|
11589 Posts
1) Sharrant has been active enough for me to get a town read. It's clear from his filter that when he is here, he's involved in figuring out the game, whether I think his reads are right or not. Town reads also require far less activity to solidify than scum reads, and you should know that. A town read can be as simple as a feel from a post. I've gotten many of those feels from Sharrant's filter.
2) A mafia player in Sharrant's position would not make the read change he did. He's not under suspicion, so why is he worried about how he looks necessarily? And why does looking like you're tunneled mean you're mafia? It doesn't. It makes no sense for mafia Sharrant to call TRN off the cuff like that after casing him at the beginning. It does make sense as town, however, as he processes new information and evaluates his reads. Far more likely that he's town for that than mafia.
3) When I look at Sharrant's filter, his contributions are many. He's obviously trying, and he's not even someone I consider a particularly good player. Contrast that with BC, and his contributions, and you'll see how I get nearly all of my reads. I don't expect much from Sharrant, but what he has put forth exceeds those expectations. I expect much more from BC, but what he's put forth wouldn't even be acceptable from Kushmasta.
Do you understand now? If you're town, it's pretty fucking obvious that I'm town. I'm basically the only person who gives enough of a fuck about this game to make sure we're lynching actual mafia. You might just be confirmation biased or whatever, since I don't know what to expect from you as a player, but my gut tells me you're mafia. You seem intent on slandering my name to the thread and shooting down my perfectly good analysis at every turn.
So if you're town, address my case on BC. Do you think he's trying this game? Do you think the one post out of context with the reasoning he gives is an acceptable level of effort put forth into finding mafia for the day? Even if you think I'm mafia, don't you think it's a little suspicious that he's been unable to provide any solid analysis of anyone's posting that wasn't about policy? Where's his real case on me, if I'm the mafia here?
I daresay I'm the most involved player left in this game. What does that say about my alignment? Why aren't you doubting your scum read on me if you're town?
I just have so many questions, and I don't think you have all the answers.
|
11589 Posts
On April 24 2013 18:35 Vivax wrote: @ Rayn
I might be speaking for Sharrant here, but large part of his case was founded on the fact that you defensively said: You want to lynch BM cause he's mafia, not for policy, but all the while saying that you lynch all claimed millers in earlier posts, there is no reason for BM being mafia, just policy. And as I might add, we didn't know at that point if BM claimed, so your attack looked bad on multiple fronts.
@ Yamato
Your 5-man-scumteam seems weird, it seems focused on people who are rather at the center of attention, and you've become really spammy and seemingly nervous once contrasted by ace.
How are we supposed to know what ShiaoPi, tube, Drazak, stutters and hopeless are, for example? More information digging, less quick decisions please. I'm not deciding anything. I'm working with my reads. Listing a bunch of lurkers means nothing to me.
And stop telling me how to play. You're like, the biggest hypocrite of all time.
|
11589 Posts
Also
BC is only at the center of attention because of me.
CC and VE aren't even being talked about, which is a crime.
|
11589 Posts
Ugh, fuck.
Now it's 5 AM and I still haven't slept.
Hopefully someone else with a brain can come in and set the record straight while I sleep.
|
yamato. You have done nothing but trolled on D1. When votes started to pile on you you started tunneling the guy who brought up your scumminess, BC. After that you have done nothing but been after one guy.
See what i did there? Sounds familiar?
|
Tbh, Rayn, the more I read Sharrant and his case on you, the more I want to lynch you, cause his points are just that good. You are guilty of many things in his regard.
One particularly odd thing was that he defended himself against you saying he is wasting time discussing policy, and upon his defense you replied that you weren't up for lynching BM cause policy, although he never accused you of that.
As for other scummy stuff you've done, it's in his case. He points out good stuff, and that's why I won't lynch him.
I've given you leeway lately cause you kept contributing, and was so sure that Oats would flip red that I put you among the null reads at that time when you jumped on board of the lynch, but currently I have you among the suspects again.
As for yamato, I am not sure at all if he's scum or town, but if he's town he's like a gift for mafia to push with his behaviour.
|
Why do both of you and yamato ignore this simple question?
Do you think this is townie behaviour and do you think think this is what Sharrant did: Show nested quote +3) Why did you not want to find out who my "scumbuddies" are when we were discussing people, and why did you let me drive the discussion? 4) Why did you take TRN's words about my "scum strategy" at face value as at that time he was your scumread? [/quote]
|
3) I see. I'll wait until Bill Murray is back in the thread before I say anything more about this then, if I feel the need to say anything more.
Let's give ourselves another topic then. Pick a player who you would like to discuss with me, and I will read their filter while I cook and eat. I would suggest Mr. Cheesecake, but I would prefer it if you picked the candidate for discussion.
4) Don't know what you mean. He asked TRN a few questions, dropped a vote, probably for pressure, then dropped him when he saw what you were doing. He didn't say he had TRN as scum afterwards, it's only evident you are his scumread.
|
I give up, you are clearly not reading my posts.
|
Eh?
That quote is him asking you to provide a read on a player.
You say:
Why do you want me, your scumread to pick a player to discuss? If i thought you were scum i would be damn sure i wanted to pick the people we discuss (other scummy people).
Why did you not want to find out who my "scumbuddies" are when we were discussing people, and why did you let me drive the discussion?
Sharrant said:
Let's give ourselves another topic then. Pick a player who you would like to discuss with me, and I will read their filter while I cook and eat. I would suggest Mr. Cheesecake, but I would prefer it if you picked the candidate for discussion.
There's absolutely nothing scummy about that. He gave you the chance to show where you would scumhunt on your own at that point. You didn't do anything but defend TRN for strange reasons and want to policy lynch BM or lynch Sharrant up until that point.
|
Rayn, question:
On April 24 2013 06:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: Clarity i assume you have looked into BC/GiygaS/ShiaoPi as it's been many many hours since you said you'd do so. Any thoughts on them, especially on BC who yamato asked you about earlier?
You asked about ShiaoPi, but I see no instance in your filter where you actually comment on him in a way that suggests you're interested into him, yet you ask questions about him. Could you give me a read of him?
|
|
Re-reading the game, I'm on Page 18.
Biggest thing sticking out to me at the moment is that Mr. Cheesecake was going out of his way to establish that he is town by pushing the concept that a pro-town CC is not town, and then doing annoying things that make him look scummy.
On April 23 2013 12:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Either way, I'm tired. The amount of spam in the thread related to yamato / oats being dumb is astounding... just lynch one of them so I can have a little concrete information to work with going into tomorrow.
This is a totes scummy post. Maybe if I play a little more anti-town I'll be confirmed town :D
Still playing it up.
He does however mention he wants to lynch ShiaoPi, the only other scum read I could discern he has had outside of Yamato/Oats and he doesn't push it so much as suggest it.
So I invite Mr. CC to do the following: - Comprehensive case on ShiaoPi if that is still one of your scum reads, or on whoever else it is that you think is scum right now. - Stop playing to your meta and start playing the game instead of preemptively defending your scummy behavior by saying it's your town meta.
Failure to comply will result in your lynch. Thank you.
|
On April 24 2013 17:32 yamato77 wrote: He was after TRN, which he later dropped, and rightly so. His case was meh, but his conclusion that TRN was likely town is not one I would see a mafia in Sharrant's position make.
Why did he drop the case? He pushed me a little bit then voted, and then dropped it before I could even respond and once he saw a bunch of people go: "Eh I think hes just a noob." He never even made a comment on my response and Shaopi correctly points out curiously why he never followed up on me and he gives no real expliantion as to why I'm suddenly town outside of not fully trusting Rayn, which I'm not sure is the best evidence in all actuality.
Also I'm just curious because truth be told, I dislike WoS right now a lot more then I dislike Sharrant... do you think some of the points me and Rayn brought up before on shar make sense? He has a four page filter and a similar contribution level as yourself Yamato, which is impressive considering you spent the first half of the game trolling.
|
On April 24 2013 20:42 TheRavensName wrote: Also I'm just curious because truth be told, I dislike WoS right now a lot more then I dislike Sharrant... do you think some of the points me and Rayn brought up before on shar make sense? He has a four page filter and a similar contribution level as yourself Yamato, which is impressive considering you spent the first half of the game trolling.
EBWOP: I meant on WoS before he moved onto Shar
|
On April 23 2013 03:51 VisceraEyes wrote: But OO! FEELS! Lynch BM! VE do you still want to lynch BM?
|
Okay, let's get this started with the most important part:
Clarity should be lynched tomorrow, a few people have made cases on why, and they're quite right. He apparently spent 4 hours reading the thread and came up with not even half a case on me, and refused to comment on the lynch that was happening right in front of his eyes all the while flip flopping on the amount of time and effort he supposedly put in.
He's obvious enough at this point that everyone should be on board with his lynch, I don't think there's more that needs to be said about him.
Responses to cases and stuff:
@Clarity There's nothing in your case to respond to. You obviously just skimmed my filter and tried to pick out what you could skew to look mafia oriented, and you failed miserably at that.
@Rayne
+ Show Spoiler +On April 24 2013 15:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:About Sharrant:First he makes a case on TRN. The case in itself is not bad if you have never seen how TRN plays. But there is this question: I call him out for this question which i find to be scummy. Sharrant's answer is: Show nested quote +The last part of your case is even weaker, I don't think it even needs to be touched upon. Sharrant later on calls me out for saying; "So you say TRN is actually not attempting to discern who in the thread are the mafia, but you still have a town read on him. Townies should scum hunt, yes?". This is correct, mainly because Sharrant and Vivax both attacked TRN early on in the game, after that TRN went defensive and answered their questions. Sharrant is even adding more fuel into the fire by asking TRN to point him to his games on TL. Why do you think it is TRN's (or anyone other than yours) job to guide you into his past games? And why do you call me out for poining out the fact (as i have witnessed it myself) that TRN is easy to sidetrack from what he is supposed to do -> find mafia?Next thing. Sharrant's case on me. His points against me are; BM-policy lynch discussion (understandable as i failed to explain myself clearly enough) and that i called him scummy for asking TRN to point him to his last games. Which i still think is scummy. Next i explain him my BM vote, he is pleased with my answer, at least that reads so to me. + Show Spoiler +On April 22 2013 08:40 Sharrant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 08:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:Sharrant:What is your exact reasoning for voting for BM. Give me one paragraph, with your thought process. If it's policy, tell me it's policy and the exact policy. If you have other reasoning for it, please detail that reasoning to the best of your ability. I think there is no reason for a townie to claim miller for the reasons i explained before. If BM was not in fact claiming miller, he should have a damn good reason why he decided to post what he did, because posting (joking?) that as town does not make any sense. I see. I'll wait until Bill Murray is back in the thread before I say anything more about this then, if I feel the need to say anything more.Let's give ourselves another topic then. Pick a player who you would like to discuss with me, and I will read their filter while I cook and eat. I would suggest Mr. Cheesecake, but I would prefer it if you picked the candidate for discussion. In the same quote he asks me to pick a player to discuss. Why do you want me, your scumread to pick a player to discuss? If i thought you were scum i would be damn sure i wanted to pick the people we discuss (other scummy people).After that we discuss WoS and GiygaS. I also ask him about geript. I am the one asking all the questions. Note that Sharrant would have liked to discuss Mr.Cheesecake. If i am your scumread, why do you allow me to drive the discussion between us? Why do you not want to find out my scumbuddies when talking with me?Then Sharrant suddenly changes his scumread on TRN into null/leaning town. The reason is TRN saying i have told him i would use weak townies as town-credit-collectors by defending them. Sharrant takes this at face value. TRN was your scumread at that time, why didn't you take any action to figure out if he was telling the truth or not, as he wasn't?Then comes in his theory (based on what TRN said) about me trying to gain town-credit for TRN's lynch. The theory is ridiculous in the first place, if people can't see why idk what to say. He also makes a big post about it: + Show Spoiler +On April 22 2013 13:26 Sharrant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 12:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: Wait what Sharrant.. Are you seriously saying that i'm trying to gain credit from town!TRN lynch on D1 as mafia? That's your conclusion? It was part of the thought process that got me to look at you in the first place. Obviously TRN is not getting lynched so there is no credit for you to gain from it anymore. It is even, apparently, something you told TRN that you would do as mafia (though you did not state you would do it specifically to him). Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 12:32 ShiaoPi wrote:On April 22 2013 12:24 Sharrant wrote:On April 22 2013 12:07 ShiaoPi wrote:On April 22 2013 12:05 Sharrant wrote:On April 22 2013 11:59 ShiaoPi wrote: Oh if you have paid close attention to TRN then what is your stance on him now? I am calling you scummy That he's fairly unimportant in the grand scheme of things, and most likely town. What made you change your mind? This response is terribly lacking.... He realized that Rayn could be setting him up to give him town cred when he flipped. When Rayn stepped in to defend him I was sure TRN was either lynchbait, or one of Rayn's teammates. It seems more likely at this point he is lynchbait. TRN only had a small chance of actually being mafia, but a very good chance of attracting mafia attention either by virtue of A) being a weak player which they can use as town credit or to manipulate or B) was a weak mafia player who they could protect while looking like they're just trying to help out the new player. Rayn came in with a town read on him whose strength did not match what I had read in TRN's filter, so he was the person I was looking for. I find it interesting you see nothing at all to discuss between Rayn and Hopeless. At least more content than your last answer. If TRN only had a small chance of actually being mafia, why did you vote him? Isn't that fulfilling your own conclusion that you are mafia, by virtue of going after the lynchbait? What the fuck dude? Now what do you make of all the others who also defended TRN? All team mafia?? What do you say about Ace and others who also had a townread (or at least null) on TRN? You seem to be misinterpreting my definition of small chance. Small chance of being mafia still meant a greater chance than anyone elses actions in the thread. At that point I figured he probably had about a 40 percent chance of being mafia, if I were to assign a value to it. A small chance, but still greater than I felt anyone else had. So I went after him because he was the strongest scum read I had. When Rayn made these two posts: Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 06:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 22 2013 05:48 ObviousOne wrote: One more filter then I'm going to go level my Priest some more.
Oh. My. God. Tube is in this game. LOL. HI TUBE! (we played in a newbie together, my first game! He hasn't posted anything so skipping for now.)
Raynpelikoneet, sorry to pick on you again for like the third straight game in a row together. You want to lynch the "claimed miller" Bill Murray, you have made your stance on lynching millers abundantly clear, but I don't see anything that looks like it's developing into an actual scum read. Why are you leaning so heavily on your policy lynch when there are mafia to be lynched? Also, assume BM isn't here for a moment, who do you lynch? I read BM's post as a miller claim. If it wasn't, he needs to explain this: - What was the purpose of making that post? There is no reason for a townie to say anything that does not lead into finding scum or proving their towniness. I don't see that post achieving either of those things. If the claim was actually real, i want BM to explain why he thought it was a good idea to claim miller D1. Millers should not claim. All it does is that it tells the thread that they will give out a red result if checked by a cop. Why would you be a good cop check in the first place if you are town? You should prove you are town by your actions so that there is no reason for anyone to assume you are mafia, and the cops should check suspicious people instead. Claiming miller on D1 is extremely suspicious because it already shows you are afraid of being checked by a cop. If you are a miller, and are checked, so what? Tough luck, then you claim and town will believe you or not. But the place to claim is not the start of D1. This is not a policy lynch, BM's miller claim post is scummy.
About Sharrant. Sharrant accuses TRN of things. The case in itself is not scummy and i could see someone seeing TRN's posts in that light, i just don't get the same feeling from TRN's posts. Having played with him on NMXXXIX, i can tell that he has no idea how to act in the start of the game. Here he seems to be trying to figure out things and share his thoughts about stuff he is asked about. Fine, why is Sharrant scummy? - He's discussing the "policy lynch BM" matter but does not reach any kind of a conclusion that points towards this particular situation. - Asks TRN about his last games. It's not TRN's job to find those games to him. It's Sharrant's job to find out TRN's affiliation and TRN wasting time on telling him about his last games is a waste of time that does not help TRN find mafia. Seems like Sharrant is lazy and does not want to find out things on his own. Townies should not do that. Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 06:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 22 2013 06:43 Vivax wrote:On April 22 2013 06:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 22 2013 05:48 ObviousOne wrote: One more filter then I'm going to go level my Priest some more.
Oh. My. God. Tube is in this game. LOL. HI TUBE! (we played in a newbie together, my first game! He hasn't posted anything so skipping for now.)
Raynpelikoneet, sorry to pick on you again for like the third straight game in a row together. You want to lynch the "claimed miller" Bill Murray, you have made your stance on lynching millers abundantly clear, but I don't see anything that looks like it's developing into an actual scum read. Why are you leaning so heavily on your policy lynch when there are mafia to be lynched? Also, assume BM isn't here for a moment, who do you lynch? I read BM's post as a miller claim. If it wasn't, he needs to explain this: - What was the purpose of making that post? There is no reason for a townie to say anything that does not lead into finding scum or proving their towniness. I don't see that post achieving either of those things. If the claim was actually real, i want BM to explain why he thought it was a good idea to claim miller D1. Millers should not claim. All it does is that it tells the thread that they will give out a red result if checked by a cop. Why would you be a good cop check in the first place if you are town? You should prove you are town by your actions so that there is no reason for anyone to assume you are mafia, and the cops should check suspicious people instead. Claiming miller on D1 is extremely suspicious because it already shows you are afraid of being checked by a cop. If you are a miller, and are checked, so what? Tough luck, then you claim and town will believe you or not. But the place to claim is not the start of D1. This is not a policy lynch, BM's miller claim post is scummy.
About Sharrant. Sharrant accuses TRN of things. The case in itself is not scummy and i could see someone seeing TRN's posts in that light, i just don't get the same feeling from TRN's posts. Having played with him on NMXXXIX, i can tell that he has no idea how to act in the start of the game. Here he seems to be trying to figure out things and share his thoughts about stuff he is asked about. Fine, why is Sharrant scummy? - He's discussing the "policy lynch BM" matter but does not reach any kind of a conclusion that points towards this particular situation. - Asks TRN about his last games. It's not TRN's job to find those games to him. It's Sharrant's job to find out TRN's affiliation and TRN wasting time on telling him about his last games is a waste of time that does not help TRN find mafia. Seems like Sharrant is lazy and does not want to find out things on his own. Townies should not do that. Where does TRN try to figure out things? Tbh I kinda have you both as scummy along a few others, so your defense of TRN strikes me especially. I don't really see anything that could give me a reason to think he's town, but if you're so kind, could you point it out? Particularly this post of his: + Show Spoiler +On April 21 2013 23:19 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 23:09 Vivax wrote:On April 21 2013 23:01 TheRavensName wrote:On April 21 2013 22:52 Vivax wrote:On April 21 2013 22:48 TheRavensName wrote:On April 21 2013 22:42 Vivax wrote:On April 21 2013 22:38 TheRavensName wrote: Huh... I was curious to see how big boys start playing the game... and less then a page's worth of posting totals I see an OMGuS. I feel somewhat surprised; apparently the way newbies open mafia games is the right way?
PS: Bill Murray yelling indoors is really mean. Oooo, an omgus, interesting. Are you okay with the way Oats is playing the game? I'm not a 100% sure what hes doing, but if you want to call it playing then... maybe? Truth be told the fact that palmer just randomly takes offense to a baseless acucsation in a game that just started doesn't make a lot of since to me. He's asking for a base to the accusation, precisely. Do you have any ideas to get some discussion started? Your entrance kinda looked like you tried to downplay what's going on in the thread, which in turn makes me think you're trying to communicate reasons for not doing anything. Do you think this description fits your play or did your posts have other purposes? I thought it just genuinely showed disapointment. I've always had difficulty understand what to do at the start of day 1, and I see that there really is no good way to start day 1 in a purely productive way. So I suppose your right, I'm trying to downplay what happens because it doesn't seem productive, unless of course we need to know why Yamato has many weapons that arn' t guns..... And I think its more suspicious to ask in that way rather than, just ask.... seeing as how he didn't even vote baselessly or hasn't made an ssue out of it yet. If we went after everyone who accused someone day 1 just kinda in passing, we'd never get anything resembling a case or something. I don't think Oats would answer even if Palmar just asked, cause Oats rather seems to be trolling and careless about getting something productive out of this day. P said he would vote for him until he heard a proper motivation from Oats to call him scum, nothing followed, so Oats seems to oppose discussion and doesn't want to show his townieness through cooperation. The question is: How do we handle people who don't want to cooperate? Do we threaten Oats with a lynch? Do we ask him nicely to play like someone that puts thought into his posts? /shrug And what will we get out of threatening him at all? What does either lynching him for not liking a posted policy(? (Thats what that was right?)) or becase he just decided to troll actually accomplish (I think this one is more likely)? These are literaly the only responses he could make (That make any logical since and any others should count as trolling really) and I just don't see how either could prove guilt or innocense. But if you feel so strong on making him talk, why arn't you voting for him since apparently one vote isn't going to cut it? I didn't mean he is trying to find mafia. I meant he is trying to find out how to play @ the game start, what to look for and what to call people out for. If you read his exchange with yourself, you should easily figure out he has no clue how to act in the beginning of the game. This does not make him 100% town but i doubt he would be openly expressing his thought about that matter if he was mafia, i think he would be far more cautious about what he says. What makes me scummy in your eyes? That was a lot more effort than anyone took to explain TRN. Everyone that commented on him, or I asked to comment on him, just stated they thought he was a noob town, but generally people had to be prodded into action. Rayn came in attacking me with a very weak case because of my case on TRN. At this point, I am very happy because I am sure I have at least one mafia in these 2 players. I am sure after that attack and defense that Rayn is mafia either defending a mafia to deflect a bandwagon before it can start, or defending someone he sees will be lynched later and thus he would be able to go "Hey look, I knew he was town allt he way back then and I defended him!" regardless of whether he was lynched today, or tomorrow, or a week from now. At this point I am 100% sure of Rayn, and 50/50 on TRN. When TRN came in and said that he had a town read on Rayn despite the inconsistincies myself and others had pointed out, I had TRN down as very likely to be scum. But when he later mentioned how Rayn had told him that he planned to do this exact same thing as scum before, and subsequently moved him to a null read, that was when I was pretty sure that TRN was town. At this point I am less sure about Rayn being scum than I was then, because his conversations with other players has generally been good since that time, but he's still in my top 3 to lynch. I just haven't decided if there's someone I'd rather lynch more, like say Hopeless. Any more questions? At the end of that post he also says his scumread on me has weakened. After that i vote for Sharrant. This is his answer to the case: + Show Spoiler +On April 23 2013 00:02 Sharrant wrote: It's a good try, Rayne, but no.
Let's get this out of the way quickly because I have to leave, and there's more important things to do when I'm back.
The reason I looked into you is because of your chainsaw defense of TRN. That fit exactly what I was looking for, so I went through your filter.
I am not trying to lynch you on the merit of you defending TRN, get that through your head. I am going to get you lynched because you are scum. You claim that after posting several times about how miller claims should be a policy lynch, you say that it's not a policy lynch you're pushing on BM. The closest you come to make to a case is "This isn't a miller lynch policy, I'm lynching him because he claimed miller which is scummy" which is exactly the same as saying "No, this isn't a lurker lynch, I'm just lynching because his low activity is scummy". It's just attempting to disguise that you were trying to policy lynch him.
The post I voted for you details exactly why I have you as a scum read. The possibility that you were a townie who made some crazy defense on TRN went out the window when I read through your filter.
If you can't understand that, I can't help you. Now, suddenly i am 100% scum again. But no more is my town-credit-gaining a reason why i am scum. It's all back to the point that i "disguised my policy lynch vote on BM into something else". But he was already okay with my answer. Hell, he does not even answer anything to my case. Why did you make a big post about the theory of me trying to gain credit from defending town!TRN, if it isn't even part of the case against me, what's the point? TLDR;1) Why did you not answer me clearly when i asked you why should TRN point you to his past games? And he never did, why didn't you follow it up in any way, if you think that was scummy from him? 2) Why did you say you were pleased with my answer on the BM matter and later on said your whole case against me is based on that? 3) Why did you not want to find out who my "scumbuddies" are when we were discussing people, and why did you let me drive the discussion? 4) Why did you take TRN's words about my "scum strategy" at face value as at that time he was your scumread? 5) Why did you even discuss your theory about me trying to gain credit from TRN when it had apparently nothing to do with your scumread on me and was based on false premises in the first place which you were too lazy to check out and which came from you scumread? And for the record this is basically everything Sharrant has done this game besides one post where he answers Vivax about Hopeless and couple of posts questioning people with no follow ups at all. I don't see how this is anything near townie behaviour. 1. It's laughable that yous till think that asking for games is a scum tell, but run with it if it makes you happy. He did point me to his games, just not linked them. Not as helpful as I would have hoped he would have been, but he didn't mention any games off site which was the concern.
2. I never stated I was pleased with your answer. I asked you to restate so everyone would see that your answers still did not match up with what you had said earlier in the thread. Pushing that singular point any more would just make the thread more of a mess than it was starting to be, and the whole point would get lost and thus once I had you restate it again clearly there was no more value to be gained from going after you on that point at that time. So instead, I wanted to move you onto topics that would be helpful regardless of whether I was wrong or right about your alignment.
3. The choice of who to talk about is as telling as the choice of who not to talk about, I'll learn more about your alignment from you picking who you want to discuss then I will from giving you the topics I want you to discuss. It tells you too much about how I already lean on those topics, and having you drive the discussion lets me get a better feel for you.
4. I'm really surprised you don't get this part. Lots of newer scum buddy people, especially people that defend them. Here he shows that he's suspicious of the fact that you defended him, regardless of whether the fact he stated was misremembered (apparently someone else in that game had said it) he showed that his thought process went "Hey! This guy has taken up a shield for me" -> "Wait, why did he do that?" When as a new scum scared to be in his first big game would have been more hesitant to put any tarnish on his knight's armour.
5. You're mixing up your time periods so bad that this question is just a jumble of words. Your staunch defense of him got me to check out your filter. His subsequent "Hey, why are you defending me?" moment made him more than likely town.
@WaveofShadows
On April 24 2013 06:27 WaveofShadow wrote: Hey Sharrant, where you at bro? Any thoughts on yamato/Oats since you seem to have conveniently missed it entirely? Updated thoughts on Rayn/Shiao?
I think Oats was a good lynch because of how useless he was being, it's a shame he turned out to be town, but at least he was a non-self aware miller. That said, I think there were better lynches for that day, Clarity and Rayne being two I think would have been better lynches.
Yamato is almost definitely town, everything about his posts on the second half of day one scream town yamato in a way I don't think he knows how to replicate as scum. Last time I played with him when he was scum I caught him (but was not able to get him lynched before I was killed) because of how glaring the difference is between him being the townie, headstrong Yamato and him trying to emulate the townie headstrong Yamato.
I hope that satisfies your curiousity.
If there was one or two things in particular that lead you to have such a strong town read on me, what would they be?
I'm going to be around for a while doing some filter diving in, so I'm available for questions. It is very likely that I will be unavailable for Thursday, and possibly some or all of Friday (excepting phone posting which I hate hate hate doing). There will be 0 posts from me between midnight tonight, and Thursday night.
|
On April 23 2013 05:55 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 05:46 Vivax wrote: I'll tell you who I want to lynch the most today:
##Vote Oatsmaster
His play differs a lot from his town play, where he can be disruptive, but is also ballsy and involved. In Boardwalk empire he played an aggressive early game, not afraid to tunnel players, or to be annoying with his aggression.
Here he started like that, to turn defensive when threatened by me and Palmar, and his involvement seems to be very low afterwards, he rather trolls or talks about irrelevant stuff, and doesn't post much. Scared Oats. seriously, lets not do this. No meta cases please. We need 13 votes to secure a lynch by deadline - how about we not bring up lynching people with no context in THIS game whatsoever? You aren't going to convince many people with this, and you're just stalling the yamato wagon. Dont do this bullshit. Ace, I have been listening to the most recent podcast and an interesting note came up regarding use of meta. D1 meta should never be used ever, according to someone on the cast, and it is often used as a crutch by scum to secure mislynches. Does this ring true to you, and if so does this change your perspective on Vivax at all?
I ask because it seems despite your apprehension to using meta this early in the game, you seem to have come around to supporting Vivax's case:
On April 23 2013 06:37 Ace wrote: To all you people lurking the thread lets get some consensus going. Right now I've got my vote on yamato but Vivax's case on Oats looks like an even better lynch. These are our top two suspects at the moment and imo, our best 2. do not stall these fucking wagons unless you've got a really good case of your own. Else wise the discussion should be focused on these two for now. Arguments for/against either of them will be greatly appreciated. So I brought up Vivax's filter and I see he rounded out a legitimate case on Oats that leads to you coming to this conclusion.
Two points from Vivax: - Oats says VE has good reads: he did the same exact thing in boardwalk as town with VE scum, I think there might be a Craigslist Missed Connection ad VE should be looking for. Not sure what I'm not seeing that happened before this and we can't ask Oats anymore but perhaps VE can clarify whether or not they have a history together that would explain Oats thinking he's right/town all the time. - Oats found Palmar's post scummy, VE said Palmar would be town for that: Oats is just random as fuck. I don't think there's a more effective way to say it, but even the above point fits into this category.
I want to ask you specifically how familiar you are with Oats' playstyle and general thread presence outside of what you've seen in this game.
Admittedly I didn't do anything whatsoever to convince town that Oats was a bad lynch, and these are thoughts in retrospect, but they are leading to this final question:
Would town VE be suspicious of Palmar for that kind of post, from your experience and from your opinion this game, or does his off-the-cuff town read of Palmar come TOO easily? I'm not getting town vibes from VE, his style here seems to be passive enough that he's confident town will tear itself apart as scum or he's simply too busy with other things that unless he is under direct threat of lynch he will be around just enough to keep above the activity level of some of the scummier lurkers. I think he's mafia, but I've been wrong every single time on my initial read of him that I'm leery of pushing it unless it makes enough sense to at least one other person.
|
What appeared most damning to me was that Oats felt like listing up some random reads in front of different accusations, and being inconsistent with what he said about VE, it strengthened the look that those reads were plain fake. Similarly to how clarity responded to BM's accusation for his case post with a justification for his entrance post.
I'm starting to lean town on yamato lately, but I don't like his play, it hurts both him and the town. I would appreciate if he went for more constructive approaches.
First of all, case against ShiaoPi for tomorrow:
Point 1: Low activity, opportunistic timings to post in the thread (his last return was to hammer Oats), low involvement:
On April 22 2013 12:32 ShiaoPi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 12:24 Sharrant wrote:On April 22 2013 12:07 ShiaoPi wrote:On April 22 2013 12:05 Sharrant wrote:On April 22 2013 11:59 ShiaoPi wrote: Oh if you have paid close attention to TRN then what is your stance on him now? I am calling you scummy That he's fairly unimportant in the grand scheme of things, and most likely town. What made you change your mind? This response is terribly lacking.... He realized that Rayn could be setting him up to give him town cred when he flipped. When Rayn stepped in to defend him I was sure TRN was either lynchbait, or one of Rayn's teammates. It seems more likely at this point he is lynchbait. TRN only had a small chance of actually being mafia, but a very good chance of attracting mafia attention either by virtue of A) being a weak player which they can use as town credit or to manipulate or B) was a weak mafia player who they could protect while looking like they're just trying to help out the new player. Rayn came in with a town read on him whose strength did not match what I had read in TRN's filter, so he was the person I was looking for. I find it interesting you see nothing at all to discuss between Rayn and Hopeless. At least more content than your last answer. If TRN only had a small chance of actually being mafia, why did you vote him? Isn't that fulfilling your own conclusion that you are mafia, by virtue of going after the lynchbait? What the fuck dude? Now what do you make of all the others who also defended TRN? All team mafia?? What do you say about Ace and others who also had a townread (or at least null) on TRN?
On April 24 2013 00:03 ShiaoPi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2013 00:02 yamato77 wrote: Let's not hammer Oats when his wagon is just a carbon copy of mine.
Kthnxbye. I forgot again why not hammer either of you
On April 23 2013 00:02 Sharrant wrote: It's a good try, Rayne, but no.
Let's get this out of the way quickly because I have to leave, and there's more important things to do when I'm back.
The reason I looked into you is because of your chainsaw defense of TRN. That fit exactly what I was looking for, so I went through your filter.
I am not trying to lynch you on the merit of you defending TRN, get that through your head. I am going to get you lynched because you are scum. You claim that after posting several times about how miller claims should be a policy lynch, you say that it's not a policy lynch you're pushing on BM. The closest you come to make to a case is "This isn't a miller lynch policy, I'm lynching him because he claimed miller which is scummy" which is exactly the same as saying "No, this isn't a lurker lynch, I'm just lynching because his low activity is scummy". It's just attempting to disguise that you were trying to policy lynch him.
The post I voted for you details exactly why I have you as a scum read. The possibility that you were a townie who made some crazy defense on TRN went out the window when I read through your filter.
If you can't understand that, I can't help you.
As we see in these posts, Sharrant could not have possibly done much to cause a change of read in ShiaoPi, in the time where either didn't post any more. As evident in the filter, ShiaoPi treats Sharrant as his scumspect, and when Sharrant answers to what ShiaoPi says last, ShiaoPi ignores it, disappears, Sharrant then posts his last post, and we see ShiaoPi magically appear to hammer either Oats or yamato later.
Without any attempts to talk about Sharrant or give reasoning, or somehow support clarity in his case against Sharrant.
ShiaoPi is the guy I want to lynch most tomorrow I'm expecting a read on him from Rayn cause he asked questions about ShiaoPi but doesn't give opinions on him, I don't see where his interest is coming from when he doesn't show it himself, and he ignored my question so far. Clarity and Shiao being scumbuddies might explain why Shiao didn't try to support clarity in his case, additionally to Oats and yamato possibly being town and no need for scum to deviate a wagon.
This is hypothetical regarding the two, I feel quite confident that clarity lied, but then again he made a case on someone that wasn't Oats, so I'd prefer to give him some benefits for that and thus prioritize a ShiaoPi lynch over a clarity lynch, also cause we still have to see what clarity has to offer during the day now that he apparently is aware that the game has started.
Shiao tomorrow pls. Let's watch out for the Cobbler if he stays alive, he will have to post some more reasoning than during the last times, at least .
|
People I want to lynch:
25) VisceraEyes - scum - not paranoid enough to be town, mostly antagonistic with players who are more likely to be lynched and more friendly to players who are considered vets or town 17) Mr. Cheesecake - scum - too much friendly playful interplay with VE, not enough information sharing, being extremely "helpful" and "pro-town" by pointing out his meta 20) ShiaoPi - scum - not seeing anything the speaks town to me, seemingly random decision to kill BM, barely contributing or trying to figure things out 11) GiygaS - scum - fuck it, why not, someone said he was so he has to be, and besides he was more concerned people spelled his name correctly than he was about making a contribution to the thread
People I'm pissed off about:
4) Stutters695 (Dr. H replacement) - absentee still, ~20 hours after saying hello VIG THAT SHIT TOMORROW NIGHT IF HE FAILS AT BEING TOWN 15) Drazak - ????? absentee (fuck knows?) 14) Tube - ????? absentee (standard)
Night ends in like ~4.5 hours or so I guess and I really don't to wait around for just before to post my current scum list so here you go.
|
|
|
|