• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 05:45
CET 11:45
KST 19:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets0$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)12Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 103SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1822
StarCraft 2
General
SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list? Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns Spontaneous hotkey change zerg Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) WardiTV Winter Cup WardiTV Mondays SC2 AI Tournament 2026
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes
Brood War
General
Potential ASL qualifier breakthroughs? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Data analysis on 70 million replays
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 SLON Grand Finals – Season 2
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced
Blogs
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Physical Exercise (HIIT) Bef…
TrAiDoS
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2163 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 373

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 371 372 373 374 375 5433 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-28 14:59:12
June 28 2018 14:55 GMT
#7441
There is no reason to take his video at face value or assume that he wasn’t part of another group. These groups lie constantly. Part of the white supremacist/Nazi play book is to lie about affiliations and what they stand for.

On June 28 2018 23:56 Doodsmack wrote:
He wore a MAGA hat too.

The point is that it isn’t productive to read into how he outwardly presented himself. Wait until details of the investigation comes out.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
June 28 2018 14:56 GMT
#7442
He wore a MAGA hat too.
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4882 Posts
June 28 2018 14:58 GMT
#7443
I mean it was the group who claimed him, but authorities said they found nothing. I was curious, but I guess no one actually knows, although notoriety is possible.
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
June 28 2018 15:01 GMT
#7444
On June 28 2018 23:37 JimmiC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 28 2018 23:32 Nebuchad wrote:
On June 28 2018 23:20 JimmiC wrote:
Every sensible person should be against both sides extremists.


Can't say that in a vacuum, no. Depends where the center is as that's what defines extremism.

I mean you can split hairs and argue about anything. I was defining extremism as the points each side was bringing up about the other.

The point is people should be trying to get these people out of their own party because it reflects poorly on them and their party instead of justifying their inclusion because the other side worse. It brings both parties down.

The best you can hope for is rejecting politicians like Maxine Waters that look to be siding with the more stupid elements. The extremist elements will always compromise to wherever the main party is. If the main party does anything beyond tepid pushback, the extremists turn their attention to the "traitors" in their midst instead of the "enemy."

And yeah I'm with xDaunt on the far left. The riots and violence against conservative speakers is on a whole different level, and it receives greater acceptance from those just inside the extremesI wouldn't go so far as to say they're cheering for the end of the civil society, but the lefties here definitely justify and defend it to a far greater degree, with either "he started it" or "free speech is how the nazis got their start, too!" That and insane overdramatic performances I mean, Trump supporters actually chanted for the jailing Clinton! Wow! And defending the free speech rights of nazis is tantamount to defending nazi ideology, you white supremacists).

Very interesting times.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 28 2018 15:10 GMT
#7445
On June 28 2018 23:58 Introvert wrote:
I mean it was the group who claimed him, but authorities said they found nothing. I was curious, but I guess no one actually knows, although notoriety is possible.

According the the charges, he was expressed white supremacist views, including praise for Hitler.

NPR Story

It is unlikely that he came to these views on his in a vacuum and has likely been affiliated with hate groups for some time. Given the online natures of many of these groups, it is difficult to pinpoint which group he was part of or if he was part of a large number.

Also, this soft boy looking mother fucker is a sentient jar of mayonnaise.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12379 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-28 15:20:35
June 28 2018 15:19 GMT
#7446
On June 29 2018 00:01 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 28 2018 23:37 JimmiC wrote:
On June 28 2018 23:32 Nebuchad wrote:
On June 28 2018 23:20 JimmiC wrote:
Every sensible person should be against both sides extremists.


Can't say that in a vacuum, no. Depends where the center is as that's what defines extremism.

I mean you can split hairs and argue about anything. I was defining extremism as the points each side was bringing up about the other.

The point is people should be trying to get these people out of their own party because it reflects poorly on them and their party instead of justifying their inclusion because the other side worse. It brings both parties down.

The best you can hope for is rejecting politicians like Maxine Waters that look to be siding with the more stupid elements. The extremist elements will always compromise to wherever the main party is. If the main party does anything beyond tepid pushback, the extremists turn their attention to the "traitors" in their midst instead of the "enemy."

And yeah I'm with xDaunt on the far left. The riots and violence against conservative speakers is on a whole different level, and it receives greater acceptance from those just inside the extremesI wouldn't go so far as to say they're cheering for the end of the civil society, but the lefties here definitely justify and defend it to a far greater degree, with either "he started it" or "free speech is how the nazis got their start, too!" That and insane overdramatic performances I mean, Trump supporters actually chanted for the jailing Clinton! Wow! And defending the free speech rights of nazis is tantamount to defending nazi ideology, you white supremacists).

Very interesting times.


During this period where the left hasn't sufficiently called out its extremists to your liking, the right has effectively replaced the "standard politicians" that it used to have with Tea Party extremists, effectively making them the commonplace of the party and ensuring that they factually aren't extremists anymore. Now the extremists are further right: they can be the fascists and the alt-righters (who btw, are very different from fascists now, because now that we've moved the center closer to them we need to make more distinctions). All of those changes have been applauded because "at least they fight" or something to that effect, which is much more acceptance than the left has ever given the far left in any country and especially in the US.

It's not exactly subtle.
No will to live, no wish to die
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-28 15:26:55
June 28 2018 15:23 GMT
#7447
What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with?

lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-28 15:32:13
June 28 2018 15:31 GMT
#7448
Let’s not forget the many organized and well armed right wing militias that exist and were doing training drills prior to the election, following Republican Party presidential candidate Trump’s call for second amendment people to act in the event Hillary won.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 28 2018 15:38 GMT
#7449
On June 29 2018 00:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with?

lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first.

Most of the super pro-free speech people talk to are willing to concede the point that being armed while protesting shouldn’t be protected. 200 people marching with firearms isn’t peaceful. And it limits the rights of others who want to march in opposition safely.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
June 28 2018 15:46 GMT
#7450
Personally I firmly believe that the Nazis would never have risen to power had only Hitler been debated by Ben Shapiro in 1932 on a university campus.
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
June 28 2018 15:56 GMT
#7451
What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with?


To be fair, there certainly are violent left wing extremists, they're just not as common as violent right wing extremists.

I'm certainly against violence of both sides (btw a view not everyone of our resident liberals shares, funny enough it's the minority). I don't need to cite the right wing incidents, they're too much to count anyway and we all know them.

A known incident for left wing extremism would be the case of James Hodgkinson, a guy who took his rifle to a republican baseball match. Micah Johnson is another example, ambushing and killing officers.

Generally, left wing extremism doesn't target people, it targets property. Animal rights activists destroying shit, eco terrorists destroying shit etc. They usually are nowhere near as violent though (as in, deadly).

This is purely an informational post btw, i'm not gonna get pulled into another discussion where i'm attacked for condemning both sides of terrorism/violence.
On track to MA1950A.
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-28 15:59:09
June 28 2018 15:58 GMT
#7452
On June 29 2018 00:38 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 29 2018 00:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with?

lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first.

Most of the super pro-free speech people talk to are willing to concede the point that being armed while protesting shouldn’t be protected. 200 people marching with firearms isn’t peaceful. And it limits the rights of others who want to march in opposition safely.

I'm not getting that impression from either Danglars nor xdaunt. They have been asked multiple times whether they think that marching with guns should or should not be protected, whether to do so considered is reprehensible or not, whether to do so is to be considered civil or not, in various guises and each time they either ignore it, write that it is a loaded question, waffle on about something irrelevent, or just repeat that it is a constitutional right to do so. Both can consider this a question directed at them on each of those points, if they deign to answer.
m4ini
Profile Joined February 2014
4215 Posts
June 28 2018 16:03 GMT
#7453
On June 29 2018 00:58 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 29 2018 00:38 Plansix wrote:
On June 29 2018 00:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with?

lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first.

Most of the super pro-free speech people talk to are willing to concede the point that being armed while protesting shouldn’t be protected. 200 people marching with firearms isn’t peaceful. And it limits the rights of others who want to march in opposition safely.

I'm not getting that impression from either Danglars nor xdaunt. They have been asked multiple times whether they think that marching with guns should or should not be protected, whether to do so considered is reprehensible or not, whether to do so is to be considered civil or not, in various guises and each time they either ignore it, write that it is a loaded question, waffle on about something irrelevent, or just repeat that it is a constitutional right to do so. Both can consider this a question directed at them on each of those points, if they deign to answer.


They're gun advocates, both.

The answer there should be pretty clear.
On track to MA1950A.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-28 16:09:41
June 28 2018 16:06 GMT
#7454
The destruction of personal property is not desirable in most protests of policies. The tenor of the entire debate changes when it comes to things like police violence, abuse of prosecution powers and groups like ICE just snatching people in the night. That is the typing point where the system is starting to break down for one group and they cannot rely on the government and systems within to protect them. At that point, riots/destruction of property, as king put it, the voice of the voiceless. It is a product of an unjust system. And that unjust system does not just apply to race. Labor riots were caused by the same type of oppression.

Given the course of the county and that we will have the most conservative high court in nearly 100 years, I think we are at risk of that level and type of violence in our life time. We will have to see, but if the court is dumb enough to overturn Roe v Wade in the coming years, I can assure it will mark the end of a lot of left leaning people operating with accepted norms.

On June 29 2018 01:03 m4ini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 29 2018 00:58 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
On June 29 2018 00:38 Plansix wrote:
On June 29 2018 00:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with?

lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first.

Most of the super pro-free speech people talk to are willing to concede the point that being armed while protesting shouldn’t be protected. 200 people marching with firearms isn’t peaceful. And it limits the rights of others who want to march in opposition safely.

I'm not getting that impression from either Danglars nor xdaunt. They have been asked multiple times whether they think that marching with guns should or should not be protected, whether to do so considered is reprehensible or not, whether to do so is to be considered civil or not, in various guises and each time they either ignore it, write that it is a loaded question, waffle on about something irrelevent, or just repeat that it is a constitutional right to do so. Both can consider this a question directed at them on each of those points, if they deign to answer.


They're gun advocates, both.

The answer there should be pretty clear.

I’m not sure Xdaunt would argue that 200 openly armed people marching is protected speech that cannot be curbed by the government. And the courts have upheld that protesters can be required to be unarmed during their protests. It is just that most red states don’t do it (and it was never really that common of a practice)
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
June 28 2018 16:17 GMT
#7455
Things are looking up for Trumps upcoming summit with Putin. Putin is a man of his word, who should be trusted as Trump heads into negotiations. Russia insists they did not meddle.

Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-28 16:25:55
June 28 2018 16:24 GMT
#7456
On June 29 2018 01:03 m4ini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 29 2018 00:58 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
On June 29 2018 00:38 Plansix wrote:
On June 29 2018 00:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
What the heck is a left extremist and what exactly have they done in USA? Have they threatened riots if the election didn't go their way? Do they bomb abortion clinics? Do they march for the extermination of coloured people wielding guns and driving cars into counter protesters? In fact what exactly does right and left mean here, and what does extremist mean, other than a side I agree/not agree with?

lastly, Nazis and white supremacists might have free speech rights, but to march with guns and drive cars into counter protesters are indefensible. Not to mention the views are indefensible too. But hey, if you want to make your camp with said nazis and supremacists, just let everyone know first.

Most of the super pro-free speech people talk to are willing to concede the point that being armed while protesting shouldn’t be protected. 200 people marching with firearms isn’t peaceful. And it limits the rights of others who want to march in opposition safely.

I'm not getting that impression from either Danglars nor xdaunt. They have been asked multiple times whether they think that marching with guns should or should not be protected, whether to do so considered is reprehensible or not, whether to do so is to be considered civil or not, in various guises and each time they either ignore it, write that it is a loaded question, waffle on about something irrelevent, or just repeat that it is a constitutional right to do so. Both can consider this a question directed at them on each of those points, if they deign to answer.


They're gun advocates, both.

The answer there should be pretty clear.

Not particularily. I rather here from either than the supposings of either. Afterall, neither positions are mutually exclusive. Goes for both you and plansix that does.
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-28 16:37:20
June 28 2018 16:36 GMT
#7457
On June 29 2018 01:17 Doodsmack wrote:
Things are looking up for Trumps upcoming summit with Putin. Putin is a man of his word, who should be trusted as Trump heads into negotiations. Russia insists they did not meddle.

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1012295859072126977


The fact that Trump continues to believe the word of Russia over his own intelligence agencies has not been a big enough story. Nor has any arguments from the right come close to justifying it.

No doubt Trump's July meeting with Putin, like his meeting with NK, will go better than his meetings with our allies. But that's ok as long as he gives you SCOTUS seats I guess.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-28 16:45:27
June 28 2018 16:45 GMT
#7458
...Many Canadians are wondering how a once-strong relationship with the U.S. has deteriorated so quickly.

"Canadians are livid; the anger is across the country," says Roland Paris, a professor of international affairs at the University of Ottawa and a former foreign policy adviser to Trudeau.

He says Trump may be using tariffs and undignified language as leverage for trade deals, such as the ongoing North American Free Trade Agreement talks, but Canadians are shocked at being treated as an adversary.

"If President Trump's goal is to try to soften up his negotiating partner by issuing threats, it's having the opposite effect, because people are more resolved to stand up against this kind of bullying," he says.

The Canadian government says it will levy dollar-for-dollar retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. on July 1, Canada Day. These will include steel and aluminum, along with other products — such as bourbon from Kentucky — that will particularly hit states aligned with Trump.

Gary Howe, the president of the United Steelworkers Local 1005, in Hamilton, Ontario, says his members aren't panicking yet about a possible trade war with the U.S. The bigger concern is what's happening on the U.S.-Mexico border.

"You know, the kids that are separated from their parents — I mean, it really makes Trump look to be like quite a monster," he says. "I think that most Canadians would kind of view him as ... quite an evil person, you know, because that's the way that the [Canadian] media has been kind of presenting it."

Paris says many Canadians have relatives and friends in the U.S. and understand it is a big and complex country.

"Nevertheless," he says, "the chaos, the meanness, the brutality of American politics right now is something that is profoundly shocking to Canadians and I think many people feel that they do not recognize the U.S. anymore."

Gordon Ritchie, Canada's ambassador for trade negotiations in the 1980s and one of the principal negotiators of the original Canada-U.S. free trade agreement, says the tariffs and tough talk have created a breach of trust — but the relationship will survive.

"I think the Canadian-American relationship — in political and economic terms — is very, very close and it will outlast this president," he says.

In the meantime, he believes Canadians will continue to voice their disapproval with the Trump administration through the #BuyCanadian movement. He predicts that will extend to the tourism industry as well. Three of his neighbors who spend time in Florida every year are now looking for new vacation spots outside the U.S.


Source

NPR is reporting on a fast growing movement in Canada to boycott American goods over Trump's treatment of their country and president. Canada, one of the few counties we had a trade surplus with until now. And the UK just dropped a report on US torture tactics and how the UK knew about them. Today is not a great day to be an American who sells products over seas.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Mercy13
Profile Joined January 2011
United States718 Posts
June 28 2018 17:02 GMT
#7459
On June 29 2018 01:45 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
...Many Canadians are wondering how a once-strong relationship with the U.S. has deteriorated so quickly.

"Canadians are livid; the anger is across the country," says Roland Paris, a professor of international affairs at the University of Ottawa and a former foreign policy adviser to Trudeau.

He says Trump may be using tariffs and undignified language as leverage for trade deals, such as the ongoing North American Free Trade Agreement talks, but Canadians are shocked at being treated as an adversary.

"If President Trump's goal is to try to soften up his negotiating partner by issuing threats, it's having the opposite effect, because people are more resolved to stand up against this kind of bullying," he says.

The Canadian government says it will levy dollar-for-dollar retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. on July 1, Canada Day. These will include steel and aluminum, along with other products — such as bourbon from Kentucky — that will particularly hit states aligned with Trump.

Gary Howe, the president of the United Steelworkers Local 1005, in Hamilton, Ontario, says his members aren't panicking yet about a possible trade war with the U.S. The bigger concern is what's happening on the U.S.-Mexico border.

"You know, the kids that are separated from their parents — I mean, it really makes Trump look to be like quite a monster," he says. "I think that most Canadians would kind of view him as ... quite an evil person, you know, because that's the way that the [Canadian] media has been kind of presenting it."

Paris says many Canadians have relatives and friends in the U.S. and understand it is a big and complex country.

"Nevertheless," he says, "the chaos, the meanness, the brutality of American politics right now is something that is profoundly shocking to Canadians and I think many people feel that they do not recognize the U.S. anymore."

Gordon Ritchie, Canada's ambassador for trade negotiations in the 1980s and one of the principal negotiators of the original Canada-U.S. free trade agreement, says the tariffs and tough talk have created a breach of trust — but the relationship will survive.

"I think the Canadian-American relationship — in political and economic terms — is very, very close and it will outlast this president," he says.

In the meantime, he believes Canadians will continue to voice their disapproval with the Trump administration through the #BuyCanadian movement. He predicts that will extend to the tourism industry as well. Three of his neighbors who spend time in Florida every year are now looking for new vacation spots outside the U.S.


Source

NPR is reporting on a fast growing movement in Canada to boycott American goods over Trump's treatment of their country and president. Canada, one of the few counties we had a trade surplus with until now. And the UK just dropped a report on US torture tactics and how the UK knew about them. Today is not a great day to be an American who sells products over seas.


Retaliatory tariffs on certain important exports are all well and good, but Trump doesn't care if his supporters lose their jobs; they'll probably vote for him anyway as long as he projects sufficient disgust at black people protesting their lack of civil rights and other similar cultural issues. Our allies should focus on what he actually cares about and implement targeted sanctions against the Trump Organization.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-28 17:06:45
June 28 2018 17:05 GMT
#7460
To be honest, I really don't give a shit what Trump supporters care about. Or what Trump cares about. Only 58% of voters turned out in 2016, there are so many vote out there that will be impacted by this and be pissed. That will be the impact of these tariffs other trade non-sense.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Prev 1 371 372 373 374 375 5433 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 15m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 133
Rex 2
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 5644
Sea 4507
Horang2 1326
Shuttle 659
Hyuk 535
Mini 441
Stork 394
actioN 279
Larva 275
ZerO 270
[ Show more ]
Leta 184
EffOrt 170
Mong 169
Soma 150
Zeus 122
Hyun 106
Light 103
ggaemo 93
Nal_rA 91
Rush 91
JulyZerg 90
910 67
Killer 64
hero 52
Mind 39
zelot 33
Sharp 29
Free 24
Sexy 21
Terrorterran 19
soO 17
scan(afreeca) 15
Sacsri 11
Bale 10
Noble 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 9
Dota 2
XcaliburYe109
NeuroSwarm109
ODPixel82
League of Legends
C9.Mang0446
JimRising 441
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1841
shoxiejesuss774
allub220
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King92
Other Games
summit1g7504
ceh9586
Pyrionflax312
Fuzer 180
ZerO(Twitch)11
crisheroes8
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3022
StarCraft 2
WardiTV6
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 3
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• naamasc22
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2376
• Lourlo1003
• Stunt490
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
1h 15m
PiGosaur Cup
14h 15m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 1h
The PondCast
1d 23h
OSC
2 days
OSC
3 days
All Star Teams
3 days
INnoVation vs soO
sOs vs Scarlett
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
All Star Teams
4 days
MMA vs DongRaeGu
Rogue vs Oliveira
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-12
Big Gabe Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W4
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Thunderfire SC2 All-star 2025
Nations Cup 2026
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.