Newbie Student Mafia XXVI

On June 04 2017 03:33 ritoky wrote:
i guess i get how tonally it can feel the same from your PoV because HF is saying you're inconsistent and if you were consistent you should think X, but you randomly think Y which makes no sense.

but HF does that always and to pretty much everyone. it's how sometimes he ends up lynching dumb instead of scum. i think you're kinda omgusing.

On June 04 2017 08:38 Vivax wrote:


There's enough info in the thread RN and I still don't have the feeling that you're trying to do much with it, but you keep noticing it every time whenever you are adressed.

Like, no opinion on HF, fidei. You do give out a bunch of reads but there's barely any explanation behind them. You keep coming back to BHs RNG as even if it mattered anything if he explained where the number came from.

No hint at all that you're having fun or are invested whatsoever into the game. Others sort of have a tone to them, you don't. You just seem completely unemotional.

If you think you have a reason to be like this and realize it, then be open about it, but if you told me that you are like you always are as town, I'd have a hard time believing it.

For RNG, this post will be used for generating a random lynch. The # in the upper left corner can be right-clicked and used to access the absolute TL post # for this post. That number mod 9 is the random lynch. 1 =Oats, 2 = rayn, etc, all the way up to 8 = holyflare and 0 = sloosh.

The reason we use the absolute TL post number is that posts are constantly being made, so the number is truly random. We turn it into a number 1-14 by taking that number mod 14. What is mod? effectively, it's the remainder after division. For example. 13 mod 14 = 13. 14 mod 14 = 0. 18 mod 14 = 4. 19 mod 14 = 5. and so on.

Basically, this generates a random number 1 through 14. I am in favor of the random lynch (though am somewhat interested in a policy lynch today as well-- TL does not do this enough. I will start off by voting for the random lynched based on THIS POST.

On October 07 2014 13:43 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
So asking people about why their reasoning is bad and seeing how far they're willing to push it is nothingness? Focusing on people who state that other players are "interesting" without bothering to follow it up is scummy?

Yeah, okay. You're being ridiculous.

On October 08 2014 07:41 batsnacks wrote:
If no one here knew each other I think a few more people would have scum read BH for his RNG thing. I also think if no one here knew each other more than a few people would be scum reading palmar. BH and palmar play a lot though, so just about everyone but Liam is used to seeing this from both of them.

And I think it's positive that he learned, accepted, and worked with that in regards to BH.

On October 08 2014 07:42 StorrZerg wrote:


Why the priority on "logic" when i feel the majority of people that are reading him scum has to do with how he scum reads people, and that he is very wishy washy with reads, and is only really scum reading inactives.

On October 09 2014 02:49 Damdred wrote:
BH seems interested, and is actually doing things and pushing his lynch today. Normally when hes scum in almost every scum game i've seen or read, he makes excuses complains and only posts during the time hes not "busy". here he is the opposite he has been in the thread, has argued not complained and not made excuses for his absence plus he did lynch scum oo day one and put rng on him even before he made his entrance into the thread.

On June 04 2017 09:16 Blazinghand wrote:













YOU SEEM QUITE CONFIDENT IN MY RNG FOR A GUY WHO DOESNT KNOW ABOUT MY RNG

On June 04 2017 08:38 Vivax wrote:


There's enough info in the thread RN and I still don't have the feeling that you're trying to do much with it, but you keep noticing it every time whenever you are adressed.

Like, no opinion on HF, fidei. You do give out a bunch of reads but there's barely any explanation behind them. You keep coming back to BHs RNG as even if it mattered anything if he explained where the number came from.

No hint at all that you're having fun or are invested whatsoever into the game. Others sort of have a tone to them, you don't. You just seem completely unemotional.

If you think you have a reason to be like this and realize it, then be open about it, but if you told me that you are like you always are as town, I'd have a hard time believing it.

On June 04 2017 09:16 Blazinghand wrote:













YOU SEEM QUITE CONFIDENT IN MY RNG FOR A GUY WHO DOESNT KNOW ABOUT MY RNG

On June 04 2017 09:23 Blazinghand wrote:


I'm not talking about your read on me, Grack. Screw your read, that's irrelevant bull crap. I'm talking about the fact that you were trying to fake lack of knowledge about or familiarity with my RNG. You're caught in a lie and trying to talk about something else, but everyone knows you're lying about my RNG now, you DID know about it, you've played with it, youv'e argued about it. You can't wiggle out of this one buddy.

On June 04 2017 05:53 Grackaroni wrote:
Also BH you know you can't random lynch in newbie games. Plus you never told me how you generated the number. I think the post id disappeared from the old method you used to use.

On June 04 2017 09:32 Blazinghand wrote:


haha yeah you try to back out of the web of lies you've made up about me but everyone knows now.

On June 04 2017 17:02 Blazinghand wrote:


Man that game was great, probably the best scumgame I've played ever

On June 05 2017 06:57 Grackaroni wrote:
I think your case is solid but I still kind of like him because he's being snarky and more defiant in this game. The other problem is that he's not exactly known to make very much sense as town.

On June 05 2017 07:06 Blazinghand wrote:


You lied and are pretty likely to be scum. People even admit you're lying but don't think it makes you scum. Very frustrating. Sigh

On June 05 2017 07:29 Blazinghand wrote:


I have a big reputation but I doubt I'm an above average player these days

Anyways I'm just feeling low key I guess. Didn't expect to be in so soon

On June 05 2017 07:43 Tubesock wrote:
I'm contemplating a yolo vivax lynch.

On June 05 2017 07:51 Tumblewood wrote:

i don't even agree with the claim that he's doing nothing. that's usually the flaw in that sort of argument, that they keep yelling about it and never turn around and realize the player actually did something. or they just write off everything as not a real contribution

On June 05 2017 07:53 Vivax wrote:


BH summary of this day:

RNG stuff.
Push Grack for lying about rng even though it's obviously not an argument anyone would follow.
Talk about past game with onegu scum teammate but posting no opinion on onegu this game at all.
Then stick around at EoD kind of posting one liners and some wifom about ritoky.

On June 05 2017 08:00 Holyflare wrote:
I absolutely think LS is the optimal lynch today by the way.

On June 05 2017 08:01 LightningStrike wrote:

Better me than a claimed blue I guess.

On June 05 2017 07:59 Blazinghand wrote:

Sigh well better I die than the claimed doc at least

On June 05 2017 08:03 Tumblewood wrote:

this is a very town thing to say. not voting ls today

On June 05 2017 08:06 LightningStrike wrote:
I think BH is likely town who was willing to die for our unCCed blue.

On June 05 2017 08:21 Vivax wrote:


.....................................................

He's still here, still not doing any scumhunting whatsoever.

On June 05 2017 08:30 Tumblewood wrote:
but you know what hf? i would be totally fine with not lynching you today. we just need an alternative who isn't an active townie trying to solve the game. as in not vivax, bh, ls, or grack

On June 05 2017 08:55 Blazinghand wrote:
ARE WE SHENANNIING ONTO FIDEI? I DON'T WANT TO DIE AND I DON'T WANT THE BLUE TO DIE SO PLEASE ASNWER

On June 05 2017 08:55 Grackaroni wrote:

We really should have killed BH. This isn't town BH.

On June 05 2017 08:58 Blazinghand wrote:


:p then vote me for it kiddo

On June 05 2017 09:10 Blazinghand wrote:
Once again Blazinghand saves the day with his good choices

On June 05 2017 09:39 Prison Break wrote:
I mean how many scum are there. I assume 3? one was fidei. Maybe one was AFK. So you make any conclusions on this based off literally 1 person who did or didn't fight it?

On June 05 2017 09:59 Blazinghand wrote:

Yeah it's possible, I think it was a pretty snappy shenannie though. Shenannies are vastly underrated and people think that scum can stop them but really they're one of the most powerful tools in the town toolbox. As former shenanigan king I assure you this is true

On June 06 2017 04:29 ritoky wrote:


bh waited until the dude was basically in the ground b4 playing games, he didn't endanger shit.

and wasted my vote? i came back with 3 minutes, barely grasped that a blue had been claimed and voted on the next up on my list. you act like my vote could have done anything. i don't see a quadruple voter role in this game.

On June 06 2017 04:42 LightningStrike wrote:

It still makes you and BH look bad for VCA that why I giving a damn about it. We both know wasting votes regardless of the flip is terrible.

On June 06 2017 04:42 LightningStrike wrote:

It still makes you and BH look bad for VCA that why I giving a damn about it. We both know wasting votes regardless of the flip is terrible.

On June 06 2017 04:43 Holyflare wrote:


no it doesn't really

On June 06 2017 04:46 ritoky wrote:


i mean i could sit here and argue back that i would have voted on fid for the free cred if i come back to the thread and my partner is basically dead. but where's that gonna get us?

On June 06 2017 04:49 ritoky wrote:
i don't get you LS. do you think i am wrong or mafia? i feel like you're talking to me like i am wrong, not mafia; which is just bizarre.

On June 06 2017 05:42 Vivax wrote:
Yea well if you think I'm mafia for afking this game shoot me tonight cause I'm pulling a rayn and will be afk.
Just gonna vote when either of HF or BH gets lynched and make a token post during the day.

On June 06 2017 10:41 Holyflare wrote:


And then there's no blues or what?? You're saying, as the only claimed power role in the game, against 2 known power roles from mafia that we'd get you lynched?

On June 06 2017 13:14 ritoky wrote:


like i said your narrative for me being mafia is "he called me mafia! oh and he quoted this post onegu made 2 days ago that i didn't care about, but now i do; cuz he plotted to lump me in with fidei in the off chance onegu became confirmed town and fidei died! also he made a really convincing case on btdt that i agreed with, makes him mafia too."

town find evidence and draw conclusions from it. you make conclusions and try to find evidence and warp a narrative to fit your constructed worldview, that's just basic mafia mindset.

On June 06 2017 16:15 Blazinghand wrote:

So much faulty logic in this post..

Ok well first off, now that you've made this post, Vivax will not rescind right? lol

"If we decide to lynch Vivax first, and he is cop then we just gave mafia a free nightkill." If we decide to lynch HF first and Vivax is lying scum we ALSO just gave mafia a free kill :/ so like while technically your statement is true it is highly misleading because it implies the reverse isn't true.

On June 06 2017 16:28 Holyflare wrote:
And I have seen some damn questionable responses to this claim.

On June 06 2017 16:31 Blazinghand wrote:



WHY WOULD VIVAX RESCIND AFTER YOU WRITE THIE POST? this is literally a self-defeating post. If you say to someone, "if you rescind your claim, we will lynch you" then they will absolutely not rescind their claim, ESPECIALLY if they are scum. ??? isn't this obvious???

On June 06 2017 21:09 Holyflare wrote:
This game could be really really fun if vivax turns out to be the real cop who green checked bh and is making a logic leap to calling me mafia because that means Tumblewood is mafia.

That's the dream.

On June 06 2017 12:53 Vivax wrote:
Morning.
I'm cop and redchecked HF (in spite of his BS vet claim at the end of the night).

Now what's going to happen is:

You're all going to go ham on whether cop and doc is likely in this setup.

Everyone will either vote HF or me as it should be.

At the end of the day nothing anyone ever said matters again and you will all just lynch another random person again in some attack of herd mentality (which is the prime reason I'm not happy with this game). And don't tell me that lynching fidei wasn't random as hell cause you were all literally just looking for someone else to lynch other than TW except for 1gu who actually had some real arguments.

Now I will park my vote on HF, and probably afk until the end of the day when I check in to see if he got lynched. I literally don't care who you vote, but it has to be one of us.

On June 05 2017 09:11 Vivax wrote:
He was green this is a bastard game

On June 05 2017 09:17 Vivax wrote:
Well I'm not mad cause BH is still mafia. If he is town I will be mad and bad, otherwise I feel no shame for defending fidei.

On June 05 2017 09:17 Vivax wrote:
So whoever wants to prove I'm bad has to lynch BH. 10/10 argument for lynching BH.

On June 06 2017 05:42 Vivax wrote:
Yea well if you think I'm mafia for afking this game shoot me tonight cause I'm pulling a rayn and will be afk.
Just gonna vote when either of HF or BH gets lynched and make a token post during the day.

On June 07 2017 03:09 Prison Break wrote:
if vivax flips cop we lynch HF and are down to 1 scum, which seems fine

I have more of a problem if vivax is town fake claiming, I want to eliminate that possibility first so I want him to come in and confirm his claim / or retract it

On June 07 2017 03:07 Blazinghand wrote:
So BTDT "why would vivax trade himself for holyflare if vivax was scum?" is implying that Vivax wasn't already gonna be lynched today. You of course had Vivax in your "don't lynch" list but let's imagine that he was 100% doomed today. If he was in fact 100% gonna be lynched, as scum, why NOT try to take down HF first?

Another way to look at it was "We're either lynching Vivax or HF today, who is scummier?" and I think the obvious answer is Vivax, even accounting for the cop claim.

It's entirely possible Vivax is in fact the town cop (or a vanilla townie who's just really mad at HF or something). But his play makes sense from the PoV of low-effort scum who can't be arsed to play the game, thinks he's dead no matter what, but wants to try to take someone down with him.

On June 07 2017 03:12 Blazinghand wrote:


Depends on if HF is the RB or not. In this scenario, Mafia RB, if still alive, can RB the doc and shoot the cop. That being said, there is SOMETHING to be said for "all things being absolutely equal, it's probably better to lynch HF first since it'd give us an extra cop check if he's the RB" so this is a valid point

On June 07 2017 03:19 Blazinghand wrote:



"I'm fairly certain he's not the guy to leave his teammates alone and fuck off of the sinking ship" he literally is the kind of guy to do that

"HF is capable of talking himself out of a check" not with me around kiddo

" a framer might be in, right" literally impossible under the rules

On June 07 2017 03:21 Blazinghand wrote:


GF being in does NOT confirm cop existence. The Hosts don't want the Mafia to have too much information, so they get a GF at the start whether or not there's a cop.

Man every piece of setup speculation you're doing is so bad

On June 07 2017 03:22 Blazinghand wrote:


So you think it's more likely HF will flip scum than Vivax will flip scum, based on their contributions to the game and Vivax's claim? Just to be clear here, you think HF is more likely to be scum than Vivax is? please explicitly answer directly.

On June 07 2017 03:27 Blazinghand wrote:


Sigh, AS A HOST, and as the guy who does balance checks (sometimes) for new hosts, I give mafia a GF and advise giving Mafia GF even in games with no cop, it it's a closed setup. You make the experience identical whether there is or isn't a cop. This is like... I mean, come on man/

I'm not saying you're a bad player, but at least please trust my experience. I'm not saying there's definitely no cop; I'm saying the existence of a GF is independent of that fact.

I'm not saying you're a bad player, but just leave the setup speculation to me ok

On June 07 2017 03:29 Blazinghand wrote:


JESUS CHRIST HOW ARE YOU SO DENSE

THE POINT IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE EXACT ROLE COUNTS AND SHIT, YOUR OBJECTION IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT

ALSO THIS IS SEMI-CLOSED NOT SEMI-OPEN

JUST STOP TALKING

On June 07 2017 03:31 Blazinghand wrote:
actually you know what BTDT if it makes you feel better I concede the point on the NAMING of the setup type, but there's NOTHING that implies that automatically there must be a Cop if there is a GF. In fact, PM the host if you want and ask, "in setups with a GF, is it required by the rules there also is a cop" please give it a try

sweet mother of mercy

On June 07 2017 03:31 beentheredonethat wrote:
Just one question:

In a situation where a un-cc'ed cop claims a red-check on a player, do you lynch the un-cc'ed cop over the red-check because the un-cc'ed cop previously was scummier than his red-check?

On June 07 2017 03:26 beentheredonethat wrote:

I don't think you're making sense. And I think you're trying to talk me into lynching Vivax. I'm not gonna lynch into the un-cc'ed cop because his red-check told me to do so. It's super madness.

If he lied, he'll be lynched next day. If not, HF is scum. Supercool.

On June 07 2017 03:33 Blazinghand wrote:


That's exactly the question we're asking!

So we have someone who is SUPER SUPER scummy like Vivax, who 100% needs to be lynched. In his desperation, he claims a redcheck on the highly town HF. Who do we lynch?

That's a tough call. There's not an obvious answer. I think we lynch Vivax for a variety of reasons, but people can reasonably disagree on this.

On June 07 2017 03:33 Holyflare wrote:


How does this not make sense to you. You said it makes sense that vivax is frustrated at the randomness. But what reason does he possibly have to be frustrated when he compliments onegu and said he had valid reasons to vote fidei? zero.

Then you say he's frustrated because fidei wasn't talked about but no shit, we didn't have time with Tumblewood claiming doctor. But fidei flipped mafia.

Why is vivax, the guy who doesn't like to play the game as mafia who had a not so bad start to the game, rage quitting when we kill a mafia super early? Because he was doing well, his team likely in a good spot and fidei "randomly" dies.

Bye bye motivation.

On June 04 2017 06:51 Vivax wrote:
I like Fidei's first post cause he reprimands me for forming certain reads he thinks I shouldn't have. I will say that they are preliminary reads based on the little content I had so I think that shows that he isn't suffering from TMI.
Fidei town for now.

HF town I think cause he isn't just yelling about any mistake someone may have made and extending the discussion about it into as much detail as he can to produce endless unproductive arguments. He seems really chill about his scumhunting and thinks he has something on TW. I can see where he's coming from cause imo that post looked overly emotional (if you wanna call it forced, call it forced) but I'm not that sure that it makes TW mafia as he is.

BTDT I'm atm conflicted on cause I don't think Grack played like this in generic. I feel like Grack has slowed down his posting even more than in the last game, and I'm surprised btdt doesn't see it the same way.
I like on the other hand that he's pointing out how PB is making easy posts by saying certain things in a contrived, overly worded way. But I also think that it's something a scum can easily point out esp. emphasizing that PB won a mafia game recently which reads to me like soft fearmongering. I prefer to remain inconclusive on btdt for now and watch more development between him ritoky and PB.

PB on the other hand calls out fidei for the lurker thingy, but says it's only scummy if it's not to move the game forward, which is a statement that cancels itself and ends up not really saying anything. He could ask fidei if that was his intention before explaining that if it was, he could ignore the argument, for example.
I like his idea of discussing how to find mafia early game actually and giving his own opinion on it cause it looks cute at best, pointless at worst and since it's what we are already doing I don't think that it needs to be laid out.
He doesn't latch onto someone instantly like last scum game but prefers a chill start instead so I remain conflicted on him as well.

HF also pointed out that he's asking for help on how to play and shouldn't be auto made out as scummy which looks like what btdt wants to do.

I think in this conversation btdt looks a bit too eager to push PBs post into a scummy light and comes out slightly worse of the two, although superficially, PB has more things you could construe as scummy quickly (and hence possibly qualifies as lynch bait)

Conversion post explaining his absence reads tonally super town explaining without a hint of nervousness why he's playing like he is. Feels safe to townpile for now.

Ritoky's case on btdt seems good and isn't overly adorned and gets straight to the point. Ritoky likey.

Grack has achieved a new dimension of mafia laziness but his latest read post ends up at something similar like where I am. Gonna see what he comes up with further. I maintain that he didn't try to do jack in early game and even less than last game where at least he actively constructed shit posts (like inserting wrong quotes on purpose).

LS and HFs arguments on LS I'm postponing atm. Also fideis new post doesn't end up where I am at all. I'ma stick around now instead of throwing walls of text at you. And BH?BH whatever, he has a star in his name and is the banlist fuhrer so should probably lynch just to be rebellious.

On June 04 2017 07:32 Vivax wrote:




This reads like real frustration. But no need to be frustrated btdt. Just keep doing your thing!

On June 07 2017 03:45 Blazinghand wrote:
Jeez I've kinda been a grouch to your btdt sorry

Gonna take a break then come back

On June 07 2017 04:19 beentheredonethat wrote:

You cannot write this and expect me to continue reading.

nah HF you have my vote as long as no counter claim happens.

On June 07 2017 04:58 Blazinghand wrote:


Basically I loathe setup speculation, but I have a particularly huge loathing for incorrect setup speculation. So pointing out that it's incorrect then having someone also point out incorrect setup names bothers me too.

Anyways Grack don't worry we'll get to you after we got Vivax brodooski

On June 07 2017 04:26 Prison Break wrote:
If Vivax flips scum I want to lynch Conversion

Any chance they'd both vote me yesterday? maybe trying to get my lynched over fidei

In that case I could maybe see btdt being town despite playing scummy, because he also wants to kill vivax here

On June 05 2017 07:46 Vivax wrote:
HF is mafia obviously.



you are awful

On June 05 2017 07:49 Vivax wrote:


Yes what has TL come to that active engaged players want to lynch others for doing nothing.
Or is the issue that there are players doing nothing?

On June 05 2017 07:51 Vivax wrote:
Sadly he's most likely town and isn't gifted with being able to read btdts emotional progression during D1.

On June 05 2017 08:33 Vivax wrote:


Thanks for your valuable input in the 20 minutes you've spent playing this game after puking out a post of shallow reads to keep up the appearance that you're actually here to play mafia. I'm sure your opinion is very informed and valuable.



And this guy.

On June 05 2017 08:40 Vivax wrote:
Chance to lynch BH, two guys avoid him for shit reasons and go to HF and another goes for PB instead.

Basically townies splitting all over my scumreads while tubesock is blatantly throwing his votes into the worst places possible. Kill me please.

On June 05 2017 08:45 Vivax wrote:


Well you wanted to start with being a dick. And it's a 100% serious answer. I think you're town and I think you are super wrong and I'm pretty sure everyone else thinks that too so there's your answer. I didn't coat it in sugar cause you don't coat things in sugar either, and if I coated it in sugar you'd just eat it anyway before reading it.

On June 05 2017 08:52 Vivax wrote:




Calling my posts shit for no reason and suggesting that you should do the opposite of what my reads say.

Meanwhile never stating a single reason for me being mafia so just assuming you are here to lynch people at your own leisure and not to win the game.

On June 07 2017 08:59 Blazinghand wrote:


Please Vivax, PLEASE it's so simple, it's so INTEGRAL to your claim, and you know it! you could have typed it out in the moment it took you to make that post. Come on man, work with me here, not because you're obligated to, but because it's the right thing to do. I can't MAKE you do anything, but if you're town we're on the same side here buddy. Just gimme this much, ok? It'll help!

On June 07 2017 09:23 Blazinghand wrote:


I really appreciate that reply and I know it wasn't easy for you. Could you also tell me what time you decided to check HF instead of me? Sorry again about the trouble. And, I know you're discussing things in good faith so I'll do so as well.

Why not lynch HF? Well, he's basically sounded tryhard, though yes, I know he could do this as Scum, he also called me a 50/50 early on which is pretty accurate (whereas he could have tried to defend me with a legit townread to look good after I flipped if lynched) given the info he had. Yeah, it's not a solid TR on him. But I like him and he's fun to play with, which influences me as well.

Really though, not gonna lie here Vivax I think it's a lot more a case of "jesus christ let's just get rid of this guy" when it comes to you. Up until about an hour ago I figured you were gonna AFK all day, and the way you reacted to the D1 lynch seemed at its core not to come from the mindset of a townie. On top of that, RNG, man, RNG. But also when I think about it, you know, the effort put forth from you was really bad. And if you make it a situation where like, either you or HF is scum, it's hard from the PoV of "HF is generally playing well and engaging people for the last 48 hours" and "Vivax has been really down and having trouble being involved, and seemed particularly upset that we lynched scum" to justify a vote on HF.

That being said, I can be convinced. But that's basically my reasoning. Like, even if you flip scum for example I don't think that absolves HF, he's a smooth operator. He's a good player. So are you, of course, but HF knows how to talk to talk. I think he could do this as scum, I even think he could do a double bus as scum and try to pull it off. I don't think it's likely you're both scum, but it's possible, and moreso than with like, a normal player.

On June 07 2017 09:37 Blazinghand wrote:


Ah sorry if I came off as overaggressive with those questions. And it's not a policy lynch of "the cop who has a red check on someone" because that's not the policy. In fact, if anything, the policy is to lynch the guy who there's a redcheck on. What's happening right now is a strong push against the policy, because of the unique circumstances.

On June 07 2017 10:17 Vivax wrote:


You didn't come off as overaggressive you just come off as trying to generate irrelevant drivel as proven by your opinion not being affected by those questions at all. Cause the answer to those questions is proven 100% irrelevant to you considering this followup.

You and HF are 100% mafia.

On June 07 2017 06:22 Grackaroni wrote:

lol ok.

Don't come running back to me after I get proven right again with some Grack TMI bullshit over something this blatant.

On June 07 2017 15:56 Blazinghand wrote:


If he's scum I'm gonna trumpet RNG for eva

On June 07 2017 15:57 Blazinghand wrote:


Ok but i'm gonna be a LOT more annoying about it if Vivax is actually scum; you gotta admit this at least

On June 07 2017 16:18 Vivax wrote:


I actually made it clear that there are no other blues besides TW: So that's the most pro town thing I did today as nobody can ever fakeclaim anything this game.

You're just lucky that town doesn't take the free chance to lynch scumflare. What is this going to be? Your sixth scum game in a row or something?

On June 07 2017 16:19 Holyflare wrote:



????? AND THEN YOU RESCINDED AND CALLED ME TOWN FOR CLAIMING BLUE LOL

LOL

LOL

On June 07 2017 16:22 Vivax wrote:


That was the only condition under which I would rescind yes. Since now you admitted to not being blue, I can safely conclude that TW is the only blue in this game.

No more fakeclaimerinos for you this game. And the dramatic capslock doesn't suit you.

On June 07 2017 16:32 Blazinghand wrote:


ok but this won us a lynch d1