 15:43 GMT
#1239
On December 20 2012 21:15 Sigmur wrote:
He will just add a third resource: rocks.
Cost of CC: 400m 0g 50rocks
And you will get them dunno, from destroying them?

you do know that the game is designed around the rock paper scissors principle?
OGzan
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States289 Posts
December 20 2012 16:03 GMT
#1240
Blizzard just doesn't listen to the community at all, such horrible business practice.
(Zan) :: http://www.twitch.tv/byzantiumsc :: Terran Player currently teamless ::
Prev 1 60 61 62 63 64 92 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
SEL Masters #7
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft610
RuFF_SC2 181
Nina 70
FoxeR 43
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 3634
GuemChi 2256
Shuttle 410
JYJ 397
Leta 294
ggaemo 158
Hyun 71
Noble 34
Purpose 11
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm192
League of Legends
JimRising 691
Counter-Strike
summit1g8601
tarik_tv2606
Coldzera 1359
m0e_tv442
Other Games
hungrybox1356
C9.Mang0370
PiGStarcraft303
ViBE131
Maynarde116
ToD33
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick763
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 63
• practicex 26
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 9
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1221
• Lourlo1036
• Stunt305
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
5h 35m
OSC
5h 35m
INu's Battles
6h 35m
Percival vs Cure
Classic vs Clem
Replay Cast
19h 35m
Escore
1d 5h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 6h
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs SHIN
Clem vs Solar
Serral vs Rogue
RSL Revival
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
The Patches Monday
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
PiG Sty Festival
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-08-04
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
Acropolis #5
RSL Revival: Season 6
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W6
Escore Tournament S3: W7
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
Thunderpick World Champ.
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.