TL Mafia LXI - Page 70

On April 25 2013 01:39 Sharrant wrote:



Kush is so town it's not even funny. Sylencia I'm really sure about, I want him to explain that post more.

On April 25 2013 01:57 Bill Murray wrote:

slip

On April 25 2013 02:00 Bill Murray wrote:
how is that a typo? you are slipping regarding you having too much information, and therefore, mafia

On April 25 2013 02:04 Bill Murray wrote:
makes me lean town on him, but I want to see more before it's more than a lean. sorry to doublepost.

On April 25 2013 02:07 ObviousOne wrote:
Getting on Syl for activity is like getting on Mocsta for spamming. It is what it is. From what I remember in TTABEN mafia he only really gets to post a couple times a day. Yeah it's not a great post. I'd like to see where it's headed. Let's see what he makes of it when he returns instead of starting an activity argument that he will probably feel compelled to defend himself against therefore continuing the cycle of not having time to give reads.

On April 25 2013 02:10 Sharrant wrote:


I don't want him to defend himself, I just want him to clarify why the people he summaried were chosen, and what the end result was on the people that he did not explicitly state were scummy. I'm led to assume they're town, but I'd just like to be sure that's what he's saying.

His activity isn't an issue to me, most people jump on me for my lack of activity, so I view it as null in most cases anyways.

On April 25 2013 02:06 Sharrant wrote:


Good to know.

What do you think of WoS right now?

@WaveofShadows
You didn't dispute me, or respond when I said Kush was super town. Am I to believe that you agree that he is town?

On April 25 2013 02:15 WaveofShadow wrote:
My fucking blackberry just bricked so now I'm frantically trying to fix it before heading out to a party.
Will be back much later tonight, sorry Sharrant.
I think I'm null on Kush? Can't remember I have to go.

On April 25 2013 02:14 Bill Murray wrote:

i was leaning town on him until theravensname brought up some points and it made me feel like WoS is a bit opportunistic

On April 25 2013 01:36 Sharrant wrote:
Hey, Sylencia, glad to see you around. It looks like you put in a lot of work going through filters, but I don't see a lot of reads, just a lot of summary. Is this a list of your top suspects or just a collection of players? Because at one point you actually mention yourself on your list, and that just seems a little strange to me.

I can tell you've got a scum read on VE, and at least a bit of a scum read on Grush, does this mean the other players are also suspicious in your eyes or are they town or null? I'm just having a bit of trouble making heads or tails of it all.

On April 25 2013 02:23 Sylencia wrote:


I've been going through people as a collection (hence why the list is so messy), yet going through them I found myself to become more suspicious of VE and grush so far. Unless something pretty much proves them to be innocent, I don't generally find true town reads since it's dependent on having information you don't have. In any case, no one on that list (other than myself) I can say that I have a strong town read on, Wave of Shadow is probably the person on that current list I have the least suspicion on, but in any case, I am more concerned with the ones I find most suspicious, not the least.

On April 25 2013 02:26 Sylencia wrote:
Also, are you guys actually serious about grush starsenses things... That's like saying WoS isn't scum becuase he hasn't rolled scum.

(Am I not allowed to go watch Game of Thrones after posting)

On April 22 2013 20:45 Sylencia wrote:
Comments / Observations:
- Oats v Palmar early on. The way I read it, Oats seemingly made a joke statement about Palmar, yet the response was ever so serious.
Palmar: Is your vote just parked on Oats while you look for actual suspicious people or do you seriously believe that Oats was calling you out there? Since it's instant majority lynch, a single vote doesn't really matter until we get to 10+ votes, but I'm just interested if your read on Oats has changed since the initial accusation.

On April 22 2013 20:45 Sylencia wrote:
Trying. Not easy though, 20 pages of catchup doesn't make it easy to digest the content.

On April 22 2013 20:45 Sylencia wrote:
From the pages regarding TRN and Rayn, both have been hard at work defending each other, though I don't really understand the point being raised about why Rayn isn't scum.

Was he scum when he tunneled or was he town? Rayn has shown tendencies in other games to shotgun vote and accuse others, and it's seen here and from your games he can tunnel too. His behaviour is erratic and so unless there's points regarding the content being townie, I don't think anything can be said about the way he plays.

You dislike Sharrant, so does that mean you suspect him or are you just putting it out there? Does Rayn's activity put him in the town books for you, because while it can be used as a basis for a case when none others appear, it's pretty alignment indicitive. If it's not part of your reasoning behind it, why is rayn already town in your eyes?

On April 22 2013 20:45 Sylencia wrote:
I'm somewhat doing the same, so I'm wondering how you can see someone as town without looking at the whole picture. I haven't really got any town reads due to this, but the fact you're able to either means you're doing something wrong, or you know something we don't.

On April 22 2013 20:45 Sylencia wrote:
Rayn: Pushing for all millers to die (and voting on it) on day 1 honestly doesn't sound like a great plan. It wastes days where there's actually stuff to analyse, it creates a lazy town atmosphere which only helps scum, and with that comes a lot less conversation. You said you thought that BM was scum but what makes him so much more scummy at the time than someone else with low number of posts and providing just words and not content (eg. me)?

On April 22 2013 20:45 Sylencia wrote:In any case:




This looks so dumb honestly.

Ok, I'm done for now, ##vote rayn at the moment because of the weirdest irregularities in posts.

On April 23 2013 23:58 Sylencia wrote:
Oats is the vote for me. Case from Vivax + aftermath between yamato vs Oats has convinced me more to taking down Oats. The thing that was holding me back most was that my primary scum suspect (rayn) was on Oats fairly early on.

On April 23 2013 23:58 Sylencia wrote:
Given that Oats never actually provided anything for us in terms of reads afterwards and posted crap about being green and telling people to push others. If he has nothing to say either:
a) He's playing as the bad townie
b) He's withholding that info from us to stop us from gaining more than we need from the lynch.

Either case is bad for town, so that's why I'm willing to go down on Oats.

##Unvote
##Vote Oats

On April 25 2013 01:28 Sylencia wrote:
Sylencia:
Semi-suspected TRN due to the rayn defense provided
Suspects Rayn due to inconsistent statements about miller lynch / scum suspicion of BM
Wagoned on Oats due to lack of town contribution from Oats.