|
On November 10 2010 11:27 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2010 11:20 Nemesis wrote: Wow, I just got back, and lots of shit happened.
First, NB is most likely blue. He was targetted by the random +1 kill, but he survived because he was switched with DoctorH.
Second, kenpachi lol nice attempt.
Third, that leaves the two mafia with one of these people:: Meapak_Ziphh youngminii L
And out of those 3, I'm willing to bet that L is one of the other two mafia. Seriously, his attempt at trying to paint me red was patethic. And as for voting patterns: Day 1 - DoctorH(Masq) Day 2 - CubedIn Day 3 - Pandain Day 4 - KtheZ and Nemesis
Lastly, do we still have one more double lynch? You sound confident.. do you know what the fuck your talking about? I doubt you read my posts carefully enough to just post "lol nice attempt." When im revealed blue, ima quote you.
On November 10 2010 11:06 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2010 11:02 LunarDestiny wrote:Pandain is a legit blue. On November 07 2010 08:22 KtheZ wrote: Considering that the state of the town is in complete disarray, I will now roleclaim.
I am the detective. However, I suspect that I am an "insane detective". The reasons and my finding will be below.
On night 1, I forgot to investigate anyone, being the lurker dumbass I was. On night 2, I investigated Pandain. I found him to be the MAFIA Garbage collector. On night 3, I investigated infinitestory, and found him to be the MAFIA ADD detective.
Now, what the hell? Why would the mafia have an ADD Detective? This has led me to conclude that I am insane.
Now, assuming I'm an insane detective, it is apparent that Pandain and infinitestory are town-aligned. I am no longer into lynching pandain; I had found him to be mafia, which is why i was so ardent in pursuing his lynch.
I feel that infinitestory's results are now trustworthy, and that pandain did not lie about his role.
If you think I am lying, look at my posts against pandain. I was so one-mindedly pursuing pandain because I thought he was mafia. However, this night has confirmed my sad suspicion that I am "insane". On November 09 2010 09:17 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On November 09 2010 09:16 kitaman27 wrote:On November 09 2010 09:13 Artanis[Xp] wrote:KtheZ the Detective has been piranha'd.You are the Detective! Once per night, you may pm me to find out the role and alignment of one of the players. Your head hurts though for some reason. To clarify, would we be informed if he was insane, like with the extra note for the ADD-Doctor? Yes, sorry. He was indeed insane (returned opposite alignment) Imo, there are 3 possibilities 1. Pandain is fucking red 2. theres a flaw in pandain's role 3. Someones able to frame others as mafia nothing in my role is flawed to lead him to find me as a red Sorry but this is your best attempt? Pandain has been scanned to be blue already, and Pandain has already proven his role.
You could at least try something like "my role makes me show up as mafia" for some reason.
The third one is possible, but I just don't see it.
If you mean previous post, here lemme quote them for you and tell me what can I learn from your posts?
On October 31 2010 09:10 Kenpachi wrote: LOL THE BOOGER. well, would it be that someone has a nosepicking related profile? is he even mafia?
also, i am not the elder guys. Is it even confirmed if HE is the mafia either? ~_~
On October 31 2010 09:36 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 09:11 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On October 31 2010 09:10 Kenpachi wrote: LOL THE BOOGER. well, would it be that someone has a nosepicking related profile? is he even mafia?
also, i am not the elder guys. Is it even confirmed if HE is the mafia either? ~_~ no obviously not now that you're here wanna discuss the matter at hand: who should be lynched cant really say. im not one to decide on inactivity.. right now, i only read posts with my name in it and so far im a suspect again.. Would it be possible to provide evidential clues >_>
On November 04 2010 09:29 Kenpachi wrote: am back. sorry for a delay from posting.. after all, im just a teenager.
Ill do a page for Pandain.. pg4
On November 10 2010 10:27 Kenpachi wrote: eh.. fuck lynch Pandain when i die. i cant defend myself from this
[QUOTE]On November 10 2010 10:59 Kenpachi wrote: + Show Spoiler [obnoxious replies to posts] +On November 10 2010 10:11 LunarDestiny wrote: oh... they'll get one more day to live. more than 1 actually On November 10 2010 10:12 Glasse wrote: dont forget the possibility that there would be a good liar in the "confirmed" list Pandain imo On November 10 2010 10:16 Glasse wrote:the possibility is very small but it's still there lol 0.000000000000001% is still a possibility data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" it will rise to about 25% after i die On November 10 2010 09:22 LunarDestiny wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2010 09:15 Pandain wrote: rofl I've been like "why hasn't anyone even reacted at all yet to my finding?" Then I realized all the active people are dead(infinite...kitaman somewhat) Besides Glasse, and somewhat Lunar I guess. But they don't seem to care :/ We care because we can actually win now. We'll lynch Kenpachi. Im your hope crusher. On November 10 2010 09:28 Glasse wrote: we still need to find someone else though. double lynch is active Pandain
yea im pretty angry right now for feeling pretty helpless but have you guys noticed i voted for Ace on the previous day? And i wanted to kill Coag but DrH and DC were the people to change me to Pandain.. Ace even voted for ME stupids :l His role doesnt benefit from voting Mafia.. mine does but im not mafia Sorry but bussing someone is an everday thing in mafia/QUOTE]
Was there anything useful that I missed that is supposed to prove your innocence other than your roleclaim?
|
Don't waste time on Kenpachi. We should instead focus on who our second lynch is going to be.
|
what the fuck? Damn it Pandain.. you caused lots of good to die /ragequit
|
I'm blue. I was one of the few people to try and defend aeres when that shitfest and the BG went down. My only mistake I've made was a bad post analysis on bumatlarge. Other than that I've stayed quite because there have always been louder voices and after my mistake with bum I didn't want to try and analyze anyone again.
I think YM is red, he and Ace were the people who pushed hard for aeres and Ace has since flipped red.
I stand by my earlier role claim of Granny Veteran. It wasnt really that useful early in the game and it can't confirm itself but now it becomes more valuable because the mafia have lost a role blocker so baring they have two, it would take a twice as long to night kill me.
|
Yes, I remember Meapak roleclaiming Granny Veteran.. For now, he seem more innocence than the other 3 unconfirmed (node is not included).
|
On November 10 2010 11:47 L wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2010 11:20 Nemesis wrote: Wow, I just got back, and lots of shit happened.
First, NB is most likely blue. He was targetted by the random +1 kill, but he survived because he was switched with DoctorH.
Second, kenpachi lol nice attempt.
Third, that leaves the two mafia with one of these people:: Meapak_Ziphh youngminii L
And out of those 3, I'm willing to bet that L is one of the other two mafia. Seriously, his attempt at trying to paint me red was patethic. And as for voting patterns: Day 1 - DoctorH(Masq) Day 2 - CubedIn Day 3 - Pandain Day 4 - KtheZ and Nemesis
Lastly, do we still have one more double lynch? L is red because he called me out as inactive? Sounds legit. Anyways, where's node at? Lololol your argument is inactive nowXD
On November 04 2010 10:03 L wrote: Nemesis starts off the game pretty apologetic. Makes a case for the mayor being super dangerous, then realizes that the mayor gets an extra vote, not an extra lynch.
He asks fishball's circle to reveal itself to confirm fishball during the elections.
Some M-rus related posts.
Supports pandain on the account that he's a good communicator, but easy to spot as mafia.
Skeptical of DrH's ability to be confirmed. Says he doesn't trust him.
Pushes on Orgolove and Youngmiini as his top 2 scumreads.
Comes out against roleclaiming, despite having asked the fishball crew to step up earlier.
Wow. I'm only halfway through but this is looking pretty bad.
Going to LoL is up for a bit, I'll finish soon. Yes your argument is definitely about being inactive.
You know what time to do a full blown analysis:
On November 01 2010 14:21 L wrote: Okay, just got my pms and whatnot, so I think this is the game I'm supposed to be in. I'm hungover from last night's partying and drunk from this night's partying so I'll catch up as much as I can after sleeping off the effects of imbibing an amount of alcohol sufficient to disinfect all of the wounded at solferino. First post, nothing suspicious. He just got subbed in and trying to catch up to the game.
On November 02 2010 01:06 L wrote: That's because Aeres is probably a hatter type role that wanted to get hit, so he claimed BG to draw attention to himself and away from more vulnerable/valuable players. He's likely not a VI role, because the revealed roles thusfar are relatively watered down and mafia started with 9 fucking members + there's aids going around (unless the game design is based around town's ability to use murrayitis as a shock and awe town controlled kp attack, which it doesn't seem to be).
The push to get him killed here is pretty understandable due to people loving LAL, but there's zero way someone would vote for themselves as mafia with the usual suspects driving a bus over him. Or rather that would hold unless there was a huge benefit to be gained from him dying. Either a mafia bomb type role (seems unlikely due to plague mechanics) or his death pushes another mafia member into a trusted position vis a vis the town where he can ask for roleclaims.
As for this Young/DrH/Pandain/Infinite circle of morons situation going on, there's a few things which just don't really add up; DrH campaigned on being able to 100% confirm himself and clearly lied about it. LAL should apply to him to, right?
Wrong.
DrH can still confirm himself, but he needs to die for it to happen. I'm not sure if DrH is fumbling for time as his ability gathers information which he'll confirm as valid with a self-kill, but it seems rather odd that young would try to focus attention onto Aeres and cite LAL when LAL can be applied to DrH too. This leads me to believe that DrH/Young are in a circle together, and DrH is feeding him information, which he'll, again, confirm by death. Claims that DoctorH should die so that we can get info on what alignment other people are
If it wasn't for that, based on the aeres situation, I'd suggest killing DrH immediately in order to find out what allegiance Aeres has. Aeres is either innocent or sacking himself to benefit another mafia member; there was no benefit to fakeclaiming BG of all roles. This is based on the fact that DrH stands to benefit the most from the diverted attention and post-lynch bragging rights if Aeres flips red.
There's some kind of intense attention-fu going on here to keep us discussing a certain set of facts, which leads me to believe that someone fucked up pretty hard and outed themselves earlier and we're actively being pushed away from that. Given that I kinda just read pages 10,20,30, etc until 80-92, I'm not entirely certain what's being thrown under the rug, but when I get more time and less women offering themselves to me, I'll be sure go over more material in search thereof. Says a bit of protown stuff by saying that we are being misleaded
On November 02 2010 11:38 L wrote: No I'm not. I'm saying in the event that we kill either, these are the likely orientations of the other player because a rank 0 new kid isn't going to throw some crazy mindgames at us like whoa. In fact, I specifically said if I was going to lynch for information, I'd kill DrH, but that the entire Pandain/Young/DrH/Infinity arguesquare will probably clear itself up and give us a good candidate from it anyways. Denies that he was asking to "confirm" another player by lynching them, but somehow still says that he'd kill DrH. Idk what he's getting around to here.So like, I did the opposite of what you're trying to say I did. Cool beans bro. In other news, this feud is taking up a huge chunk of the thread. That's cool. Super cool even. Super cool if we're picking between two targets that are both town. The debate here is placid, with maybe 2 actors at most on a side weighing in. With 8 total vote power, mafia should be snoooooozing through this if one of the two candidates are mafia, because they can easily deploy enough votes to swing themselves to safety. In all likelihood, mafia isn't even heavily invested in this conversation, since there are at most 6 players making substantial contributions to the (now endlessly repeating) argument. Since both sides seem to have halos of associated players, it would be easy enough to swing a certain direction, then cook up why an unfortunate townie was the most ardent pusher for the lynch and get them killed. So, L, who do you suggest we pick? I dunno lol. We probably have a 1/6 chance hitting aeres or DrH. The game as a whole provides us with closer to 1/4 odds. Given that, we're probably better off completely ignoring this situation and producing alternatives before the day runs out and I get modkilled for eating curry for 30 minutes longer than anticipated. That said, that's a blind analysis. You can make the % chance even better by seeing what your position on players like Node or others is. In total, this yield me a list looking like this: 2. Hyperbola 3. Bumatlarge 4. Veldril 7. deconduo 8. Coagulation 10. infundibulum 11. Amber[LighT] 12. Kenpachi 13. RebirthOfLegend 14. Nemesis 15. ghrur 16. KtheZ 18. CubEdIn 19. Meapak_Ziphh 21. DCLXVI 22. Divinek 23. Lexpar 28. jcarlsoniv 31. L 32. NB 33. Glasse 34 Misder 38. kitaman27 39. LunarDestiny So basically I've removed the players that are too heavily engaged in the stupidity to be cruise control mafia + Node because I think he's legit. There's probably a mafia member up in that group, but they're all hopped up on crazy pills at the moment, so we're not going to get very far with our tea leaf divination technique just yet. Out of the remaining group, mafia are hiding at the feigned activity level. They'll jump on players who make mistakes, or just lightly brush people with the threat of the shitlist, but otherwise just reformulate other people's posts for giggles. And shits. I haven't read all hundred pages. Closer to 40, so I can't accurately say what happened during day 1. It seems, however, that there was a standard mayoral election, so one of the candidates who's remaining on this list might be a good person to start analysis on. Additionally, anyone who played heavily day 1, but then dropped off is less likely to be mafia, because townies' give-a-shit meter is very low normally (this, however, might be wrong this game because we're all blue and that's awesome), consistently low activity players who haven't asked for replacement or made overt apologies are more likely to be mafia given that LSB is actively kicking people outta his game if they say they're busy, and mafia players are never inactive. What is this? He tries to look protown by producing a list of 20 people that should be looked at, but doesn't go into specific at who specifically should be looked atCept that Caller kid. He's pretty brave, though.
I'll skip a few of his post and just summarize a bit of it. He suspects node, but says that if he is lying about his roleclaim, he'll only last a day or two.
On November 03 2010 02:21 L wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2010 02:15 CubEdIn wrote: Oh, I understand, you think I picked townie? No.
I picked doctor, that's why I roleclaimed straight away. No use in just the mafia knowing what I am. Why would I think that you picked doctor? I'm saying that the role you say you have does not make sense. At all. So there's probably more to it that you haven't revealed. Here comes his crazy attempt to put suspicion on CubedIn based on "his impossible role." This continues for a few more post
After that, he tries to push for a Pandain lynch when Coag was scanned red.
On November 04 2010 09:07 L wrote: Went through coag's posts.
There's 2 main overt things he does:
1) He pushes pandain for mayor the entire time 2) He shits on youngmiini
Pandain's pretty much our best target for tomorrow.
Some less overt stances:
1)Seems undecided on DocH. Starts by being rather deferential, then moves to a "not so sure about you" position. 2)His posts are TINY. He feigns activity without producing very much.
Given my prior assessment it seems like I was right. Most mafia are just trying to keep under the radar. Tries to make another "alliance" between players and pushes for Pandain to be lynched first over Coag.
On November 04 2010 09:50 L wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2010 09:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote: Nemesis voted for him immediately iirc. Deconduo also voted for Pandain. I'll look at his post history then. Gimme a few min. I've already mentioned this before, but oh look DrH puts suspicion on Deconduo and me. Guess who is the one he analyzed? The one who is now confirmed blue, while he completely ignores the one who flipped red.
Now let's look at his analysis on me
On November 05 2010 09:32 Nemesis wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2010 09:02 L wrote:On November 05 2010 06:58 Nemesis wrote:On November 05 2010 05:43 L wrote:Re: Nemesis. This is the portion during which you get apologetic. On October 30 2010 03:12 Nemesis wrote:On October 30 2010 02:58 annul wrote: its what, 2 votes? if the vote is close enough (like, 16-14) where my one vote will tip the scale, then perhaps it is not "stupid" to have voted it, right?
the mayoral role is not really a town leader position. it's an extra set of lives and a very weak voting power that can be overcome easily (and is 100% transparent). i am playing along with the leadership meme because hey it makes sense, but think about what POWER the mayor has. the only power it has is protection and a weak voting boost. any other leadership that the town chooses to assign to the mayor player is entirely on their own volition.
why do we want to give death protection to a mason? there is no real reason we want to keep the masons alive above someone else who can actually affect things, right? so he has a circle, cool, what does that do for us and why would his death hurt the town, per se?
if i died it would be much worse than a random mason dying, that is all i am saying. are there others out there with roles better suited to protection? probably. but they aren't talking, so i will. My bad, it seems that I misunderstood the mayor role. I thought they get to lynch one extra person. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" Lol, I made a misunderstanding early in the game and make on post that i made a mistake and that makes me apologetic early on in the game. You are one funny man.After repeated oneliners clarifying rules to other players with no submissions of your own, you start trying to produce real content around the 300 post mark. You then realize your arguments are pretty ridiculous and back off quickly. Can you at least please point that out. Looking at around the 300 post, my posts are about clarifying people's candidacy for mayor and I was asking them how they can disprove my doubts. I wasn't really arguing.Its not super incriminating, but its odd that someone who's staring at the rules wouldn't know that the mayor gets an extra vote and not an extra lynch. I am pretty new to mafia(although I've played it irl), so I don't exactly know all the roles and what they do, which is why I was asking about the rules and stuff. This is my second game here and this game has a different format than last game.Around the 2k post mark you shift back to one liners and ask other people to do analysis on certain players. You say you're too lazy to do it yourself. I only asked an analysis on misder as far as I remember, how does that turn into "players"?You also trip yourself up when you state that you're all for lynching inactives to get them to post, but then you turn around immediately and say that LAL makes no sense because it targets liars rather than scum. Why use one heuristic over the other? You never really make the argument. And that's not just a single point; there are multiple posts of yours on this front. I never made the argument, because no one asked me too. Those were during different phases of the game. I had forgotten about inactives as most of them have died already at that point. Inactives don't contribute to the game at all if they are townies. It also allows for a place for mafia to hide, and we have no way of knowing which is mafia and which is not.
Lying on the other hand can be beneficial to town if used correctly, and if someone is caught in a lie, you just have to read the intention of the lie to determine whether that lie was supposed to benefit the townie or mafia. Aeres' lie was clearly meant to benefit the town even if it was dumb which was why I was against lynching him.
Does that answer your question?The 2200 series of posts are pretty much a rehash. Against LAL, targetting inactives and clearing up rules questions. Mostly in one liners. In the 2300 section, he pushes for cube to prot DC, which is reasonable regardless of his alignment. The 2500 are a bit more interesting. There's a focus on M-rus and asking pandain to confirm himself + questions about double lynches. This is prior to pandain having a bus driven at him. The rest of the posts are literally one liners regarding inactives or in another instance just a quote from DrH. There's a LOT of chaff in these posts. Look above. Anything suspicious about asking how the game works?Nemesis opens into the 2600 section by stating that he'll look bad if pandain flips red. There's more one liners including a one liner rebuke of my first post, then s'more another question for pandain, regarding how he can confirm himself. Overall Nemesis's concrete actions aren't unreasonable after the halfway point during his posts. But there's a problem: he doesn't really do much even when he is posting. There's a lot (a LOT) of one-two line posts that parrot other players, and the majority of his posting seems to be a combination of talking about the rules, and lightly incriminating people who are unlikely to retaliate. I am just observing for now. I am just "lightly" incriminating people for now as I haven't decided to lynch them. If I decide to lynch them, then I'll be more aggresive. That's just my play style.Anyways, Take a skim through his posts and tell me if you agree. Overall, you seem to EXAGGERATE a lot of the stuff that I said. Really? I make one post about making a misunderstanding and you call that "early on, he was pretty apologetic." You might also want to include more quotes of my post if you want to have a proper analysis. I don't really know what to think of you at this point as you seem to have mostly skimmed over my post and make your opinions based on that. Since you were subbed in, I will give you the benefit of a doubt that you just didn't understand the situation at the time my early posts were made. If anything, I understated the majority of the claims I made. I grouped most of your posts together by post number in the thread, and they're readily accessible here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=&t=c&f=-1&u=Nemesis&gb=dateTrying to tell me that you're 'just observing' or whatnot doesn't explain why you're making 1 liner me-toos chaff posts. Additionally, if you are just observing why would you be lightly incriminating people? Seems like you just want to have future targets to pick off later without taking responsibility for throwing suspicion on them. I am trying to get some information out of them, is that a bad thing?Its silly that your defense here only reinforces the scum-like qualities that were pointed out. To reply to a few points of yours: "I didn't bother making the argument because no one asked me to" Yeah, that's because you were me-tooing me. That doesn't cut it. Its a way of trying to appear active while trying to not take any responsibility. Lol, let me give you an analogy on your crappy point: If you were arguing about how good this movie is a week ago, and someone claims that the worst movie you have ever seen is "the best movie" ever, would you concentrate on comparing it to the 'good' movie that you saw last week or would you concentrate on points on why that movie is crap? Not the best analogy ever, but you get my point. Wtf would be the point of me trying to compare LAL to lynch inactive. I wasn't trying to make people switch to lynch inactive 'mode' at that time, I was just trying to get them to steer away from that direction."I only asked an analysis on misder as far as I remember, how does that turn into "players"?" The important part isn't the plural, its the fact that you, with all your free observing time, decided it was a good idea to ask other people to do work instead of do it yourself. Its pretty a pretty standard way to play as mafia; tell the town to do useful things, but rejoice silently as they don't bother doing it. That way the town's at a net neutral position, but you end up looking both active and pro-town without actually having contributed anything. No, it is important as you were exagerating shit that isn't true.If you were busy in the slightest, this might be excusable, but you readily admit you're just sitting around doing nothing for the sake of watching people. "I am pretty new to mafia(although I've played it irl), so I don't exactly know all the roles and what they do, which is why I was asking about the rules and stuff." Very odd excuse given your prior posting, when you were almost zealous in your will to clear up rule issues. Again, like I said, this isn't conclusive proof that you're mafia, but it sets up the claim that I was really hoping you wouldn't make; the "i'm bad at mafia" claim. The clueless newbie persona is a rather common one with new players who are on mafia's side; its easy, low maintenance, and it rarely brings attention to yourself. I didn't say I was bad at mafia, I just wanted some clarification on some rules that I didn't know how it worked.So yeah, this last post just made my suspicions worse, given that you confirmed pretty much every tentative theme I had noticed in your posts. And yes if you actually want to know I am actually quite busy right now irl. I have midterms last week and I have one last midterm this wednesday(I'll probably go inactive around tuesday). I check tl mafia everytime I take a break from studying 'hence my one liner posts.' I didn't mention this, because I know that you are just going to use this against me saying "you're just making up excuses now." But I guess it doesn't matter eitherway as you still try to paint me as red either way. This is the last time I'm replying to you as to not shit up this thread like what happened during the Pandain/Doctor H/Infinitestory circle. I feel like you will just be making the same points over and over again. You have made your point. I have made my point, there's nothing left that I have to argue about. He definitely has great points against me ^.^ With more than half of his arguments being exagerrated.
When he was finally being called out on his crap last day phase here are his posts
On November 07 2010 13:38 L wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2010 12:17 youngminii wrote: Holy shit lol, I didn't even realise it was night, looks like I changed my vote to Coag a bit late.
Anyway, I think it's safe to say Pandain's been supported/protected by Coag a lot more than a normal townie would have. Sorry Pandain but one of my votes goes to you. Unless you can convince me otherwise ofc.
Who else is there to choose from? I remember a case on Nemesis, can we get an update on him. Also, can someone do an analysis on L? I feel as if he's been a bit weak, if we look at him as a townie. His town play is usually very, very strong (targets and analyses scum well) but as far as I can remember, that hasn't been happening this game. See you might have a problem attributing strong analysis to me when you forget that the case you've mentioned isn't attributed to me. So far I've actually produced the most comprehensive analysis of any person in the game, which was vetted by a bunch of people who died and flipped blue. Most comprehensive analysis? What? What have you done so far? So far you've pushed for 3 now confirmed blues to be lynched based on crappy reasoning. CubedIn - "definitely lying about his role" Pandain - "Him and coag are definitely working together" Nemesis - "Plenty of one liners. Definitely mafia"
I've operated on very limited assumptions this game. The first of which is that during the Aeres/Youngmiini melee, most of the involved parties were blue and that mafia were staying out of the problem. So far, everyone who's died from that group has flipped blue. Lol, and how does that help anyone? You didn't try and find another target that day but only said that.Second is that because of that, mafia would have been very, very quiet day 2. Go look at the people who flipped mafia since then: Divinek, Coag and Decuowhatever. All said the bare minimum, or in the case of Divinek, got modkilled for being flat out afk. So where does that leave us? DrH asked the thread to look up Nemesis. I did. He fit straight up into the middle of the qualities that all of the previous mafia members had, and what's more: He admits to them. He admits to lightly pushing people. He admits to throwing around one liners. He flat out admits he's just watching the game. His response to this? Throw shit on me now that DrH, who supported the view that he was likely a good kill today, is dead. Seems pretty open and shut on this one. The only question is whether or not we can find one of his scumbuddies to hang with him. And now he throws suspicion at another person when he's been called out
He doesn't vote at all on the whole kitaman/Ace situation until it had been agreed upon that Ace is most likely innocent.
|
Haha, wow. Maybe you should go back and actually read those posts before commenting them, because you've falsely characterized half my arguments. My statements regarding DrH on the top, for instance, were actually a defence of DrH's statement that he could be 100% confirmed.
The rest of the post, similarly, and perhaps oddly, ignores RoL's idea that there might be a godfather in the game, and that its probably pandain.
Why is that odd? Well, because you're 'confirmed' because he has you on his list. But if his list is bullshit, then so is your confirmation. Oh but wait, if his list is bullshit, then Kenpachi might be blue too, and lynching me/him would win you the game. If you were blue, you'd know you aren't confirmed, and that pandain isn't either.
Between you just plain lying about my positions, playing scummy all game, and overzealously trying to claim that you're confirmed, there doesn't seem to be much room for doubt. You've pretty much cemented that you/pandain are mafia in my mind.
|
On November 10 2010 13:39 L wrote: Haha, wow. Maybe you should go back and actually read those posts before commenting them, because you've falsely characterized half my arguments. My statements regarding DrH on the top, for instance, were actually a defence of DrH's statement that he could be 100% confirmed.
The rest of the post, similarly, and perhaps oddly, ignores RoL's idea that there might be a godfather in the game, and that its probably pandain.
Why is that odd? Well, because you're 'confirmed' because he has you on his list. But if his list is bullshit, then so is your confirmation. Oh but wait, if his list is bullshit, then Kenpachi might be blue too, and lynching me/him would win you the game. If you were blue, you'd know you aren't confirmed, and that pandain isn't either.
Between you just plain lying about my positions, playing scummy all game, and overzealously trying to claim that you're confirmed, there doesn't seem to be much room for doubt. You've pretty much cemented that you/pandain are mafia in my mind.
Give concrete reason why this list is bullshit. If you can't, we will continue discussing who on the uncertain is to be lynch. + Show Spoiler +On November 10 2010 09:52 LunarDestiny wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2010 08:24 kitaman27 wrote:On November 08 2010 08:23 Nemesis wrote: Well can infindibulum and AmberLight confirm that they both did not leave their house during the respective days they were visited?
Which days were who visited? inf on night one amber on night twoace on night three Amber is Blue.Show nested quote +On November 08 2010 12:15 infinitestory wrote:On November 08 2010 12:12 Nemesis wrote: Infinitestory I'm just wondering who did you check the previous days? No need to reveal their roles. conveniently, i have returned from dinner in time to answer this night 1, i checked annul, found bullet bill & bodyguard. PM included flavor text of me having fun playing on the tire swing night 2, i checked coagulation, found mafia retard. night 3, i checked infundibulum, role name will be withheld since he's still alive and town infundibulum is BLUEShow nested quote +On November 07 2010 08:22 KtheZ wrote: Considering that the state of the town is in complete disarray, I will now roleclaim.
I am the detective. However, I suspect that I am an "insane detective". The reasons and my finding will be below.
On night 1, I forgot to investigate anyone, being the lurker dumbass I was. On night 2, I investigated Pandain. I found him to be the MAFIA Garbage collector. On night 3, I investigated infinitestory, and found him to be the MAFIA ADD detective.
Now, what the hell? Why would the mafia have an ADD Detective? This has led me to conclude that I am insane.
Now, assuming I'm an insane detective, it is apparent that Pandain and infinitestory are town-aligned. I am no longer into lynching pandain; I had found him to be mafia, which is why i was so ardent in pursuing his lynch.
I feel that infinitestory's results are now trustworthy, and that pandain did not lie about his role.
If you think I am lying, look at my posts against pandain. I was so one-mindedly pursuing pandain because I thought he was mafia. However, this night has confirmed my sad suspicion that I am "insane". This guy is insane. Pandain is BLUEShow nested quote +On November 10 2010 09:48 Pandain wrote:On November 10 2010 09:45 LunarDestiny wrote: Pandain, who did you check for all of your night actions? Well remember it was random. Let's see... night 1: infnite Night two: nemesisNight three: Veldril Night 4: Kenpachi.All innocent 'cept Kenpachi Nemesis is BLUE. Kenpachi is RED.Cleaned ListPandain - BLUE Infundibulum - BLUE Kenpachi - RED Nemesis - BLUE Meapak_Ziphh Node - Oracle??? youngminii L NB Glasse - THIRD PARTY LunarDestiny - THIRD PARTY
|
On November 10 2010 13:39 L wrote: Haha, wow. Maybe you should go back and actually read those posts before commenting them, because you've falsely characterized half my arguments. My statements regarding DrH on the top, for instance, were actually a defence of DrH's statement that he could be 100% confirmed.
The rest of the post, similarly, and perhaps oddly, ignores RoL's idea that there might be a godfather in the game, and that its probably pandain.
Why is that odd? Well, because you're 'confirmed' because he has you on his list. But if his list is bullshit, then so is your confirmation. Oh but wait, if his list is bullshit, then Kenpachi might be blue too, and lynching me/him would win you the game. If you were blue, you'd know you aren't confirmed, and that pandain isn't either.
Between you just plain lying about my positions, playing scummy all game, and overzealously trying to claim that you're confirmed, there doesn't seem to be much room for doubt. You've pretty much cemented that you/pandain are mafia in my mind. LOL you are using RoL's idea that there is a godfather role and it's probably Pandain when RoL flipped red. So you are using an argument that another red used to try and lynch someone? Can you be any more scummy at this point?
|
On November 10 2010 13:52 Nemesis wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2010 13:39 L wrote: Haha, wow. Maybe you should go back and actually read those posts before commenting them, because you've falsely characterized half my arguments. My statements regarding DrH on the top, for instance, were actually a defence of DrH's statement that he could be 100% confirmed.
The rest of the post, similarly, and perhaps oddly, ignores RoL's idea that there might be a godfather in the game, and that its probably pandain.
Why is that odd? Well, because you're 'confirmed' because he has you on his list. But if his list is bullshit, then so is your confirmation. Oh but wait, if his list is bullshit, then Kenpachi might be blue too, and lynching me/him would win you the game. If you were blue, you'd know you aren't confirmed, and that pandain isn't either.
Between you just plain lying about my positions, playing scummy all game, and overzealously trying to claim that you're confirmed, there doesn't seem to be much room for doubt. You've pretty much cemented that you/pandain are mafia in my mind. LOL you are using RoL's idea that there is a godfather role and it's probably Pandain when RoL flipped red. So you are using an argument that another red used to try and lynch someone? Can you be any more scummy at this point? Uh, if RoL flips red it doesn't mean he was lying. Every information role in the game was summarily killed, with the exception of pandain. Why?
Mafia do this all the time. The argument you've made here is one of the only real examples of WIFOM in the thread.
Lunar: This is pretty much why I think the list is bullshit; Coag asked DTs to check Pandain on day 1. This alone, pretty much one of the only requests for a DT check, is a huge GF tip off, especially in a game where everyone is blue; why bother asking for role confirmation unless you're going to leverage your role for something else? Coag isn't a super brilliant mafia player either; when he asked for a DT to check Pandain, it probably wasn't to leave a paper trail later. Add that to Pandain parroting divinek's posts, and its pretty self explanatory.
Nemesis is just the cherry on the cake. With these last posts he's pushed the notion that Pandain's innocent for the aim of having himself cleared. The best part is that when I flip blue he knows he doesn't have anything to fear, because town will have lost 2 blues during the lynch, then another 2 during the night, leaving town with 2+2 third party vs 3 mafia+ the potential secret mafia vote, for an instant win.
|
|
Lunar: This is pretty much why I think the list is bullshit; Coag asked DTs to check Pandain on day 1. This alone, pretty much one of the only requests for a DT check, is a huge GF tip off, especially in a game where everyone is blue; why bother asking for role confirmation unless you're going to leverage your role for something else? Coag isn't a super brilliant mafia player either; when he asked for a DT to check Pandain, it probably wasn't to leave a paper trail later. Add that to Pandain parroting divinek's posts, and its pretty self explanatory.
So are you saying that Kitz who checked Pandain lying?
So we should believe that Coag told a dt to check Pandain, to prove Pandain is blue when he should be mafia.
Ok. Next game when a red ask a dt to check on someone. That person is Godfather. i should follow that advice next game too.
|
FIXED.
On November 10 2010 14:11 LunarDestiny wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2010 14:03 L wrote:On November 10 2010 13:52 Nemesis wrote:On November 10 2010 13:39 L wrote: Haha, wow. Maybe you should go back and actually read those posts before commenting them, because you've falsely characterized half my arguments. My statements regarding DrH on the top, for instance, were actually a defence of DrH's statement that he could be 100% confirmed.
The rest of the post, similarly, and perhaps oddly, ignores RoL's idea that there might be a godfather in the game, and that its probably pandain.
Why is that odd? Well, because you're 'confirmed' because he has you on his list. But if his list is bullshit, then so is your confirmation. Oh but wait, if his list is bullshit, then Kenpachi might be blue too, and lynching me/him would win you the game. If you were blue, you'd know you aren't confirmed, and that pandain isn't either.
Between you just plain lying about my positions, playing scummy all game, and overzealously trying to claim that you're confirmed, there doesn't seem to be much room for doubt. You've pretty much cemented that you/pandain are mafia in my mind. LOL you are using RoL's idea that there is a godfather role and it's probably Pandain when RoL flipped red. So you are using an argument that another red used to try and lynch someone? Can you be any more scummy at this point? Uh, if RoL flips red it doesn't mean he was lying. Every information role in the game was summarily killed, with the exception of pandain. Why? Mafia do this all the time. The argument you've made here is one of the only real examples of WIFOM in the thread. Lunar: This is pretty much why I think the list is bullshit; Coag asked DTs to check Pandain on day 1. This alone, pretty much one of the only requests for a DT check, is a huge GF tip off, especially in a game where everyone is blue; why bother asking for role confirmation unless you're going to leverage your role for something else? Coag isn't a super brilliant mafia player either; when he asked for a DT to check Pandain, it probably wasn't to leave a paper trail later. Add that to Pandain parroting divinek's posts, and its pretty self explanatory. Nemesis is just the cherry on the cake. With these last posts he's pushed the notion that Pandain's innocent for the aim of having himself cleared. The best part is that when I flip blue he knows he doesn't have anything to fear, because town will have lost 2 blues during the lynch, then another 2 during the night, leaving town with 2+2 third party vs 3 mafia+ the potential secret mafia vote, for an instant win. So are you saying that Kitz who checked Pandain lying? So we should believe that Coag told a dt to check Pandain, to prove Pandain is blue when he should be mafia. Ok. Next game when a red ask a dt to check on someone. That person is Godfather. i should follow that advice next game too.
|
So are you saying that Kitz who checked Pandain lying? No, I'm saying that if Pandain is godfather, he'll be able to choose what his check returns, and if that's the case, his star pupil over there, Nemesis, isn't confirmed either.
|
On November 10 2010 14:19 L wrote: No, I'm saying that if Pandain is godfather, he'll be able to choose what his check returns, and if that's the case, his star pupil over there, Nemesis, isn't confirmed either. Again... Ok. Next game when a red ask a dt to check on someone. That person is Godfather. i should follow that advice next game too.
|
Alternatively, Pandain might be 100% legit, and Nemesis could be the GF. Either way, I'm pretty certain Nemesis is mafia, because he's literally a walking encyclopedia of scumtells at this point.
|
On November 10 2010 14:21 L wrote: Alternatively, Pandain might be 100% legit, and Nemesis could be the GF. Either way, I'm pretty certain Nemesis is mafia, because he's literally a walking encyclopedia of scumtells at this point. Yeah, they are a much better lynch than those have no concrete information to prove their innocence.
|
On November 10 2010 14:21 L wrote: Alternatively, Pandain might be 100% legit, and Nemesis could be the GF. Either way, I'm pretty certain Nemesis is mafia, because he's literally a walking encyclopedia of scumtells at this point. Walking scumtell?
Tell me who just recently changed their argument to "making a bunch of one liner and lightly accusing people" to "calling out for being inactive."
|
On November 10 2010 14:25 Nemesis wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2010 14:21 L wrote: Alternatively, Pandain might be 100% legit, and Nemesis could be the GF. Either way, I'm pretty certain Nemesis is mafia, because he's literally a walking encyclopedia of scumtells at this point. Walking scumtell? Tell me who just recently changed their argument to "making a bunch of one liner and lightly accusing people" to "calling out for being inactive." Uh, making one liners is a sign of feigned activity. They're called chaff posts and typically indicate nothing unless they form the vast majority of a player's statements, in which case he's inactive and trying to appear otherwise.
How is this new?
As for lunar: they are, actually. When you have Divinek, RoL and Coag in game actions all pointing at Pandain's guilt, its pretty huge. Add that to Nemesis admitting he wanted to sit back and watch the game during a period in which 2 blues were the lynch targets, and then the panoply of other gaffes he's made and you have fantastic lynches for today.
Anyways, I suppose the town can decide the merits. I'm still not going to claim until Node shows up, because quite frankly I don't want to lose what's probably our only shot at winning. And when I say town, I mean town. Not third party. If the mafia win tonight, so does the third party. Which is kinda terrible, because it means this is a 6 to 5 vote and not a single townie can screw up or we lose.
|
On November 10 2010 14:33 L wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2010 14:25 Nemesis wrote:On November 10 2010 14:21 L wrote: Alternatively, Pandain might be 100% legit, and Nemesis could be the GF. Either way, I'm pretty certain Nemesis is mafia, because he's literally a walking encyclopedia of scumtells at this point. Walking scumtell? Tell me who just recently changed their argument to "making a bunch of one liner and lightly accusing people" to "calling out for being inactive." Uh, making one liners is a sign of feigned activity. They're called chaff posts and typically indicate nothing unless they form the vast majority of a player's statements, in which case he's inactive and trying to appear otherwise. How is this new? As for lunar: they are, actually. When you have Divinek, RoL and Coag in game actions all pointing at Pandain's guilt, its pretty huge. Add that to Nemesis admitting he wanted to sit back and watch the game during a period in which 2 blues were the lynch targets, and then the panoply of other gaffes he's made and you have fantastic lynches for today. Anyways, I suppose the town can decide the merits. I'm still not going to claim until Node shows up, because quite frankly I don't want to lose what's probably our only shot at winning. And when I say town, I mean town. Not third party. If the mafia win tonight, so does the third party. Which is kinda terrible, because it means this is a 6 to 5 vote and not a single townie can screw up or we lose. Mafia have a long road of winning and I don't have intention to win with mafia. On night 4, I killed Ace who I thought to be a 90ish% mafia at that point.
Also, a lot of people accused Pandain being mafia (me included, see 5 hours before day3 lynch).
You are still not pointing out solid information that Pandain is mafia.
|
|
|
|