• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:01
CEST 11:01
KST 18:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202515Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder2EWC 2025 - Replay Pack2Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced27BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
Serral wins EWC 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Shield Battery Server New Patch BW General Discussion [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 634 users

The Games Industry And ATVI - Page 60

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 58 59 60 61 62 77 Next
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25270 Posts
September 05 2024 07:36 GMT
#1181
Unfortunately many gamers are as impotently angry as they are lacking in patience.

Perhaps it’s just an unfortunately unrepresentative cross-section I’m exposed to, but my god that segment may be among the daftest consumer group I’ve ever encountered
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16701 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-09-05 13:56:38
September 05 2024 13:31 GMT
#1182
On September 05 2024 16:36 WombaT wrote:
Unfortunately many gamers are as impotently angry as they are lacking in patience.

Perhaps it’s just an unfortunately unrepresentative cross-section I’m exposed to, but my god that segment may be among the daftest consumer group I’ve ever encountered

Dude, I fall prey to it. I got Red Alert 3 because of Gina Carano.


In the fight shown in the video she went into the cage with a Red Alert 3 shirt.


Paul Tassi
twitter.com
Part of the reason Tassi is so hated is that he is smart and calculated. He has a colleague at Forbes, Erik Kain, and he does the "thoughtful right wing" opinion side. I think its orchestrated by Forbes and Tassi only believes a portion of what he puts out in public. Forbes has their "anti woke" guy in Erik Kain and their "woke" guy in Paul Tassi.

As a company and brand, How do you survive the "woke"//"anti woke" war? You put guys on both sides who pretend to "oppose" each other. Kinda like pro wrestling.

At a basic level, I think Kain and Tassi believe in the perspectives they put out there. I do not think either is any where close to a 100% fraud nor are they giving us 100% what they beleive in their heart. I think Forbes has carefully hand picked both of these guys.

This is how Forbes inoculates itself from being the next "Bud Light".

All this said. I must give a tip of my cap to Forbes. Well Played.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16701 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-09-06 16:01:32
September 06 2024 15:57 GMT
#1183
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16701 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-09-06 16:02:21
September 06 2024 16:01 GMT
#1184
Double post
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25270 Posts
September 06 2024 17:46 GMT
#1185
On September 07 2024 00:57 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.

Skill-based matchmaking has many downsides too, and tons of players complain about it all the time.

It seems the obvious solution is to have a ranked mode that uses it, and an unranked that does not. I suppose it can potentially split playerbases which can be dicey, but outside of this you can have the best of both worlds


'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16701 Posts
September 06 2024 18:27 GMT
#1186
On September 07 2024 02:46 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2024 00:57 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.

Skill-based matchmaking has many downsides too, and tons of players complain about it all the time.

It seems the obvious solution is to have a ranked mode that uses it, and an unranked that does not. I suppose it can potentially split playerbases which can be dicey, but outside of this you can have the best of both worlds

That sounds like a good idea. They should put xDefiant on Steam.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
hexhaven
Profile Joined July 2014
Finland931 Posts
September 06 2024 18:35 GMT
#1187
On September 07 2024 02:46 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2024 00:57 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.

Skill-based matchmaking has many downsides too, and tons of players complain about it all the time.

It seems the obvious solution is to have a ranked mode that uses it, and an unranked that does not. I suppose it can potentially split playerbases which can be dicey, but outside of this you can have the best of both worlds




We used to have dedicated servers. We used to be a real country.
WriterI shoot events. | http://www.jussi.co/esports
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25270 Posts
September 06 2024 19:08 GMT
#1188
On September 07 2024 03:35 hexhaven wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2024 02:46 WombaT wrote:
On September 07 2024 00:57 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.

Skill-based matchmaking has many downsides too, and tons of players complain about it all the time.

It seems the obvious solution is to have a ranked mode that uses it, and an unranked that does not. I suppose it can potentially split playerbases which can be dicey, but outside of this you can have the best of both worlds




We used to have dedicated servers. We used to be a real country.

Not every day you get a Frank Sobotka reference! Unless you’re in a Facebook Wire memes group of course…
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
September 06 2024 19:22 GMT
#1189
On September 07 2024 02:46 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2024 00:57 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.

Skill-based matchmaking has many downsides too, and tons of players complain about it all the time.

It seems the obvious solution is to have a ranked mode that uses it, and an unranked that does not. I suppose it can potentially split playerbases which can be dicey, but outside of this you can have the best of both worlds




You need only look to Activision Research's experiment where they disabled the skill-matching component of their matchmaker to see the negative ripple effects. The main people who complain about SBMM are content creators (obviously, they're making all the videos about it) who are typically also near the top of the skill spectrum. They have a personal interest in removing SBMM because in a purely-random lobby it allows them to pop off and generate Sick Plays which they can use in their streams and videos which makes their content more exciting which makes them more money. To everyone else in the player pool, though, more balanced matches means more satisfaction and more retention -- even in unranked modes.
Moderator
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
11827 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-09-06 19:45:40
September 06 2024 19:45 GMT
#1190
On September 07 2024 04:22 Excalibur_Z wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2024 02:46 WombaT wrote:
On September 07 2024 00:57 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.

Skill-based matchmaking has many downsides too, and tons of players complain about it all the time.

It seems the obvious solution is to have a ranked mode that uses it, and an unranked that does not. I suppose it can potentially split playerbases which can be dicey, but outside of this you can have the best of both worlds




You need only look to Activision Research's experiment where they disabled the skill-matching component of their matchmaker to see the negative ripple effects. The main people who complain about SBMM are content creators (obviously, they're making all the videos about it) who are typically also near the top of the skill spectrum. They have a personal interest in removing SBMM because in a purely-random lobby it allows them to pop off and generate Sick Plays which they can use in their streams and videos which makes their content more exciting which makes them more money. To everyone else in the player pool, though, more balanced matches means more satisfaction and more retention -- even in unranked modes.


That is an interesting paper. Tight matchmaking is found to be beneficial for all but the best players. Where they instead start losing players once the skill matchmaking get tighter.

Perhaps Dota's experiment with player drafting in the lobby was made to tackle that. Tightening the overall matchmaking while giving up on using the same method for the top percentage.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25270 Posts
September 06 2024 20:06 GMT
#1191
On September 07 2024 04:22 Excalibur_Z wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2024 02:46 WombaT wrote:
On September 07 2024 00:57 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.

Skill-based matchmaking has many downsides too, and tons of players complain about it all the time.

It seems the obvious solution is to have a ranked mode that uses it, and an unranked that does not. I suppose it can potentially split playerbases which can be dicey, but outside of this you can have the best of both worlds




You need only look to Activision Research's experiment where they disabled the skill-matching component of their matchmaker to see the negative ripple effects. The main people who complain about SBMM are content creators (obviously, they're making all the videos about it) who are typically also near the top of the skill spectrum. They have a personal interest in removing SBMM because in a purely-random lobby it allows them to pop off and generate Sick Plays which they can use in their streams and videos which makes their content more exciting which makes them more money. To everyone else in the player pool, though, more balanced matches means more satisfaction and more retention -- even in unranked modes.

As someone who was top 200 in the world in pretty much every game mode in CoD Black Ops in my teens, the lack of SBMM was pretty fun.

If I was having to sweat every single game, with players just as good as me, less fun

I could also invite players of a mass variety of skills and have a good time. If you’re relatively bad at the game, queuing with an SC2 GM equivalent will mean it balances out that the average opponent is considerably better than you.

Unless I was to play some ranked mode, where that’s the whole point, and climbing the leaderboard necessitates challenging yourself every game.

I agree that content creators have something of an incentive that maybe doesn’t align with the health of the game on the whole

On the flipside, even really good players wanna have a good time too.

I’ve played a little CoD in the modern era as well, I’m not as good as I was and my lobbies aren’t insane by any means. I basically still have to play on meta basically every game

In the old days, me and my boys were mucking around and doing things like playing pistols-only, or running weird loadouts. We spent a good 2 days trying to win a domination game 200-0 as a challenge

Depending on how SBMM is tuned, which is another thing, if I’m playing folks as good as me every game, I gotta go with the best tools for the job every game. It gets a bit monotonous

I enjoy playing pool, amongst my friend group there’s a guy who’s not clueless, but worse than the rest of us. There’s a middle group that trades 50/50 or 60/40 and there’s a guy way better than all of us.

I can beat the bad player playing left-handed, and I can beat the player much better than me if I have a great game and he has a bad one, and that step up in challenge is fun

With SBMM I’m just playing myself 24/7, I don’t have that shot to fuck around versus a bad player, nor do I get the shot to see if I can takedown a much better player and hope they’re off their game.

You kinda remove that ‘some day you’re the pigeon, some days you’re the statue’ element, and that can be quite fun!

Again I think you just use both. Have a ranked mode that matches you based on an approximation of your ability and rise through the ranks if you’re improving. But have an unranked too where it’s a complete crapshoot of skill sets and see where it goes.

Despite not having SBMM, there was one time we ran into a group of guys we actually knew, with a full squad of people super high up the leaderboard. Queued a good 18 games in a row, maybe went 12-6.

Had fun chatting shite a bit and enjoying the rivalry

Another thing modern CoD does is re-queue you, you play one game and that’s that. You don’t have a persistent lobby that lasts 10-20 games with a few swaps
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-09-06 20:13:56
September 06 2024 20:12 GMT
#1192
On September 07 2024 04:45 Yurie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2024 04:22 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On September 07 2024 02:46 WombaT wrote:
On September 07 2024 00:57 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.

Skill-based matchmaking has many downsides too, and tons of players complain about it all the time.

It seems the obvious solution is to have a ranked mode that uses it, and an unranked that does not. I suppose it can potentially split playerbases which can be dicey, but outside of this you can have the best of both worlds




You need only look to Activision Research's experiment where they disabled the skill-matching component of their matchmaker to see the negative ripple effects. The main people who complain about SBMM are content creators (obviously, they're making all the videos about it) who are typically also near the top of the skill spectrum. They have a personal interest in removing SBMM because in a purely-random lobby it allows them to pop off and generate Sick Plays which they can use in their streams and videos which makes their content more exciting which makes them more money. To everyone else in the player pool, though, more balanced matches means more satisfaction and more retention -- even in unranked modes.


That is an interesting paper. Tight matchmaking is found to be beneficial for all but the best players. Where they instead start losing players once the skill matchmaking get tighter.

Perhaps Dota's experiment with player drafting in the lobby was made to tackle that. Tightening the overall matchmaking while giving up on using the same method for the top percentage.


Immortal Draft is a very curious beast. By the nature of Glicko2, the amount of MMR you gain is inversely proportional to your expected win probability for a match. You can earn or lose anywhere from +/-10 to +/-40. Unsurprisingly, players want to draft teammates who represent an opportunity to earn the most MMR, but what they seem not to grasp is that they are constructing teams where they are a 20% or worse underdog. It's a smart decision from Valve in terms of design, but degrades because the playerbase isn't smart enough to use it properly, turning it into a cesspool of toxicity.

The main abuse in Immortal Draft shows up in the form of more social factors, such as overt collusion related to smurfing/boosting, or players refusing to play with each other..
Moderator
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
September 06 2024 20:36 GMT
#1193
On September 07 2024 05:06 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2024 04:22 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On September 07 2024 02:46 WombaT wrote:
On September 07 2024 00:57 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.

Skill-based matchmaking has many downsides too, and tons of players complain about it all the time.

It seems the obvious solution is to have a ranked mode that uses it, and an unranked that does not. I suppose it can potentially split playerbases which can be dicey, but outside of this you can have the best of both worlds




You need only look to Activision Research's experiment where they disabled the skill-matching component of their matchmaker to see the negative ripple effects. The main people who complain about SBMM are content creators (obviously, they're making all the videos about it) who are typically also near the top of the skill spectrum. They have a personal interest in removing SBMM because in a purely-random lobby it allows them to pop off and generate Sick Plays which they can use in their streams and videos which makes their content more exciting which makes them more money. To everyone else in the player pool, though, more balanced matches means more satisfaction and more retention -- even in unranked modes.

As someone who was top 200 in the world in pretty much every game mode in CoD Black Ops in my teens, the lack of SBMM was pretty fun.

If I was having to sweat every single game, with players just as good as me, less fun

I could also invite players of a mass variety of skills and have a good time. If you’re relatively bad at the game, queuing with an SC2 GM equivalent will mean it balances out that the average opponent is considerably better than you.

Unless I was to play some ranked mode, where that’s the whole point, and climbing the leaderboard necessitates challenging yourself every game.

I agree that content creators have something of an incentive that maybe doesn’t align with the health of the game on the whole

On the flipside, even really good players wanna have a good time too.

I’ve played a little CoD in the modern era as well, I’m not as good as I was and my lobbies aren’t insane by any means. I basically still have to play on meta basically every game

In the old days, me and my boys were mucking around and doing things like playing pistols-only, or running weird loadouts. We spent a good 2 days trying to win a domination game 200-0 as a challenge

Depending on how SBMM is tuned, which is another thing, if I’m playing folks as good as me every game, I gotta go with the best tools for the job every game. It gets a bit monotonous

I enjoy playing pool, amongst my friend group there’s a guy who’s not clueless, but worse than the rest of us. There’s a middle group that trades 50/50 or 60/40 and there’s a guy way better than all of us.

I can beat the bad player playing left-handed, and I can beat the player much better than me if I have a great game and he has a bad one, and that step up in challenge is fun

With SBMM I’m just playing myself 24/7, I don’t have that shot to fuck around versus a bad player, nor do I get the shot to see if I can takedown a much better player and hope they’re off their game.

You kinda remove that ‘some day you’re the pigeon, some days you’re the statue’ element, and that can be quite fun!

Again I think you just use both. Have a ranked mode that matches you based on an approximation of your ability and rise through the ranks if you’re improving. But have an unranked too where it’s a complete crapshoot of skill sets and see where it goes.

Despite not having SBMM, there was one time we ran into a group of guys we actually knew, with a full squad of people super high up the leaderboard. Queued a good 18 games in a row, maybe went 12-6.

Had fun chatting shite a bit and enjoying the rivalry

Another thing modern CoD does is re-queue you, you play one game and that’s that. You don’t have a persistent lobby that lasts 10-20 games with a few swaps


I get this sentiment. Top players get bored and want to handicap themselves. They make gimmick-based smurf accounts in their games just for the extra challenge or to mix it up. But that is an extremely narrow use case in the grand scheme, and doesn't justify the removal of SBMM.

I do think that gimmick accounts have their place, as long as their usage in applying the gimmick is consistent. For example, if you wanted to see how you would do in Starcraft playing mouse-only, obviously you wouldn't want to use your main account because that lost MMR is hard to earn back (plus it feeds undeserving wins to opponents), so you could use a secondary account solely limited to playing mouse-only. If you ever deviate from that gimmick then you impose some undue fluctuation onto the ladder, but treating it as its own "player" minimizes the impact of unfair smurfing since you're applying your handicap consistently.
Moderator
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25270 Posts
September 06 2024 21:40 GMT
#1194
On September 07 2024 05:36 Excalibur_Z wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2024 05:06 WombaT wrote:
On September 07 2024 04:22 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On September 07 2024 02:46 WombaT wrote:
On September 07 2024 00:57 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.

Skill-based matchmaking has many downsides too, and tons of players complain about it all the time.

It seems the obvious solution is to have a ranked mode that uses it, and an unranked that does not. I suppose it can potentially split playerbases which can be dicey, but outside of this you can have the best of both worlds




You need only look to Activision Research's experiment where they disabled the skill-matching component of their matchmaker to see the negative ripple effects. The main people who complain about SBMM are content creators (obviously, they're making all the videos about it) who are typically also near the top of the skill spectrum. They have a personal interest in removing SBMM because in a purely-random lobby it allows them to pop off and generate Sick Plays which they can use in their streams and videos which makes their content more exciting which makes them more money. To everyone else in the player pool, though, more balanced matches means more satisfaction and more retention -- even in unranked modes.

As someone who was top 200 in the world in pretty much every game mode in CoD Black Ops in my teens, the lack of SBMM was pretty fun.

If I was having to sweat every single game, with players just as good as me, less fun

I could also invite players of a mass variety of skills and have a good time. If you’re relatively bad at the game, queuing with an SC2 GM equivalent will mean it balances out that the average opponent is considerably better than you.

Unless I was to play some ranked mode, where that’s the whole point, and climbing the leaderboard necessitates challenging yourself every game.

I agree that content creators have something of an incentive that maybe doesn’t align with the health of the game on the whole

On the flipside, even really good players wanna have a good time too.

I’ve played a little CoD in the modern era as well, I’m not as good as I was and my lobbies aren’t insane by any means. I basically still have to play on meta basically every game

In the old days, me and my boys were mucking around and doing things like playing pistols-only, or running weird loadouts. We spent a good 2 days trying to win a domination game 200-0 as a challenge

Depending on how SBMM is tuned, which is another thing, if I’m playing folks as good as me every game, I gotta go with the best tools for the job every game. It gets a bit monotonous

I enjoy playing pool, amongst my friend group there’s a guy who’s not clueless, but worse than the rest of us. There’s a middle group that trades 50/50 or 60/40 and there’s a guy way better than all of us.

I can beat the bad player playing left-handed, and I can beat the player much better than me if I have a great game and he has a bad one, and that step up in challenge is fun

With SBMM I’m just playing myself 24/7, I don’t have that shot to fuck around versus a bad player, nor do I get the shot to see if I can takedown a much better player and hope they’re off their game.

You kinda remove that ‘some day you’re the pigeon, some days you’re the statue’ element, and that can be quite fun!

Again I think you just use both. Have a ranked mode that matches you based on an approximation of your ability and rise through the ranks if you’re improving. But have an unranked too where it’s a complete crapshoot of skill sets and see where it goes.

Despite not having SBMM, there was one time we ran into a group of guys we actually knew, with a full squad of people super high up the leaderboard. Queued a good 18 games in a row, maybe went 12-6.

Had fun chatting shite a bit and enjoying the rivalry

Another thing modern CoD does is re-queue you, you play one game and that’s that. You don’t have a persistent lobby that lasts 10-20 games with a few swaps


I get this sentiment. Top players get bored and want to handicap themselves. They make gimmick-based smurf accounts in their games just for the extra challenge or to mix it up. But that is an extremely narrow use case in the grand scheme, and doesn't justify the removal of SBMM.

I do think that gimmick accounts have their place, as long as their usage in applying the gimmick is consistent. For example, if you wanted to see how you would do in Starcraft playing mouse-only, obviously you wouldn't want to use your main account because that lost MMR is hard to earn back (plus it feeds undeserving wins to opponents), so you could use a secondary account solely limited to playing mouse-only. If you ever deviate from that gimmick then you impose some undue fluctuation onto the ladder, but treating it as its own "player" minimizes the impact of unfair smurfing since you're applying your handicap consistently.

This is why I propose a kind of ‘free for all’ mode alongside the ranked one with SBMM

If your unranked mode is literally just ranked except you don’t get some shiny points, it doesn’t really deal with that core issue. SC2’s implementation is basically just that

I’m no longer a high enough ranking player in any game myself to really care either way, but I understand the complaints.

I can 100% tell you that if my late teens, being good at CoD meant just perpetually being stuck tryharding, I don’t think I’d have enjoyed the game nearly as much

I’m of an age where UT and Quake 3 were staples for me, and sometimes a server saw me brutalised, sometimes I was better than everyone and sometimes it was somewhere in between

To me, that’s absolutely fine really. Sometimes you’re the pigeon, sometimes you’re the statue and all that. Sometimes I’ll have fun stomping people, sometimes I’ll have an even match and sometimes I’ll be sweating my heart out and failing against much better players.

That, for me is fine as an experience. I think implementing it in a serious ranked mode is 100% the correct call, obviously.

I’m just against implementing it in every core mode, which seems to be the trend.


'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21672 Posts
September 06 2024 21:49 GMT
#1195
On September 07 2024 06:40 WombaT wrote:If your unranked mode is literally just ranked except you don’t get some shiny points, it doesn’t really deal with that core issue. SC2’s implementation is basically just that
That is because SC2's unranked exists as a counter to ladder anxiety.
Some (a lot) of people have problems with the fear of losing their shiny points they worked hard to earn, a mode where the points still exist but are just hidden from the player helps combat that fear of losing points and keeps effected people playing.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
September 06 2024 23:08 GMT
#1196
On September 07 2024 06:40 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 07 2024 05:36 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On September 07 2024 05:06 WombaT wrote:
On September 07 2024 04:22 Excalibur_Z wrote:
On September 07 2024 02:46 WombaT wrote:
On September 07 2024 00:57 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Ubisoft is tanking hard.
The second to second combat in Star Wars Outlaws is boring. xDefiant is collapsing. Skill based match increases the probability of a decent match. Removing that to differentiate from CoD was a mistake.

Ubisoft has gone from €25 to €14 in a few weeks.

Ubisoft deserves this. They are a garbage company relying heavily on government subsidies.

Skill-based matchmaking has many downsides too, and tons of players complain about it all the time.

It seems the obvious solution is to have a ranked mode that uses it, and an unranked that does not. I suppose it can potentially split playerbases which can be dicey, but outside of this you can have the best of both worlds




You need only look to Activision Research's experiment where they disabled the skill-matching component of their matchmaker to see the negative ripple effects. The main people who complain about SBMM are content creators (obviously, they're making all the videos about it) who are typically also near the top of the skill spectrum. They have a personal interest in removing SBMM because in a purely-random lobby it allows them to pop off and generate Sick Plays which they can use in their streams and videos which makes their content more exciting which makes them more money. To everyone else in the player pool, though, more balanced matches means more satisfaction and more retention -- even in unranked modes.

As someone who was top 200 in the world in pretty much every game mode in CoD Black Ops in my teens, the lack of SBMM was pretty fun.

If I was having to sweat every single game, with players just as good as me, less fun

I could also invite players of a mass variety of skills and have a good time. If you’re relatively bad at the game, queuing with an SC2 GM equivalent will mean it balances out that the average opponent is considerably better than you.

Unless I was to play some ranked mode, where that’s the whole point, and climbing the leaderboard necessitates challenging yourself every game.

I agree that content creators have something of an incentive that maybe doesn’t align with the health of the game on the whole

On the flipside, even really good players wanna have a good time too.

I’ve played a little CoD in the modern era as well, I’m not as good as I was and my lobbies aren’t insane by any means. I basically still have to play on meta basically every game

In the old days, me and my boys were mucking around and doing things like playing pistols-only, or running weird loadouts. We spent a good 2 days trying to win a domination game 200-0 as a challenge

Depending on how SBMM is tuned, which is another thing, if I’m playing folks as good as me every game, I gotta go with the best tools for the job every game. It gets a bit monotonous

I enjoy playing pool, amongst my friend group there’s a guy who’s not clueless, but worse than the rest of us. There’s a middle group that trades 50/50 or 60/40 and there’s a guy way better than all of us.

I can beat the bad player playing left-handed, and I can beat the player much better than me if I have a great game and he has a bad one, and that step up in challenge is fun

With SBMM I’m just playing myself 24/7, I don’t have that shot to fuck around versus a bad player, nor do I get the shot to see if I can takedown a much better player and hope they’re off their game.

You kinda remove that ‘some day you’re the pigeon, some days you’re the statue’ element, and that can be quite fun!

Again I think you just use both. Have a ranked mode that matches you based on an approximation of your ability and rise through the ranks if you’re improving. But have an unranked too where it’s a complete crapshoot of skill sets and see where it goes.

Despite not having SBMM, there was one time we ran into a group of guys we actually knew, with a full squad of people super high up the leaderboard. Queued a good 18 games in a row, maybe went 12-6.

Had fun chatting shite a bit and enjoying the rivalry

Another thing modern CoD does is re-queue you, you play one game and that’s that. You don’t have a persistent lobby that lasts 10-20 games with a few swaps


I get this sentiment. Top players get bored and want to handicap themselves. They make gimmick-based smurf accounts in their games just for the extra challenge or to mix it up. But that is an extremely narrow use case in the grand scheme, and doesn't justify the removal of SBMM.

I do think that gimmick accounts have their place, as long as their usage in applying the gimmick is consistent. For example, if you wanted to see how you would do in Starcraft playing mouse-only, obviously you wouldn't want to use your main account because that lost MMR is hard to earn back (plus it feeds undeserving wins to opponents), so you could use a secondary account solely limited to playing mouse-only. If you ever deviate from that gimmick then you impose some undue fluctuation onto the ladder, but treating it as its own "player" minimizes the impact of unfair smurfing since you're applying your handicap consistently.

This is why I propose a kind of ‘free for all’ mode alongside the ranked one with SBMM

If your unranked mode is literally just ranked except you don’t get some shiny points, it doesn’t really deal with that core issue. SC2’s implementation is basically just that

I’m no longer a high enough ranking player in any game myself to really care either way, but I understand the complaints.

I can 100% tell you that if my late teens, being good at CoD meant just perpetually being stuck tryharding, I don’t think I’d have enjoyed the game nearly as much

I’m of an age where UT and Quake 3 were staples for me, and sometimes a server saw me brutalised, sometimes I was better than everyone and sometimes it was somewhere in between

To me, that’s absolutely fine really. Sometimes you’re the pigeon, sometimes you’re the statue and all that. Sometimes I’ll have fun stomping people, sometimes I’ll have an even match and sometimes I’ll be sweating my heart out and failing against much better players.

That, for me is fine as an experience. I think implementing it in a serious ranked mode is 100% the correct call, obviously.

I’m just against implementing it in every core mode, which seems to be the trend.




I'm a server browser veteran too, and for me, the experience followed these steps:
1. Find a server with low ping.
2. Then, find one that has actual people playing - but not too few, nor too many.
3. After that, see how I do. If I'm doing great, then perfect: I'm the best. If someone else is owning, and they're too hard to beat, then come up with an excuse "that guy's cheating"/"lag"/"sweatlord" and find a different server.

I think it was Rob Pardo or Tom Cadwell who said that if you leave it to players to choose their opponent, they'll always pick the opponent they can beat 51% of the time. They're okay with games being close, as long as they win! I don't know how common my server browser experience was, but it definitely let me customize my experience until I could be the best... provided I could set the rules.
Moderator
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16701 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-09-07 14:38:20
September 07 2024 13:35 GMT
#1197
Sony will put on a brave face for investors and the general public regarding Concord. In the background, Hiroki Totoki has already sounded the alarm. His comment about not enough IP was coded language for ... "i'm getting ready to fire people".


Fairgame$ is supposed to be a game about big heists. To me, the Heist has already been pulled off by Jade Raymond.

The Quebecois born woman secured an extremely favourable government funding deal with the Quebec government with promises of future studios with 100s of employees. An independent studio forging new creative visions in video games. No sir, this studio won't be the "branch plant" that Canadian politicians fear. This studio won't be a glorified QA Testing Group for a big evil American studio! This studio will be creative and do new things! Seriously though, the last thing Canadian politicians want is the "branch plant economy".

So she gets the $$$ from the Canadian and Quebec governments with promises of a massive studio that is a hub of independent creative Canadian content. The CRTC is just loving this! Quebec politicians are patting each other on the back. Jim Carrey, Drake, Ryan Reynolds move over. We've got a new MADE IN CANADA international Canadian superstar! Jade Raymond!

Then months later she sells "her" independent studio to Sony; Haven Studios becomes a support studio for Sony owned Firewalk in the evil USA. Canadian taxpayer funded Branch Plant Engaged. Those boys at the Fraser Institute are now wagging their fingers at Quebec saying "see we told you so".

Well played , Ms. Raymond.

It is going to be interesting to see if Haven Studios gets turned into a support studio for a different Sony game not made in Canada now that Firewalk is toast. The Quebec politicians supporting these subsidies ... won't like it.

I wonder how many employees of Haven Studios are actually living in Montreal in February in -20C weather. LOL. How many are in some small Carolina town VNCing into work.

There is pressure being exerted right now by Quebec and Canadian politicians for Haven Studios to produce a new game. If Haven Studios turns into a Sony QA Department then both Canada and Quebec will tighten the screws on the regulations around video game subsidies.
On September 07 2024 08:08 Excalibur_Z wrote:
I think it was Rob Pardo or Tom Cadwell who said that if you leave it to players to choose their opponent, they'll always pick the opponent they can beat 51% of the time. They're okay with games being close, as long as they win! I don't know how common my server browser experience was, but it definitely let me customize my experience until I could be the best... provided I could set the rules.

in 2v2, and 3v3 pick up games of SC1, SC2, C&C at PC Bangs we always arrange the teams to be as balanced as possible. in IRL pick up games in foosball, bubble hockey, standard basketball, and standard hockey ... same thing.. balanced.

Most people in live in-person competitive games would rather lose an hour long very close game of anything than win 12-0 in a stomp. I am not sure if its different for people playing alone at the PC in online games though. People seem overly serious on places like GR.Org, reddit, TL.Net etc etc.

I find in person there is a "who gives a fuck its just a stupid game any way" attitude prevails; both winning and losing doesn't mean much.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
11827 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-09-07 15:20:29
September 07 2024 15:18 GMT
#1198
I think the point ladder system removes a lot of that casual feeling from the game. I can take chess as a comparison, when you play with a friend you would use handicaps to balance the game. In a tournament game you do not give a handicap even if your ratings are far apart. Match making with points often devolves into a tournament and not casual pickup game mentality. It basically moves from a for fun hobby setting into a serious game. Which is good for some people and bad for other people.

Another way to see it might be to look at sports leagues. NBA is a highly competitive league with a lot of money where you expect even games. Yet the Portland Trail Blazers is 21-61 in w-l. You can have good games against them but if you only cared about even games you would have to impose some handicap. Which you would never do in this type of setting (at most resting a player for a harder game). I think the same feeling is sparked in a lot of top players in online games that are not professional. Most professional players would see it as practice and thus still do it seriously but for other reasons.
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16701 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-09-07 18:05:33
September 07 2024 17:58 GMT
#1199
The NBA is most successful when it has a titan super team. When there is parity the league is less popular.

Also, your typical 21-61 team is only involved in a handful of blowouts throughout the year. The emphasis of the 3 point shot create in game see-saw battles. Also, the volatility around the 3 point shot allows any team to win any game similar to a baseball game.

NBA's "rule set designers" are absolute geniuses.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
frontgarden2222
Profile Joined June 2024
58 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-09-10 08:42:20
September 10 2024 08:29 GMT
#1200
On September 07 2024 22:35 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Sony will put on a brave face for investors and the general public regarding Concord. In the background, Hiroki Totoki has already sounded the alarm. His comment about not enough IP was coded language for ... "i'm getting ready to fire people".


Layoffs are going to happen like in the rest of the entertainment industry but that's not coded language for 'I'm going to fire people [to cut costs]'. It wasn't even in the background either, he practically yelled it. The quote in question:

“Whether it’s for games, films or anime, we don’t have that much IP that we fostered from the beginning,” Totoki said in an interview with the Financial Times. “We’re lacking the early phase (of IP) and that’s an issue for us.”


The CEO is objectively right, Sony's entertainment conglomerate lacks a big back catalogue of strong original IP that they completely own. They spend most of their time:
  • Piggy-backing off the IP of others, where they accept the majority of the financial risk for razer thin profit margins like in the case of Spider-Man.
  • Acting as sub-contractors, like in the case of A-1 Pictures. They do good work but its not exactly a lucrative venture because the revenue is split between half a dozen other committee members who get a larger cut due to owning the IP. Kyoto Animation, as an example, can offer way better working conditions for workers, and in turn produce higher quality animation in general, because they cut half the committee members out by owning a lot of the IP they animate.
  • Bidding for distribution rights, which puts your business at the mercy of the production company. This happened when they lost the US and International distribtuion rights to No Time To Die after their contract to any new James Bond films expired.

Like what does Sony Pictures own that is a fairly guaranteed box office and/or ratings hit? Hotel Transylvania? Breaking Bad? Both of which are dependent on specific people for the project to be successful?

Analysts can read tea leaves into shit like Concord and fit square pegs into round holes. But Sony has been pretty transparent about desperately needing software that can generate recurring revenue. They have no real mobile efforts, their IP strength is nowhere near the strength of Nintendo where they can maintain MSRP for their entire lifespan, and the IP they do own is built with the expectation that it will swing for the fences. At certain points, they were better off not developing anything and just shoving money into a term deposit.

They need to fully own a successful live service game that can fund their single player efforts during dry spells. There's nothing amazing about their strategy, they're loading everything into a shotgun and hoping one or two will hit. That's the start and end of any analysis on current and future Sony backed live service games, its not smart but they also clearly have no idea what they're doing in this space so that's the strategy they've gone with. Helldivers 2 definitely hit but you can see their inexperience in how bad the end game is, which is often kills the longevity of successful live service games.
Prev 1 58 59 60 61 62 77 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 59m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 135
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 3199
Nal_rA 409
Killer 373
Soma 362
ggaemo 216
EffOrt 173
PianO 123
JulyZerg 94
Leta 88
Aegong 61
[ Show more ]
Backho 52
Mind 50
Sacsri 42
GoRush 34
Sharp 34
sorry 33
Free 30
soO 29
sSak 25
Bale 15
Dota 2
BananaSlamJamma260
XaKoH 225
XcaliburYe193
ODPixel124
League of Legends
JimRising 435
febbydoto9
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1421
Stewie2K862
Super Smash Bros
Westballz126
Other Games
ceh9676
SortOf128
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1032
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Light_VIP 48
• davetesta34
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota273
League of Legends
• Stunt1032
• HappyZerGling165
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
59m
WardiTV European League
6h 59m
PiGosaur Monday
14h 59m
OSC
1d 3h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 6h
The PondCast
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
Online Event
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.