EPT[GSL] 2012 Jan Code S RO32 D2 - Page 96
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Shock710
Australia6097 Posts
| ||
|
Swink
Australia26 Posts
| ||
|
Witten
United States2094 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:42 Fionn wrote: Why are people calling Supernova a cheeser? He usually has one of the safest, mech-style plays of any of the Terrans. Because he went 1/1/1 in game one and went cloak banshee in all three games. I'm not saying Supernova is a cheesy player, but that was definitely a cheesy series. Also, people love MC and flying a banshee into a mineral line and cloaking it then clicking H for hold position makes for a sad way for a fan favorite to lose a game 3. But it happens. Supernova wants to win, so he does cloak banshee. It's good against Protoss. Observers please. | ||
|
AndAgain
United States2621 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:43 teamamerica wrote: Cloaked units are pretty good you mean. Except against Terran but that's just how scans work. Why? It's not that exploitable, just like a 1rax expand isn't that exploitable. If you're not going to do that you can at least confirm the expand - when MC does his zlot/stalker poke you can run up to confirm the CC has landed at least and keep the stalker alive. MC was blindly going for the 4gate, his own fault. Anyway, I can easily see Leenock beating Supernova and MC beating fOrGG which would make a Supernova MC rematch to decide who advances. There's this thing called economy and it's kinda important. | ||
|
iamke55
United States2806 Posts
Here's a replay where Oz does the same build MC just did: http://www.sc2rep.com/replays/download?id=16810 | ||
|
Jigsetcza
United States118 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:44 GreyKnight wrote: he wasn't playing risky of gimmicky at all. At what part was he gimmicky? What I see is an uninformed player echoing what he just heard. | ||
|
darkscream
Canada2310 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:44 GreyKnight wrote: he wasn't playing risky of gimmicky at all. um ok the most fearsome all-in terran can do, that every protoss has nightmares about countered by one building skips that building nope, not risky play at all, making assumptions and cutting corners based on a bunker placement Oh well, GG ^^ | ||
|
Sc2Null
United States3754 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:45 Shock710 wrote: The only way this group will ever live up to my expectations is if ForGG beats MC (sad face T_T <3 Mc) and then goes on to beat Leenock and make it into the group (hoping supernova to beat leenock, give mc a bit more cerdit if the person he lost too got out of the group) do we need 2 more terrans x.x? | ||
|
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
Not all variations are all-in. In fact most 1-1-1s are very safe. | ||
|
Zorgaz
Sweden2951 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:40 TheDwf wrote: You know there are BO losses to Cloak Banshees even in TvT, right? Yeah....  .You know Protoss can get up a Robo with DT's around the same cost of cloaked banshees? T - Fact-SP-Techlab-Cloak 550 minerals 425 gas P - Twilight-Robo-Darkshrine 450 minerals 450 gas Yes Terran has Scan, but if you hit just after a MULE'ing.... P generally should go robo unless he is absolutely 100% no banshees can be coming | ||
|
Hofo
United States16 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:46 pdd wrote: Not all variations are all-in. In fact most 1-1-1s are very safe. This | ||
|
soulist
United States932 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:40 CortoMontez wrote: So blind robo every game? There is a reason that so many people have thought that observers should be build from the cyber instead of robo. I dont get what the big deal is. In bw protoss had to build an observetory first before building a obsever from robotics. And in pvt in bw protoss couldnt move from its base until it had an observer to clear out spider mines. | ||
|
Wrathsc2
United States2025 Posts
yes, yes we do. | ||
|
Witten
United States2094 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:44 Jigsetcza wrote: Wow, can we just talk about the games and not your whines about balance? I wish tl would make a forum rule that gets you banned for whining. Balance whine is supposed to be banned from LR threads. But no one reads that when the post it at the top anyways. I'm spoiled from the Proleague LR threads. No balance whine there. | ||
|
Shock710
Australia6097 Posts
But there not just any other terrans, look at it this way one of them is ForGG, the second supernova has had it through so many times, u kinda expect him to be there | ||
|
keioh
France1099 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:43 XiaoJoyce- wrote: Oh shit!!! ForGG lose 2 times to LeeNock  That wasn't what I expect...I thought he is Flash sidekick ...Did he play bad? Or close game? Leenock had key moves in the first game, while ForGG didn't make game changing decision. Second game, ForGG tried a timing push that was completely unsuccessful against the opening of Leenock (+1 ling armor, 3 hatch late tech) and he got badly raped after. So to sum up : a first really good slow and macro game, and a one-sided rape. | ||
|
CrappyHippo
Canada275 Posts
I mean yeah, nice analogy. | ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
| ||
|
jkang
United States404 Posts
| ||
|
ThaSlayer
707 Posts
On January 10 2012 19:47 jkang wrote: If MC and SuperNoVa were to somehow meet again, do they start with the 2:1 score or is it a new Bo3? New Series | ||
| ||
