• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 11:58
CET 17:58
KST 01:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Dark completes military service, returns to SC22[BSL23] RO16 Group Stage17Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top?2Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175
StarCraft 2
General
Greetings.. Dark completes military service, returns to SC2 No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Serral's getting trashed by New Catsle's Mind Weekly Cups (Nov 2-8): herO back on top?
Tourneys
soO & FanTaSy return! SC2 Kevin Scrim 4v4 (Nov 16) RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament iNu's Battles #22
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Starcraft 2 Advance [G] How to playtest arcade maps [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 551 Robotic Revival Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles
Brood War
General
[BSL23] RO16 Group Stage BW General Discussion List of top players active on ShieldBattery Starcraft player cRuZa Passed away. screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool
Tourneys
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4 BWCL Season 65 Announcement [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL23] Ro16 Group C - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Infested Terran strategies in 2026 Nuke strategy worked in K-League 2026-11-09 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy)
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread List of Game Threads The PlayStation 5 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Can Game Data Analytics Help Players Improvements
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Trading/Investing Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Dating: How's your luck? US Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The time I organised my…
AssyrianKing
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 12096 users

[D] Spamming Orbital Commands - Page 2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
raga4ka
Profile Joined February 2008
Bulgaria5679 Posts
March 17 2010 17:26 GMT
#21
On March 18 2010 02:22 Volshok wrote:
I agree with the OP actually. Even after you turret up all your expos and your base, you still have massive amounts of unused minerals because TvT is limited by gas. 5-8 Orbital Commands allow you to scan constantly, as well as MULE bomb/repair anywhere on the map.


I haven't actually tried this "mule bombing" it could actually be worth spending minerals on orbital commands , but it sounds hilarious .
-fj.
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Samoa462 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-17 17:28:52
March 17 2010 17:27 GMT
#22
In late late game you probably want to use only mules to mine whatever minerals there are left so you have more supply for units. If you are gonna mine out the map and you have not reached 200 supply yet, you can upgrade depots for free minerals.

I think this is actually a good idea but in moderation and only in late late game on a map with a lot of expansions and constant 200/200 armies
BlasiuS
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States2405 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-17 19:22:02
March 17 2010 17:28 GMT
#23
As has been the case since BW, if you have extra minerals and no gas, you need to take additional expansions to get more gas.

Don't try to come up with creative ways to use your minerals...just get more gas!

edit: it's also possible you are using too many MULEs, giving you additional minerals at a time you don't really need them; try using scan more, and upgrading expansions to be Planetary Fortresses instead of Orbital Commands.
next week on Everybody Loves HypnoToad:
MeruFM
Profile Joined February 2010
United States167 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-17 18:55:23
March 17 2010 18:54 GMT
#24
Mule bombing is useful if you're in mid/late game going for the 4th mineral by using your original command center.

By then, the command centers should have enough energy for 2-3 mules which means you can spam a mule launch on each of the minerals right after you land. Then you can expand right after that by actually building a 4th cc on another expo without mineral blocking your unit production.
FortuneSyn
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
1826 Posts
March 17 2010 19:14 GMT
#25
scan, and mule dropping on tanks is pretty damn useful. But so are turret highways.
yoshi_yoshi
Profile Joined January 2010
United States440 Posts
March 17 2010 19:36 GMT
#26
I like the idea. If you have a span of time where minerals are not useful then OC is a great long-term investment. The free scans of course, and also the late game benefits as others have mentioned (no need for SCVs, you can quickly mine out a new expansion that is hard to defend).

The only thing is that I don't think there are really many times where minerals are not immediately useful or even necessary for something else.
Cyclon
Profile Joined March 2010
United States99 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-17 20:56:26
March 17 2010 20:54 GMT
#27
Energy regenerates at approximately 2/3 a second (correct me on this if I'm wrong).

You can drop 1 mule every 75 seconds, for a mineral intake of 3.7 minerals per second average.
So OC costs 550 for 3.7 minerals per second.
An SCV costs 50 minerals for 1 mineral per second.

SCV's are about 3.5x as cost efficient, and this is assuming perfect macro of the OC's.

I don't see the ability to scan more often as being a use of spamming OC's. If you want to scan more, don't use the mules so often. Unless you need to scan a huge number of times, its not going to help. The only benefit of the OC's is that Mule's are almost immune to worker harassment (since you spawn them for free), and cost no supply. They can also be used for other interesting tasks, but that cuts into your mineral intake.

I can't see it being worthwhile unless you KNOW that you don't need a huge mineral intake, and your production is limited ONLY by your gas and/or supply. In that case, it could be worthwhile. In an endgame situation limited by gas, it effectively would mean you have infinite scans plus you have an extra 40 or so food supply to play around with. In such a case, I could see this getting some use.
Deleted User 31060
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
3788 Posts
March 17 2010 21:00 GMT
#28
just make marines; right now I feel like marines are cost effective against almost everything in TvT
Peaked at C- on ICCUP and proud of it! @Sunyveil
Volshok
Profile Joined August 2008
United States349 Posts
March 17 2010 21:04 GMT
#29
I think a lot of people are underestimating the sheer number of minerals you get in TvT. Even after you've built turrets around everything, you'll still have huge numbers of minerals. Barring some fort of 2 Rax Marauder push, TvT normally lacks back and forth battles that require troop reinforcement. It's a very slow match up, just like BW.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=123657
lololol
Profile Joined February 2006
5198 Posts
March 17 2010 22:13 GMT
#30
On March 18 2010 00:59 Gretorp wrote:
I'm going to use this actually, but for scan.

I was recently playing kawaiirice in a 50 minute tvt where i had just about 100 gasish, but I had around 17,000 minerals. I think the additional scans will allow me to see what's up better, and if necessary bait fire of tanks with mule drops.

Thanks for the idea :-)



Training 300+ marines would've surely helped, even if they were just for cannon fodder.
I'll call Nada.
Mooster
Profile Joined March 2008
Canada43 Posts
March 17 2010 22:20 GMT
#31
i think OP's got a good idea, building more OCs with extra minerals in late game TvT is a great way to increase army size (no need for mineral scvs) while continue to mine minerals. Also you get lots of scans (intel such as army position and composition and what your op is doing is crucial).
NevilleS
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada266 Posts
March 17 2010 22:23 GMT
#32
So many bad replies... OP, this is a good idea when you are near-max, preparing for some kind of tactical move after the map is divided and those key one or two expansions are all that remains contested... wasting supply on mineral heavy units won't help, neither will more scvs, but a handful of extra scans is great. Command centers are expendable late game TvT, scan is definitely worth it.
zatic
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Zurich15366 Posts
March 17 2010 23:11 GMT
#33
On March 18 2010 00:54 Chill wrote:
I think spending the minerals on almost anything else would be a better use. You are spending minerals you deem useless to get more minerals more quickly. How is that productive?

Pretty much says it.

And no, you don't get the minerals you waste on those back, you will just be outmined faster.
ModeratorI know Teamliquid is known as a massive building
Steve496
Profile Joined July 2009
United States60 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-17 23:22:42
March 17 2010 23:21 GMT
#34
Well, lets run some quick numbers. All numbers are based on my memory of rough testing I did a week or so back, so some of them might be slightly off - if so, by all means correct me. However:

An Orbital Command regenerates 50 energy every 90 seconds or so; hence, an extra Orbital Command gives you an extra MULE - and thus an extra 270 minerals - every 90 seconds, which works out to roughly 180 minerals a minute.

An SCV mines about 40 mineral a minute; hence, an extra Orbital Command provides mining throughput equal to about 4.5 SCVs. The SCVs cost 225 minerals, while the Orbital Command costs 550 minerals plus 100 seconds of SCV mining time, which is another 66.7 minerals. Hence, the cost difference is 391.7 minerals, right?

Well, no, because the OC *provides* 11 supply while the SCVs would use 4.5 supply; hence, there's a swing of 15.5 supply in terms of how many Supply Depots we need. A Supply Depot takes 100 minerals to build, as well as 20 minerals worth of mining time from an SCV, for a total of 120 minerals per 8 supply; thus, each supply costs about 15 minerals to obtain, meaning the swing of 15.5 supply saves us 232.5 minerals. Hence, the Orbital Command really only costs us an extra 159.2 minerals.

(For purposes of these calculations, I'm ignoring the various ramp-up effects - the fact that the OC gets a MULE the instant it finishes, versus the fact that the SCVs would be done sooner and could start mining earlier. This tradeoff is too circumstantial to easily comment on in general, and, as such, is omitted - we're looking only at steady-state income once both are up and running).

Hence, the question is: what are the benefits of building extra OCs versus extra SCVs, and are those advantages worth the 159.2 mineral cost difference? Well, the fact that you actually use less supply so can have a slightly larger army means it's slightly more appealing as you near the resource cap, as is the fact that you have more energy you can reasonably spend on scans if you desire. On the downside, MULEs are more subject to harassment - if they come in and snipe 2 or 3 MULEs (or even just force you to run them away to avoid dying), you lose a lot more than if they snipe 2 or 3 SCVs.

So all in all: I'd say that as a general rule, it's probably not worth it. However, I can easily imagine situations where these factors would work out such that it is slightly advantageous to build the extra orbital commands. So as a generally useful strategy that one expects to do as a matter of routine? Probably not. But it's an interesting trick to remember nevertheless, as situations may arise where it's useful.
JTPROG
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States254 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-17 23:29:55
March 17 2010 23:28 GMT
#35
On March 18 2010 08:21 Steve496 wrote:
Well, lets run some quick numbers. All numbers are based on my memory of rough testing I did a week or so back, so some of them might be slightly off - if so, by all means correct me. However:

An Orbital Command regenerates 50 energy every 90 seconds or so; hence, an extra Orbital Command gives you an extra MULE - and thus an extra 270 minerals - every 90 seconds, which works out to roughly 180 minerals a minute.

An SCV mines about 40 mineral a minute; hence, an extra Orbital Command provides mining throughput equal to about 4.5 SCVs. The SCVs cost 225 minerals, while the Orbital Command costs 550 minerals plus 100 seconds of SCV mining time, which is another 66.7 minerals. Hence, the cost difference is 391.7 minerals, right?

Well, no, because the OC *provides* 11 supply while the SCVs would use 4.5 supply; hence, there's a swing of 15.5 supply in terms of how many Supply Depots we need. A Supply Depot takes 100 minerals to build, as well as 20 minerals worth of mining time from an SCV, for a total of 120 minerals per 8 supply; thus, each supply costs about 15 minerals to obtain, meaning the swing of 15.5 supply saves us 232.5 minerals. Hence, the Orbital Command really only costs us an extra 159.2 minerals.

(For purposes of these calculations, I'm ignoring the various ramp-up effects - the fact that the OC gets a MULE the instant it finishes, versus the fact that the SCVs would be done sooner and could start mining earlier. This tradeoff is too circumstantial to easily comment on in general, and, as such, is omitted - we're looking only at steady-state income once both are up and running).

Hence, the question is: what are the benefits of building extra OCs versus extra SCVs, and are those advantages worth the 159.2 mineral cost difference? Well, the fact that you actually use less supply so can have a slightly larger army means it's slightly more appealing as you near the resource cap, as is the fact that you have more energy you can reasonably spend on scans if you desire. On the downside, MULEs are more subject to harassment - if they come in and snipe 2 or 3 MULEs (or even just force you to run them away to avoid dying), you lose a lot more than if they snipe 2 or 3 SCVs.

So all in all: I'd say that as a general rule, it's probably not worth it. However, I can easily imagine situations where these factors would work out such that it is slightly advantageous to build the extra orbital commands. So as a generally useful strategy that one expects to do as a matter of routine? Probably not. But it's an interesting trick to remember nevertheless, as situations may arise where it's useful.


Great post, but I want you to do one more calculation.

Calculate the effectiveness of this strat when your excess minerals are of absolutely no use to you at the time you decide to build the orbital commands due to gas restrictions and mass tanks.
inflowgaming.net
zatic
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Zurich15366 Posts
March 17 2010 23:30 GMT
#36
On March 18 2010 08:21 Steve496 wrote:
Well, lets run some quick numbers. All numbers are based on my memory of rough testing I did a week or so back, so some of them might be slightly off - if so, by all means correct me. However:

[...]

So all in all: I'd say that as a general rule, it's probably not worth it. However, I can easily imagine situations where these factors would work out such that it is slightly advantageous to build the extra orbital commands. So as a generally useful strategy that one expects to do as a matter of routine? Probably not. But it's an interesting trick to remember nevertheless, as situations may arise where it's useful.

This is the perfect example of how you can contribute to this forum even if you are not a good player / not in the beta. (Not saying you are not, but this is the kind of post we need more from).
ModeratorI know Teamliquid is known as a massive building
ahcho00
Profile Joined March 2010
United States220 Posts
March 17 2010 23:46 GMT
#37
i really think marines are what u need to build. massing marines really does some major dmg if u have like 3-4 medivacs. maybe don't even need that. gosh with 17k minerals...i would feel like i lost the game because i'm not doing something right haha. i would say in TVT though, it's really about thought, what ur opponent's strategy really is because there's many variations and ways to attack and the both of you really have the same capabilities. i think tvt is my worst matchup but it really comes down to the mindgames of the players. keeping micro/macro consistent is a must of course. if u find urself with more minerals that u need while all ur rax/fact/sp are queued with 2 production it's time to expand, or expand twice. it's more about map control in tvt than any other matchup as i've beaten a zerg with 3 bases vs my 2 but maybe he was just a bad player. just from my experience though, expanding and constantly keeping that food up is really key because ur gonna lose units that's for sure so u need to be able to compensate for losing those units and bringing out more units ASAP which means more rax, more space, more minerals and hopefully with ur careful expanding ur gas should be up there also.
Rucky
Profile Joined February 2008
United States717 Posts
March 18 2010 00:06 GMT
#38
On March 18 2010 08:28 JTPROG wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2010 08:21 Steve496 wrote:
Well, lets run some quick numbers. All numbers are based on my memory of rough testing I did a week or so back, so some of them might be slightly off - if so, by all means correct me. However:

An Orbital Command regenerates 50 energy every 90 seconds or so; hence, an extra Orbital Command gives you an extra MULE - and thus an extra 270 minerals - every 90 seconds, which works out to roughly 180 minerals a minute.

An SCV mines about 40 mineral a minute; hence, an extra Orbital Command provides mining throughput equal to about 4.5 SCVs. The SCVs cost 225 minerals, while the Orbital Command costs 550 minerals plus 100 seconds of SCV mining time, which is another 66.7 minerals. Hence, the cost difference is 391.7 minerals, right?

Well, no, because the OC *provides* 11 supply while the SCVs would use 4.5 supply; hence, there's a swing of 15.5 supply in terms of how many Supply Depots we need. A Supply Depot takes 100 minerals to build, as well as 20 minerals worth of mining time from an SCV, for a total of 120 minerals per 8 supply; thus, each supply costs about 15 minerals to obtain, meaning the swing of 15.5 supply saves us 232.5 minerals. Hence, the Orbital Command really only costs us an extra 159.2 minerals.

(For purposes of these calculations, I'm ignoring the various ramp-up effects - the fact that the OC gets a MULE the instant it finishes, versus the fact that the SCVs would be done sooner and could start mining earlier. This tradeoff is too circumstantial to easily comment on in general, and, as such, is omitted - we're looking only at steady-state income once both are up and running).

Hence, the question is: what are the benefits of building extra OCs versus extra SCVs, and are those advantages worth the 159.2 mineral cost difference? Well, the fact that you actually use less supply so can have a slightly larger army means it's slightly more appealing as you near the resource cap, as is the fact that you have more energy you can reasonably spend on scans if you desire. On the downside, MULEs are more subject to harassment - if they come in and snipe 2 or 3 MULEs (or even just force you to run them away to avoid dying), you lose a lot more than if they snipe 2 or 3 SCVs.

So all in all: I'd say that as a general rule, it's probably not worth it. However, I can easily imagine situations where these factors would work out such that it is slightly advantageous to build the extra orbital commands. So as a generally useful strategy that one expects to do as a matter of routine? Probably not. But it's an interesting trick to remember nevertheless, as situations may arise where it's useful.


Great post, but I want you to do one more calculation.

Calculate the effectiveness of this strat when your excess minerals are of absolutely no use to you at the time you decide to build the orbital commands due to gas restrictions and mass tanks.


1. minerals are never excess
2. minerals are never of absolutely no use
Beyond the Game
JTPROG
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States254 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-18 00:41:54
March 18 2010 00:15 GMT
#39
On March 18 2010 09:06 Rucky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2010 08:28 JTPROG wrote:
On March 18 2010 08:21 Steve496 wrote:
Well, lets run some quick numbers. All numbers are based on my memory of rough testing I did a week or so back, so some of them might be slightly off - if so, by all means correct me. However:

An Orbital Command regenerates 50 energy every 90 seconds or so; hence, an extra Orbital Command gives you an extra MULE - and thus an extra 270 minerals - every 90 seconds, which works out to roughly 180 minerals a minute.

An SCV mines about 40 mineral a minute; hence, an extra Orbital Command provides mining throughput equal to about 4.5 SCVs. The SCVs cost 225 minerals, while the Orbital Command costs 550 minerals plus 100 seconds of SCV mining time, which is another 66.7 minerals. Hence, the cost difference is 391.7 minerals, right?

Well, no, because the OC *provides* 11 supply while the SCVs would use 4.5 supply; hence, there's a swing of 15.5 supply in terms of how many Supply Depots we need. A Supply Depot takes 100 minerals to build, as well as 20 minerals worth of mining time from an SCV, for a total of 120 minerals per 8 supply; thus, each supply costs about 15 minerals to obtain, meaning the swing of 15.5 supply saves us 232.5 minerals. Hence, the Orbital Command really only costs us an extra 159.2 minerals.

(For purposes of these calculations, I'm ignoring the various ramp-up effects - the fact that the OC gets a MULE the instant it finishes, versus the fact that the SCVs would be done sooner and could start mining earlier. This tradeoff is too circumstantial to easily comment on in general, and, as such, is omitted - we're looking only at steady-state income once both are up and running).

Hence, the question is: what are the benefits of building extra OCs versus extra SCVs, and are those advantages worth the 159.2 mineral cost difference? Well, the fact that you actually use less supply so can have a slightly larger army means it's slightly more appealing as you near the resource cap, as is the fact that you have more energy you can reasonably spend on scans if you desire. On the downside, MULEs are more subject to harassment - if they come in and snipe 2 or 3 MULEs (or even just force you to run them away to avoid dying), you lose a lot more than if they snipe 2 or 3 SCVs.

So all in all: I'd say that as a general rule, it's probably not worth it. However, I can easily imagine situations where these factors would work out such that it is slightly advantageous to build the extra orbital commands. So as a generally useful strategy that one expects to do as a matter of routine? Probably not. But it's an interesting trick to remember nevertheless, as situations may arise where it's useful.


Great post, but I want you to do one more calculation.

Calculate the effectiveness of this strat when your excess minerals are of absolutely no use to you at the time you decide to build the orbital commands due to gas restrictions and mass tanks.


1. minerals are never excess
2. minerals are never of absolutely no use


bad post

1.prove
2.it

If the usefullness is near nothing, it might as well be nothing. Sending marines or hellions against tanks with support is a huge waste of minerals. I already have enough marines for support. I don't need any more turrets. Now what? I do like collecting rocks....
inflowgaming.net
az2
Profile Joined March 2010
United States62 Posts
March 18 2010 00:40 GMT
#40
For all of you saying this is a bad idea I think he is saying to do it when you already have taken all the expansions you can, you are in a TvT late game where tanks, thors, and air dominate, and you have 1-2k excess minerals but dont want to use up supply.

Take a look at this game to see this situation, both players would have benefited from extra scans.

http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?mhnyjzjkiyw
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
01:00
OSC 5000
EmpressLilyy35
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
elazer 240
Classic 20
EnDerr 12
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 22409
Calm 3005
Rain 1540
Shuttle 371
Mini 354
EffOrt 306
Rush 167
firebathero 137
Dewaltoss 84
Zeus 71
[ Show more ]
hero 51
Hyun 41
Killer 28
Hm[arnc] 26
ToSsGirL 26
Barracks 21
Trap 21
PianO 20
Terrorterran 20
910 19
scan(afreeca) 15
Aegong 14
Movie 13
soO 11
Sacsri 9
Dota 2
Gorgc7132
420jenkins359
monkeys_forever353
Counter-Strike
x6flipin342
jkaem126
gobbtv107
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr53
Other Games
singsing1934
FrodaN1265
Liquid`RaSZi1204
Beastyqt587
Lowko359
hiko195
Liquid`VortiX155
ArmadaUGS152
KnowMe144
QueenE108
Mew2King81
kaitlyn30
Railgan11
Organizations
StarCraft 2
TaKeTV 3
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1911
League of Legends
• Jankos2788
• TFBlade892
Other Games
• Shiphtur400
Upcoming Events
OSC
6h 2m
ArT vs MindelVK
MiniZergUA vs TBD
Shameless vs TBD
Ultimate Battle
19h 2m
OSC
21h 2m
OSC
1d 6h
ByuN vs MaxPax
herO vs Krystianer
Percival vs Shameless
LetaleX vs YoungYakov
Nicoract vs Gerald
GgMaChine vs ArT
CranKy Ducklings
1d 17h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 19h
IPSL
2 days
TerrOr vs IJ_Terran
rasowy vs Hazorath
BSL
2 days
TerrOr vs OyAji
UltrA vs Gosudark
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
[ Show More ]
IPSL
3 days
Art_Of_Turtle vs KameZerg
Radley vs George
BSL
3 days
Artosis vs Dewalt
Ret vs Tech
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-11
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
Individual League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

YSL S4
Sector 591
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
StarCraft2 Weekly Open Tournament 2026 Grand Finals
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.