TL Mafia Ban List 3.0 - Page 30

On February 16 2016 09:55 Half the Sky wrote:
[N] Star Wars: The Mafia Awaken actions to be as follows:

1 Stutters695 has completed his one-game ban.

2 After discussion with others on a proper solution, MoosyDoosy, the mafia vigilante, was effectively modkilled for failure to submit a shot in a game that required the scumteam to shoot. I'm not placing in a recommendation for an actual ban, unless there was actual precedent for such by other moderators. Part of my issue here was that I've never encountered a situation where scum failed to submit a shot in a mandatory shot game, so if there's a proper reasoning where someone in the past was penalised for it, then that's the precendent I'll follow.

One issue is that he did not post all night phase in thread or in mafia qt after his remaining teammate died. The instructions to concede were first given 2 cycles prior to this, when two of his teammates were alive, yet up for auto-lynch. It was to be expected to know to shoot and also to properly concede. Additionally, there has been some peripheral discussion of rulebreaking involved that I'll leave up to the experts to expand on if they wish.

3 Onegu replaced out day 2 due to illness, and so, no action necessary.

On February 18 2016 20:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So i repeat my question, what is the point of having rules in the game if breaking them does nothing?

On February 18 2016 21:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I see your point. My point is that every rule the host puts in their game should be enforced, and the enforcement should be a modkill followed by at least a 1-game ban. Always. Warnings don't do anything, because otherwise the people who have not warned before are being treated differently under same circumstances -- in some situations breaking the rules actually becomes beneficial to your team, and if there is no punishment it's more likely to be abused.

The line of punishments should be the same, regardless of games, or the rule that has been violated.

One example, how can anyone justify yamato's one game ban for failing to vote is in any line with ~7 games after that where ~10 people have failed to vote? yamato's punishment is perfectly reasonable, people telling those other people "there there...next time just remember *pats on head*" is not. If you break the rules, or are incapable of reading them, then get your appropriate punishment or do not play at all.

On February 23 2016 05:19 nooniansoong wrote:
think of the wifom caused by an rng nk though...