|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
United States43255 Posts
On September 16 2025 23:08 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2025 23:02 LightSpectra wrote:On September 16 2025 22:57 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On September 16 2025 22:53 Liquid`Drone wrote:The trans partner part seems plausible to me because I've seen it mentioned from many outlets I consider reputable (for example axios, several norwegian ones too), and because they specify that the roommate has a) absolutely nothing to do with the murder b) been extremely cooperative from the start.
The reasonable thing is to wait and see and not draw conclusions, though. As far as the 'if you read this you are gay lmao', that's a pretty common discord meme and again, that he's influenced by gamer culture seems like the only certain thing revealed so far. But honestly from what I've seen at this point I think the 'had a trans partner' seems way more likely than 'was a groyper' - and I've moved back and forth on this at least twice by now. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but all of those news outlets are citing the same single source: Utah's Republican governor Spencer Cox. Or are there second and third sources corroborating what that governor is saying - that the shooter was dating a trans person? Because multiple news sites all quoting the same single person is still just getting information from one person. Not only that, but the evidence for this claim is that there's an existing social media post where the roommate posted an anime-ification filter of one of their photos that rendered them feminine.But even if they were trans and even if Robinson was in love with them, that still proves nothing. There were segregationists with black mistresses and Nazis with Jewish mistresses. And even more closely related: Charlie Kirk's racism against black people is well-documented, despite him having a black friend (Candace Owens). Candace Owens would be devastated if she ever learned she was black.
|
On September 17 2025 02:14 Luolis wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2025 00:45 LightSpectra wrote:On September 17 2025 00:35 castleeMg wrote:On September 17 2025 00:06 Gorsameth wrote:On September 16 2025 23:58 castleeMg wrote:This whole weird argument that he was right wing but shot one of his own is absurd. Weren't both of Trumps assassination attempts conducted by right wing people? The notion that a right wing person will not attempt to kill right wing political figure is objectively false. The guy had a trans roommate who admitted to being his partner and that they were in a secret romantic relationship. Neither of these things have been confirmed by real journalists. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/utah-governor-shares-details-charlie-kirk-assassination-investigation-rcna231022I feel like at this stage we kinda have to trust the reporting we get, no?
I'm not trying to belabor the point, but NBC is reporting that the governor of Utah said this, it hasn't been confirmed yet. I'm still waiting to hear an independent journalist investigate this and say "yeah it's right" before I can say it's "confirmed".
On September 17 2025 02:16 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2025 23:08 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On September 16 2025 23:02 LightSpectra wrote:On September 16 2025 22:57 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On September 16 2025 22:53 Liquid`Drone wrote:The trans partner part seems plausible to me because I've seen it mentioned from many outlets I consider reputable (for example axios, several norwegian ones too), and because they specify that the roommate has a) absolutely nothing to do with the murder b) been extremely cooperative from the start.
The reasonable thing is to wait and see and not draw conclusions, though. As far as the 'if you read this you are gay lmao', that's a pretty common discord meme and again, that he's influenced by gamer culture seems like the only certain thing revealed so far. But honestly from what I've seen at this point I think the 'had a trans partner' seems way more likely than 'was a groyper' - and I've moved back and forth on this at least twice by now. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but all of those news outlets are citing the same single source: Utah's Republican governor Spencer Cox. Or are there second and third sources corroborating what that governor is saying - that the shooter was dating a trans person? Because multiple news sites all quoting the same single person is still just getting information from one person. Not only that, but the evidence for this claim is that there's an existing social media post where the roommate posted an anime-ification filter of one of their photos that rendered them feminine.But even if they were trans and even if Robinson was in love with them, that still proves nothing. There were segregationists with black mistresses and Nazis with Jewish mistresses. And even more closely related: Charlie Kirk's racism against black people is well-documented, despite him having a black friend (Candace Owens). Candace Owens would be devastated if she ever learned she was black.
Apropos to nothing, anyone remember that time a black Neo-Nazi shot up a school and said "Candace Owens has influenced me above all each time she spoke"?
|
To sum up the current US political environment.
Vances declared battle against cultural marxism. The martyr mentality and norse admiration. Supporters of the great replacement theory. Seeing themselves as crusaders of christianity. Ideology of national supremacy.
Reminds me of the guy who killed hundreds in Norway. Very reassuring to know who‘s in charge here.
|
I mean, Chistchurch shooter who killed 50 Muslim men, women and children and he claimed in his manifesto that Candance Owens was the person who "influenced me above all".
After that, I take it that most of the subsequent maniacs from this genre of shooters, given that they are trolls and edge lords above all could have been saying this kind of shit deliberately, as a troll.
Regardless of that, if you go out of your way to kill Muslims and cite hateful right wing rhetoric, including Breivik, who is also worshiped by ghouls like the guru behind JD Vance's politics Curtis Yarvin it's pretty clear that you are a right wing maniac.
Same for the black neo-Nazi LS mentioned.
Same as many other right wing mass murderers over the past 10 years.
For now, since this guy didn't leave a manifesto, or maybe he did but it doesn't fit the narrative so it's not coming out, we can only speculate.
|
On September 16 2025 23:52 Jankisa wrote:
He, being the dumb and incompetent buffoon that he is, fucked his first term up enough that "normal" Americans coalesced around Biden to get him out for 4 years, but accepting another black, this time also female person was a line too far, and now we have fascism. Yey.
And now we have these guys explaining to us how anyone pointing this shit out, and specifically pointing out that Charlie Kirk was a major force behind pushing Trump and his racist and regressive brand of politics is a terrible person and the real problem.
Nah, the problem is the wannabe fascist dictator giving Hitler like speeches from the White House while subbing in on a podcast threatening to go after their political opponents, and no amount of gaslighting will change those facts.
Puzzling phenomenon really. Some people realized yeah this is not it, but then went back on that. Hopefully they snap out of it again, but how can you be so clueless in the second attempt. Fool me twice you ain't folling me again, no?
And some people never woke up from it and will just loudly defend him/them while spouting 5 different contradictions a minute. Fascinating
|
Northern Ireland26075 Posts
On September 16 2025 23:04 oBlade wrote:I find it VERY easy to understand why a particularly loathsome and insecure murderer would call someone "gay" who they think will be homophobic, i.e. the supposed anti-LGBTQ police system collecting evidence to prosecute the killing of the supposed anti-LGBTQ Satan that they shot. That's absolutely the same needle as every Mark Twain who thinks it's funny to say maybe every other Republican is secretly gay. Do you believe there is police use of force that isn't brutality? Otherwise there's no reason for me to go through the methods of these hundreds of sources that I've checked about 10 so far and many are either to dead twitter links, videos that don't show the lead-up, with no context (ex. after disperse and go home orders), or filings of alleged police brutality that went nowhere. Basically, the more police have to deal with, in general, the more collateral brutality you will get. If you don't want to get tear gassed or pepper sprayed, the easiest way is don't assemble with rioters. As I’ve said innumerable times, you don’t have to police disturbances like this.
Unless it’s an emergent event they can’t get to, the PSNI’s riot squad are best in class here, they’ve plenty of practice after all. They contain riots until they die out, which requires them to sit there and take it for a bit. Sucks for the police, but it starves out most riots so they don’t escalate.
American police do not do this. They wade in and pepper spray folks at the slightest provocation, smack some people around a bit. That’s how they operate.
It’s not how you police these things, it is throwing petrol on an existing fire.
You’ve two options, and only two options. 1. Containment until it dissipates 2. Crushing the disturbance with overwhelming force
That’s your lot. I prefer option 1 personally. If you start to escalate the force employed, but fall short of doing option 2, all that does is turn a bad situation into a completely shit situation.
The antagonistic nature of US law enforcement across the board, makes them incredibly ill-suited to policing riots.
Us Northern Irish have few institutions or individuals that can conceivably be the best in the world in any field, but we probably do in riot policing. And American law enforcement basically does the diametric opposite of many of our practices in this domain.
|
There isn‘t even proof it was a politically motivated act. Maybe the guy just hated politicians in general because his entire family did and CK was the best available option for him when he thought that murdering someone would be a cure to his depression. Or maybe he just wanted to be famous.
He‘s not likely to be very differentiated in his views at that age.
Or several other options.
Will it have consequences for arms policy in the US ? Nope. A good guy with a gun could have stopped him. That‘s how it works there.
|
Northern Ireland26075 Posts
On September 16 2025 21:09 Doublemint wrote:now that is sickening. Stephen Miller Vows to JD Vance He Will ‘Dismantle’ Left-Wing Orgs ‘Promoting Violence’ to Honor Charlie Kirk - on the Charlie Kirk show being hosted by VP VanceShow nested quote +White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told Vice President JD Vance he will honor Charlie Kirk’s memory by dismantling “left-wing organizations that are promoting violence” and the “vast domestic terror movement” that Miller said is behind the murder of the 31-year-old conservative activist.
Miller made those comments to Vance on Monday afternoon as the vice president hosted The Charlie Kirk Show on Rumble.
President Donald Trump’s aide said that in his last text exchange with Kirk, the influencer told him something needed to be done about violent left-wing organizations; Miller told Vance he had taken those words “to heart” and would make it his mission to destroy them, without naming any groups in particular.
“The organized doxing campaigns, the organized riots, the organized street violence, the organized campaigns of dehumanization, vilification, posting people’s addresses [must stop],” Miller said. “Combining that with messaging that’s designed to trigger, incite violence, and the actual organized cells that cary out and facilitate the violence. It is a vast domestic terror movement.”
He continued: “With God as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle, and destroy these networks and make America safe again for the American people. It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name.”
Miller’s comments come after Kirk was shot and killed at an event at Utah Valley University on September 10.
The suspected shooter, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, believed Kirk was “spreading hate,” Axios reported on Friday. Fox News, a day later, reported Robinson’s trans partner was “fully cooperating” with the FBI investigation into the murder.
Vance, a moment before Miller shared his aforementioned comments, said the pair would not be going after “constitutionally protected speech.”
“We’re going to go after the NGO network that foments, facilitates, and engages in violence. That’s not okay,” Vance said. “Violence is not okay in our system, and we want to make it less likely it happens.”
Miller, at a different point in the interview, said he “loved” Kirk and felt “incredible anger” since the murder.
“The thing about anger is that unfocused anger or blind rage is not a productive emotion,” Miller said. “But focused anger, righteous anger, directed for a just cause, is one of the most important agents of change in human history.” (ab)using a dead man's platform for your own twisted little games, harvesting the sympathies and trying to point the anger somewhere convenient. funny how they don't mention social media and its problems. while streaming from hate spreading right wing platform Rumble. now that is dancing on CK's grave while pointing fingers how others are undignified. then again he was a state propagandist. backing off from Epstein at Trump's direction. he might have been totally fine with them using him like that for their goals, who knows. apart from solving nothing this will foment actual division and hate. but that's their MO and the goal, little piggies like to play in the dirt. incidentally we had a funny thing occur here in my local neck of the woods, a conservative mayor unilaterally "honored" Kirk by flying a black flag at half-mast. controversy and inconvenient questions like WHO? and WHY? followed. usually black flags being flown is reserved for important locals/dignitaries and local officials dying. but that's a nice example of how social media spreads the brain rot very efficiently. and makes US talking points international, while also looping back to the US once it catches on. but the question really is - why in the ever loving fuck would be care in the EU about Kirk, let alone Austria? I tell you why, there are very strong bonds and relations between the right internationally. and their backers. and who is controlling the medium, will control the message. ironically this conservative/right wing alliance is a way more robust one than an "international left" could have ever dared to dream back when actual socialism was a thing in the last century. This is what Fascism looks like. It’s a Reichstag fire event.
People burying their heads in the sand to deny this are either bullshitting me, or bullshitting themselves.
It’s that simple really. It really is, there’s no point dancing around it.
If Miller, who shares my surname, alas he spelt it the worse way, or his ilk had this energy in a more general sense, to try and wrest things back from various extremes, that’s one thing.
They are not doing that, remotely. They hand wave right wing political violence, and are trying to stoke fears against the left as justification for clamping down on stuff they’re ideologically opposed to.
If it quacks like a duck, is obviously some kind of semi-aquatic bird, resembles the Wikipedia entry for a duck, it’s a fucking duck.
|
As I said, my feeling is that the average american rather follow the MOTD of Maga-clown-fascism, than to come across "offensive" and lose business opportunity or stand out in a community.
The media at large is sanewashing Trump administration...despite they are obviously insincere. Trump is an idiot, Colonel Kegstand is an Idiot, RFK is an idiot, Patel is an Idiot, Miller is an Idiot that plays with dolls, Noem is an idiot that shoots puppies.
But they roles in the news cycle are "important", no matter how idiotic the idiot is.
|
This is a good source of info and matches what was just released by the prosecutor at the press conference: https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/exclusive-leaked-messages-from-charlie
The prosecutor did release a lot more including a long text exchange with the suspect's roommate and romantic partner. The romantic partner clearly had no idea about this - Tyler texted her "Drop what you're doing right now and look under my keyboard" where she found a note admitting that he had killed Charlie Kirk. They then shared a long text exchange where Tyler admitted to it that I'm sure will be released in print somewhere soon.
Definitely don't see how this is a groyper thing anymore but the article I linked above really goes to show that, unless he was really active in a bunch of secret radical groups (which may very well be found soon), he was largely pretty apolitical. I'm not comparing the murders themselves but it's eerily similar to Luigi who was pretty down the middle in his ideology (I remember reading stuff stating he found good points from both conservatives and liberals) and seemed like a very normal guy.
Maybe my expectations were unrealistic. I expected there to be clear evidence that this dude was involved in extreme groups, either far-left or far-right, but man so far he just seems like a normal dude
|
Norway28712 Posts
On September 17 2025 02:15 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2025 01:14 castleeMg wrote:On September 17 2025 00:45 LightSpectra wrote:On September 17 2025 00:35 castleeMg wrote:On September 17 2025 00:06 Gorsameth wrote:On September 16 2025 23:58 castleeMg wrote:This whole weird argument that he was right wing but shot one of his own is absurd. Weren't both of Trumps assassination attempts conducted by right wing people? The notion that a right wing person will not attempt to kill right wing political figure is objectively false. The guy had a trans roommate who admitted to being his partner and that they were in a secret romantic relationship. Neither of these things have been confirmed by real journalists. Apparently the roommate has been pretty cooperative with authorities, but how many people in relationships with trans people are right wing? More than you'd imagine. The right-wing fetishizes trans people and it's not like there aren't any trans Republicans (e.g. Brianna Wu, Caitlyn Jenner) despite the obvious reasons it's not smart to vote that way. Edit: Upon double checking, Brianna Wu endorsed Trump but I can't find out if she formally registered as a Republican. So that may be incorrect. Also Thomas Crooks political affiliation was not definitively known, he donated to a left wing group in 2021 and voted republican only once in a primary in 2022. Other than that his political activity seems pretty neutral. Why are you falsely painting him as some sort of right wing guy? "After the shooting, the FBI uncovered a social media account "believed to be associated with the shooter" with about 700 comments from 2019 to 2020. A public statement from FBI deputy director Paul Abbate described Crooks' activity on social networking services as including comments that "appear to reflect antisemitic and anti-immigration themes" and "espouse political violence"." https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/trump-shooting-hearing-fbi-secret-service-assassination-attempt-senate/Also did you forget about Ryan Routh? That nutjob democrat that tried to kill Trump on a golf course? I guess you conveniently forgot about that. Nobody's saying there's zero left-wing violence, it's just that nonpartisan sources indicate that the overwhelming majority of political violence is right-wing. e.g. https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/9/13/2343349/-Justice-Dept-Study-Proves-Right-Wing-Extremists-Commit-Most-Violence-So-the-Trump-Regime-Removes-ItAlso, Ryan Routh was not a Democrat. He was anti-Trump but wanted a Nikki Haley/Vivek Ramaswamy ticket for the Republican primary in 2024. https://time.com/7021494/ryan-wesley-routh-trump-golf-course-shooter-politics-iran-ukraine/The fact that you guys are trying to say he was right wing but he killed Kirk because he didn’t like that he supported Israel is fucking insane. So the guy threw his whole life away and killed Kirk because of a few stand points that he didn’t agree with Kirk on? But overall he was right wing because he has photo of him dressed as a groyper in 2018? Hilarious mental gymnastics Spend thirty minutes scrolling through groyper communities yourself and let me know how sane you find the lot of them. Seems like it’s well known at this point that Tyler wears dating a trans person according to what I googled. Many publications are coming out with articles on it. Are they all using the exact same single person as their source (Utah's Republican governor Spencer Cox), or are there other sources corroborating what this one person is saying?
The axios link I gave earlier is behind a paywall, but it opens with this paragraph (not paywalled): Authorities are investigating whether Tyler Robinson, suspected of killing Charlie Kirk, believed Kirk's views on gender identity were "hateful" to people like Robinson's transgender roommate, six sources familiar with the case tell Axios.
I think Kwark's 'it's a jodie foster thing' seems most likely tbh - Robinson probably thought he'd impress his gf through killing Kirk because Kirk was spreading hate against transgender people. Then his partner actually thinks it was a horrible thing to do, so Robinson being motivated by this is in no way an indictment towards trans people, if anything it shows the importance of treating them with respect because they, like other human beings, are human beings with feelings and friends and relationships and the hate they experience is bound to make others hateful too, as expressed feelings have a tendency to reciprocate in a way. There's no indication that Robinson was part of some leftist network or that he was particularly political, period, but the 'his roommate whom he was romantically involved with was transgender' seems to have some legs, and what more, it seems like a totally plausible reason why someone - presumably a bit mentally unstable - could do what he did.
|
United States43255 Posts
I was rooting for it to literally be an attempt to impress Jodie Foster specifically. I’d have found that funny in an absurdist 80s nostalgia remake way. Much funnier than a descent towards civil war at least. A timeline in which Jodie Foster still has it would be better than this one.
|
Norway28712 Posts
I agree that'd be preferable but I think that one is less likely. 
I liked her a lot in true detective, which was recent, anyway.
|
On September 17 2025 04:43 Liquid`Drone wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2025 02:15 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On September 17 2025 01:14 castleeMg wrote:On September 17 2025 00:45 LightSpectra wrote:On September 17 2025 00:35 castleeMg wrote:On September 17 2025 00:06 Gorsameth wrote:On September 16 2025 23:58 castleeMg wrote:This whole weird argument that he was right wing but shot one of his own is absurd. Weren't both of Trumps assassination attempts conducted by right wing people? The notion that a right wing person will not attempt to kill right wing political figure is objectively false. The guy had a trans roommate who admitted to being his partner and that they were in a secret romantic relationship. Neither of these things have been confirmed by real journalists. Apparently the roommate has been pretty cooperative with authorities, but how many people in relationships with trans people are right wing? More than you'd imagine. The right-wing fetishizes trans people and it's not like there aren't any trans Republicans (e.g. Brianna Wu, Caitlyn Jenner) despite the obvious reasons it's not smart to vote that way. Edit: Upon double checking, Brianna Wu endorsed Trump but I can't find out if she formally registered as a Republican. So that may be incorrect. Also Thomas Crooks political affiliation was not definitively known, he donated to a left wing group in 2021 and voted republican only once in a primary in 2022. Other than that his political activity seems pretty neutral. Why are you falsely painting him as some sort of right wing guy? "After the shooting, the FBI uncovered a social media account "believed to be associated with the shooter" with about 700 comments from 2019 to 2020. A public statement from FBI deputy director Paul Abbate described Crooks' activity on social networking services as including comments that "appear to reflect antisemitic and anti-immigration themes" and "espouse political violence"." https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/trump-shooting-hearing-fbi-secret-service-assassination-attempt-senate/Also did you forget about Ryan Routh? That nutjob democrat that tried to kill Trump on a golf course? I guess you conveniently forgot about that. Nobody's saying there's zero left-wing violence, it's just that nonpartisan sources indicate that the overwhelming majority of political violence is right-wing. e.g. https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/9/13/2343349/-Justice-Dept-Study-Proves-Right-Wing-Extremists-Commit-Most-Violence-So-the-Trump-Regime-Removes-ItAlso, Ryan Routh was not a Democrat. He was anti-Trump but wanted a Nikki Haley/Vivek Ramaswamy ticket for the Republican primary in 2024. https://time.com/7021494/ryan-wesley-routh-trump-golf-course-shooter-politics-iran-ukraine/The fact that you guys are trying to say he was right wing but he killed Kirk because he didn’t like that he supported Israel is fucking insane. So the guy threw his whole life away and killed Kirk because of a few stand points that he didn’t agree with Kirk on? But overall he was right wing because he has photo of him dressed as a groyper in 2018? Hilarious mental gymnastics Spend thirty minutes scrolling through groyper communities yourself and let me know how sane you find the lot of them. Seems like it’s well known at this point that Tyler wears dating a trans person according to what I googled. Many publications are coming out with articles on it. Are they all using the exact same single person as their source (Utah's Republican governor Spencer Cox), or are there other sources corroborating what this one person is saying? The axios link I gave earlier is behind a paywall, but it opens with this paragraph (not paywalled): Show nested quote + Authorities are investigating whether Tyler Robinson, suspected of killing Charlie Kirk, believed Kirk's views on gender identity were "hateful" to people like Robinson's transgender roommate, six sources familiar with the case tell Axios.
Yeah I was able to read that part, but that's not the same thing as the original claim the governor made. Six sources confirming that authorities are investigating whether or not TR believed Kirk's views on gender identity were hateful =/= TR was dating his trans roommate. (Plenty of people, including myself, believe that Kirk's views on gender identity were hateful, but that's not the same thing as saying we're dating anyone in the queer community.)
I think Kwark's 'it's a jodie foster thing' seems most likely tbh - Robinson probably thought he'd impress his gf through killing Kirk because Kirk was spreading hate against transgender people. Then his partner actually thinks it was a horrible thing to do, so Robinson being motivated by this is in no way an indictment towards trans people, if anything it shows the importance of treating them with respect because they, like other human beings, are human beings with feelings and friends and relationships and the hate they experience is bound to make others hateful too, as expressed feelings have a tendency to reciprocate in a way. There's no indication that Robinson was part of some leftist network or that he was particularly political, period, but the 'his roommate whom he was romantically involved with was transgender' seems to have some legs, and what more, it seems like a totally plausible reason why someone - presumably a bit mentally unstable - could do what he did.
Yeah that could very well be the case. People do a lot of stupid things when they want to impress other people, even if they're not currently dating. I agree that it doesn't sound like there were evil Democratic transgender puppetmasters pulling the strings on this assassination. I can't imagine that Republicans will walk back their rhetoric though.
|
When people think "Civil War", are they basically imagining the far-right going to war to keep the West Coast in the Union, rural vs urban wars around the country, North vs South, or what?
I don't know that enough of the US populace gives enough of a shit for an actual civil war.
I imagine more of a general "balkanization" with some conflicts internally (from oppressed groups) and between regions over resources and such.
|
The most fucked up thing about this is American's reaction to celebrity's getting shot compared to even a bunch of school children or all the other mass shootings that barely make a dent in the news these days.
Also, to everyone who thinks he couldn't possibly be a fan and shoot Kirk (it is looking like he's not) you are dead wrong. When it comes to celebrity shooting it is common for the person to be a super fan. John Lennon's killer was the president of his fan club and more recently the singer Christina Grimmie was killed by a super fan who was in love with her. People don't only kill people they hate, especially when celebrity is involved.
|
On September 17 2025 05:53 GreenHorizons wrote: When people think "Civil War", are they basically imagining the far-right going to war to keep the West Coast in the Union, rural vs urban wars around the country, North vs South, or what?
I don't know that enough of the US populace gives enough of a shit for an actual civil war.
I imagine more of a general "balkanization" with some conflicts internally (from oppressed groups) and between regions over resources and such.
See you dont have single culture any more (like western/US culture) you have liberal culture and conservative culture and 2 cultures cant coexist within the same borders. One have to take over.
|
On September 17 2025 09:50 Razyda wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2025 05:53 GreenHorizons wrote: When people think "Civil War", are they basically imagining the far-right going to war to keep the West Coast in the Union, rural vs urban wars around the country, North vs South, or what?
I don't know that enough of the US populace gives enough of a shit for an actual civil war.
I imagine more of a general "balkanization" with some conflicts internally (from oppressed groups) and between regions over resources and such. See you dont have single culture any more (like western/US culture) you have liberal culture and conservative culture and 2 cultures cant coexist within the same borders. One have to take over.
No nation has a single culture except maybe China and other Asian nations. Western culture doesn‘t even exist. It‘s too fractured for that. Which is why you can have different experiences in Italy, the UK, France, US etc.
In terms of anthropology, when it has its own language, it‘s something of their own.
The point is for them to be able to coexist because it‘d be pretty boring if we only had one.
|
On September 17 2025 09:50 Razyda wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2025 05:53 GreenHorizons wrote: When people think "Civil War", are they basically imagining the far-right going to war to keep the West Coast in the Union, rural vs urban wars around the country, North vs South, or what?
I don't know that enough of the US populace gives enough of a shit for an actual civil war.
I imagine more of a general "balkanization" with some conflicts internally (from oppressed groups) and between regions over resources and such. See you dont have single culture any more (like western/US culture) you have liberal culture and conservative culture and 2 cultures cant coexist within the same borders. One have to take over.
That's such a hard read to make not on the ground. Even here, there are more people that don't participate in USPOL than do, so surely there's more space for 'Just american people culture'. I know the times I've been in the US i haven't been forced to identify myself as a political alignment, there was just normal mixed bag american culture.
Granted, I'm not in the US currently, but I'd still expect that liberal and conservative cultures aren't the primary identity of most folk, so suggesting that only one of those two can win seems... dumb?
|
On September 17 2025 10:23 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2025 09:50 Razyda wrote:On September 17 2025 05:53 GreenHorizons wrote: When people think "Civil War", are they basically imagining the far-right going to war to keep the West Coast in the Union, rural vs urban wars around the country, North vs South, or what?
I don't know that enough of the US populace gives enough of a shit for an actual civil war.
I imagine more of a general "balkanization" with some conflicts internally (from oppressed groups) and between regions over resources and such. See you dont have single culture any more (like western/US culture) you have liberal culture and conservative culture and 2 cultures cant coexist within the same borders. One have to take over. No nation has a single culture except maybe China and other Asian nations. Western culture doesn‘t even exist. It‘s too fractured for that. Which is why you can have different experiences in Italy, the UK, France, US etc. In terms of anthropology, when it has its own language, it‘s something of their own. The point is for them to be able to coexist because it‘d be pretty boring if we only had one.
Of course they do. There is French culture, British culture, US culture. They are all different with different traditions, history even effing food. If you think different cultures can coexist within the same borders, then you are mistaken. Ask native Americans, ask St Bartholomew/ du Plessis how did that work out in France, check what papist is, or what happened in Granada.
|
|
|
|
|
|