On October 14 2015 06:01 Zdrastochye wrote: How would you feel about a 2 mana 2/2 gives all minions with 3 attack or fewer charge?
I'd feel bad. I assume you intended it to work for your opponent as well, which means you basically only use it when you have some sort of game-winning combo like leeroy, which is exactly what they want to avoid here.
also re warhammer stuff: Looked at a bunch of things, and it seems like the new rules (ie updated at some point over the last 12 years or so) allow for a lot more army mixing. If I understand it correctly, in fantasy there's no limit to this whatsoever but people still build around a single theme typically. So, my main question is that in terms of community stuff, are more abstract themes (ex// "all the walking robot things", "things with wings", "random units of 5-ish figures led a commander modelled after a wwe wrestler (like john cena leading the ultramarines)", etc.) looked down upon compared to race/lore/faction themes like "space marines" or "orcs"?
Also knockoff warhammers are like way cheaper than real warhammers, which is neat since I'm more into decorating them then making anything tournament legal etc.
On October 14 2015 06:01 Zdrastochye wrote: How would you feel about a 2 mana 2/2 gives all minions with 3 attack or fewer charge?
I'd feel bad. I assume you intended it to work for your opponent as well, which means you basically only use it when you have some sort of game-winning combo like leeroy, which is exactly what they want to avoid here.
also re warhammer stuff: Looked at a bunch of things, and it seems like the new rules (ie updated at some point over the last 12 years or so) allow for a lot more army mixing. If I understand it correctly, in fantasy there's no limit to this whatsoever but people still build around a single theme typically. So, my main question is that in terms of community stuff, are more abstract themes (ex// "all the walking robot things", "things with wings", "random units of 5-ish figures led a commander modelled after a wwe wrestler (like john cena leading the ultramarines)", etc.) looked down upon compared to race/lore/faction themes like "space marines" or "orcs"?
Also knockoff warhammers are like way cheaper than real warhammers, which is neat since I'm more into decorating them then making anything tournament legal etc.
Again, can only really speak to 40k.
No one really looks down on anyone for making allied armies, for the most part. If you're just doing it to cheese, then yeah people will bitch. But in fact, there are a lot of really cool allied armies out there, especially if you put a lot of time into customizing them into a consistent theme.
Rules wise, allies are a thing. Different armies have different levels of alliance based on how likely they are to work together in the lore. But if you want, you can ally anything with anything with varying amount of drawback. For example, any Imperium Army (Space Marines, Imperial Guard, Adeptus Mechanicus) is buddy buddy with any other faction, but have varying amounts of downsides for allying with any Chaos army.
If you're talking about just making a counts-as army that's a mix of different models with a consistent theme but is using a certain set of rules, that's generally ok, as long as it's really clear what's what and you're not trying to pass off a Guardsman as a Daemon Prince. I saw a really cool Orks/Renegades (Chaos Imperial Guard) list that had Ork gunners on the artillery pieces and Ork-themed Daemons. I've also seen Necrons kitted out with Eldar bits to make an army that looks Necron-y but played with the Eldar ruleset.
Generally, if you actually want to play, then you'll want to stick to one army, at least to start with (probably to around 1000 points, as allying at below point is pretty tough), but if you're just looking to buy some models and make dioramas or whatever, then go nuts.
Even though it says public i think due to the fact that they call it closed beta and say "In order to get the most meaningful and constructive feedback possible, the total number of players in the Closed Beta will be extremely limited" means no one we know will be playing besides day9 and cixah
I was interested in them, but I was thinking at starting at the Witcher 2. Is this a good idea or is the Witcher not worth playing? Feedback would be appreciated!
I only played witcher 3 and enjoyed it for a while without knowing the story of the others. I bet they would add to it. I didn't get THAT far but thats just due to my preference for muliplayer games but this one had me more hooked than most others. Its fun and your character feels customizable and it provides adequate challenges. TLDR im no help
On October 15 2015 03:25 Frudgey wrote: Hey I have a question.
I've never played any of the Witcher games.
I was interested in them, but I was thinking at starting at the Witcher 2. Is this a good idea or is the Witcher not worth playing? Feedback would be appreciated!
I'd say start with the original, but both the original and the Witcher 2 are still pretty different from TW3. What is very nice though is how your decisions are pretty impactful for the next game, unlike Mass Effect or Telltale games.
TW3 is definitely the best game out of the three though. Also will take up the most time.
TW1 you can expect a play time of ~30 hours. TW2 about 25 hours, and TW3, especially with the new expansion, is more in the range of 45 hours of game time for a casual playthrough.
If you are a completionist kinda guy, prepare for several hundred hours for the trilogy.
From a gameplay standpoint, TW3 is the most refined and most accessible. TW1/2 tried some ambitious things but are a lot more rough around the edges.
That said, I'd still play them in order unless you really don't like the gameplay of 1/2 for whatever reason or only plan on playing one of the games. If you only play one, TW3 is probably still the best complete package.
It's clearly mocking today's materialistic standards and the way that many people view the world. It's not poking fun at any one country but instead at many countries (well the weather one is clearly targetted at Britain but that's another thing) and how they're all falling into the same unlikable places.
On October 15 2015 04:38 Zdrastochye wrote: It's clearly mocking today's materialistic standards and the way that many people view the world. It's not poking fun at any one country but instead at many countries (well the weather one is clearly targetted at Britain but that's another thing) and how they're all falling into the same unlikable places.
Is there any updates for the liquidlegends team logos in the right corner? I want logo for a GPL team (Full Louis), they have been around since forever but still no logo.
EPT
