• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 22:53
CET 04:53
KST 12:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT28Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0258LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)46Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2
StarCraft 2
General
MMOexp Diablo4 exploring the edges of swamps MMOexp FC26 rounds out the forward recommendations Terran AddOns placement How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker
Tourneys
MMOexp Poe 2 can acquire better flask bases PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SEL Doubles (SC Evo Bimonthly) WardiTV Team League Season 10
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare
Brood War
General
Soma Explains: JD's Unrelenting Aggro vs FlaSh Recent recommended BW games TvZ is the most complete match up BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/02
Tourneys
BWCL Season 64 Announcement The Casual Games of the Week Thread [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [LIVE] [S:21] ASL Season Open Day 1
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Online Quake Live Config Editor Tool Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Diablo 2 thread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread Mexico's Drug War
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Inside the Communication of …
TrAiDoS
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3117 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3734

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 3732 3733 3734 3735 3736 5527 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
gobbledydook
Profile Joined October 2012
Australia2605 Posts
July 18 2022 09:23 GMT
#74661
It's a catch 22, because if you hold show votes all day then you get criticized for wasting the taxpayer's money on grandstanding.
I am a dirty Protoss bullshit abuser
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22112 Posts
July 18 2022 09:25 GMT
#74662
On July 18 2022 18:23 gobbledydook wrote:
It's a catch 22, because if you hold show votes all day then you get criticized for wasting the taxpayer's money on grandstanding.
Doesn't matter if a senator is voting or scratching his ass. He still gets paid the same...

It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
gobbledydook
Profile Joined October 2012
Australia2605 Posts
July 18 2022 09:29 GMT
#74663
On July 18 2022 18:25 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2022 18:23 gobbledydook wrote:
It's a catch 22, because if you hold show votes all day then you get criticized for wasting the taxpayer's money on grandstanding.
Doesn't matter if a senator is voting or scratching his ass. He still gets paid the same...


You're of course logically correct, but you could say the same for the guy who shows up to work and just surfs the net all day and does nothing useful. Both are wastes of time and money and you could argue they deserve to be fired.
I am a dirty Protoss bullshit abuser
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22112 Posts
July 18 2022 09:33 GMT
#74664
On July 18 2022 18:29 gobbledydook wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2022 18:25 Gorsameth wrote:
On July 18 2022 18:23 gobbledydook wrote:
It's a catch 22, because if you hold show votes all day then you get criticized for wasting the taxpayer's money on grandstanding.
Doesn't matter if a senator is voting or scratching his ass. He still gets paid the same...


You're of course logically correct, but you could say the same for the guy who shows up to work and just surfs the net all day and does nothing useful. Both are wastes of time and money and you could argue they deserve to be fired.
And when given the option Americans overwhelmingly vote to not fire them. Which goes back to where the problem lies, an 80% disapproval rate yet an 85+% re-election rate.

Everyone is garbage, except my guy.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Blitzkrieg0
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States13132 Posts
July 18 2022 11:58 GMT
#74665
On July 18 2022 15:54 Djabanete wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 18 2022 13:22 Severedevil wrote:
On July 18 2022 12:06 WombaT wrote:
In terms of raw numbers Manchin does rather tow the party line, I looked as per your mention, but there’s a notable enough series of instances where he doesn’t play ball, and that’s frequently impactful to boot. And often the optics are awful.

Raw numbers can also mislead, because AFAIK the majority leader rarely schedules a vote unless they already know it'll pass.

Schumer seems to think it would be bad optics to say, “Okay, we’re going to vote once a week on simple, basic economic issues, starting with extending the Expanded Child Tax Credit indefinitely. In the coming weeks we’ll vote to peg the federal minimum wage to inflation / make capital gains regular income / make your rent tax deductible / etc. We’ll probably lose most of these votes, but at least you’ll all see what you’re missing by having all these Republicans in the Senate.” IMO they could easily keep up that pace from now until the midterms, and it would be great optics, but what do I know.


Is Schumer not wanting to vote on those things or would the Republicans obstruct all of those votes with the filibuster and they'd never get voted on? Even if Schumer wanted to do what you're saying he couldn't force votes on anything.
I'll always be your shadow and veil your eyes from states of ain soph aur.
Zambrah
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States7393 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-18 12:18:11
July 18 2022 12:15 GMT
#74666
If Democrats ousted Manchin and won every senate election in 2022 they wouldn't have 70 seats. Even an optimistic Democrat gain is something like 54. This is the strawmen that Jimmy is pointing out.


The fucking point is that optimistic gains are made even more optimistic by Joe Manchin’s bull shit. Democrats can’t get the gains people keep asserting they absolutely need because Joe Manchin exists to deflate any enthusiasm Democrats might be able to generate by like, doing their fucking jobs.

People can’t even begin to consider that maybe, just maybe, Democrats looking so weak and worthless is bad for their electoral prospects and that maybe, just maybe, trying to to bolster their future prospects in half a dozen or more states in the future might be worth losing that one senate seat that won’t even be blue in a decade, regardless of how much power gets ceded to Manchin?

When Republicans take the Senate and the House there will be no excuses to keep Manchin, toss his bitch ass aside and fight for states that can actually be meaningfully blue without having to do aggressive work (because Democrats at their best can only ever do mediocre work anyways)

Clinging to Manchins extremely temporary seat is shit long term strategy, not that the US has much of a long term given how Republicans are, so you know what sure keep him on board, stick with the Democrat orthodoxy and enjoy the hot water as the pot boils.

Is Schumer not wanting to vote on those things or would the Republicans obstruct all of those votes with the filibuster and they'd never get voted on? Even if Schumer wanted to do what you're saying he couldn't force votes on anything.


“Republicans block vote on [Good Thing] over and over” is easier messaging than “Democrats can’t get their own party on board for [Good Thing] so they gave up,” doubly so when the president is fuckin Joe “Bipartisan Deal Maker” Biden.

These are enormous failures of optics.
Incremental change is the Democrat version of Trickle Down economics.
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
July 18 2022 13:41 GMT
#74667
--- Nuked ---
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26301 Posts
July 18 2022 14:31 GMT
#74668
On July 18 2022 16:13 Velr wrote:
Or it would just paint the democrats as weak losers that can't get anything done. I feel like you understimate how much people like "winning".


On July 18 2022 18:07 Silvanel wrote:
Not as much as they despise "not even trying".

There’s some kind of ‘happy’ medium between making continual stands of ineffective principle, and not trying at all.

And there’s a huge divergence in how much people attention to politics on the daily, or how much they know about various structures etc. Or what their value systems are.

It would be a tad arrogant of me to say what a shift in tack would actually look like across such a varied populace, I can only speak personally in finding the lack of ambition profoundly dispiriting

'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-07-18 16:22:40
July 18 2022 16:16 GMT
#74669
I think it certainly doesn't help move the needle for folks to get deeply involved in politics, when the prospect for Democratic voters is basically you get a better understanding of just how little they're accomplishing, and that's about it. Contrast that with the Right-wing crowd, their whole schtick has been that everything they do is keeping it non-political. They've literally convinced their voters that issues of healthcare and identity are "just politics", and that "politics" is some dirty word that denotes a whole host of things that are basically just frivolous, as opposed to the reality of many people navigating their very real lives together.

For the Right, keeping people disaffected and recalcitrant towards government is the whole point. For Democrats, it's the product of a process where people could be reached, but the people who would reach them see that the Democrats just aren't delivering anything to write home about. Why go to someone's door to try to sell them a product that you're not even sure works properly?

So I think there is a persistent issue the Democrats face, entirely of their own making, where their turnout is constantly depressed by some degree. Nearly every instance in my memory where a more active and progressive Democrat actually fights to get things done drives out support and turnout like fucking nobody's business, it's why Fetterman is gonna trash Oz for the Senate. But still they hang in there with their bullshit metrics like "electability", where they sabotage any chances of winning because they're afraid of losing. They're afraid of taking any risks or leaving any impression. They just don't get it yet.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
July 18 2022 20:35 GMT
#74670
On July 19 2022 01:16 NewSunshine wrote:
I think it certainly doesn't help move the needle for folks to get deeply involved in politics, when the prospect for Democratic voters is basically you get a better understanding of just how little they're accomplishing, and that's about it. Contrast that with the Right-wing crowd, their whole schtick has been that everything they do is keeping it non-political. They've literally convinced their voters that issues of healthcare and identity are "just politics", and that "politics" is some dirty word that denotes a whole host of things that are basically just frivolous, as opposed to the reality of many people navigating their very real lives together.

For the Right, keeping people disaffected and recalcitrant towards government is the whole point. For Democrats, it's the product of a process where people could be reached, but the people who would reach them see that the Democrats just aren't delivering anything to write home about. Why go to someone's door to try to sell them a product that you're not even sure works properly?

So I think there is a persistent issue the Democrats face, entirely of their own making, where their turnout is constantly depressed by some degree. Nearly every instance in my memory where a more active and progressive Democrat actually fights to get things done drives out support and turnout like fucking nobody's business, it's why Fetterman is gonna trash Oz for the Senate. But still they hang in there with their bullshit metrics like "electability", where they sabotage any chances of winning because they're afraid of losing. They're afraid of taking any risks or leaving any impression. They just don't get it yet.
I want to emphasize this point. If I were to attempt to go door to door canvassing for a Democratic party candidate for the Senate, I have no idea what positive ideas I could use to persuade people. There are no accomplishments - which is definitely part of the Republican strategy - but there are also no attempts at accomplishments. I can't even point to votes for bills containing things that would be popular, because Manchin or Sinema says "no" and they don't even bother with a cloture vote. All I can bring up to persuade people is how terrible the Republicans are, which doesn't motivate people as well unless you can make it personal somehow.
mounteast0
Profile Joined January 2020
59 Posts
July 19 2022 03:21 GMT
#74671
I think it might "worth considering" that what actually Biden administration want, not just what he said, may be they just want to be seen as doing something while not really interested in doing anything, especially regarding "progressive" issues.

I have hard time believing that the whole administration is completely idiotic / incompetent in pushing anything through. After all, those people are all "seasoned" / long time / experienced participant in the field, they don't rise to the top because they are totally incompetent. It is not like some kind of rookie that somehow overthrow the government but have no idea how governing works.

The conspiracy theorist in me think that Biden is not really want to push for "progressive" agenda, and he bank on the fact that voters on the left have no choice other than voting for Dem, even if the Dem don't do anything for them, "because" otherwise the life of those minority will be even shitter under Rep rule. May be this is the rationale behind leaning toward "centre" / "moderate"?

From my experience of observing my local election (not US election if anyone actually interested), the above strategy works for a while, after that, there will be enough voters get fed up that they will turn away, not voting or voting anyone else but them. I don't know enough of the US politics to determine if the same would happen, or if that would significantly affect the chance of Dem in election.

Predicting if not trying is a better strategy than not winning is a hard one. Since we don't have parallel universe / controlled experiment, the definite answer may not be known / concluded....
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
July 19 2022 03:36 GMT
#74672
On July 19 2022 12:21 mounteast0 wrote:
I think it might "worth considering" that what actually Biden administration want, not just what he said, may be they just want to be seen as doing something while not really interested in doing anything, especially regarding "progressive" issues.

I have hard time believing that the whole administration is completely idiotic / incompetent in pushing anything through. After all, those people are all "seasoned" / long time / experienced participant in the field, they don't rise to the top because they are totally incompetent. It is not like some kind of rookie that somehow overthrow the government but have no idea how governing works.

The conspiracy theorist in me think that Biden is not really want to push for "progressive" agenda, and he bank on the fact that voters on the left have no choice other than voting for Dem, even if the Dem don't do anything for them, "because" otherwise the life of those minority will be even shitter under Rep rule. May be this is the rationale behind leaning toward "centre" / "moderate"?

From my experience of observing my local election (not US election if anyone actually interested), the above strategy works for a while, after that, there will be enough voters get fed up that they will turn away, not voting or voting anyone else but them. I don't know enough of the US politics to determine if the same would happen, or if that would significantly affect the chance of Dem in election.

Predicting if not trying is a better strategy than not winning is a hard one. Since we don't have parallel universe / controlled experiment, the definite answer may not be known / concluded....

The line of thinking I find most compelling is that the current Democratic party leadership, including most of its elected officials, lived through Reagan and the fundamental change in American politics from "the government exists to help the weak," to "the government is a problem getting in the way of the strong," that led to Clinton cutting welfare programs and calling it a win.

As a result they're traumatized, afraid of getting destroyed like that again and incapable of believing that progressive action will win instead of leading to another Reagan.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26301 Posts
July 19 2022 11:21 GMT
#74673
On July 19 2022 12:36 Kyadytim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2022 12:21 mounteast0 wrote:
I think it might "worth considering" that what actually Biden administration want, not just what he said, may be they just want to be seen as doing something while not really interested in doing anything, especially regarding "progressive" issues.

I have hard time believing that the whole administration is completely idiotic / incompetent in pushing anything through. After all, those people are all "seasoned" / long time / experienced participant in the field, they don't rise to the top because they are totally incompetent. It is not like some kind of rookie that somehow overthrow the government but have no idea how governing works.

The conspiracy theorist in me think that Biden is not really want to push for "progressive" agenda, and he bank on the fact that voters on the left have no choice other than voting for Dem, even if the Dem don't do anything for them, "because" otherwise the life of those minority will be even shitter under Rep rule. May be this is the rationale behind leaning toward "centre" / "moderate"?

From my experience of observing my local election (not US election if anyone actually interested), the above strategy works for a while, after that, there will be enough voters get fed up that they will turn away, not voting or voting anyone else but them. I don't know enough of the US politics to determine if the same would happen, or if that would significantly affect the chance of Dem in election.

Predicting if not trying is a better strategy than not winning is a hard one. Since we don't have parallel universe / controlled experiment, the definite answer may not be known / concluded....

The line of thinking I find most compelling is that the current Democratic party leadership, including most of its elected officials, lived through Reagan and the fundamental change in American politics from "the government exists to help the weak," to "the government is a problem getting in the way of the strong," that led to Clinton cutting welfare programs and calling it a win.

As a result they're traumatized, afraid of getting destroyed like that again and incapable of believing that progressive action will win instead of leading to another Reagan.

I could see that dwelling in the psyche to degrees, for sure.

I think part of the issue is, they were also forged in temperament in a time where average Americans were much more closely aligned around various unifying pillars, be they institutions, or in ideology.

Of course, let’s not exaggerate there have been huge conflicts politically going back, the country wasn’t all linking hands and singing songs together.

If you come from a time where the centre of the country is relatively reasonable, open to the odd compromise, generally trusts mainstream news, well that keeps the door open to compromise and bipartisanship.

That’s patently not the case, but some seem to be approaching politics as if it is. Being able and willing to make deals is baked into Biden’s core, and indeed would be a strength if the political ground was primed for it. It’s like he and the Dems are bringing out their best WoL builds and wondering why they’re not working in LoTV. They may have been excellent for their time, but anyone more versed in the current game knows exactly why they’re not working

Speaking of people being unreasonable, here’s an interesting snapshot of perception on the Watergate scandal and Richard Nixon through time.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/09/25/how-the-watergate-crisis-eroded-public-support-for-richard-nixon/

As more information came to light, those thinking he should face censure and general disapproval climbed. Which is basically the opposite of the trend we’re seeing with the Jan 6th hearings.

People’s response to the pandemic would also indicate the growth of these schisms.

In terms of viable responses, if I could wave a magic wand and rebuild trust in mainstream centralist media that would be great. But I’ve no idea how one would do that, so I don’t blame the Dems for not knowing.

I think that realistically leaves pushing for the rough status quo but fighting considerably dirtier, or go ambitious and aspirational and hope to punch through and make gains.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
July 19 2022 14:27 GMT
#74674
On July 19 2022 20:21 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2022 12:36 Kyadytim wrote:
On July 19 2022 12:21 mounteast0 wrote:
I think it might "worth considering" that what actually Biden administration want, not just what he said, may be they just want to be seen as doing something while not really interested in doing anything, especially regarding "progressive" issues.

I have hard time believing that the whole administration is completely idiotic / incompetent in pushing anything through. After all, those people are all "seasoned" / long time / experienced participant in the field, they don't rise to the top because they are totally incompetent. It is not like some kind of rookie that somehow overthrow the government but have no idea how governing works.

The conspiracy theorist in me think that Biden is not really want to push for "progressive" agenda, and he bank on the fact that voters on the left have no choice other than voting for Dem, even if the Dem don't do anything for them, "because" otherwise the life of those minority will be even shitter under Rep rule. May be this is the rationale behind leaning toward "centre" / "moderate"?

From my experience of observing my local election (not US election if anyone actually interested), the above strategy works for a while, after that, there will be enough voters get fed up that they will turn away, not voting or voting anyone else but them. I don't know enough of the US politics to determine if the same would happen, or if that would significantly affect the chance of Dem in election.

Predicting if not trying is a better strategy than not winning is a hard one. Since we don't have parallel universe / controlled experiment, the definite answer may not be known / concluded....

The line of thinking I find most compelling is that the current Democratic party leadership, including most of its elected officials, lived through Reagan and the fundamental change in American politics from "the government exists to help the weak," to "the government is a problem getting in the way of the strong," that led to Clinton cutting welfare programs and calling it a win.

As a result they're traumatized, afraid of getting destroyed like that again and incapable of believing that progressive action will win instead of leading to another Reagan.

I could see that dwelling in the psyche to degrees, for sure.

I think part of the issue is, they were also forged in temperament in a time where average Americans were much more closely aligned around various unifying pillars, be they institutions, or in ideology.

Of course, let’s not exaggerate there have been huge conflicts politically going back, the country wasn’t all linking hands and singing songs together.

If you come from a time where the centre of the country is relatively reasonable, open to the odd compromise, generally trusts mainstream news, well that keeps the door open to compromise and bipartisanship.

That’s patently not the case, but some seem to be approaching politics as if it is. Being able and willing to make deals is baked into Biden’s core, and indeed would be a strength if the political ground was primed for it. It’s like he and the Dems are bringing out their best WoL builds and wondering why they’re not working in LoTV. They may have been excellent for their time, but anyone more versed in the current game knows exactly why they’re not working

Speaking of people being unreasonable, here’s an interesting snapshot of perception on the Watergate scandal and Richard Nixon through time.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/09/25/how-the-watergate-crisis-eroded-public-support-for-richard-nixon/

As more information came to light, those thinking he should face censure and general disapproval climbed. Which is basically the opposite of the trend we’re seeing with the Jan 6th hearings.

People’s response to the pandemic would also indicate the growth of these schisms.

In terms of viable responses, if I could wave a magic wand and rebuild trust in mainstream centralist media that would be great. But I’ve no idea how one would do that, so I don’t blame the Dems for not knowing.

I think that realistically leaves pushing for the rough status quo but fighting considerably dirtier, or go ambitious and aspirational and hope to punch through and make gains.
I think fighting considerably dirtier is also necessary for the second option. "They go low, we go high" ends up with Merrick Garland as attorney general instead of on the Supreme Court. Losing honorably is still losing.
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11756 Posts
July 19 2022 14:38 GMT
#74675
On July 19 2022 23:27 Kyadytim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2022 20:21 WombaT wrote:
On July 19 2022 12:36 Kyadytim wrote:
On July 19 2022 12:21 mounteast0 wrote:
I think it might "worth considering" that what actually Biden administration want, not just what he said, may be they just want to be seen as doing something while not really interested in doing anything, especially regarding "progressive" issues.

I have hard time believing that the whole administration is completely idiotic / incompetent in pushing anything through. After all, those people are all "seasoned" / long time / experienced participant in the field, they don't rise to the top because they are totally incompetent. It is not like some kind of rookie that somehow overthrow the government but have no idea how governing works.

The conspiracy theorist in me think that Biden is not really want to push for "progressive" agenda, and he bank on the fact that voters on the left have no choice other than voting for Dem, even if the Dem don't do anything for them, "because" otherwise the life of those minority will be even shitter under Rep rule. May be this is the rationale behind leaning toward "centre" / "moderate"?

From my experience of observing my local election (not US election if anyone actually interested), the above strategy works for a while, after that, there will be enough voters get fed up that they will turn away, not voting or voting anyone else but them. I don't know enough of the US politics to determine if the same would happen, or if that would significantly affect the chance of Dem in election.

Predicting if not trying is a better strategy than not winning is a hard one. Since we don't have parallel universe / controlled experiment, the definite answer may not be known / concluded....

The line of thinking I find most compelling is that the current Democratic party leadership, including most of its elected officials, lived through Reagan and the fundamental change in American politics from "the government exists to help the weak," to "the government is a problem getting in the way of the strong," that led to Clinton cutting welfare programs and calling it a win.

As a result they're traumatized, afraid of getting destroyed like that again and incapable of believing that progressive action will win instead of leading to another Reagan.

I could see that dwelling in the psyche to degrees, for sure.

I think part of the issue is, they were also forged in temperament in a time where average Americans were much more closely aligned around various unifying pillars, be they institutions, or in ideology.

Of course, let’s not exaggerate there have been huge conflicts politically going back, the country wasn’t all linking hands and singing songs together.

If you come from a time where the centre of the country is relatively reasonable, open to the odd compromise, generally trusts mainstream news, well that keeps the door open to compromise and bipartisanship.

That’s patently not the case, but some seem to be approaching politics as if it is. Being able and willing to make deals is baked into Biden’s core, and indeed would be a strength if the political ground was primed for it. It’s like he and the Dems are bringing out their best WoL builds and wondering why they’re not working in LoTV. They may have been excellent for their time, but anyone more versed in the current game knows exactly why they’re not working

Speaking of people being unreasonable, here’s an interesting snapshot of perception on the Watergate scandal and Richard Nixon through time.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/09/25/how-the-watergate-crisis-eroded-public-support-for-richard-nixon/

As more information came to light, those thinking he should face censure and general disapproval climbed. Which is basically the opposite of the trend we’re seeing with the Jan 6th hearings.

People’s response to the pandemic would also indicate the growth of these schisms.

In terms of viable responses, if I could wave a magic wand and rebuild trust in mainstream centralist media that would be great. But I’ve no idea how one would do that, so I don’t blame the Dems for not knowing.

I think that realistically leaves pushing for the rough status quo but fighting considerably dirtier, or go ambitious and aspirational and hope to punch through and make gains.
I think fighting considerably dirtier is also necessary for the second option. "They go low, we go high" ends up with Merrick Garland as attorney general instead of on the Supreme Court. Losing honorably is still losing.


Yeah, "they go low, we go high" only works with a population which values basic decency. If most of the population just says "lol suckers", then it doesn't work.
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35170 Posts
July 19 2022 16:03 GMT
#74676
Which is why I prefer a pivot of "They go low, we knee them in the face."
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15742 Posts
July 19 2022 16:07 GMT
#74677
On July 19 2022 23:27 Kyadytim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 19 2022 20:21 WombaT wrote:
On July 19 2022 12:36 Kyadytim wrote:
On July 19 2022 12:21 mounteast0 wrote:
I think it might "worth considering" that what actually Biden administration want, not just what he said, may be they just want to be seen as doing something while not really interested in doing anything, especially regarding "progressive" issues.

I have hard time believing that the whole administration is completely idiotic / incompetent in pushing anything through. After all, those people are all "seasoned" / long time / experienced participant in the field, they don't rise to the top because they are totally incompetent. It is not like some kind of rookie that somehow overthrow the government but have no idea how governing works.

The conspiracy theorist in me think that Biden is not really want to push for "progressive" agenda, and he bank on the fact that voters on the left have no choice other than voting for Dem, even if the Dem don't do anything for them, "because" otherwise the life of those minority will be even shitter under Rep rule. May be this is the rationale behind leaning toward "centre" / "moderate"?

From my experience of observing my local election (not US election if anyone actually interested), the above strategy works for a while, after that, there will be enough voters get fed up that they will turn away, not voting or voting anyone else but them. I don't know enough of the US politics to determine if the same would happen, or if that would significantly affect the chance of Dem in election.

Predicting if not trying is a better strategy than not winning is a hard one. Since we don't have parallel universe / controlled experiment, the definite answer may not be known / concluded....

The line of thinking I find most compelling is that the current Democratic party leadership, including most of its elected officials, lived through Reagan and the fundamental change in American politics from "the government exists to help the weak," to "the government is a problem getting in the way of the strong," that led to Clinton cutting welfare programs and calling it a win.

As a result they're traumatized, afraid of getting destroyed like that again and incapable of believing that progressive action will win instead of leading to another Reagan.

I could see that dwelling in the psyche to degrees, for sure.

I think part of the issue is, they were also forged in temperament in a time where average Americans were much more closely aligned around various unifying pillars, be they institutions, or in ideology.

Of course, let’s not exaggerate there have been huge conflicts politically going back, the country wasn’t all linking hands and singing songs together.

If you come from a time where the centre of the country is relatively reasonable, open to the odd compromise, generally trusts mainstream news, well that keeps the door open to compromise and bipartisanship.

That’s patently not the case, but some seem to be approaching politics as if it is. Being able and willing to make deals is baked into Biden’s core, and indeed would be a strength if the political ground was primed for it. It’s like he and the Dems are bringing out their best WoL builds and wondering why they’re not working in LoTV. They may have been excellent for their time, but anyone more versed in the current game knows exactly why they’re not working

Speaking of people being unreasonable, here’s an interesting snapshot of perception on the Watergate scandal and Richard Nixon through time.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/09/25/how-the-watergate-crisis-eroded-public-support-for-richard-nixon/

As more information came to light, those thinking he should face censure and general disapproval climbed. Which is basically the opposite of the trend we’re seeing with the Jan 6th hearings.

People’s response to the pandemic would also indicate the growth of these schisms.

In terms of viable responses, if I could wave a magic wand and rebuild trust in mainstream centralist media that would be great. But I’ve no idea how one would do that, so I don’t blame the Dems for not knowing.

I think that realistically leaves pushing for the rough status quo but fighting considerably dirtier, or go ambitious and aspirational and hope to punch through and make gains.
I think fighting considerably dirtier is also necessary for the second option. "They go low, we go high" ends up with Merrick Garland as attorney general instead of on the Supreme Court. Losing honorably is still losing.


100% agreed. Biden's outdated perspective on political discourse is hurting the country. Farvacola did a good job at explaining that in this thread previously.
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
July 19 2022 20:44 GMT
#74678
--- Nuked ---
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
July 19 2022 23:04 GMT
#74679
--- Nuked ---
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43620 Posts
July 19 2022 23:49 GMT
#74680
On July 20 2022 05:44 JimmiC wrote:
What is the logic in being against Finland and Sweden joining NATO? Its 18 Reps, so I instantly assume its hur dur everyone says this is good so itd bad hurdur QAnon.

Every additional member of the alliance represents additional obligations and entanglement. Ukraine joining massively increases the risk of a NATO Russia war, for example.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Prev 1 3732 3733 3734 3735 3736 5527 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 7m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 240
Ketroc 47
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 9048
GuemChi 2596
Artosis 726
Leta 68
Jaeyun 24
Icarus 11
Dota 2
monkeys_forever635
NeuroSwarm149
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor162
Other Games
summit1g11573
JimRising 768
C9.Mang0370
Maynarde175
Mew2King62
ViBE33
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick916
Counter-Strike
PGL135
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta31
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1479
• Lourlo336
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 7m
Wardi Open
8h 7m
Monday Night Weeklies
13h 7m
Replay Cast
20h 7m
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
KCM Race Survival
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Ultimate Battle
4 days
Light vs ZerO
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS5
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
WardiTV Winter 2026
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 21: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.