Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine - Page 119
Forum Index > General Forum |
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. | ||
Magic Powers
Austria3709 Posts
| ||
RvB
Netherlands6191 Posts
| ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
DOHA, Qatar—Key negotiators in an agreement to free Israeli hostages and pause the fighting in Gaza said the deal would take effect Friday morning, even as the parties raced to overcome sticking points to the arrangement weeks in the making. Qatar’s Foreign Ministry said a temporary cease-fire would begin at 7 a.m. local time Friday. In return, an initial group of 13 hostages, all women and children held by Hamas, would be freed around 4 p.m. the same day, said Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari. A group of Palestinian prisoners, also women and children, would be released around the same time, he added. “We are hoping that we don’t see any delays. I think we’ve reached a point now where everything is in place and we’re ready to go on the ground,” Ansari said during a news conference in Doha. He said that the Qataris were setting up an operations room to monitor the cease-fire and communicate with the parties to the conflict and the International Committee of the Red Cross. The announcement came after the deal, which was approved by Israel and Hamas earlier this week, stumbled over logistical issues relating to the details of the first people to be exchanged. Senior Egyptian officials blamed that setback on last-minute demands from Hamas and its failure to hand over a list of the first group of hostages it planned to release. Qatar said the list of the initial hostages to be released was handed over on Thursday. Israel’s prime minister’s office also said it had received and was checking an initial list of names and was currently in contact with all of the hostages’ families. Officials from Qatar, Egypt, Israel and the U.S. are still pushing to work out the deal’s implementation, including the finer details of what happens to the hostages once they are out of Hamas’s hands and to those left behind. Egypt said it continued to work with all the parties involved and expected the agreement to come into force by Friday. Meanwhile, Israel pressed its military operation in Gaza, hitting hundreds of targets across the strip. The broad terms of the agreement outlined a four-day pause in the fighting in Gaza and the release of 50 hostages by Hamas in exchange for 150 Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails. All those swapped would be women and children. The deal calls for the hostages to be released in smaller groups each day over the course of four days and reserves the right to extend the pause if more hostages are freed. Senior Egyptian officials said Hamas failed to formally sign off on the mechanism for the hostages’ release, and didn’t provide Israel with a specific list of around a dozen or more to be freed first. The two sides already reviewed the full list of 50 people set for release, including their names, ages and genders. According to negotiators, Hamas asked Israel for a list of the first group of Palestinian prisoners to be released so it could inform their families. When Israel turned down the request, Hamas refused to share the list of hostages it plans to hand over on the first day. Ansari, the Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesman, said on Thursday that the lists of hostages and prisoners to be swapped beyond Friday hadn’t yet been exchanged. Another technical issue gumming up the process is access by the International Committee of the Red Cross to the released hostages, and negotiations over the exit through which they will leave Gaza, according to officials familiar with the situation. As well as its border with Israel, Gaza also shares a frontier with Egypt. Israel had wanted the hostages to be handed over to the Red Cross before their transfer to Israel, while Hamas is now asking for them to be given directly to Egypt, the officials said. Israel has also asked that the Red Cross be given access to those hostages who remain in Gaza after the first exchange, something Hamas hasn’t agreed to. Ansari said the hostages would be handed over to the Red Cross, without elaborating. “It constitutes the first glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel for this conflict,” he said of the deal. Egypt and Qatar, which are mediating in the talks, late Wednesday decided to delay the release by 24 hours in order to resolve the remaining issues, according to people familiar with the talks. Negotiators were working on Thursday to resolve the logistical issues and remained hopeful that the deal would be set in motion by Friday, according to one official familiar with the talks. Source | ||
Mohdoo
United States15401 Posts
On November 23 2023 16:13 GreenHorizons wrote: Hamas has been saying for weeks that dozens of hostages were missing/killed/buried under rubble from Israeli air strikes. www.reuters.com So I don't think you're reading the dynamics correctly. We have zero incentive to trust “hospital destroyed and 500 injured” Hamas. And even if we made a conscious decision to be insane and trust Hamas, Hamas kidnapping people and holding them hostage is clearly where things went south. Trying to pretend Israel could ever be framed as at fault for anything that happens to these people after Hamas kidnapped them is completely nuts. It is not ok to kidnap people and hold them as hostages. Hamas did that, and now we have no idea what happened to them. Whether they were held somewhere that Israel bombed or one of their smooth brain dip shits yelled something about jihad before killing them, the hostages should never have been taken to begin with. It was entire evil and unethical for Hamas to take hostages and it’s silly to pretend it was some kind of valid and not evil thing to do Collective punishment is not ethical. Although part of the issue is that Hamas wants to kill all Jews, so I doubt they even view it as collective punishment. Regardless, their shitty ass philosophical framework is invalid and these people were punished wrongly. | ||
GreenHorizons
United States22736 Posts
On November 23 2023 21:34 RvB wrote: We should just wait for independent verification. Access for the red cross is part of the deal so we'll know soon enough. Hamas is not reliable but on the other hand do have an incentive to keep the hostages alive since it's their only leverage. This is reasonable (though Israel has been consistently against this in basically every other case). The idea that the hold up on the deal is that Hamas members didn't tell their superiors that hostages died is just silly. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15401 Posts
| ||
Magic Powers
Austria3709 Posts
On November 23 2023 23:39 JimmiC wrote: Which is the group not getting called evil? Here it’s like at least 90% calling the IDF evil and I think 100% of those who have written about Hamas have said evil. I'm talking about the international response. | ||
GreenHorizons
United States22736 Posts
On November 24 2023 01:58 Mohdoo wrote: What I don’t understand is...+ Show Spoiler + what incentive Hamas has to do any of this. What does a 4 day ceasefire really get them? The Palestinian version of gravy seals are being shown it takes more than racism and anger to fight a war. They are toast either way, so why even trade the hostages? Once Israel has everyone back, it all starts up again. If anything I’d expect 4 days of prep would be way better for Israel than Hamas since they are an actual military with education and stuff like that A lot when it comes to this conflict. Whether it's shaming Palestinian parents for not leaving Gaza before you learned Israel doesn't let them leave, this recent example of silly speculation about the deal, or any in-between, it's because you're pulling these ideas out of your ass while being oblivious to their absurdity. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15401 Posts
On November 24 2023 02:17 GreenHorizons wrote: A lot when it comes to this conflict. Whether it's shaming Palestinian parents for not leaving Gaza before you learned Israel doesn't let them leave, this recent example of silly speculation about the deal, or any in-between, it's because you're pulling these ideas out of your ass while being oblivious to their absurdity. Egypt doesn’t let them leave. Muslim nations leadership don’t wants them to leave because they view them as martyrs. I’ve quoted the leadership of Jordan and Egypt numerous times at this point. They are dehumanized and regarded as weapons by Egypt, Jordan, Yemen, Iran, and Qatar. And Hamas agrees and has reiterated they are a nation of martyrs. Do you disagree with Hamas on this point? Are all Palestinians some kinda blood sacrifice to the antisemitism cause? Or are they humans who Egypt should allow to escape this war? Israel and Hamas are both committing an evil by participating in a war, but the depraved indifference from the folks claiming they are cheering for Gaza is also extreme. Rather than slapping a sticker on their foreheads that says “weapon, use as needed”, Egypt and other neighboring nations should be frantically doing all they can to help people escape. You said “let them escape”, which indicates some number want to escape. Should Egypt open their border to let them escape? Should people help them escape? It’s unclear to me why folks are pretending it is ok to cheer on blood sacrifices. Rather than demanding further blood sacrifices, neighboring nations should be trying to let folks escape because they want to leave a war zone. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
GreenHorizons
United States22736 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On November 24 2023 02:31 Mohdoo wrote: Egypt doesn’t let them leave. Muslim nations leadership don’t wants them to leave because they view them as martyrs. I’ve quoted the leadership of Jordan and Egypt numerous times at this point. They are dehumanized and regarded as weapons by Egypt, Jordan, Yemen, Iran, and Qatar. And Hamas agrees and has reiterated they are a nation of martyrs. Do you disagree with Hamas on this point? Are all Palestinians some kinda blood sacrifice to the antisemitism cause? Or are they humans who Egypt should allow to escape this war? Israel and Hamas are both committing an evil by participating in a war, but the depraved indifference from the folks claiming they are cheering for Gaza is also extreme. Rather than slapping a sticker on their foreheads that says “weapon, use as needed”, Egypt and other neighboring nations should be frantically doing all they can to help people escape. You said “let them escape”, which indicates some number want to escape. Should Egypt open their border to let them escape? Should people help them escape? It’s unclear to me why folks are pretending it is ok to cheer on blood sacrifices. Rather than demanding further blood sacrifices, neighboring nations should be trying to let folks escape because they want to leave a war zone. When Jordan let Palestinian refugees in they started attacks from inside Jordan against Israel they refused to stop when Jordan asked then Black September happened. Lebanon let them in, which was the Paris of the Middle East, they started the fires that led to the Civil Wars... then Egypt allowed some in that started a ISIS copy cat militant movement in the Sinai. There are valid security reasons many Middle Eastern countries don't allow Gazans refugees into their states. Because they cannot, or very great cost, try and find out who is Hamas and who is not. | ||
RvB
Netherlands6191 Posts
On November 24 2023 02:53 GreenHorizons wrote: Regarding the deal, I am curious about why Israel abandoned their "we won't negotiate" stance to take this deal and what it might mean going forward. As far as I've seen Israel hasn't given their reasoning and insists their invasion/illegal occupation will continue after any pause. They've been clear about their aims since the start. Release the hostages and get rid of Hamas. Negotiating for their release was always the most likely way to release at least some of them. They don't really lose that much with a temporary ceasefire. More time for Hamas to prepare and get on their feet but at the same time it's also a pause for Israel to prepare for the next parts of their campaign. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
GreenHorizons
United States22736 Posts
On November 24 2023 03:12 RvB wrote: They've been clear about their aims since the start. Release the hostages and get rid of Hamas. Negotiating for their release was always the most likely way to release at least some of them. They don't really lose that much with a temporary ceasefire. More time for Hamas to prepare and get on their feet but at the same time it's also a pause for Israel to prepare for the next parts of their campaign. Most likely sure (I don't think any serious people believed Israel was going to recover them through their bombing/ground invasion), but they essentially publicly rejected this deal/deals like them for weeks insisting they wouldn't negotiate. That the hostages would either be wholly released by Hamas without conditions and then Israel would eliminate Hamas, or Israel would destroy Hamas therefore freeing the hostages by eliminating their captors. I'm wondering why they abandoned that now. It's a position the US was openly supporting with Blinken saying things like "They need to be released, each and every one of them, now, unconditionally." So maybe some assessment of the situation (probably including internal pressure from families of hostages and their supporters in Israel, and pro-Palestinian actions in the US [edit: and in Israel/around the world]) finally made clear to both the US and Israel that wasn't going to work? I guess I'm curious how Israel is squaring this deal with their earlier position against even entertaining deals like this. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
RvB
Netherlands6191 Posts
On November 24 2023 03:58 GreenHorizons wrote: Most likely sure (I don't think any serious people believed Israel was going to recover them through their bombing/ground invasion), but they essentially publicly rejected this deal/deals like them for weeks insisting they wouldn't negotiate. That the hostages would either be wholly released by Hamas without conditions and then Israel would eliminate Hamas, or Israel would destroy Hamas therefore freeing the hostages by eliminating their captors. I'm wondering why they abandoned that now. It's a position the US was openly supporting with Blinken saying things like "They need to be released, each and every one of them, now, unconditionally." So maybe some assessment of the situation (probably including internal pressure from families of hostages and their supporters in Israel, and pro-Palestinian actions in the US) finally made clear to both the US and Israel that wasn't going to work? I guess I'm curious how Israel is squaring this deal with their earlier position against even entertaining deals like this. They've been negotiating since the start. Don't think they've ever said there would be no negotiation. From apnews.com WASHINGTON (AP) — The negotiations hardly ran smoothly. But in the end, persistence paid off. Six weeks ago, not long after Hamas killed more than 1,200 people in Israel and took scores of others hostage in a surprise assault, the government of Qatar quietly reached out to the United States to discuss how to secure the release of those who were taken captive by the militant group. But the mission demanded extreme sensitivity. It was so secret that U.S. officials established a communications cell to reach Hamas directly and kept those negotiations tightly guarded throughout the U.S. government. Only a handful of people were aware of the talks, according to a senior White House official. The cell allowed the small circle of negotiators to speak regularly without additional bureaucracy. U.S. and Israeli officials spent weeks scrambling to put together a deal that would free dozens of hostages held by Hamas. The White House saw that as the only realistic way to halt the bloody combat that has devastated the region for more than six weeks. Pressure from the US and the hostages families certainly made a difference as you say. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15401 Posts
On November 24 2023 02:53 GreenHorizons wrote: Regarding the deal, I am curious about why Israel abandoned their "we won't negotiate" stance to take this deal and what it might mean going forward. As far as I've seen Israel hasn't given their reasoning and insists their invasion/illegal occupation will continue after any pause. Is the well-being of the hostages not a sufficient reason? There is precedent for Israel making exchanges in the past. And there is a lot of public pressure within Israel. But I agree, I think it’s very likely they keep on going right after the ceasefire. I think this is a pause, not an end. Which makes it puzzling why Hamas is agreeing to it. Both sides have a clear incentive to make the exchange, but it feels like it leaves Hamas in a difficult situation after all the hostages are returned. Edit: replying to your follow up: I really see it as a huge win for Israel to do this ceasefire so I honestly don’t understand the confusion. Delaying Hamas being wiped out by 4 days is a clearly huge net benefit to get hostages back home. Once all the hostages are returned, Israel has even less reason to hold back and the 4 day delay will clearly hugely benefit Israel more than Hamas. | ||
| ||