| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS |
|
KrazyTrumpet
United States2520 Posts
On September 08 2012 06:56 pmp10 wrote: Their purpose was always to manage back-stabs base-trades and flanks. Ironically they will do it best by countering air units. idk, with the now pitiful splash damage and the fact that they still cost minerals/gas/supply mines seem incredibly underwhelming now | ||
|
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
I am a Prophet! I knew they will lower the damage of the Locusts from 16 to 14! HA! And I really like the Viper change, I also knew that the Blinding Cloud will be buffed. Warhound change seems good, they won't have as much dps anymore, but don't know if it is enough. We will see, there will be a tons of more patches. Overall, quite happy. | ||
|
Uhh Negative
United States1090 Posts
| ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12027 Posts
On September 08 2012 06:57 KrazyTrumpet wrote: idk, with the now pitiful splash damage and the fact that they still cost minerals/gas/supply mines seem incredibly underwhelming now Exactly. They could make them cost 50 minerals, you get 2 like with zerglings and build on reactor and nobody would mind. | ||
|
pmp10
3394 Posts
On September 08 2012 06:57 KrazyTrumpet wrote: idk, with the now pitiful splash damage and the fact that they still cost minerals/gas/supply mines seem incredibly underwhelming now Against ground unit it may look that way. But just imagine what they can do to a group of clumped mutas or overlords full of roaches. | ||
|
urashimakt
United States1591 Posts
| ||
|
Seiniyta
Belgium1815 Posts
On September 08 2012 07:00 pmp10 wrote: Against ground unit it may look that way. But just imagine what they can do to a group of clumped mutas or overlords full of roaches. having a single mine behind every mineral line can also be really handy to defend pesky little drops. | ||
|
testthewest
Germany274 Posts
On September 08 2012 06:09 purakushi wrote: A nice start to testing balances, I guess, but I wish haywire missiles was not autocastable.  But aren't there some situations were autocast is bad? Let's say you fight an toss army of stalkers and some immortals. If you could target the haywire missles yourself, you could a-move into the stalker, firing the regular shots against them, and manually target the immortals with the missles (instead of wasting regular shots on hardend shields). | ||
|
larse
1611 Posts
It still has 13.6 DPS with normal attack, and 18.6 DPS with missile. It has 220 HP. It's 2 supply and cost 25/25 more than stalker. While stalker has 6.7 DPS, 160 HP, and 2 supply. And roach has 8 DPS, 145 HP, and 2 supply. And it kites like crazy with their normal attack range of 7 and missile range of 10. It's fucking longer than colossus. | ||
|
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
If banelings dont damage each other with splash I dont see why mines should | ||
|
SarcasmMonster
3136 Posts
| ||
|
pmp10
3394 Posts
On September 08 2012 07:08 larse wrote: Warhound is still OP after this patch. It still has 13.6 DPS with normal attack, and 18.6 DPS with missile. It has 220 HP. It's 2 supply and cost 25/25 more than stalker. While stalker has 6.7 DPS, 160 HP, and 2 supply. And roach has 8 DPS, 145 HP, and 2 supply. And it kites like crazy with their normal attack range of 7 and missile range of 10. It's fucking longer than colossus. Missile range is 9. | ||
|
Nazeron
Canada1046 Posts
| ||
|
-NegativeZero-
United States2142 Posts
On September 08 2012 07:10 SarcasmMonster wrote: If they keep Locust at 14 dmg, then they should decrease upgrades from +2 -> +1 to match Stalkers. Although this would make them worse in the late game more like stalkers should be the ones getting an upgrade increase to +2 | ||
|
Seiniyta
Belgium1815 Posts
On September 08 2012 07:08 larse wrote: Warhound is still OP after this patch. It still has 13.6 DPS with normal attack, and 18.6 DPS with missile. It has 220 HP. It's 2 supply and cost 25/25 more than stalker. While stalker has 6.7 DPS, 160 HP, and 2 supply. And roach has 8 DPS, 145 HP, and 2 supply. And it kites like crazy with their normal attack range of 7 and missile range of 10. It's fucking longer than colossus. Which is fine, no need for large sweeping nerfs, do it incremental until you get a sweet spot. | ||
|
Whiplash
United States2929 Posts
| ||
|
Fig
United States1324 Posts
On September 08 2012 06:53 purakushi wrote: I would not mind leaving the other problems with the warhound you mentioned, but I think Blizzard would be smart to make it cost 3 supply. This will encourage less massing of these units, leading to more variety in unit composition. I'm all for making haywire missiles not autocastable, though. I would actually switch the supply on tanks and warhounds. With 2 supply tanks, it would be more incentive to make them a main part of the army, and the opposite for 3 supply warhounds. It would reward good micro, but if you wanted to just a-move, you could still do it, just need more supply depots | ||
|
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
On September 08 2012 07:10 SarcasmMonster wrote: If they keep Locust at 14 dmg, then they should decrease upgrades from +2 -> +1 to match Stalkers. Although this would make them worse in the late game Don't worry, they're pretty insane in the late-game as it is  . | ||
|
Tuczniak
1561 Posts
| ||
|
SarcasmMonster
3136 Posts
On September 08 2012 07:22 ZAiNs wrote: Don't worry, they're pretty insane in the late-game as it is .I'm not really worrying. Blizz can nerf  into oblivion for all I care  | ||
| ||
The PiG Daily
Best Games of SC
Rogue vs TriGGeR
Maru vs MaxPax
Rogue vs herO
Clem vs herO
Rogue vs Maru
PiGStarcraft457
[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Team League
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
IPSL
Hawk vs TBD
StRyKeR vs TBD
BSL
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Team League
OSC
BSL
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
IPSL
Artosis vs TBD
Napoleon vs TBD
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
