EPT[Patch 1.0.0.133: Ziggs] General Discussion - Page 13
| Forum Index > LoL General |
Heed these two simple warnings. It will help make our GD a better place. Consider this fair notice to all users. Warning will be dished out this patch. Thanks. Neo, 31.01.12 | ||
|
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
| ||
Treadmill
Canada2833 Posts
On February 02 2012 03:28 IntoTheheart wrote: Oh yeah, she's still good, but I'm curious as to why they felt it necessary to buff her in thes ways. It's like that random Nasus buff a while ago. I mean, I was already kicking ass as it was, but then I got better stats n' stuff. Wonder what playing Ashe'll be like to be honest. I do think the biggest issue with Ashe is that her volley has base damage of 40/50/60/70/80 - it basically doesn't scale at all. And its one of the easiest ad skillshots to avoid since minions block it completely. Cait's Q has 100 more base damage when max ranked, and Sivir's Q has 160 and can hit twice. They could easily give her volley 100-200 more base damage (at max rank) and she might just become viable off of that. | ||
|
Pudge_172
United States1378 Posts
On February 02 2012 03:34 red_ wrote: I'm still absolutely baffled at the lack of a new 20 champ bundle of some kind(like champs 41-60, or a make your own roster of X-6300's, Y-3150/4800's, Z-450/1350's, something). I would love the make your own bundle. I'm a new player and I've only hit level 19. That means I'm saving all my IP for runes and I'm limited to 11 Champs(i got Alistar from Youtube/10 free each week). If I could pick champs that I've enjoyed playing while they are free by making my own bundle, I'd actually go buy some RP. | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On February 02 2012 03:46 arnath wrote: I was actually looking at this yesterday. I think the last 14 champs released have all been 6300. As someone posted a few days ago, the last time a champion was reduced in price was sometime in October. We'll have to see what sort of record they're going for. A small increase in IP gained would be nice, but like someone here has already mentioned, runes are the bigger issue (at least for me). | ||
|
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
| ||
|
Keniji
Netherlands2569 Posts
On February 02 2012 03:51 Pudge_172 wrote: I would love the make your own bundle. I'm a new player and I've only hit level 19. That means I'm saving all my IP for runes and I'm limited to 11 Champs(i got Alistar from Youtube/10 free each week). If I could pick champs that I've enjoyed playing while they are free by making my own bundle, I'd actually go buy some RP. You can get tristana from facebook for free I think. I eventually bought RP (once) to get that stupid rune page bundle. Once you want to start ranked / have some champs and runes you really can't go without (imo) and 6300 ip for a runepage is crazy. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
| ||
|
arnath
United States1317 Posts
On February 02 2012 04:04 UniversalSnip wrote: the single biggest improvement they could make to ip prices is having rune pages avaliable by default instead of selling them. Having new players start with two is absolutely ridiculous and it's well over the line of selling power to me. Totally abusive. Yeah the rune page prices are just ludicrous and it limits you so much as a new level 30. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On February 02 2012 04:04 UniversalSnip wrote: the single biggest improvement they could make to ip prices is having rune pages avaliable by default instead of selling them. Having new players start with two is absolutely ridiculous and it's well over the line of selling power to me. Totally abusive. Or atleast sell them at a reasonabl IP price, as if runes themselves weren't expensive enough, they make it so a rune page is 6300 >.< so silly. | ||
|
mordek
United States12705 Posts
| ||
|
freelander
Hungary4707 Posts
the third one, actually. really original | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
On February 02 2012 03:46 arnath wrote: I was actually looking at this yesterday. I think the last 14 champs released have all been 6300. As someone posted a few days ago, the last time a champion was reduced in price was sometime in October. Being 1 year since a 3150 IP champion. Since that, 3 or 4 4800IP release, and only 6300. I miss the time were Riot was proud of telling IP price = difficulté of the champion. | ||
|
freelander
Hungary4707 Posts
| ||
|
Xevious
United States2086 Posts
On February 02 2012 04:04 UniversalSnip wrote: the single biggest improvement they could make to ip prices is having rune pages avaliable by default instead of selling them. Having new players start with two is absolutely ridiculous and it's well over the line of selling power to me. Totally abusive. I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure the argument against this is that they have to make a certain amount of money through micro transactions, and if they didn't do it through rune pages they would just make up for it somewhere else. The price of runes themselves is what really bugs me, but in terms of runes pages I don't think having only two is that bad. Most new players won't know proper setups for specific heroes and will be able to survive with just a simple AD page and AP page. | ||
|
Terranasaur
United States2085 Posts
Do we have someone that can data mine that shit or something? | ||
|
clickrush
Switzerland3257 Posts
the new aura items are super neat. Up to this point ppl bought aegis, shureilas all the time and mb wota. Now you can adapt way better. The new item is kind of a pipe clone and seems to be a viable solution to fight against aoe comps (the most boring and easyest to execute strat imo). | ||
|
arnath
United States1317 Posts
| ||
|
gtrsrs
United States9109 Posts
also anyone screens on ashe ult? i'm assuming all global ults provide icons on the minimap now? | ||
|
Jaso
United States2147 Posts
| ||
|
Hidden_MotiveS
Canada2562 Posts
On February 02 2012 04:18 Noocta wrote: Being 1 year since a 3150 IP champion. Since that, 3 or 4 4800IP release, and only 6300. I miss the time were Riot was proud of telling IP price = difficulté of the champion. I thought champion prices used to be based on age. | ||
| ||
