Also the female korean archer earlier was cuteness overload with her hat
[Olympics] Rio de Janeiro 2016 - Page 18
Forum Index > Sports |
LaNague
Germany9118 Posts
Also the female korean archer earlier was cuteness overload with her hat | ||
Dan HH
Romania9122 Posts
| ||
virpi
Germany3598 Posts
| ||
Dan HH
Romania9122 Posts
There's some new pseudo-scientific craze among olympians, as is tradition. This might be the dumbest one yet, basically hickeys. | ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
![]()
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On August 09 2016 10:17 Dan HH wrote: http://www.bbc.com/news/health-37009240 There's some new pseudo-scientific craze among olympians, as is tradition. This might be the dumbest one yet, basically hickeys. I mean, it basically doesn't matter if it works or not. As long as the athletes feel like it helps, it's almost guaranteed to be a net positive regardless. It's a pretty weird thing to do, in this case, but at least they're not chugging down smoothies made of Brazilian kids ![]() | ||
![]()
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
https://www.twitter.com/Rio2016_en/status/762834006782070790/photo/1 | ||
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On August 09 2016 10:40 travis wrote: There is an african table tennis player in the ro4? That's awesome, I know who I have to root for. He took out 2 of the strongest players in round 3 and round 4, too. I hope I get to watch his match vs ma long. I think in the Ro8? And the Nigerian player, right? I think I watched him play in Round 3, he seemed really good at those rallies where they start to move far back from the table. | ||
GoTuNk!
Chile4591 Posts
On August 09 2016 10:47 Zealously wrote: I mean, it basically doesn't matter if it works or not. As long as the athletes feel like it helps, it's almost guaranteed to be a net positive regardless. It's a pretty weird thing to do, in this case, but at least they're not chugging down smoothies made of Brazilian kids ![]() Cupping works, just like "plenty of other recovery techniques competitors use - including sports massage, sauna, ice baths and compression garments". Aside from the Qi nonsense, it's just a way to improve bloodflow and relax an specific area. | ||
![]()
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On August 09 2016 11:37 GoTuNk! wrote: Cupping works, just like "plenty of other recovery techniques competitors use - including sports massage, sauna, ice baths and compression garments". Aside from the Qi nonsense, it's just a way to improve bloodflow and relax an specific area. One of the German women's beach volleyball players has some nonsense taped to her face for her qi. | ||
Dan HH
Romania9122 Posts
On August 09 2016 11:37 GoTuNk! wrote: Cupping works, just like "plenty of other recovery techniques competitors use - including sports massage, sauna, ice baths and compression garments". Aside from the Qi nonsense, it's just a way to improve bloodflow and relax an specific area. You definitely know something works when it's sold directly to superstitious people without undergoing any trials. Just like how the kinesiotape that totally worked 4 years ago, that's why everyone is still using it now /s | ||
GoTuNk!
Chile4591 Posts
On August 09 2016 12:36 Dan HH wrote: You definitely know something works when it's sold directly to superstitious people without undergoing any trials. Just like how the kinesiotape that totally worked 4 years ago, that's why everyone is still using it now /s Yeah chinese weightlifters and US gymnasts and swimmers are a bunch of gullible idiots, they achieve the pinnacle of human performance by following fads. If you need clinical trials to realize that applying heat over muscles helps in relaxing them, you prolly don't do much thinking yourself or have any experience on the matter. Have you ever done any sports? Prolly off topic, we should take it to PMs. | ||
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On August 07 2016 03:43 FiWiFaKi wrote: Greg van Avermaet! My god, amazing ride. The most well deserved Olympic victory I've ever seen. Topping all the climbers on a course like this, absolutely beautiful. And Froome, what was that D: That was called "really damn tired from the TdF" ![]() Notice none of the guys that rode hard at the tour were up there. Nibali sat back often. Same with Alaphillipe. Same with Avermaet. The big dissapointment for me was Kruijswijk, I really thought he would factor more here, but he was dropped very early. Possible he was working for a teammate though. On August 08 2016 03:57 mdb wrote: Oh my god, that didnt look good at all. Hoping she is ok! And that guy taking pictures of her, instead of trying to help ... He did the right thing, absolutely. There is ZERO help he can give someone like that. The last thing you'd want to do when dealing with a potential spinal injury and unconscious victim is to move them. Medical support is right behind in the race, so even stopping to call for help (which he might not even know #s of) would be more or less pointless. In a serious crash like that, there is absolutely no care a spectator should provide unless they are a trained emergency medical professional. On August 08 2016 04:12 Nakajin wrote: The last 5 km of the race were amazing you could see the 3 medalist comming back 1 second at the time and just in the last moment beating the american. Amazing ending. Man, all I can think about that race is how much Abbot, with even passable confidence going downhil, would have won comfortably. They barely caught her a couple hundred meters from the line, at the point of Van Vluten's crash, Abbot had already lost over 26 seconds in less than 3 minutes of downhill riding. That wasn't just playing it safe, that was an absolute lack of any confidence. She spotted the field back a good 40-60 seconds coming down. Why you don't work on the descending if you know there is a pivotal descent in one of the most important career races and you're THAT bad is beyond me. | ||
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On August 03 2016 22:12 Mafe wrote: So, it's the olympics again. Will be a tough competition with TI6 for my viewing time. Just looking at the (great) opening post again made me realize that what people think of as a "notable" event is highly subjective. Pande surely mentioned the most popular ones, even though I sometimes wish it would be otherwise. A school friend once said that he wouldnt watch a sport where "a trained animal/monkey could beat a human", and nowadays I feel pretty much the same. I feel that sports which are inherently about maximizing a few select physical aspects of your body, are just too prone to doping: Swimming, running, road cycling I think are the prime examples I think. Even though I enjoy swimming myself and I respect any honest athelete, I just find it boring to watch and cant get the suspicions out of my head. For me, the olympics mainly consist of sports such as judo, hockey, table tennis, taekwondo or water polo, where the athletes really have one shot at glory every 4 years, and the human interaction part is a substantial component. Also worth mentioning: Competitions start today, with the womens football tournament. A "trained monkey" would have ZERO chance in a cycling race, unless it was an uphill 10%+ hill climb race or a solo TT without other riders. The teamwork, tactics, and skill needed would be far beyond the capabilities of this brainless, but monster fitness specimen. Swimming I don't know well enough to comment. For Track and Field it generally holds true, if you have an athlete at or above current WR level; they should be able to win any race they choose. Tactics come into play a bit in middle and longer distances, but if you're strong enough (probably around WR level in most of the distance events) then you could just run away from the field...but it is a risky strategy because if you're off on that day you just tow the field gassing yourself while they sit there conserving. I'll admit I really dislike the doping. It's a bummer. Don't really know about swimming. T&F is pretty damn bad right now. Large estimates of number of record holders and medalists believed to be on gear, and in self surveys that are anonymous the percentage is up over 25%. Then add in the bribing going on for tests to be swept under the rug or "pre announced" and you have a pretty bad environment. Cycling, while not perfect, is significantly better at present moment. The guys of today are at a dramatically lower level than the Armstrong days, and within the known theoretical limits of clean performance. There aren't riders blasting up final climbs at 6.8 w/kg after a long hard day at the end of a long, hard 3 week bike race. I'm sure there is still doping in cycling from individuals, but they've got it to where a good clean athlete is pretty competitive with a maximally doped athlete. All that said, I'm not sure why that makes things boring. It's still excellent competition and exciting races, even if most of the top contenders are indeed doping it's still good theatre. Shitty as hell for clean athletes, but doesn't stop the competition itself being compelling viewing. | ||
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
| ||
sharkie
Austria18413 Posts
![]() | ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
The 2016 Rio Games have suffered complaints about pollution, disease, insecurity, congestion and general disorganization. But according to historian David Clay Large, that might better describe the scene at the original Olympics in ancient Greece. Large teaches at the University of California at Berkeley, and has authored several books on the Olympics. He wrote a story for Foreign Policy, "Everything Bad About the Rio Olympics Was Much Worse in Ancient Greece," laying out what things were like at the earliest games. Take the issue of security. There are fears of muggers and terrorists in Rio, but in a conversation with The World, Large says that was a given in the old days. “The world of the ancient Olympics was so embroiled in constant fighting back and forth between rival city-states that every time the Olympics took place there was fear of some kind of attack, some kind of disruption,” he says. The Greeks established a truce for each Olympics. This did not stop any wars that might be taking place, but it did prohibit any attacks on the sacred venue, and outlawed attacks on fans and players going to and from the Olympiad. “The fact is that even this Olympic truce often broke down,” says Large. “Famously in 364 BC when soldiers from the city of Elis actually invaded the Olympics grounds in order to retrieve protection rights over the games, that had been taken away from them in the years before. So there was a bloody battle going on right during the wrestling competition.” “The Spartans were also a problem,” adds Large. “They had been banned from the Olympics for many years. They themselves thought the Olympics, in any event, were not bloody enough for their taste. But they did show up in the 420s and they got themselves banned once again for extra-curricular fighting.” The other strike against the Spartans may have been their odor, since their warrior creed prohibited them from bathing, which Large says the other ancient Greeks took very seriously. The ancient Greeks staged games every four years, for over a thousand years, on the field of Olympia, in the southern part of modern Greece. The ancient Olympics were finally abolished as being un-Christian in 393 AD. Rio is also battling problems with polluted water and backed-up toilets in the Olympic village. The ancient Greeks also had to wrestle with huge sanitary issues. Large points out that obviously they did not have the benefit of modern sewage systems, nor even running water, since the games were held at the height of summer which is notoriously dry in the Mediterranean. “What they did is they built these trench-like latrines for the visitors, who came in their thousands,” says Large. “These latrines were extremely unsanitary, to put it mildly. They attracted all kinds of bugs and flies. There were outbreaks of various kinds of gastro-intestinal diseases, diarrhea. Often fatal.” Sacrifices to the gods before every games to avert the flies did not help, Large adds. The lack of water and the high heat also caused a lot of deaths from heat-stroke. “The issues surrounding Rio today are nothing compared to those of ancient Greece,” says Large, “when it comes to matters of pollution and hygiene.” The competitions themselves were also subject to cheating, bribery and what we would now call doping. Competitors stood to win fame, glory and wealth, and the city-states that they represented also saw the contest as a key way to score one over their rivals. One thing that you don’t hear much about in the modern OIympics, though, is the use of black magic, which was quite common among their ancient predecessors. “It’s often assumed somehow these ancient Games were purer than the modern ones,” Large concludes. “In fact, if anything they were even more corrupt, perhaps.” Source | ||
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On August 09 2016 13:58 FiWiFaKi wrote: Alaphilipe would have won the Olympics if it wasn't for his crash (and still got 4th), so not sure your argument holds Eric S: Anyway, I'm not really convinced that the TdF tiredness played much into it, the top TdF contenders were all in there. Alaphilipe wasn't playing the GC game. I'm thinking the guys going every day for it. Froome was a non factor. Valverde was a non factor. Porte I guess will forever be a (?). Admittedly Rodriguez did very well. Aru sat up some. It's not a be all, end all factor...but I think depending on the rider and how you came in it plays a significant role. I find it far too implausible to think that a fully prepared Valverde, Froome, or Bardet would get badly dropped by someone like Avermaet on a signficiant 600m+ climb with many steep pitches. Obviously some people recover better than others, or have different pre tour buildups, but there isn't another way I can think of to explain why so many key names weren't even modestly competitive. We've also seen how badly fatigue from GTs plays into races. Look at the guys from 2015's Giro and how they did in 2016's Tour. It wasn't pretty. Same for the Tour -> Vuelta. Non factor there as well, relative to their strength at the Tour. And that's with greater amount of time for recovery. I guess the best way to sum up my view is that it's well known that you develop significant fatigue racing a GT for GC. There is no other good explanation that jumps out to explain the struggle of many of the big names that should have come out to play other than residual fatigue from the Tour/lack of structured training as a result of racing the Tour. If you've got another explanation, I'm certainly all ears! MTA: Alaphillipe's ride was badass btw. That guy was fighting like a madman all the way. I have to give credit to Avermaet though, who in addition to his brilliance getting over the climb, textbook style outfoxed Alaphillipe, obviously his only threat in the chase group, to distance him before the last kick. | ||
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
Watching indoors is quite compelling. I get the basics of the tactics and there is tremendous athleticism and skill consistently on display. Beach seems less compelling to me. With less people it seems to go much faster, with just an exchange or two before a point is scored, and defense seems difficult with such a large area to cover. It often seems like whoever gets first spike off pretty much gets the point, barring misplacing it or an error. | ||
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On August 09 2016 14:17 L_Master wrote: Alaphilipe wasn't playing the GC game. I'm thinking the guys going every day for it. Froome was a non factor. Valverde was a non factor. Porte I guess will forever be a (?). Admittedly Rodriguez did very well. Aru sat up some. It's not a be all, end all factor...but I think depending on the rider and how you came in it plays a significant role. I find it far too implausible to think that a fully prepared Valverde, Froome, or Bardet would get badly dropped by someone like Avermaet on a signficiant 600m+ climb with many steep pitches. Obviously some people recover better than others, or have different pre tour buildups, but there isn't another way I can think of to explain why so many key names weren't even modestly competitive. We've also seen how badly fatigue from GTs plays into races. Look at the guys from 2015's Giro and how they did in 2016's Tour. It wasn't pretty. Same for the Tour -> Vuelta. Non factor there as well, relative to their strength at the Tour. And that's with greater amount of time for recovery. I guess the best way to sum up my view is that it's well known that you develop significant fatigue racing a GT for GC. There is no other good explanation that jumps out to explain the struggle of many of the big names that should have come out to play other than residual fatigue from the Tour/lack of structured training as a result of racing the Tour. If you've got another explanation, I'm certainly all ears! MTA: Alaphillipe's ride was badass btw. That guy was fighting like a madman all the way. I have to give credit to Avermaet though, who in addition to his brilliance getting over the climb, textbook style outfoxed Alaphillipe, obviously his only threat in the chase group, to distance him before the last kick. Well to me it's subjective. Avermaet biked hard, no doubt. Avermaet stayed in yellow for a couple days and Fuglsang was the 6th Astana rider, which isn't that impressive for him, but when you combine Nibali, Aru, Kangert, etc on your team, it's not that bad. They were at the front pulling a lot, Astana attacked more than anyone really, even though it was in vain. 3rd place was Majka, did anyone really put in more effort this tour than Majka? He was out in the break every day. Alaphilipe worked hard, and I think he gave it everything he had most days, his fights for podium placings like Stage 2 I think were impressive. 5th-7th were all GC riders, so they gave it everything naturally. Don't know much about Andrey - Kangert worked hella hard in the Tour. Rui Costa raced in the Tour where he had a tough race, and Froome obviously worked very hard. G. Thomas would have done better if not for his crash, but also he worked hard at the Tour, working for Sky. He looked slower than usual, so not sure if he was holding back in the TdF or if just not in form. Then you have Dan Martin to round out the top 13, also a GC rider. Lets not forget, Henao who crashed from 2nd place gave it 100% in the TdF, and Nibali said his focus was the olympics, but still gave a respectable effort for 30th place in the Tour. So honestly, I'm sure if you looked at it statistically for this year, you're more likely to do better at the olympics if you were riding hard at the TdF. My viewpoint as someone who doesn't watch many classics is that it's a completely different race. Surviving one day with a beat up body is far far easier than for 20+ days. So honestly, while I agree with you that the Giro -> TdF will tire you out, having 10+ days to rest for a 6 hour race is just fine. Secondly, I was under the impression that the climbs were tougher than they really are initially. It was an 8.9km climb at 6.2% with a total elevation gain of 635m, three times. Heck, that's easier than many category 1 climbs, and I think if it was earlier on in the stage, you could even give it a category 2 classification, and after every climb, not only did you have time to relax the legs in the descent (a little bit lol), but you also had 10kg of flat for the larger guys to catch up. Even Cancellara was with the main group before the last climb. To me, the course was as hard on the climbing as a route like Liege-Bastogne-Liege, yet we still saw the climbers hold most of the top spots. Chris Froome has never won a classic (or like one or two max), so it's not surprising that he couldn't do well in a race like this in retrospect. | ||
| ||