NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.
Putin has signed a decree to remove all Russian stocks from overseas exchanges.
In a blow to Russia's richest business people, President Vladimir Putin signed a decree on April 16 that requires Russian companies to remove their listings from overseas stock exchanges.
The likes of Vladimir Potanin — Russia's richest man — will now have to adjust the ownership structure of their businesses, Bloomberg reported.
That means Russian billionaires who own the companies listed abroad won't be able to collect foreign-currency dividends from the depository receipts.
Trading of depositary receipts on foreign exchanges also must cease within days, though the New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq, London Stock Exchange and other top international bourses had already frozen Russian stocks after Putin launched his war on Ukraine in February.
In addition, the decree that Putin signed means foreign holders of the canceled receipts must receive normal shares placed in non-resident accounts in Russia.
The ban on overseas listings is the latest blow to Russian billionaires, who have already been targeted by Western sanctions as well as Moscow's own capital controls that restrict the ability to move money abroad.
"The rights of shareholders who believe in Russia and have invested in the Russian market for many years and who cannot hold Russian shares directly, are being hurt," a tycoon told Russian news outlet Kommersant this month. "They have nothing to do with politics, and there is a risk that their property rights will simply be lost."
Another weekly warning to Sweden and Finland to not join NATO.
Moscow [Russia], April 20 (ANI/Sputnik): Russia has warned Sweden and Finland about consequences of joining NATO via bilateral diplomatic channels, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Wednesday.
"We have issued all our warnings both publicly and through bilateral channels. They [Sweden and Finland] know about it, they will have nothing to be surprised about, they were informed about everything, what will it lead to," Zakharova told the Rossiya 24 broadcaster. (ANI/Sputnik)
New thread by Michael Weiss citing Holger Roonemäe and "Karl", the unnamed Estonian intelligence operative who's been providing an insider's view into the war.
Takeaway: Russia has started the offensive on Donbas, but it's undermanned, and even with more "dumb weapons", it's matched by roughly equivalent manpower and more precise weapons. Currently, the situation looks like a stalemate until RU runs out of resources in 1.5 weeks, then a UA counteroffensive might begin.
I've heard Russia's aiming for some sort of victory by 9 May, but with how things are progressing, will they even achieve anything?
Saw the thread. Yeah, I have no idea what 9 May is going to look like for Russia. I worry more every day that Putin will take desperate measures to achieve the appearance of success
As far as I can understand, the following video is authentic. A Ukrainian is interrogating a Russian POW on camera, who details the invasion from his point of view from Russia to Chernobyl/Bucha where he was captured. At the end he has a phone call with his mother who's living in Russia.
Moscow [Russia], April 20 (ANI/Sputnik): Russia has warned Sweden and Finland about consequences of joining NATO via bilateral diplomatic channels, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Wednesday.
"We have issued all our warnings both publicly and through bilateral channels. They [Sweden and Finland] know about it, they will have nothing to be surprised about, they were informed about everything, what will it lead to," Zakharova told the Rossiya 24 broadcaster. (ANI/Sputnik)
On April 21 2022 12:52 Magic Powers wrote: As far as I can understand, the following video is authentic. A Ukrainian is interrogating a Russian POW on camera, who details the invasion from his point of view from Russia to Chernobyl/Bucha where he was captured. At the end he has a phone call with his mother who's living in Russia.
A fresh survey shows Swedish popular support for joining NATO at 51%. Importantly, if Finland joins, support in the same survey jumps to 64%. This is good news because...
Helsinkin Sanomat (Finnish newspaper) reports that 112 Finnish members of parliament have declared themselves in support of NATO membership. This is a clear majority (the house consists of 200 members), and it only takes a parliamentary simple majority vote.
Edit: P.S. As I probably have a bit of a German-basher's reputation here by now, here's some positivity. German crowdfunding is still going strong. The state of Hesse just sent Ukrainians thermal imagers, commercial drones, tactical glasses, camo, etc. Source.
On April 21 2022 17:37 Ghanburighan wrote: A fresh survey shows Swedish popular support for joining NATO at 51%. Importantly, if Finland joins, support in the same survey jumps to 64%. This is good news because...
Helsinkin Sanomat (Finnish newspaper) reports that 112 Finnish members of parliament have declared themselves in support of NATO membership. This is a clear majority (the house consists of 200 members), and it only takes a parliamentary simple majority vote.
Edit: P.S. As I probably have a bit of a German-basher's reputation here by now, here's some positivity. German crowdfunding is still going strong. The state of Hesse just sent Ukrainians thermal imagers, commercial drones, tactical glasses, camo, etc. Source.
51% seems a bit low. What are the arguments against joining? Any Swede here got some inside knowledge? Is it mainly the "we don't want to be puppets of the US" kinda thing?
EDIT: Google says "Ei osaa sanoa" -> I don't know and "Ei tiedossa" -> abstention. Is this correct? I imagine most "I don't know"s would swing in favor of the majority
On April 21 2022 17:37 Ghanburighan wrote: A fresh survey shows Swedish popular support for joining NATO at 51%. Importantly, if Finland joins, support in the same survey jumps to 64%. This is good news because...
Helsinkin Sanomat (Finnish newspaper) reports that 112 Finnish members of parliament have declared themselves in support of NATO membership. This is a clear majority (the house consists of 200 members), and it only takes a parliamentary simple majority vote.
Edit: P.S. As I probably have a bit of a German-basher's reputation here by now, here's some positivity. German crowdfunding is still going strong. The state of Hesse just sent Ukrainians thermal imagers, commercial drones, tactical glasses, camo, etc. Source.
51% seems a bit low. What are the arguments against joining? Any Swede here got some inside knowledge? Is it mainly the "we don't want to be puppets of the US" kinda thing?
EDIT: Google says "Ei osaa sanoa" -> I don't know and "Ei tiedossa" -> abstention. Is this correct? I imagine most "I don't know"s would swing in favor of the majority
It's not abstention, it's just that the newspaper hasn't received a response yet. While the "ei osaa sanoa"/"I don't know" means that they provided a response "I don't know (yet)". Looks like they will continue to update the table as responses come in.
On April 21 2022 17:37 Ghanburighan wrote: A fresh survey shows Swedish popular support for joining NATO at 51%. Importantly, if Finland joins, support in the same survey jumps to 64%. This is good news because...
Helsinkin Sanomat (Finnish newspaper) reports that 112 Finnish members of parliament have declared themselves in support of NATO membership. This is a clear majority (the house consists of 200 members), and it only takes a parliamentary simple majority vote.
Edit: P.S. As I probably have a bit of a German-basher's reputation here by now, here's some positivity. German crowdfunding is still going strong. The state of Hesse just sent Ukrainians thermal imagers, commercial drones, tactical glasses, camo, etc. Source.
51% seems a bit low. What are the arguments against joining? Any Swede here got some inside knowledge? Is it mainly the "we don't want to be puppets of the US" kinda thing?
EDIT: Google says "Ei osaa sanoa" -> I don't know and "Ei tiedossa" -> abstention. Is this correct? I imagine most "I don't know"s would swing in favor of the majority
Not a Swede but i think it is mostly innertia. Beeing neutral has worked for them since ww2. Changing this position might be perceived as beeing a route with an uncertain outcome. And specially in uncertain times people might be more inclined wanting to stick with the status quo which has "worked" for decades. Sweden probably doesnt see Russia as a huge thread,as in the way that they fear a Russian invasion. Which makes joining Nato a less trivial decission then it is for some other nations.
51% is low. I dont think Sweden will make such an important decission unless there is a very clear majority. And i doubt support will rise much higher.
I think it’s s two fold opposition: Sweden has many left wing folks who just are strongly antimilitaristic and against a perceived US imperialism. They would totally be on board the idea that Nato is a bunch a sabre rattlers that are making things worse and that a military alliance contains the word military and you know, violence doesn’t solve anything.
They also have a strong far right that likeveverywhere in Europe, has kind of a secret hard-on for Putin, his illiberalism and his authoritarian and nationalistic style.
Also, Finland has suffeted immensely from Russia, and is its direct neighbour. The idea of actually needing protection is not outlandish for the Finns, while it will be a cold day (haha) in hell before Sweden gets invaded by Russia.
On April 21 2022 21:16 Biff The Understudy wrote: I lived in Sweden a while.
I think it’s s two fold opposition: Sweden has many left wing folks who just are strongly antimilitaristic and against a perceived US imperialism. They would totally be on board the idea that Nato is a bunch a sabre rattlers that are making things worse and that a military alliance contains the word military and you know, violence doesn’t solve anything.
They also have a strong far right that likeveverywhere in Europe, has kind of a secret hard-on for Putin, his illiberalism and his authoritarian and nationalistic style.
Also, Finland has suffeted immensely from Russia, and is its direct neighbour. The idea of actually needing protection is not outlandish for the Finns, while it will be a cold day (haha) in hell before Sweden gets invaded by Russia.
On April 21 2022 17:37 Ghanburighan wrote: A fresh survey shows Swedish popular support for joining NATO at 51%. Importantly, if Finland joins, support in the same survey jumps to 64%. This is good news because...
Helsinkin Sanomat (Finnish newspaper) reports that 112 Finnish members of parliament have declared themselves in support of NATO membership. This is a clear majority (the house consists of 200 members), and it only takes a parliamentary simple majority vote.
Edit: P.S. As I probably have a bit of a German-basher's reputation here by now, here's some positivity. German crowdfunding is still going strong. The state of Hesse just sent Ukrainians thermal imagers, commercial drones, tactical glasses, camo, etc. Source.
51% seems a bit low. What are the arguments against joining? Any Swede here got some inside knowledge? Is it mainly the "we don't want to be puppets of the US" kinda thing?
EDIT: Google says "Ei osaa sanoa" -> I don't know and "Ei tiedossa" -> abstention. Is this correct? I imagine most "I don't know"s would swing in favor of the majority
Not a Swede but i think it is mostly innertia. Beeing neutral has worked for them since ww2. Changing this position might be perceived as beeing a route with an uncertain outcome. And specially in uncertain times people might be more inclined wanting to stick with the status quo which has "worked" for decades. Sweden probably doesnt see Russia as a huge thread,as in the way that they fear a Russian invasion. Which makes joining Nato a less trivial decission then it is for some other nations.
51% is low. I dont think Sweden will make such an important decission unless there is a very clear majority. And i doubt support will rise much higher.
We have always tied Nato membership to Finland. If they join the opinion in Sweden will shift dramatically.
The drones have pretty much zero information publicly available. I assume we'll get information in the next month as to what they actually are once videos from ukraine come out. My guess though, is a middle ground between the small and big switchblades. You need more boom than a hand grenade, but not a full on Javelin warhead, which is enough to disable lightly armoured vehicles like BMPs, or artillery.