• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 17:08
CET 23:08
KST 07:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation12Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7
StarCraft 2
General
Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle What happened to TvZ on Retro? SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review BW General Discussion Brood War web app to calculate unit interactions
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
PvZ map balance Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers How to stay on top of macro?
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1959 users

[D] Is there a way to beat Spanishiwa's build? (P) - Page 7

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 13 Next All
Horchata
Profile Joined March 2011
United States11 Posts
April 19 2011 09:11 GMT
#121
I came across something like this but i don't think the player knew what he was doing. I sat an observer in his base almost the whole game and saw him lay down like 5 or 6 spine clawers and then start to mass lings transitioning into hydra/infesters/broodlords. Anyway with all that time he left me to build probes I made about 30 voidrays like I was in bronze all over again.
Sup brotoss.
Firekidt
Profile Joined March 2011
United States28 Posts
April 19 2011 16:57 GMT
#122
Zerg vs Zerg: All you have to do is deny his 3rd. His build focuses on a long-term macro based game that punishes all-in attempts while spending the bare-minimum for defense while macroing. However, the finer points of the build, like Nydus worms, Overlord drops, and many other forms of harass require creativity and APM that only higher level masters players can perform.

Subsequently, just deny his 3rd base as long as possible while a. getting your own 3rd, and b. teching to Roach-Infestor-Broodlord. Also, his build can fail to a well executed baneling bust.

Protoss vs Zerg: DT rushes are really difficult to counter with his delayed lair, regardless of what he said on Day9's stream. A high level rush will hit earlier than the 8 min mark. Also, a forge FE is a smart choice regardless of what build he is doing(although do not attempt air cheese). At lower levels, a 6 gate +1 timing push can break his build.

Terran vs Zerg: Like i said, his build in the mid-late game is where skill really matters. While Spanishiwa himself can easily mind-control tanks and thors while controlling his whole army/magic boxing his mutas, not many people can. Mech play works very well, especially since hsi build doesn't punish early expansions. Similarly, early/mid/late game drops are very effective becuase of how delayed his mutalisks will be.
"Shut up your terran"
tehemperorer
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2183 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-19 17:15:33
April 19 2011 17:14 GMT
#123
On April 20 2011 01:57 Firekidt wrote:
Zerg vs Zerg: All you have to do is deny his 3rd. His build focuses on a long-term macro based game that punishes all-in attempts while spending the bare-minimum for defense while macroing. However, the finer points of the build, like Nydus worms, Overlord drops, and many other forms of harass require creativity and APM that only higher level masters players can perform.

Subsequently, just deny his 3rd base as long as possible while a. getting your own 3rd, and b. teching to Roach-Infestor-Broodlord. Also, his build can fail to a well executed baneling bust.

Protoss vs Zerg: DT rushes are really difficult to counter with his delayed lair, regardless of what he said on Day9's stream. A high level rush will hit earlier than the 8 min mark. Also, a forge FE is a smart choice regardless of what build he is doing(although do not attempt air cheese). At lower levels, a 6 gate +1 timing push can break his build.

Terran vs Zerg: Like i said, his build in the mid-late game is where skill really matters. While Spanishiwa himself can easily mind-control tanks and thors while controlling his whole army/magic boxing his mutas, not many people can. Mech play works very well, especially since hsi build doesn't punish early expansions. Similarly, early/mid/late game drops are very effective becuase of how delayed his mutalisks will be.

I've been doing 6:45 DT rushes against no gas zergs and so far I have had 3 quit right after the first swipe of a DT; the rest hang in there trying to put up spores but I just warp in 2 more DTs. If he builds a spore, you put 1 DT on it and it won't ever finish building. Regardless of what he says, it is not safe against DT expands at all. 6:45 is late too, you can get 3 DT out earlier than that, and he can't pressure anything since he's relying on lings and you can xform 2 DT into 1 archon that, together with 2 zealots and a sentry can basically wipe out 10-18 zerglings.
Knowing is half the battle... the other half is lasers.
CecilSunkure
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States2829 Posts
April 19 2011 17:38 GMT
#124
You don't need super early DT. You just need them as you're taking third. Once you have DT tech throw a couple into his main via warp prism, and some at his other bases, and draw most of his army to a single location with your army. By hitting multiple locations with the DTs and placing your army in a location that will force him to draw his army out forces the Zerg to split his army up properly to take care of each harass point, and if he over-compensates one of the areas your large army might just crush his and you'll take the game.

DTs shouldn't be used to immediately kill the guy, they just take advantage of late lair tech, many low-tier zerglings/banelings, and extends the amount of time you control the middle of the map (easier to take a third/fourth). Once you've hit multiple hatcheries with your DTs you can merge them into archons after forcing a lot of resources to be spent on detection, 4 archons in a normal stalker/zealot/sentry army is incredibly tough for ling/baneling styles to harm, often times people baneling carpet bomb my archons, and none of them die, but they do it anyways because they are so used to sentry/stalker armies dieing like that.
tehemperorer
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2183 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-19 17:47:27
April 19 2011 17:46 GMT
#125
On April 20 2011 02:38 CecilSunkure wrote:
You don't need super early DT. You just need them as you're taking third. Once you have DT tech throw a couple into his main via warp prism, and some at his other bases, and draw most of his army to a single location with your army. By hitting multiple locations with the DTs and placing your army in a location that will force him to draw his army out forces the Zerg to split his army up properly to take care of each harass point, and if he over-compensates one of the areas your large army might just crush his and you'll take the game.

DTs shouldn't be used to immediately kill the guy, they just take advantage of late lair tech, many low-tier zerglings/banelings, and extends the amount of time you control the middle of the map (easier to take a third/fourth). Once you've hit multiple hatcheries with your DTs you can merge them into archons after forcing a lot of resources to be spent on detection, 4 archons in a normal stalker/zealot/sentry army is incredibly tough for ling/baneling styles to harm, often times people baneling carpet bomb my archons, and none of them die, but they do it anyways because they are so used to sentry/stalker armies dieing like that.

Great insight man I really appreciate it... What would you say if I told you I use early DTs for the chance to kill them outright and deny a 3rd while I take my second?

Context: When I read what you wrote I thought that you are suggesting using spread DTs to hit 3-4 hatcheries while I grab a 3rd and/or push out. What I thought I was doing was using DTs to hit 2 hatcheries while I grab my natural without being able to be punished for it and deny their 3rd. It seems that we are aiming for the same thing, except I do it earlier with some risk and you do it later for less risk. I would love to hear your take on that, since it's clear what my preference is (I play to win though so I'm not unreasonable hehe)
Knowing is half the battle... the other half is lasers.
ZeromuS
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada13389 Posts
April 19 2011 17:56 GMT
#126
On April 18 2011 22:03 Apolo wrote:
Since his build relies a lot of counters, many times to the main, instead of warping in a zealot in the small choke of gate + cyber which can be quickly killed by his upgraded zerglings, warping in a dt instead, means he will never be able to get in.


Very smart assertion that has been lost so far in the thread sounds effective at keeping chokes safe
StrategyRTS forever | @ZeromuS_plays | www.twitch.tv/Zeromus_
tehemperorer
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2183 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-19 18:00:05
April 19 2011 17:59 GMT
#127
On April 20 2011 02:56 ZeromuS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2011 22:03 Apolo wrote:
Since his build relies a lot of counters, many times to the main, instead of warping in a zealot in the small choke of gate + cyber which can be quickly killed by his upgraded zerglings, warping in a dt instead, means he will never be able to get in.


Very smart assertion that has been lost so far in the thread sounds effective at keeping chokes safe

Kinda different though, since lings on a-move will ignore the DT and attack the buildings, where the zealot makes them try to attack him if they aren't micro'ed. If you are going to do DT for defense, make it a dt in front and a zealot behind, DT on hold position but not the zeal. This will keep the lings focused on the zeal unless they are micro'ed, doubt a decent player will let them die or not attack the building wall-off though.
Knowing is half the battle... the other half is lasers.
CecilSunkure
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States2829 Posts
April 19 2011 18:08 GMT
#128
On April 20 2011 02:46 tehemperorer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 02:38 CecilSunkure wrote:
You don't need super early DT. You just need them as you're taking third. Once you have DT tech throw a couple into his main via warp prism, and some at his other bases, and draw most of his army to a single location with your army. By hitting multiple locations with the DTs and placing your army in a location that will force him to draw his army out forces the Zerg to split his army up properly to take care of each harass point, and if he over-compensates one of the areas your large army might just crush his and you'll take the game.

DTs shouldn't be used to immediately kill the guy, they just take advantage of late lair tech, many low-tier zerglings/banelings, and extends the amount of time you control the middle of the map (easier to take a third/fourth). Once you've hit multiple hatcheries with your DTs you can merge them into archons after forcing a lot of resources to be spent on detection, 4 archons in a normal stalker/zealot/sentry army is incredibly tough for ling/baneling styles to harm, often times people baneling carpet bomb my archons, and none of them die, but they do it anyways because they are so used to sentry/stalker armies dieing like that.

Great insight man I really appreciate it... What would you say if I told you I use early DTs for the chance to kill them outright and deny a 3rd while I take my second?

Context: When I read what you wrote I thought that you are suggesting using spread DTs to hit 3-4 hatcheries while I grab a 3rd and/or push out. What I thought I was doing was using DTs to hit 2 hatcheries while I grab my natural without being able to be punished for it and deny their 3rd. It seems that we are aiming for the same thing, except I do it earlier with some risk and you do it later for less risk. I would love to hear your take on that, since it's clear what my preference is (I play to win though so I'm not unreasonable hehe)

Well you definitely can do it earlier if you like, and it should work really well on many people, but if the other player has any foresight (perhaps has played you before which happens a lot high up on the ladder) then they can simply make an overseer. Also really good Zergs make overseers at the specific timings of which DTs are most likely to appear, so going a with a standard DT timing and relying super heavily on it is a terrible thing to do, as the DT will just die. You have to throw the DTs against players like this when you know they won't have an overseer, and it can be hard to know when to do that. So, if you use them later like I do it's highly unlikely they'll have 2-3 spines and a spore crawler at each base while having an overseer on their army, thus they must split their army apart to take care of each harass point. I also like to warp in a lot of zealots into the main with the DTs to force a larger chunk of forces to be sent back to their main (and if they don't their main is gone along with their lair and any tech).

There's also a timing you can hit with units from 3 Gates that hits before the Zerg should have speed and carrying capacity for overlords, where you can deny the third pretty safely as long as you have good FF usage. Here's an example: http://drop.sc/6843 - Note I was playing really casually (had just gotten off work, only had time for one game). If you do move out to hit their third and they engage you, you need to FF their ling/banelings away and also FF and trap a lot of units. Your army will die off before it can get back if you simply FF without killing any of the Zerg forces. FF one line and immediately FF another line behind it and trap as many banelings as you can.

tehemperorer
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2183 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-19 18:21:22
April 19 2011 18:20 GMT
#129
On April 20 2011 03:08 CecilSunkure wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 02:46 tehemperorer wrote:
On April 20 2011 02:38 CecilSunkure wrote:
You don't need super early DT. You just need them as you're taking third. Once you have DT tech throw a couple into his main via warp prism, and some at his other bases, and draw most of his army to a single location with your army. By hitting multiple locations with the DTs and placing your army in a location that will force him to draw his army out forces the Zerg to split his army up properly to take care of each harass point, and if he over-compensates one of the areas your large army might just crush his and you'll take the game.

DTs shouldn't be used to immediately kill the guy, they just take advantage of late lair tech, many low-tier zerglings/banelings, and extends the amount of time you control the middle of the map (easier to take a third/fourth). Once you've hit multiple hatcheries with your DTs you can merge them into archons after forcing a lot of resources to be spent on detection, 4 archons in a normal stalker/zealot/sentry army is incredibly tough for ling/baneling styles to harm, often times people baneling carpet bomb my archons, and none of them die, but they do it anyways because they are so used to sentry/stalker armies dieing like that.

Great insight man I really appreciate it... What would you say if I told you I use early DTs for the chance to kill them outright and deny a 3rd while I take my second?

Context: When I read what you wrote I thought that you are suggesting using spread DTs to hit 3-4 hatcheries while I grab a 3rd and/or push out. What I thought I was doing was using DTs to hit 2 hatcheries while I grab my natural without being able to be punished for it and deny their 3rd. It seems that we are aiming for the same thing, except I do it earlier with some risk and you do it later for less risk. I would love to hear your take on that, since it's clear what my preference is (I play to win though so I'm not unreasonable hehe)

Well you definitely can do it earlier if you like, and it should work really well on many people, but if the other player has any foresight (perhaps has played you before which happens a lot high up on the ladder) then they can simply make an overseer. Also really good Zergs make overseers at the specific timings of which DTs are most likely to appear, so going a with a standard DT timing and relying super heavily on it is a terrible thing to do, as the DT will just die. You have to throw the DTs against players like this when you know they won't have an overseer, and it can be hard to know when to do that. So, if you use them later like I do it's highly unlikely they'll have 2-3 spines and a spore crawler at each base while having an overseer on their army, thus they must split their army apart to take care of each harass point. I also like to warp in a lot of zealots into the main with the DTs to force a larger chunk of forces to be sent back to their main (and if they don't their main is gone along with their lair and any tech).

There's also a timing you can hit with units from 3 Gates that hits before the Zerg should have speed and carrying capacity for overlords, where you can deny the third pretty safely as long as you have good FF usage. Here's an example: http://drop.sc/6843 - Note I was playing really casually (had just gotten off work, only had time for one game). If you do move out to hit their third and they engage you, you need to FF their ling/banelings away and also FF and trap a lot of units. Your army will die off before it can get back if you simply FF without killing any of the Zerg forces. FF one line and immediately FF another line behind it and trap as many banelings as you can.


I totally get it thanks a lot for clarifying. Seems like the way I do it there is a good chance of them holding, but the way you do it capitalizes on them relying on multiple bases and having to invest in multiple detection sources to stop the damage. Very interesting: the way I do it they can do 1-2 things and hold, your way they have to do 3-8 things to hold and all at the same time (clock ticking).
Knowing is half the battle... the other half is lasers.
Phemto
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1 Post
April 19 2011 22:36 GMT
#130
As Protoss, I was able to beat this strategy with a 14 forge, 16 nexus fast expand. Once my warp gates were up I was able to out-produce him.
Limpedalong
Profile Joined March 2011
United States2 Posts
April 20 2011 02:40 GMT
#131
I think the main thing is that the build is VERY strong as a tier 1 defense. Anything past the opening, is just due to the fact that the Zerg player has been given the chance to acquire any and all tech that he wants to. The build is really strong, in my opinion, because it opens people up to the idea that you can do something other than throwing wave after wave of roaches at an opponent and hoping you wear them down.

As for a response to the "Ice Fisher" build, I think you need to just play it the way the zerg player is playing, as people are saying. You get the chance to come into the mid-game with a strong economy due to the zero harassment you are receiving, and therefore you can afford to get many tech structures and a lot of research done. You cannot hope to build a standard ball of units and win in a one-on-one fight though, I think it will come down to fast tech switches and an all out scrap fest of trading bases and armies.
Mutedhorn
Profile Joined July 2010
United States14 Posts
April 20 2011 04:47 GMT
#132
I would be interested to see how the build would work against FE >> 2x Stargate. When I go phoenix a lot of zergs that I play who rely on zerg for defense I"m able to get a lot of harass picking up the queens and bouncing back and forth between the two bases.

But I'm plat league so that may only work due to zerg macro slip ups. Again would be interested in seeing how the timings actually work out.
polysciguy
Profile Joined August 2010
United States488 Posts
April 20 2011 05:35 GMT
#133
a couple things, 1 what is the standard "tell" for a spanishiwa build, is it the absurdly early hatch? the absurdly early hatch with no gas? what should i look for when im scouting to determine that this is coming

2. I think people, since the KA removal, have been underestimating the power of templar tech, which, with feedback, seems like it would do much better here than the more standard colo/void deathball. people seem to forget that archons are absurdly good against zerg, at +3 they do 44 damage vs bio with a splash, so get 4-5 archons and watch zergling armies explode, combined with storms/feedback, and backed up by a standard gateway army, it seems like this would be a good way to go.
glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever---napoleon
Golgotha
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Korea (South)8418 Posts
April 20 2011 07:15 GMT
#134
On April 20 2011 14:35 polysciguy wrote:
a couple things, 1 what is the standard "tell" for a spanishiwa build, is it the absurdly early hatch? the absurdly early hatch with no gas? what should i look for when im scouting to determine that this is coming

2. I think people, since the KA removal, have been underestimating the power of templar tech, which, with feedback, seems like it would do much better here than the more standard colo/void deathball. people seem to forget that archons are absurdly good against zerg, at +3 they do 44 damage vs bio with a splash, so get 4-5 archons and watch zergling armies explode, combined with storms/feedback, and backed up by a standard gateway army, it seems like this would be a good way to go.


his hatch is similar timing to any standard Z FE...the tell is seeing no workers on gas.
AzureD
Profile Joined September 2010
United States320 Posts
April 20 2011 20:44 GMT
#135
In my experience the delayed DT rush is far more deadly than the fastest DT rush you can do because it is pretty easy to read a fast DT tech which can be countered rather quickly with a Spore. A fast DT tech also kinda looks like a Stargate rush so a Spore counters both.
shuckyducky
Profile Joined October 2010
United States19 Posts
April 21 2011 00:35 GMT
#136
On April 20 2011 16:15 Golgotha wrote:
his hatch is similar timing to any standard Z FE...the tell is seeing no workers on gas.


Against Protoss, I've been adapting Spani's build by building an extractor at a standard timing so it can be scouted. I'll even put some guys in gas until I can chase the probe scout out.

The idea I'm playing with is to plant a little doubt as to how safe it is to fast expand since I might be doing a normal speedling fast expand. Once I get my queens and first spine crawler I can deny any follow up probe scouts, so they're limited on information until they get an observer, hallucinated phoenix, or probe my defenses and see I did not get an early zergling speed.

Also it's helpful in that, if the situation calls for a deviation - say I scout a DT rush - I can start gassing without the delay of the extractor build time.
polysciguy
Profile Joined August 2010
United States488 Posts
April 21 2011 02:01 GMT
#137
On April 21 2011 09:35 shuckyducky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 20 2011 16:15 Golgotha wrote:
his hatch is similar timing to any standard Z FE...the tell is seeing no workers on gas.


Against Protoss, I've been adapting Spani's build by building an extractor at a standard timing so it can be scouted. I'll even put some guys in gas until I can chase the probe scout out.

The idea I'm playing with is to plant a little doubt as to how safe it is to fast expand since I might be doing a normal speedling fast expand. Once I get my queens and first spine crawler I can deny any follow up probe scouts, so they're limited on information until they get an observer, hallucinated phoenix, or probe my defenses and see I did not get an early zergling speed.

Also it's helpful in that, if the situation calls for a deviation - say I scout a DT rush - I can start gassing without the delay of the extractor build time.


don't most speedling expands get gas at nearly the same time as pool so you can get to that 100 gas as the pool pops?
glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever---napoleon
shuckyducky
Profile Joined October 2010
United States19 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-21 03:18:54
April 21 2011 03:18 GMT
#138
[B]On April 21 2011 11:01 polysciguy wrote:[/B
don't most speedling expands get gas at nearly the same time as pool so you can get to that 100 gas as the pool pops?


Speedling expands are usually ~14 pool, ~16 or later hatch.

My thought is to try the normal early hatch first zerg opening that is preferable (if possible) for most zergs.

The difference is that after most zergs drop their hatch, follow up with the pool, they very quickly start mining gas.

This is where Spanish's build deviates. Standard play will get a quick gas move to speed and/or roaches...Spanish delays.

Scouting probes will normally see if an extractor is started or not. They usually leave - otherwise they lose the probe. As a proponent of Spanish's build, I feel that by starting an extractor it makes your opponents read a little more difficult.

I feel once Spanish's build reaches the Queens/Spines - follow up probe scouts can not easily confirm wether Zerg was mining gas or not.

Tortious_Tortoise
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States944 Posts
April 21 2011 03:56 GMT
#139
Look at the playstyle of this build--> it revolves around a highly defensive play until lair tech, at which point the Z's harassment factor explodes. It's cherry-on-top is the late-game unstoppable force hive tech brings the Zerg.

The ways to break this as P aren't limited to a couple strategies. Anything that abuses the turtling state of Z early game, out-multi-tasks or denies the harassment midgame, or has a superior or comparable deathball lategame will fare very well against this.

Abusing the style around which a build is structured is often the first step towards figuring out how to deal with it.
Treating eSports as a social science since 2011; Credo: "The system is never wrong"-- Day9 Daily #400 Part 3
tehemperorer
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2183 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-21 18:18:33
April 21 2011 18:12 GMT
#140
On April 21 2011 05:44 AzureD wrote:
In my experience the delayed DT rush is far more deadly than the fastest DT rush you can do because it is pretty easy to read a fast DT tech which can be countered rather quickly with a Spore. A fast DT tech also kinda looks like a Stargate rush so a Spore counters both.

A fast DT rush won't be countered by spores since they come at a time where you can only really afford to have 1 or 2, and they die in about 5 seconds to 3 DTs, not allowing you time to react and do enough DPS to kill 3 dts. Spore does counter both, but DTs can eliminate the spore and spread out and still be effective, while pheonixes cannot. Also, if you pull back your dts, you can either deny the zerg 3rd while you take your second, or pull back to xform into 1-2archons for defense. Since you have doubled gas early, you will have mostly zeal/sentry at your base, and can easily defend your expansion/deny theirs because:

1. lings melt to zeal/sentry/archon (Ice Fisher build is incapable of putting on pressure to many builds as people have stated before)
2. No overseer/Late overseer means no 3rd/late 3rd for Zerg player. Protoss can even double expand behind DTs depending on how the game went

Start watching at 15:45:
http://www.justin.tv/tehemperorer/b/284076111
Knowing is half the battle... the other half is lasers.
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 13 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
20:30
Best Games of SC
Serral vs Clem
Solar vs Cure
Serral vs Clem
Reynor vs GuMiho
herO vs Cure
PiGStarcraft374
LiquipediaDiscussion
BSL 21
20:00
ProLeague - RO32 Group C
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
ZZZero.O282
LiquipediaDiscussion
OSC
19:00
Masters Cup #150: Group B
davetesta56
Liquipedia
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
15:55
FSL teamleague CNvsASH, ASHvRR
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft374
Nathanias 94
ProTech47
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 890
ZZZero.O 282
NaDa 53
Dota 2
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m1046
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe84
Other Games
tarik_tv6426
Grubby4762
gofns4266
DeMusliM346
Fuzer 207
Pyrionflax197
summit1g173
Dewaltoss11
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV947
gamesdonequick782
StarCraft 2
angryscii 37
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 53
• musti20045 17
• Adnapsc2 7
• Dystopia_ 2
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 10
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV556
• masondota2296
• Ler91
• lizZardDota247
Other Games
• imaqtpie1730
• Shiphtur288
• tFFMrPink 16
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
11h 52m
RSL Revival
11h 52m
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
13h 52m
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs TBD
WardiTV Korean Royale
13h 52m
BSL 21
21h 52m
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
21h 52m
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d
Wardi Open
1d 13h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 18h
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL: GosuLeague
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
BSL: GosuLeague
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
IPSL
6 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-14
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.