• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 00:26
CET 06:26
KST 14:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT18Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book16Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0224LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)46Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker16
StarCraft 2
General
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16) Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) WardiTV Team League Season 10
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ? [A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 512 Overclocked Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth
Brood War
General
TvZ is the most complete match up BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ladder maps - how we can make blizz update them? Gypsy to Korea Brood War inspired Terran vs Zerg cinematic – feed
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile ZeroSpace Megathread Diablo 2 thread Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Ask and answer stupid questions here! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Search For Meaning in Vi…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1966 users

Mule vs Chrono boost - A simple breakdown - Page 2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Deckkie
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Netherlands1595 Posts
January 24 2011 14:33 GMT
#21
On January 24 2011 23:18 Jumbled wrote:
Chronoboost makes research or unit production run 50% faster for 20 seconds. This is not the same as a 50% time reduction. Fix your maths and try again.


haha yeh thank you, thats what I meant.. I blame it on english being my second language :p
Always look on the bright side of life
noD
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
2230 Posts
January 24 2011 14:34 GMT
#22
another balance discussion with a hidden complain in it ?
kk but u forgot T workers stay all the time when building stuff so your logic is flawed =X
Jermstuddog
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2231 Posts
January 24 2011 14:37 GMT
#23
On January 24 2011 23:34 noD wrote:
another balance discussion with a hidden complain in it ?
kk but u forgot T workers stay all the time when building stuff so your logic is flawed =X


I think the OP is trying to say MULEs AREN'T OP. I on the other hand AM complaining about them.

But if you call me a noob loud enough, I'm sure nobody will read my post.
As it turns out, marines don't actually cost any money -Jinro
Zariel
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia1285 Posts
January 24 2011 14:40 GMT
#24
1 little problem with terran and scvs is that you tend to bring a few with you when you attack for repairs, bunkers and turrets, also note, terran buildings need an scv to construct for the whole duration, which means 1-2 scvs are always building supply depots, 2-3 building other stuff. I treat mules as being the filler for the lost income due to pulling scvs.

Of course, purely on a macro basis, MULE is always better in the long run for mineral gain. But don't forget, all 3 main building's abilities have their opportunity costs. Every boost you cast on probes means slower tech/units, every mule costs you a scan, your extra 4 larvae can be used in all sorts of diff ways.

Anyway, if your concerned about how mule can be harassed etc., not much point as you wouldnt be thinking aborut how chrono>mules if your getting attacked.
sup
Deckkie
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Netherlands1595 Posts
January 24 2011 14:43 GMT
#25
On January 24 2011 23:34 noD wrote:
another balance discussion with a hidden complain in it ?
kk but u forgot T workers stay all the time when building stuff so your logic is flawed =X


It isnt meant to be a complaint. I wnat to show people when they are behind and when they are not.
And yes there are obviously many other things to take in to consideration, like the scv's staying with the buildings to make them while the Protoss can be harvesting. Or that Protoss needs to spend 100 minerals at 9 supply while terran can harvast till 10 supply but needs to make his barracks at 12 while protoss can wait with the gateway till 13 or 14 even.

The bottom line is that Blizzard has thought this all out very well, and that this thread is just a little step of understanding everyhing as best as possible
Always look on the bright side of life
Pry
Profile Joined December 2010
Sweden3 Posts
January 24 2011 14:44 GMT
#26
4 probes also need half a pylon so they actually cost 250 minerals.
Kyandid
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada124 Posts
January 24 2011 14:48 GMT
#27
you want to mine longer from everybase.


whaaaaaat

if you could press a button and instantly receive all the minerals from all of your bases and mine them all out, you'd do that.
noD
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
2230 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-24 14:56:46
January 24 2011 14:54 GMT
#28
On January 24 2011 23:43 Deckkie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2011 23:34 noD wrote:
another balance discussion with a hidden complain in it ?
kk but u forgot T workers stay all the time when building stuff so your logic is flawed =X


It isnt meant to be a complaint. I wnat to show people when they are behind and when they are not.
And yes there are obviously many other things to take in to consideration, like the scv's staying with the buildings to make them while the Protoss can be harvesting. Or that Protoss needs to spend 100 minerals at 9 supply while terran can harvast till 10 supply but needs to make his barracks at 12 while protoss can wait with the gateway till 13 or 14 even.

The bottom line is that Blizzard has thought this all out very well, and that this thread is just a little step of understanding everyhing as best as possible


I agree ...
Actually the basic basic basic mechanics shouldnt even be discussed they had 10 years to do that ...
Dominator1370
Profile Joined November 2010
United States111 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-24 15:03:49
January 24 2011 14:55 GMT
#29
The problem with Mules (in theory) is that they afford Terran some pretty unique and powerful benefits: the ability to generate additional income without needing extra bases, and the ability to artificially inflate their relative supply cap.

Compare this with Spawn Larva and Chronoboost: these abilities help you get more stuff, but this is hardly a unique ability - you can always just build more of the pertinent structures. Chronoboost allows for some interesting possibilities with upgrades and timings that aren't quite duplicatable by the other races, but as a unique ability, this hardly seems of the same order as those afforded to Terran. Spawn Larva allows you to change what you're producing on the fly, which is useful, but this is productionally equivalent to building more production structures.

There are two areas of comparison here:

1) Spawn Larva provides a re-allocation of production capacity that allows tech switching without building as many structures. Chronoboost also allows for re-allocation of production capacity, but allows this re-allocation to include upgrades at the cost of not being as powerful for tech switching as Spawn Larva. Orbital Commands allow Terran to gain additional income without building Command Centers at additional expansions.

2) Spawn Larva allows you to "save" a certain number of production cycles that you can use later, typically to re-max very quickly. Likewise, Chronoboost allows you to save up the ability to spontaneously boost your production capacity significantly. Replacing SCV's with Mules allows you to actually have more usable supply on the field.

With regards to 1, all races are capable of getting some kind of extra "production" without building extra structures. The disconnect comes from the fact that the extra Barracks can be built in a safe location, while if either of the other races wants extra income, they're forced to expand, which carries with it a number of risks.

With regards to 2, all races have a capability to bolster an army, especially in the late game. The disconnect comes from the fact that Terran can have those units all on the field at the same time. If you've ever been attacked with your army out of position, you know that throwing half your army at your opponent's whole army twice isn't nearly as strong as engaging once with your whole army. The same applies here.

Edit: I should probably note that this isn't some attempt to convey that ZOMG MULES ARE OP!, but rather to point out that Starcraft isn't strictly a game of numbers, and that unique capacities can be quite powerful and make it difficult to "math out" who is ahead. On paper, Terran seems to have some pretty powerful "non-numerical" benefits, which make attempts at analysis of game-states difficult if not futile.
zDUST
Profile Joined November 2010
Finland165 Posts
January 24 2011 15:00 GMT
#30
On January 24 2011 22:36 siri wrote:
mules are good because they can harvest simultaneously with scv's, which means you can increase your mineral income after the 24 worker saturation
while chronoboost lets you saturate your bases faster with probes

so in equal bases, that are already saturated, mules gives you a mineral income advantage
while chronoboost is good if you have bases that are still to be saturated


thats all you need to know


although, at that point CB can be used on producing useful units/upgrades. If OC energy is used on anything else (scans) the advantage is wasted.
Drazzzt
Profile Joined September 2002
Germany999 Posts
January 24 2011 15:02 GMT
#31
Sorry OP, but you are making so many assumptions which are simply way too over-simplified.
There are much more factors to take into account and I can't even think of all of them.
* MULEs die, probes usually don't ( so you need new energy for every new MULE, but CB energy only for the first time)
* Pylon cost, supply cost for probes
* Saturation of minerals plays a role (MULEs dont care about saturation, probes do)
* 1 chronoboost only makes ~1.76 (=30/17) probes, not 2 => more than 5 CBs needed for 4 extra probes
* etc.

So, basically your post is not very helpful to be honest
Be Nice, Be Fair, Be Mannered.
Deltablazy
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada580 Posts
January 24 2011 15:04 GMT
#32
You're only comparing the two abilities economy wise. It's not like a Terran can allow himself to only spend his OC energy on mules. Hell, just by using that 50 energy, doesn't mean it's a free gain. Mule dies too early and doesn't pay for himself, scan misses and doesn't reveal anything. Those can put Terran at a disadvantage. I'm not even mentioning extra supply, but let's ignore that.

A Protoss though can Chrono boost with no loss. Upgrades, warp gates, researches, workers, etc. Sure a structure can be sniped, but you're at fault for letting that happen.

Chrono is just way better, so Protoss do not need to be always 4 workers ahead of the number of OCs the Terran has. And what if the Terran has 50 OCs, are you gonna say the Protoss needs 200 workers? Yes it's an exaggeration, but do consider the possibility of mass OCs.
AimlessAmoeba
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Canada704 Posts
January 24 2011 15:04 GMT
#33
Interesting analysis. I'd be curious to see some math on the rate at which drones can pop at max efficiency compared to these numbers.
Brutus
Profile Joined May 2010
Netherlands284 Posts
January 24 2011 15:08 GMT
#34
On January 24 2011 22:04 Deckkie wrote:
Edit: alot of people are stating that the biggest advantage is that Mules can harvast next to scv's, making the Terran economy stronger from one base. ALtough this is true it should be taking in to consideration that this hurts the Terran the most. you want to mine longer from everybase. Surely it will give you the avantage in the beginning but it will hurt you when u need to be on the fourth base while Protoss can still mine out off three. A good terran will always drop his mules on a new unsaturated base.


This is so wrong. it's better to have the minerals already. Always.

Math is off. Chronoboost increases production by 50%. 150% is not 200%. You will make 3 workers when you would normally make 2, so it means you make probes 1/3 faster.

The whole text makes assumptions which are just wrong. Why do you want to mine out slower? Why do you think Mules mining side by side isn't a big deal? These 2 things make mules so powerfull, being able to mine out that gold base faster, while not being hindered by scvs.
Endorsed
Profile Joined May 2010
Netherlands1221 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-24 15:15:46
January 24 2011 15:12 GMT
#35
Upon the mule die: 12000 (8 batches of mineral x 1500, 16 batches if that player FE) - (mineral left in batch 1 + min left in batch 2 + .....) = Total minerals harvested until the mules die.

If you use that fomula and track down the first 3 mules, you'll see that Terran's income is always lower than Protoss's EVEN WHEN Terran use mules. If for some reason Terran uses the scan, he will 100% be behind economically.

Of course the advantage of mules is it can harvest the same batch with the scvs, but unless the Terran is being contained or commits to 1,2 base play, he rarely use mules on saturated bases but save energy for scan.



This basically. Someone analyzed about 10+ top level TvP's and the terran was ALWAYS BEHIND IN ECONOMY IN EVERY SINGLE GAME. Luckily our units are more cost effective until there are collosus or storm, that's why every terran wants to end it quick. Also you need to scan and when you drop 8 mules on a gold patch because you are bad. You won't have the production facility's to back it up. So missing a mule is just like missing a larva inject.

1 gate/core FE against a 1 rax FE(wich isn't safe at all whilste 1 gate/core is) 1 gate/core is WAYYYYYYYYYY ahead in eco. It's not even funny how fast a protoss can saturate a base.

Brutus
Profile Joined May 2010
Netherlands284 Posts
January 24 2011 15:15 GMT
#36
On January 25 2011 00:04 Deltablazy wrote:
You're only comparing the two abilities economy wise. It's not like a Terran can allow himself to only spend his OC energy on mules. Hell, just by using that 50 energy, doesn't mean it's a free gain. Mule dies too early and doesn't pay for himself, scan misses and doesn't reveal anything. Those can put Terran at a disadvantage. I'm not even mentioning extra supply, but let's ignore that.

A Protoss though can Chrono boost with no loss. Upgrades, warp gates, researches, workers, etc. Sure a structure can be sniped, but you're at fault for letting that happen.

Chrono is just way better, so Protoss do not need to be always 4 workers ahead of the number of OCs the Terran has. And what if the Terran has 50 OCs, are you gonna say the Protoss needs 200 workers? Yes it's an exaggeration, but do consider the possibility of mass OCs.


Lol, sorry, but wut?

Why can't he allow to only use it on mules? Maybe you need a few scans, but most of them will be on mules.

You are saying that it is the protoss' fault for letting someone snipe the building, but when terran loses the mule it's not their fault? Why?
Sometimes revealing nothing= something. If you don't see double gas at the expansion of zerg, it means mutas will be delayed or not coming at all. And after all, I think terran will be using energy more on eco than protoss, because they will chrono out upgrades/units too.

Your last paragraph makes no sense. Mule is the best macro mechanic for eco, without a doubt. Larva and cb can be used on something else, which kinda makes up for it.
Autunno
Profile Joined January 2011
Brazil147 Posts
January 24 2011 15:17 GMT
#37
Even though the math is not perfect (as you have to consider a TON of factors, as even the OP has stated), it's at least a kind of ok way to know who is ahead of who.
Brutus
Profile Joined May 2010
Netherlands284 Posts
January 24 2011 15:18 GMT
#38
On January 25 2011 00:12 Endorsed wrote:
Show nested quote +
Upon the mule die: 12000 (8 batches of mineral x 1500, 16 batches if that player FE) - (mineral left in batch 1 + min left in batch 2 + .....) = Total minerals harvested until the mules die.

If you use that fomula and track down the first 3 mules, you'll see that Terran's income is always lower than Protoss's EVEN WHEN Terran use mules. If for some reason Terran uses the scan, he will 100% be behind economically.

Of course the advantage of mules is it can harvest the same batch with the scvs, but unless the Terran is being contained or commits to 1,2 base play, he rarely use mules on saturated bases but save energy for scan.



This basically. Someone analyzed about 10+ top level TvP's and the terran was ALWAYS BEHIND IN ECONOMY IN EVERY SINGLE GAME. Luckily our units are more cost effective until there are collosus or storm, that's why every terran wants to end it quick. Also you need to scan and when you drop 8 mules on a gold patch because you are bad. You won't have the production facility's to back it up. So missing a mule is just like missing a larva inject.

1 gate/core FE against a 1 rax FE(wich isn't safe at all whilste 1 gate/core is) 1 gate/core is WAYYYYYYYYYY ahead in eco. It's not even funny how fast a protoss can saturate a base.



1 gate/core is safer than 1 rax FE AND ahead in eco? I am calling bullshit on this until I see some replays or something.
lololol
Profile Joined February 2006
5198 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-01-24 15:39:01
January 24 2011 15:25 GMT
#39
50 energy regenerates in 88.(8) game seconds or ~61.8 seconds real time. 1.5 minutes is not 1 minute 50 seconds, it's 1 minute 30 seconds.

Mules mine 240 or 270 minerals depending on the mineral patch. If you use them only on the 270 ones then they will deplete faster limiting your mineral income, compared to if you spread them out.

At full saturation 4 workers will mine around 230-240 minerals for 90 seconds, but that's an average for all the workers, while the last 4 would've improved your mining rate by less than that. A mule is roughly equal to 4.5 workers on full saturation and 3 workers with low saturation.

The chronoboost stuff already got corrected and it means you will need more chronos to match a mule.

Protoss is ahead economically if he chronos his nexus, but approaching saturation quickly turns that around and the terran pulls ahead in mineral income by ~20%, while the protoss has to expand, which incurs additional costs and risks.

Depleting your minerals faster with Mules is not a disadvantage, just like having more probes than the terran has SCVs is not a disadvantage. You will get the same amount of minerals from the base(not an advantage or disadvantage, it's equal) in less time(an obvious advantage).

About the mining from more bases at the same time, it would be like terran having 4000 extra minerals spent on units or in the bank and 2 mining bases and the toss having 3 mining bases, with the extra base having 4000 minerals left. Clearly the terran is not hurt in any way.
I'll call Nada.
Offhand
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1869 Posts
January 24 2011 15:32 GMT
#40
On January 24 2011 22:52 BrahCJ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2011 22:49 Sm3agol wrote:
On January 24 2011 22:44 Deckkie wrote:
On January 24 2011 22:43 Sm3agol wrote:
MULES are free. Chronoboost just makes your 50 mineral units come out faster. MULE >>>>> chronoboost in the pure economy department. I think it's balanced out by being able to chronoboost upgrades and such though, not crying imba. Just don't say chrono makes P economy equal to Ts, because that is pure bs.


Did u even read the OP??


Yes. I'm saying that what op is saying is not accurate. Because P has to spend 200 extra minerals per OC to stay even in income.



Orbital commands are not free.


Orbital commands pay for themselves in slightly more then half a MULE drop, so as soon as the orbital finishes, you're ahead. Chrono boosted probes are a constant drain on the protoss economy.

MULEs are better then literally every other existing resource mechanic in the game. There's no point in arguing otherwise.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
HomeStory Cup 28 - Group D
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 189
FoxeR 120
SortOf 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Snow 167
Bale 40
Icarus 7
League of Legends
JimRising 786
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K678
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1077
Mew2King28
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor120
Other Games
summit1g9787
C9.Mang0541
WinterStarcraft416
RuFF_SC2171
Trikslyr46
kaitlyn12
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick968
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra1894
• Lourlo1201
Upcoming Events
PiG Sty Festival
3h 34m
Maru vs Bunny
Classic vs SHIN
The PondCast
4h 34m
KCM Race Survival
4h 34m
WardiTV Winter Champion…
6h 34m
OSC
6h 34m
Replay Cast
18h 34m
PiG Sty Festival
1d 3h
Clem vs Percival
Zoun vs Solar
Escore
1d 4h
Epic.LAN
1d 6h
Replay Cast
1d 18h
[ Show More ]
PiG Sty Festival
2 days
herO vs NightMare
Reynor vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
Epic.LAN
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
PiG Sty Festival
3 days
Serral vs YoungYakov
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
5 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-02-18
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: King of Kings
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 1st Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 1st Round Qualifier
Acropolis #4 - TS5
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026: China & Korea Invitational
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.