• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:20
CEST 07:20
KST 14:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall6HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL40Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster14Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? StarCraft Mass Recall: SC1 campaigns on SC2 thread How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL Help: rep cant save BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Where did Hovz go?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 502 users

[D] Spamming Orbital Commands - Page 4

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 All
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25979 Posts
March 18 2010 15:35 GMT
#61
Can you explain to me how this situation is any different than in Starcraft 1? We've literally never seen people spamming extra Command Centers in SC2 for scan, so why is it such a supposedly great move in Starcraft 2? I understand that scouting and sighting for Tanks is important, but it was important in SC1 too. You still have your 3-4 scans from your normal CCs as well as floating buildings and Turrets to spot for you as well.
Moderator
JTPROG
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States254 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-18 15:56:38
March 18 2010 15:50 GMT
#62
On March 19 2010 00:35 Chill wrote:
Can you explain to me how this situation is any different than in Starcraft 1? We've literally never seen people spamming extra Command Centers in SC2 for scan, so why is it such a supposedly great move in Starcraft 2? I understand that scouting and sighting for Tanks is important, but it was important in SC1 too. You still have your 3-4 scans from your normal CCs as well as floating buildings and Turrets to spot for you as well.


Besides the fact someone just said boxer has done this, I will reply.

1.Command centers in SC1 needed an add-on which took up more already scarce space and could not be lifted off with it (obviously), making it very immobile.

2.Comsat stations did not have the added bonus of MULEs, which is a bonus economic factor that partially makes up for the cost spent. Also, it can be used in place of SCVs for continued mining with lower supply limitations (for late game), not to mention MULE bombing, and quick resource boosts (can mine over 2000 minerals in less than a minute with MULEs).

3.The way tanks work in SC2 as compared with SC1 is much different, as you need sight to return fire, making scans even MORE important.

4.Tanks in SC2 are actually more gas-intensive than in SC1, leading to an even greater source imbalance.

5.Vultures (and mines) were actually useful in SC1 to spend minerals on as compared to hellions, in TvT.
inflowgaming.net
BlasiuS
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States2405 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-18 15:57:22
March 18 2010 15:56 GMT
#63
Gas is much more scarce in SC2, more than it is in SC1. You need twice the # of drones to achieve gas saturation at each base. For example, 4 base gas in this game requires twenty-four workers. That's a lot. And many of the units' gas prices haven't changed; mutas are still 100 gas, ultras are still 200 gas, broodlords are more expensive than guardians in gas cost, HT are still 150 gas, I think siege tanks are still 100 gas(?), colossus are very good units but very gas-intensive, etc. etc.

In addition, making the right unit is even more important in SC2, since the hard-counters are "harder" than SC1, so to speak. So you can't just use your extra minerals to spam marines/zealots/hellions/zerglings/etc., they are much less useful against their counters than basic units are in SC1.

I think Terrans are MULEing too much, and ending up with ridiculous amounts of minerals, and very little gas. From what I can tell the OP is trying to find a 'creative' way to spend minerals (but I don't agree that making mass command centers is the way to do it).
next week on Everybody Loves HypnoToad:
Twilight Templar
Profile Joined April 2009
99 Posts
March 18 2010 16:38 GMT
#64
I'd just build more production so that if I lose my army i'll be able to rebuild it a 3 times the speed of my opponent. (this is of course assuming we're talking about 200/200 armies)He simply wouldn't be able to keep up with the production unless he also build multiple production buildings.

As for OC's if it's lategame TvT you prolly already have 3-4 anyway so i don't see how you'll need anymore scans than that. One could argue however that mules bombs could be very useful. I can see it now, mules dropping from the sky as tanks move forward behind them. the defenders blow the shit out of the free mules and then procede to get their asses handed to them by the previously mentioned tanks. (that would be pretty epic to see)
dum dadi do dum dum dee do dee da
Louder
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States2276 Posts
March 18 2010 16:53 GMT
#65
On March 18 2010 00:59 Gretorp wrote:
I'm going to use this actually, but for scan.

I was recently playing kawaiirice in a 50 minute tvt where i had just about 100 gasish, but I had around 17,000 minerals. I think the additional scans will allow me to see what's up better, and if necessary bait fire of tanks with mule drops.

Thanks for the idea :-)



Yeah... I think the most I've had is 14k, but anything over 1-2k while you have 0 gas is retarded. For people saying make marines... that's dumb. Marines suck ass TvT. I don't even bother making marines/marauders after the first 10 minutes of the game usually :D
JTPROG
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States254 Posts
March 18 2010 17:14 GMT
#66
On March 19 2010 01:38 Twilight Templar wrote:
I'd just build more production so that if I lose my army i'll be able to rebuild it a 3 times the speed of my opponent. (this is of course assuming we're talking about 200/200 armies)He simply wouldn't be able to keep up with the production unless he also build multiple production buildings.

As for OC's if it's lategame TvT you prolly already have 3-4 anyway so i don't see how you'll need anymore scans than that. One could argue however that mules bombs could be very useful. I can see it now, mules dropping from the sky as tanks move forward behind them. the defenders blow the shit out of the free mules and then procede to get their asses handed to them by the previously mentioned tanks. (that would be pretty epic to see)


Production you say? The only production building that costs no gas is a barracks without a reactor.

So you're saying you want to mass single-unit producing barracks to suicide your worthless marines at 3 times the speed of your opponent?

Sounds like a stellar plan.
inflowgaming.net
Perkins1752
Profile Joined May 2009
Germany214 Posts
March 18 2010 17:22 GMT
#67
So please correct me if I am wrong. You mule more and scan less in order to buy more CC's with the gained minerals which will allow you to scan more without muling less. This will allow you to build even more CC's. So why not mule less and scan more without being outmined so ridiculous fast?
JohannesH
Profile Joined September 2009
Finland1364 Posts
March 18 2010 17:49 GMT
#68
How long does it take for it to pay itself with just the supply adding? Since if you cant use those minerals now, theres not much harm in using it that way even if the payback time to that mineral investment was pretty slow, as long as it pays itself before youre mineral stalling again.
If you have to ask, you don't know.
Steve496
Profile Joined July 2009
United States60 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-18 18:12:03
March 18 2010 18:06 GMT
#69
Well, by my previous analysis: Orbital Command costs 550 + 66.7 lost mining time, Depot costs 100 + 20 lost mining time; hence, OC pays for itself via supply upgrade when you've gained 616.7/120 = 5.14 supply depots from it. The OC itself replaces 1.25, so you need to do 3.89 upgrades to pay for the rest. You can do one immediately, and then need to wait for 2.89 * 50 energy to do the rest, which takes about 2.89 * 90 = 260 seconds. So a little over 4 minutes to pay for itself via supply upgrades alone.

Edit: I should add that that's 260 seconds from when OC finishes, hence 260 + 100 + 35 = 395 seconds - about 6.5 minutes - from when it started.
JTPROG
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States254 Posts
March 18 2010 18:09 GMT
#70
On March 19 2010 03:06 Steve496 wrote:
Well, by my previous analysis: Orbital Command costs 550 + 66.7 lost mining time, Depot costs 100 + 20 lost mining time; hence, OC pays for itself via supply upgrade when you've gained 616.7/120 = 5.14 supply depots from it. The OC itself replaces 1.25, so you need to do 3.89 upgrades to pay for the rest. You can do one immediately, and then need to wait for 2.89 * 50 energy to do the rest, which takes about 2.89 * 90 = 260 seconds. So a little over 4 minutes to pay for itself via supply upgrades alone.


The only thing to take into account with using it for supply, though, is that you actually need a depot to use the extra supply, making it slightly less effective over a short period of time.
inflowgaming.net
Twilight Templar
Profile Joined April 2009
99 Posts
March 18 2010 19:06 GMT
#71
On March 19 2010 02:14 JTPROG wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2010 01:38 Twilight Templar wrote:
I'd just build more production so that if I lose my army i'll be able to rebuild it a 3 times the speed of my opponent. (this is of course assuming we're talking about 200/200 armies)He simply wouldn't be able to keep up with the production unless he also build multiple production buildings.

As for OC's if it's lategame TvT you prolly already have 3-4 anyway so i don't see how you'll need anymore scans than that. One could argue however that mules bombs could be very useful. I can see it now, mules dropping from the sky as tanks move forward behind them. the defenders blow the shit out of the free mules and then procede to get their asses handed to them by the previously mentioned tanks. (that would be pretty epic to see)


Production you say? The only production building that costs no gas is a barracks without a reactor.

So you're saying you want to mass single-unit producing barracks to suicide your worthless marines at 3 times the speed of your opponent?

Sounds like a stellar plan.

If you had read my post you'd have noticed i said to do that only if at 200/200. So you wouldn't need gas for units since you're maxed out. (maybe upgardes, i dunno) read posts before spewing nonsense.
dum dadi do dum dum dee do dee da
JTPROG
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States254 Posts
March 20 2010 14:10 GMT
#72
On March 19 2010 04:06 Twilight Templar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2010 02:14 JTPROG wrote:
On March 19 2010 01:38 Twilight Templar wrote:
I'd just build more production so that if I lose my army i'll be able to rebuild it a 3 times the speed of my opponent. (this is of course assuming we're talking about 200/200 armies)He simply wouldn't be able to keep up with the production unless he also build multiple production buildings.

As for OC's if it's lategame TvT you prolly already have 3-4 anyway so i don't see how you'll need anymore scans than that. One could argue however that mules bombs could be very useful. I can see it now, mules dropping from the sky as tanks move forward behind them. the defenders blow the shit out of the free mules and then procede to get their asses handed to them by the previously mentioned tanks. (that would be pretty epic to see)


Production you say? The only production building that costs no gas is a barracks without a reactor.

So you're saying you want to mass single-unit producing barracks to suicide your worthless marines at 3 times the speed of your opponent?

Sounds like a stellar plan.

If you had read my post you'd have noticed i said to do that only if at 200/200. So you wouldn't need gas for units since you're maxed out. (maybe upgardes, i dunno) read posts before spewing nonsense.


Even if so, wouldn't you rather save the gas for units later, rather than spend it on factoriesi or starports to make those units a bit faster...? This still doesn't have anything to do with the fact that you will have a shit-ton of minerals and no gas though, so I'm still failing to see the point.
inflowgaming.net
Zoler
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Sweden6339 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-20 14:22:37
March 20 2010 14:22 GMT
#73
On March 20 2010 23:10 JTPROG wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2010 04:06 Twilight Templar wrote:
On March 19 2010 02:14 JTPROG wrote:
On March 19 2010 01:38 Twilight Templar wrote:
I'd just build more production so that if I lose my army i'll be able to rebuild it a 3 times the speed of my opponent. (this is of course assuming we're talking about 200/200 armies)He simply wouldn't be able to keep up with the production unless he also build multiple production buildings.

As for OC's if it's lategame TvT you prolly already have 3-4 anyway so i don't see how you'll need anymore scans than that. One could argue however that mules bombs could be very useful. I can see it now, mules dropping from the sky as tanks move forward behind them. the defenders blow the shit out of the free mules and then procede to get their asses handed to them by the previously mentioned tanks. (that would be pretty epic to see)


Production you say? The only production building that costs no gas is a barracks without a reactor.

So you're saying you want to mass single-unit producing barracks to suicide your worthless marines at 3 times the speed of your opponent?

Sounds like a stellar plan.

If you had read my post you'd have noticed i said to do that only if at 200/200. So you wouldn't need gas for units since you're maxed out. (maybe upgardes, i dunno) read posts before spewing nonsense.


Even if so, wouldn't you rather save the gas for units later, rather than spend it on factoriesi or starports to make those units a bit faster...? This still doesn't have anything to do with the fact that you will have a shit-ton of minerals and no gas though, so I'm still failing to see the point.


You ever seen late late game TvT of SCBW? Terrans usually build a TON of factories. Especially when they are maxed.
Lim Yo Hwan forever!
JTPROG
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States254 Posts
March 20 2010 14:48 GMT
#74
On March 20 2010 23:22 Zoler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2010 23:10 JTPROG wrote:
On March 19 2010 04:06 Twilight Templar wrote:
On March 19 2010 02:14 JTPROG wrote:
On March 19 2010 01:38 Twilight Templar wrote:
I'd just build more production so that if I lose my army i'll be able to rebuild it a 3 times the speed of my opponent. (this is of course assuming we're talking about 200/200 armies)He simply wouldn't be able to keep up with the production unless he also build multiple production buildings.

As for OC's if it's lategame TvT you prolly already have 3-4 anyway so i don't see how you'll need anymore scans than that. One could argue however that mules bombs could be very useful. I can see it now, mules dropping from the sky as tanks move forward behind them. the defenders blow the shit out of the free mules and then procede to get their asses handed to them by the previously mentioned tanks. (that would be pretty epic to see)


Production you say? The only production building that costs no gas is a barracks without a reactor.

So you're saying you want to mass single-unit producing barracks to suicide your worthless marines at 3 times the speed of your opponent?

Sounds like a stellar plan.

If you had read my post you'd have noticed i said to do that only if at 200/200. So you wouldn't need gas for units since you're maxed out. (maybe upgardes, i dunno) read posts before spewing nonsense.


Even if so, wouldn't you rather save the gas for units later, rather than spend it on factoriesi or starports to make those units a bit faster...? This still doesn't have anything to do with the fact that you will have a shit-ton of minerals and no gas though, so I'm still failing to see the point.


You ever seen late late game TvT of SCBW? Terrans usually build a TON of factories. Especially when they are maxed.


I'm not entirely discrediting you, but this isn't SCBW. lol.

Plus, we must stay on topic, and that is that we have no gas TONS OF SPARE MINERALS which I suggest spending on OCs. I don't know how people got building factories out of spare minerals.
inflowgaming.net
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-20 14:59:45
March 20 2010 14:52 GMT
#75
The initial calculation on the real cost of a OC was a bit wrong as it used some wrong numbers I think. A scv mines 1 min/sec so the given build time roughly equals in extra mineral cost thus.
Supply is 135 minerals for 7 supply so 1 command center is 11/7 * 135 = 212 minerals.
So real costs are
OC:
400+150+100 - 212 = 438 minerals
gives:
3.6 min/ sec of MULES
payback time about 2 mins

SCV:
50 minerals
gives:
1 min/sec
payback time 50 secs.

So as far as minerals goes the scv is offcourse more efficient but in the lategame the fact they take supply can be relevant. Lategame it should be noted though that the real cost of a OC becomes more because you will have 200 supply anyway.
Population efficiency is incredibly important though in a stale matchup such as TvT so being able to cut scv's by replacing them with extra OC's and mule power can be worthwhile. The point to start doing this, if it's usefull at all, is either at around 160/160 when the extra supply of those OCs is still usefull or latelate game when minerals are near useless.
I can see a use for it in those situations where the map is divided half by half and pretty locked up, you should be having 3 to 4 OCs already though so don't generally need that much more scan's.
There aren't a lot of mineral outlets in TvT but early on marines and later on turrets seem more useful.

I just wish they added something to break tank lines more easily in the mirror, the defensive bonus from a tank is too big making TvT's so damn boring at times.

Edit:
On a sidenote this discussion should reveal that Fast expanding is quite safe in SC2 given that a OC pays itself back quite quickly even if it's NOT at your expansion. Expanding within your 'wall' is quite safe and even if your opponent keeps you in your base you can MULE and make extra scv's for your main till it's safe to float over to your expo. Given that your main can take up to ~26 scv's before being fully saturated this is quite effective. It's one of the reasons I think expanding as terran while at 20 pop is quite effective as a walled ramp can easily be defended against zerg and toss. Before colossi etc. roll around the expansion paid itself back even if you never actually floated it to your expansion!
NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
March 20 2010 15:09 GMT
#76
Since TvT consists of mostly Tank/Viking and can transition into Thors later on, you have lots of OC's / Bases anyway, so you don't really need more OC's.
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
Gedrah
Profile Joined February 2010
465 Posts
March 20 2010 18:14 GMT
#77
In any 2v2 game that isn't going to be over fast, once I've taken either my cliff or my natural and dropped mules off my initial 2 OCs, I make 2 more CC in my main and upgrade them, then head out with my army and try and take ground for additional expos. The nice thing is that by the time I land, I can drop 4-6 mules and pump Marines or Hellions out of as many structures as I want to slow down any tech-intensive attack with attrition.

ADAM.1, what you say is true but the value of ALWAYS having a scan available is huuuge. Moreso than 11 Marines (550 minerals) per scanner, imho. As long as you have enough units, map control, and good position that your opponent can't walk over you, you can spend those minerals on a long-term investment like a Scanner energy tank (OC).
What is a dickfour?
Klockan3
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
Sweden2866 Posts
March 20 2010 22:01 GMT
#78
On March 20 2010 23:52 Markwerf wrote:
A scv mines 1 min/sec

No, they mine 5 minerals/7 in game seconds, since that is the time you use for mules that must be the time you use for the workers. 1 real second in faster is 1.4 game seconds.
ShaperofDreams
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada2492 Posts
March 20 2010 22:15 GMT
#79
Oh it's JTPROG again. If you have that kinda money its more worth investing into almost anything else. spending extra mins for MULES or scans is redundant because you could just be sacrificing mins for scans. Ideally you shouldn't have extra mins because you are capable of "spending" MULE money on scans.

If you aren't casting MULEs and still have extra mins something is really wrong with your game :/
Bitches don't know about my overlord. FUCK OFF ALDARIS I HAVE ENOUGH PYLONS. My Balls are as smooth as Eggs.
Gedrah
Profile Joined February 2010
465 Posts
March 21 2010 04:58 GMT
#80
On March 18 2010 04:14 FortuneSyn wrote:
scan, and mule dropping on tanks is pretty damn useful. But so are turret highways.


Prove to Zerg you can place as many turrets around the map as he can hide overlords. > Having massive excess of minerals from multi-OC mule mining can be a very good thing if your enemy even dreams of going air units.
What is a dickfour?
Prev 1 2 3 4 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 41m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 231
StarCraft: Brood War
PianO 391
Snow 103
Aegong 65
JulyZerg 61
Nal_rA 45
Rock 31
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
Noble 9
Icarus 7
Bale 6
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm116
League of Legends
JimRising 779
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K726
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King201
amsayoshi47
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor98
Other Games
summit1g9128
shahzam719
hungrybox380
WinterStarcraft368
RuFF_SC266
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1007
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH330
• practicex 48
• OhrlRock 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1280
• Lourlo883
• Stunt388
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
4h 41m
RSL Revival
4h 41m
ByuN vs Classic
Clem vs Cham
WardiTV European League
10h 41m
Replay Cast
18h 41m
RSL Revival
1d 4h
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
WardiTV European League
1d 10h
FEL
1d 10h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 21h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
[ Show More ]
FEL
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL: ProLeague
3 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.