EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 2928
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
Zambrah
United States7393 Posts
| ||
|
Broetchenholer
Germany1961 Posts
On January 06 2021 06:22 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Seems oddly targeted combined with the odd phrasing. Was wondering what brought that about. American conservatives, European far left, strong far right, anti Corona measures community, Nazi, right leaning folks, Christians are all specific groups which people would identify themselves as such. People of French descent, not so much. A French person would not describe themselves as a person of French descent, much like you wouldn't describe yourself as a person of norwegian descent. Who knows, maybe people of French descent, whatever that supposed to be meant, have a greater propensity in Germany to ignore coronvirus regulations. No, i was just picking a nationality as an example. Same with chistianity. I am not aware of any other group then Querdenker and AfD that is arguing so strongly against the corona measures in germany and endanger others by not following the rules. But if there were any, i would not see why we should not try to identify and watch them, no matter if they are ethnic, religious or other minorities. Being a minority does not protect from the law. and being far-right is especially not protecting anyone from it. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32747 Posts
| ||
FlaShFTW
United States10402 Posts
| ||
|
FlaShFTW
United States10402 Posts
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/0TmoQUA.png) As usual, we will be analyzing the before and present versions of the votes because I think those will be the best indicator of how the results will be predicted in the future. Remember that Dems barely eeked out wins in the general, so they'll want to keep hold of that line. Thus far though, Republicans look like they've gained a bit in their tiny districts, but will that be enough. Reports have said that the Democrat voting this time is weaker, with less younger voters. That being said, mail-in might be even stronger this time so that doesn't give us a clear picture as the first few counties come in. | ||
|
HelpMeGetBetter
United States764 Posts
| ||
|
FlaShFTW
United States10402 Posts
| ||
|
Zambrah
United States7393 Posts
Thats where I'd put my money anyways. | ||
|
FlaShFTW
United States10402 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
I think "both Democrats win" is the most likely result today. That's what the latest polls show, and the momentum is not fantastic for Republicans based on what the last two months have looked like. | ||
|
hiro protagonist
1294 Posts
| ||
|
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
| ||
|
Zambrah
United States7393 Posts
On January 06 2021 09:31 hiro protagonist wrote: FlashFTW desk best desk Agreed, in my opinion its the highlight of the thread! Looking forward to either eating dinner with intense trepidation over this runoff election. | ||
|
FlaShFTW
United States10402 Posts
Dooly County and Washington County are both trending the same way. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On January 06 2021 09:38 FlaShFTW wrote: Democrats are looking decent so far. Early County has flipped blue for this race, from a lean R county to a fairly blue county, +10 R -> +10 D. Very good signs for Dems. Most of the flips so far have been R->D. We'll just have to see if the rest of the counties are looking like that or if they're outliers. Dooly County and Washington County are both trending the same way. Flipped from when? Presidential election? If so, that is pretty wild. | ||
|
FlaShFTW
United States10402 Posts
On January 06 2021 09:31 hiro protagonist wrote: FlashFTW desk best desk When the fuck do I get hired by a network or Nate Silver? ![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/Afpw7gV.png) These are the results that I'm looking at the most btw. Still some more results to come in but if these numbers stick, I'm very confident in a double Dem win tonight. | ||
|
FlaShFTW
United States10402 Posts
On January 06 2021 09:39 Mohdoo wrote: Flipped from when? Presidential election? If so, that is pretty wild. I'm not sure if the "Nov results" are for Presidential or Senate, but they should be pretty close anyways since Biden won by a sliver and both the Dems made it by slivers too. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32747 Posts
We just got about 96,000 absentee votes in Fulton County (Atlanta), which Ossoff won 80 percent to 20 percent and Warnock won 81 percent to 19 percent. In November, Biden won Fulton County absentees 79 percent to 21 percent, so tonight’s numbers imply another very close race. And we also just got about 96,000 absentee votes in Gwinnett County (the Atlanta suburbs). Ossoff won this batch 70 percent to 30 percent, and Warnock won them 71 percent to 29 percent. Biden won Gwinnett absentee ballots just 66 percent to 33 percent, so that’s a pretty good sign for Democrats. Atlanta so far is holding to November's trend, and Warnock is running an inch ahead of Ossoff. | ||
|
FlaShFTW
United States10402 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On January 06 2021 09:40 PhoenixVoid wrote: Avoid the temptation to conclude the election off these, but per Nathaniel Rakich at 538's live blog: Atlanta so far is holding to November's trend, and Warnock is running an inch ahead of Ossoff. Given the national significance of this specific race, I would expect some very high turnout relative to precedent. | ||
| ||
