EPTNew Mage Card: Duplicate - Page 7
| Forum Index > Hearthstone General |
|
weikor
Austria580 Posts
| ||
|
rd
United States2586 Posts
On June 02 2014 02:29 weikor wrote: The problem with hex or polymorph is, you dont know what secret your opponent has put down and you cant always check for everything either. Theres no point trying to play around the card with hex and polymorph anyways. Which scenario is worse: Your opponent getting two additional loot hoarders, or not having a solution for their Antonidas? Your decision making doesn't change. | ||
|
Advantageous
China1350 Posts
| ||
|
Akathla
United States0 Posts
remember, there is a counter to whatever YOU are playing and SOMEONE is playing it  | ||
|
Ansinjunger
United States2451 Posts
| ||
|
awesomoecalypse
United States2235 Posts
| ||
|
S1eth
Austria221 Posts
On June 04 2014 07:42 awesomoecalypse wrote: I wonder, if this summoned two copies of the destroyed creature, rather than put them in your hand, would that too big a tempo swing? It would be incredibly overpowered. You pay 5 mana to copy a minion (Faceless Manipulator) this would be 3 mana for 2 Faceless Manipulators. | ||
|
Antisocialmunky
United States5912 Posts
| ||
|
awesomoecalypse
United States2235 Posts
On June 04 2014 08:19 S1eth wrote: It would be incredibly overpowered. You pay 5 mana to copy a minion (Faceless Manipulator) this would be 3 mana for 2 Faceless Manipulators. Well, not necessarily. Faceless Manipulator is targeted, so it always copies the best minion on the board immediately. This would copy a minion effectively of your opponent's choosing, and only when they decide to trigger it. | ||
|
pedduck
Thailand468 Posts
| ||
|
fenson
0 Posts
| ||
|
Hryul
Austria2609 Posts
On June 04 2014 13:29 pedduck wrote: I see someone said secret is not working on player turn. Is it true? so it will not work with my charge minion then? TT no it won't. blizzard changed it for exactly that reason, namely that they can introduce more powerful secrets. | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
| ||
|
CreareCopy
Norway0 Posts
| ||
|
Snotling
Germany885 Posts
On July 30 2014 09:28 CreareCopy wrote: Duplicate worked great in a Secret Mage deck so far: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fn-Gbu_8_eg You realise that dupicate had exactly ZERO effect on that game. You never even played the two Minions you got. EVERY other secret would have been better in that sutuation.... | ||
|
Nekovivie
United Kingdom2599 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
| ||
|
figq
12519 Posts
Of course, for board-presence strong legendaries, you could already duplicate them with Faceless. However, Faceless doesn't trigger battlecries. So essentially, if there are legendaries with really strong battlecries (more important than their body), then Duplicate > Faceless. I wonder if we will see such battlecry-heavy legendaries in the future. edit: ah well, pandas can bounce them back to hand just as well.. | ||
|
Nekovivie
United Kingdom2599 Posts
This means it's too slow to use that way. Best case for duplicate will be Azure Drakes or similar I guess. | ||
|
Plaid_Dragon
United States0 Posts
On July 30 2014 17:16 Nekovivie wrote: No offense but posting a game from rank 15 doesn't really demonstrate much. You can pretty much use any cards/decks at these ranks and see success. Careful. Even suggesting that people's opinions and mindsets are irrelevant based on their rank is a slippery slope. | ||
| ||
