On June 28 2018 23:56 Doodsmack wrote:
He wore a MAGA hat too.
He wore a MAGA hat too.
The point is that it isn’t productive to read into how he outwardly presented himself. Wait until details of the investigation comes out.
Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
June 28 2018 14:55 GMT
#7441
On June 28 2018 23:56 Doodsmack wrote: He wore a MAGA hat too. The point is that it isn’t productive to read into how he outwardly presented himself. Wait until details of the investigation comes out. | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
June 28 2018 14:56 GMT
#7442
| ||
Introvert
United States4682 Posts
June 28 2018 14:58 GMT
#7443
| ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
June 28 2018 15:01 GMT
#7444
On June 28 2018 23:37 JimmiC wrote: Show nested quote + On June 28 2018 23:32 Nebuchad wrote: On June 28 2018 23:20 JimmiC wrote: Every sensible person should be against both sides extremists. Can't say that in a vacuum, no. Depends where the center is as that's what defines extremism. I mean you can split hairs and argue about anything. I was defining extremism as the points each side was bringing up about the other. The point is people should be trying to get these people out of their own party because it reflects poorly on them and their party instead of justifying their inclusion because the other side worse. It brings both parties down. The best you can hope for is rejecting politicians like Maxine Waters that look to be siding with the more stupid elements. The extremist elements will always compromise to wherever the main party is. If the main party does anything beyond tepid pushback, the extremists turn their attention to the "traitors" in their midst instead of the "enemy." And yeah I'm with xDaunt on the far left. The riots and violence against conservative speakers is on a whole different level, and it receives greater acceptance from those just inside the extremesI wouldn't go so far as to say they're cheering for the end of the civil society, but the lefties here definitely justify and defend it to a far greater degree, with either "he started it" or "free speech is how the nazis got their start, too!" That and insane overdramatic performances I mean, Trump supporters actually chanted for the jailing Clinton! Wow! And defending the free speech rights of nazis is tantamount to defending nazi ideology, you white supremacists). Very interesting times. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
June 28 2018 15:10 GMT
#7445
On June 28 2018 23:58 Introvert wrote: I mean it was the group who claimed him, but authorities said they found nothing. I was curious, but I guess no one actually knows, although notoriety is possible. According the the charges, he was expressed white supremacist views, including praise for Hitler. NPR Story It is unlikely that he came to these views on his in a vacuum and has likely been affiliated with hate groups for some time. Given the online natures of many of these groups, it is difficult to pinpoint which group he was part of or if he was part of a large number. Also, this soft boy looking mother fucker is a sentient jar of mayonnaise. | ||
Nebuchad
Switzerland12062 Posts
June 28 2018 15:19 GMT
#7446
On June 29 2018 00:01 Danglars wrote: Show nested quote + On June 28 2018 23:37 JimmiC wrote: On June 28 2018 23:32 Nebuchad wrote: On June 28 2018 23:20 JimmiC wrote: Every sensible person should be against both sides extremists. Can't say that in a vacuum, no. Depends where the center is as that's what defines extremism. I mean you can split hairs and argue about anything. I was defining extremism as the points each side was bringing up about the other. The point is people should be trying to get these people out of their own party because it reflects poorly on them and their party instead of justifying their inclusion because the other side worse. It brings both parties down. The best you can hope for is rejecting politicians like Maxine Waters that look to be siding with the more stupid elements. The extremist elements will always compromise to wherever the main party is. If the main party does anything beyond tepid pushback, the extremists turn their attention to the "traitors" in their midst instead of the "enemy." And yeah I'm with xDaunt on the far left. The riots and violence against conservative speakers is on a whole different level, and it receives greater acceptance from those just inside the extremesI wouldn't go so far as to say they're cheering for the end of the civil society, but the lefties here definitely justify and defend it to a far greater degree, with either "he started it" or "free speech is how the nazis got their start, too!" That and insane overdramatic performances I mean, Trump supporters actually chanted for the jailing Clinton! Wow! And defending the free speech rights of nazis is tantamount to defending nazi ideology, you white supremacists). Very interesting times. During this period where the left hasn't sufficiently called out its extremists to your liking, the right has effectively replaced the "standard politicians" that it used to have with Tea Party extremists, effectively making them the commonplace of the party and ensuring that they factually aren't extremists anymore. Now the extremists are further right: they can be the fascists and the alt-righters (who btw, are very different from fascists now, because now that we've moved the center closer to them we need to make more distinctions). All of those changes have been applauded because "at least they fight" or something to that effect, which is much more acceptance than the left has ever given the far left in any country and especially in the US. It's not exactly subtle. | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
June 28 2018 15:23 GMT
#7447
lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first. | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
June 28 2018 15:31 GMT
#7448
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
June 28 2018 15:38 GMT
#7449
On June 29 2018 00:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with? lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first. Most of the super pro-free speech people talk to are willing to concede the point that being armed while protesting shouldn’t be protected. 200 people marching with firearms isn’t peaceful. And it limits the rights of others who want to march in opposition safely. | ||
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
June 28 2018 15:46 GMT
#7450
| ||
m4ini
4215 Posts
June 28 2018 15:56 GMT
#7451
What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with? To be fair, there certainly are violent left wing extremists, they're just not as common as violent right wing extremists. I'm certainly against violence of both sides (btw a view not everyone of our resident liberals shares, funny enough it's the minority). I don't need to cite the right wing incidents, they're too much to count anyway and we all know them. A known incident for left wing extremism would be the case of James Hodgkinson, a guy who took his rifle to a republican baseball match. Micah Johnson is another example, ambushing and killing officers. Generally, left wing extremism doesn't target people, it targets property. Animal rights activists destroying shit, eco terrorists destroying shit etc. They usually are nowhere near as violent though (as in, deadly). This is purely an informational post btw, i'm not gonna get pulled into another discussion where i'm attacked for condemning both sides of terrorism/violence. | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
June 28 2018 15:58 GMT
#7452
On June 29 2018 00:38 Plansix wrote: Show nested quote + On June 29 2018 00:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with? lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first. Most of the super pro-free speech people talk to are willing to concede the point that being armed while protesting shouldn’t be protected. 200 people marching with firearms isn’t peaceful. And it limits the rights of others who want to march in opposition safely. I'm not getting that impression from either Danglars nor xdaunt. They have been asked multiple times whether they think that marching with guns should or should not be protected, whether to do so considered is reprehensible or not, whether to do so is to be considered civil or not, in various guises and each time they either ignore it, write that it is a loaded question, waffle on about something irrelevent, or just repeat that it is a constitutional right to do so. Both can consider this a question directed at them on each of those points, if they deign to answer. | ||
m4ini
4215 Posts
June 28 2018 16:03 GMT
#7453
On June 29 2018 00:58 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Show nested quote + On June 29 2018 00:38 Plansix wrote: On June 29 2018 00:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with? lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first. Most of the super pro-free speech people talk to are willing to concede the point that being armed while protesting shouldn’t be protected. 200 people marching with firearms isn’t peaceful. And it limits the rights of others who want to march in opposition safely. I'm not getting that impression from either Danglars nor xdaunt. They have been asked multiple times whether they think that marching with guns should or should not be protected, whether to do so considered is reprehensible or not, whether to do so is to be considered civil or not, in various guises and each time they either ignore it, write that it is a loaded question, waffle on about something irrelevent, or just repeat that it is a constitutional right to do so. Both can consider this a question directed at them on each of those points, if they deign to answer. They're gun advocates, both. The answer there should be pretty clear. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
June 28 2018 16:06 GMT
#7454
Given the course of the county and that we will have the most conservative high court in nearly 100 years, I think we are at risk of that level and type of violence in our life time. We will have to see, but if the court is dumb enough to overturn Roe v Wade in the coming years, I can assure it will mark the end of a lot of left leaning people operating with accepted norms. On June 29 2018 01:03 m4ini wrote: Show nested quote + On June 29 2018 00:58 Dangermousecatdog wrote: On June 29 2018 00:38 Plansix wrote: On June 29 2018 00:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with? lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first. Most of the super pro-free speech people talk to are willing to concede the point that being armed while protesting shouldn’t be protected. 200 people marching with firearms isn’t peaceful. And it limits the rights of others who want to march in opposition safely. I'm not getting that impression from either Danglars nor xdaunt. They have been asked multiple times whether they think that marching with guns should or should not be protected, whether to do so considered is reprehensible or not, whether to do so is to be considered civil or not, in various guises and each time they either ignore it, write that it is a loaded question, waffle on about something irrelevent, or just repeat that it is a constitutional right to do so. Both can consider this a question directed at them on each of those points, if they deign to answer. They're gun advocates, both. The answer there should be pretty clear. I’m not sure Xdaunt would argue that 200 openly armed people marching is protected speech that cannot be curbed by the government. And the courts have upheld that protesters can be required to be unarmed during their protests. It is just that most red states don’t do it (and it was never really that common of a practice) | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
June 28 2018 16:17 GMT
#7455
| ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
June 28 2018 16:24 GMT
#7456
On June 29 2018 01:03 m4ini wrote: Show nested quote + On June 29 2018 00:58 Dangermousecatdog wrote: On June 29 2018 00:38 Plansix wrote: On June 29 2018 00:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with? lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first. Most of the super pro-free speech people talk to are willing to concede the point that being armed while protesting shouldn’t be protected. 200 people marching with firearms isn’t peaceful. And it limits the rights of others who want to march in opposition safely. I'm not getting that impression from either Danglars nor xdaunt. They have been asked multiple times whether they think that marching with guns should or should not be protected, whether to do so considered is reprehensible or not, whether to do so is to be considered civil or not, in various guises and each time they either ignore it, write that it is a loaded question, waffle on about something irrelevent, or just repeat that it is a constitutional right to do so. Both can consider this a question directed at them on each of those points, if they deign to answer. They're gun advocates, both. The answer there should be pretty clear. Not particularily. I rather here from either than the supposings of either. Afterall, neither positions are mutually exclusive. Goes for both you and plansix that does. | ||
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
June 28 2018 16:36 GMT
#7457
On June 29 2018 01:17 Doodsmack wrote: Things are looking up for Trumps upcoming summit with Putin. Putin is a man of his word, who should be trusted as Trump heads into negotiations. Russia insists they did not meddle. https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1012295859072126977 The fact that Trump continues to believe the word of Russia over his own intelligence agencies has not been a big enough story. Nor has any arguments from the right come close to justifying it. No doubt Trump's July meeting with Putin, like his meeting with NK, will go better than his meetings with our allies. But that's ok as long as he gives you SCOTUS seats I guess. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
June 28 2018 16:45 GMT
#7458
...Many Canadians are wondering how a once-strong relationship with the U.S. has deteriorated so quickly. "Canadians are livid; the anger is across the country," says Roland Paris, a professor of international affairs at the University of Ottawa and a former foreign policy adviser to Trudeau. He says Trump may be using tariffs and undignified language as leverage for trade deals, such as the ongoing North American Free Trade Agreement talks, but Canadians are shocked at being treated as an adversary. "If President Trump's goal is to try to soften up his negotiating partner by issuing threats, it's having the opposite effect, because people are more resolved to stand up against this kind of bullying," he says. The Canadian government says it will levy dollar-for-dollar retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. on July 1, Canada Day. These will include steel and aluminum, along with other products — such as bourbon from Kentucky — that will particularly hit states aligned with Trump. Gary Howe, the president of the United Steelworkers Local 1005, in Hamilton, Ontario, says his members aren't panicking yet about a possible trade war with the U.S. The bigger concern is what's happening on the U.S.-Mexico border. "You know, the kids that are separated from their parents — I mean, it really makes Trump look to be like quite a monster," he says. "I think that most Canadians would kind of view him as ... quite an evil person, you know, because that's the way that the [Canadian] media has been kind of presenting it." Paris says many Canadians have relatives and friends in the U.S. and understand it is a big and complex country. "Nevertheless," he says, "the chaos, the meanness, the brutality of American politics right now is something that is profoundly shocking to Canadians and I think many people feel that they do not recognize the U.S. anymore." Gordon Ritchie, Canada's ambassador for trade negotiations in the 1980s and one of the principal negotiators of the original Canada-U.S. free trade agreement, says the tariffs and tough talk have created a breach of trust — but the relationship will survive. "I think the Canadian-American relationship — in political and economic terms — is very, very close and it will outlast this president," he says. In the meantime, he believes Canadians will continue to voice their disapproval with the Trump administration through the #BuyCanadian movement. He predicts that will extend to the tourism industry as well. Three of his neighbors who spend time in Florida every year are now looking for new vacation spots outside the U.S. Source NPR is reporting on a fast growing movement in Canada to boycott American goods over Trump's treatment of their country and president. Canada, one of the few counties we had a trade surplus with until now. And the UK just dropped a report on US torture tactics and how the UK knew about them. Today is not a great day to be an American who sells products over seas. | ||
Mercy13
United States718 Posts
June 28 2018 17:02 GMT
#7459
On June 29 2018 01:45 Plansix wrote: Show nested quote + ...Many Canadians are wondering how a once-strong relationship with the U.S. has deteriorated so quickly. "Canadians are livid; the anger is across the country," says Roland Paris, a professor of international affairs at the University of Ottawa and a former foreign policy adviser to Trudeau. He says Trump may be using tariffs and undignified language as leverage for trade deals, such as the ongoing North American Free Trade Agreement talks, but Canadians are shocked at being treated as an adversary. "If President Trump's goal is to try to soften up his negotiating partner by issuing threats, it's having the opposite effect, because people are more resolved to stand up against this kind of bullying," he says. The Canadian government says it will levy dollar-for-dollar retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. on July 1, Canada Day. These will include steel and aluminum, along with other products — such as bourbon from Kentucky — that will particularly hit states aligned with Trump. Gary Howe, the president of the United Steelworkers Local 1005, in Hamilton, Ontario, says his members aren't panicking yet about a possible trade war with the U.S. The bigger concern is what's happening on the U.S.-Mexico border. "You know, the kids that are separated from their parents — I mean, it really makes Trump look to be like quite a monster," he says. "I think that most Canadians would kind of view him as ... quite an evil person, you know, because that's the way that the [Canadian] media has been kind of presenting it." Paris says many Canadians have relatives and friends in the U.S. and understand it is a big and complex country. "Nevertheless," he says, "the chaos, the meanness, the brutality of American politics right now is something that is profoundly shocking to Canadians and I think many people feel that they do not recognize the U.S. anymore." Gordon Ritchie, Canada's ambassador for trade negotiations in the 1980s and one of the principal negotiators of the original Canada-U.S. free trade agreement, says the tariffs and tough talk have created a breach of trust — but the relationship will survive. "I think the Canadian-American relationship — in political and economic terms — is very, very close and it will outlast this president," he says. In the meantime, he believes Canadians will continue to voice their disapproval with the Trump administration through the #BuyCanadian movement. He predicts that will extend to the tourism industry as well. Three of his neighbors who spend time in Florida every year are now looking for new vacation spots outside the U.S. Source NPR is reporting on a fast growing movement in Canada to boycott American goods over Trump's treatment of their country and president. Canada, one of the few counties we had a trade surplus with until now. And the UK just dropped a report on US torture tactics and how the UK knew about them. Today is not a great day to be an American who sells products over seas. Retaliatory tariffs on certain important exports are all well and good, but Trump doesn't care if his supporters lose their jobs; they'll probably vote for him anyway as long as he projects sufficient disgust at black people protesting their lack of civil rights and other similar cultural issues. Our allies should focus on what he actually cares about and implement targeted sanctions against the Trump Organization. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
June 28 2018 17:05 GMT
#7460
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2![]() ![]() EffOrt ![]() Hyuk ![]() actioN ![]() Nal_rA ![]() ggaemo ![]() firebathero ![]() Last ![]() Mind ![]() Hyun ![]() [ Show more ] Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH305 StarCraft: Brood War• HeavenSC ![]() • -Miszu- ![]() • Adnapsc2 ![]() • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() League of Legends |
BSL: ProLeague
Cross vs TT1
spx vs Hawk
JDConan vs TBD
Wardi Open
SOOP
NightMare vs Wayne
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
GSL Code S
Cure vs Zoun
Solar vs Creator
The PondCast
Online Event
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
HupCup
GSL Code S
GuMiho vs Bunny
ByuN vs SHIN
[ Show More ] Online Event
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|