|
On January 10 2012 19:40 Twinmold wrote:
Now I only want to watch SuperNova get smashed by Leonock followed by him dropping down to Code A. If you have to rely on allins to win a Bo3 you don't deserve a Code S spot.
ROFL. If you prepare builds to specifically kill your opponent you deserve to stay in code S. MC cut quite a few corners in all those games.
|
this is the worst outcome possible now leenock will beat supernova, and either forgg or mc is out already ... so lame
|
Fin - MC, another team kill :/
|
On January 10 2012 19:39 Alejandrisha wrote:Show nested quote +On January 10 2012 19:38 dubRa wrote:On January 10 2012 19:36 Pandemona wrote:We call that a BO loss  poor MC That was a brilliant deceiving play rather. brilliant..? i see this kind of play all the time. it's not what i'd call brilliant. it's gimmicky as any other thing one can hide.
What was smart (I wouldn't say brilliant) is to go banshee a 3rd time, while disguising your build as a gasless expand.
Totally fooled MC, so it worked perfectly. Inducing suicide toss 4 gate mode :D
|
On January 10 2012 19:41 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On January 10 2012 19:40 Twinmold wrote:
Now I only want to watch SuperNova get smashed by Leonock followed by him dropping down to Code A. If you have to rely on allins to win a Bo3 you don't deserve a Code S spot. You do what it takes to win...
Ofcourse, but I still don't want him in Code S if this is all he can do. "Deserve" might not have been the best possible word choice.
|
On January 10 2012 19:38 Azzur wrote:Show nested quote +On January 10 2012 19:37 MuseMike wrote:On January 10 2012 19:36 Azzur wrote:
Lol, why don't MC just go 1-gate FE into 3-gate robo
Such a safe and solid build against everything... You can't 3 gate robo every game. Oz goes 3-gate robo almost every game.
1gate expand 3gate robo die to 3rax with marines in bunker (wich looks like tech from terran), so yeah, u cant play this every game
|
the MC fanboi tears are so delicious
T'was said by LiquidTyler once, MC is risky and gimmicky, and that risky play will come back to bite him..
... but since he's walking around with Take's money in his pocket, I can't imagine he minds too much.
|
On January 10 2012 19:41 LimitSEA wrote:
Hoping to see Fin crush MC. I love it when hyped players get steam rolled.
FTFY
|
I cannot take Tastetosis seriously. I feel like I need to be showing them my airplane boarding passes and passport...
|
Why is everyone saying 111 is all-in or cheese? Its not :/
|
On January 10 2012 19:42 Fionn wrote:
Why are people calling Supernova a cheeser?
He usually has one of the safest, mech-style plays of any of the Terrans.
There fav player got beaten, people go to fanboy mode and stop thinking clearly.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37120 Posts
0/2 in liquibets.... Sighhhh
|
Australia18228 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:41 Exempt. wrote:Show nested quote +On January 10 2012 19:37 Asha` wrote:gg nice hole to have in your build. I'll put it down to MC being jetlagged. On January 10 2012 19:37 FuRong wrote:
Leenock probably feeling a bit relieved now, doesn't have to play MC, and instead gets to face a Terran not as good as the one he just beat. Hehe, Nova has pretty solid TvZ though right? He played a very nice series when he beat DRG for instance. true but i think i agree with the other guy, considering game 1 of fin vs leenock i dont think supernova stands a chance -- fin played extremely well and still bested convincingly.
ForGG was extremely defensive in this place, which allowed Leenock to be so dominating. SuperNova can play a good macro and aggressive game (keep rallying marines, drop to deny bases, continuously pushing etc.) which is what causes a lot of Zergs to break apart.
|
On January 10 2012 19:39 Lysanias wrote:Show nested quote +On January 10 2012 19:38 MetalLobster wrote:
I knew supernova couldn't win without using 1/1/1 Why should he, it's a valid strat, MC cheeses all the time aswell. Part of the game and Supernova fooled him like a BOSS.
Future protoss players will know he can only 111 in order to win then he's fucked.
|
On January 10 2012 19:40 Twinmold wrote:
Now I only want to watch SuperNova get smashed by Leonock followed by him dropping down to Code A. If you have to rely on allins to win a Bo3 you don't deserve a Code S spot.
So you don't think MC deserves Code S either? This is even exactly why he dropped out of Code S before! It will probably take you quite a while to find a Code S game in which MC goes to three bases.
|
On January 10 2012 19:37 SC2Phoenix wrote:its been like this for 18 months, cloak banshees are good.
Cloaked units are pretty good you mean. Except against Terran but that's just how scans work.
On January 10 2012 19:37 MuseMike wrote:Show nested quote +On January 10 2012 19:36 Azzur wrote:
Lol, why don't MC just go 1-gate FE into 3-gate robo
Such a safe and solid build against everything... You can't 3 gate robo every game.
Why? It's not that exploitable, just like a 1rax expand isn't that exploitable. If you're not going to do that you can at least confirm the expand - when MC does his zlot/stalker poke you can run up to confirm the CC has landed at least and keep the stalker alive. MC was blindly going for the 4gate, his own fault. Anyway, I can easily see Leenock beating Supernova and MC beating fOrGG which would make a Supernova MC rematch to decide who advances.
|
On January 10 2012 19:42 Fionn wrote:
Why are people calling Supernova a cheeser?
He usually has one of the safest, mech-style plays of any of the Terrans.
Coz you can't play a safe and solid mech-style against a protoss,you need to do a timing with it or a allin.
*Or wreck a toss economy with banshe/hellion and than finish him off with mech
|
On January 10 2012 19:39 Hassybaby wrote:Show nested quote +On January 10 2012 19:38 Seraphone wrote:On January 10 2012 19:37 MuseMike wrote:On January 10 2012 19:36 Azzur wrote:
Lol, why don't MC just go 1-gate FE into 3-gate robo
Such a safe and solid build against everything... You can't 3 gate robo every game. Why not? Because sometimes you can 3gate Stargate
If he did his Phoenix would see the tech lab on the Starport so he would have been able to get an observer in time.
On January 10 2012 19:40 Deathmanbob wrote:Show nested quote +On January 10 2012 19:38 Seraphone wrote:On January 10 2012 19:37 MuseMike wrote:On January 10 2012 19:36 Azzur wrote:
Lol, why don't MC just go 1-gate FE into 3-gate robo
Such a safe and solid build against everything... You can't 3 gate robo every game. Why not? because if you do the same damn thing every game you get owned hardcore? if you push out every time at 15 min you will be countered all the damn time. If you 2 rax open pressure every game TvP people will just start 4 gating you and taking the insta win
1 gate nexus into 3 gate robo is solid vs everything.
|
Ummmm why was that guy banned on page 88? I agree that faking expand into a different strat isn't that uncommon.... maybe it's not "cheese" but i don't see why he was banned.....
|
On January 10 2012 19:42 darkscream wrote:
the MC fanboi tears are so delicious
T'was said by LiquidTyler once, MC is risky and gimmicky, and that risky play will come back to bite him..
... but since he's walking around with Take's money in his pocket, I can't imagine he minds too much.
No, I'm pretty sure that he still cares about winning GSL which is more than 6x the money he got at HSV IV.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
