|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
On January 05 2021 03:28 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2021 02:50 RvB wrote: I'm not sure about that. US unemployment figures are higher but that's because they try to handle the economic fallout different than the EU. They prefer to increase and extend unemployment benefits instead of paying most of the wages of companies in trouble. The US stimulus package was also much larger than the European ones and the FED still had room to cut rates. Stimulus to who tho? Because if you pay stimulus to companies that sack workers because they can't work anyway then that isn't helping the 'common man', just lining the pockets of CEO's. A large part of the stimulus went either directly to Americans with the 1200 dollar check and the increased unemployment benefits (together that's 40% of the stimulus package already). Help for businesses was mostly done by low interest loans which can be forgiven if workers aren't fired. In addition most of the help for businesses was to small business. Bruegel has a good overview including other European countries.
The larger issue with the US stimulus is that some of it is poorly spent. Especially the 1200 and 600 dollar checks make little sense. It's not nearly enough for the people who are in trouble financially while it's too much for people who still work. Better to use it to help those in actual need.
https://www.bruegel.org/publications/datasets/covid-national-dataset/#usa
|
On January 06 2021 01:25 Nevuk wrote:So, Hawley's family residence got visited by an antifa group last night. (They live in a DC suburb, which the group points out to be a little strange, but he's not at all alone in that being the case). Now, I'm not totally sure how I feel about this. Hawley is definitely misrepresenting the situation. He claims there was vandalism and threats, but he wasn't actually there. The group released a stream of what happened and there's definitely no vandalism and no overt threats. (They sang some songs and left a copy of the constitution). (This is part of why I take Carlson's and others claims with a massive grain of salt : if there's no video evidence, I will ALWAYS take the antifa group's word, as whenever there HAS been video evidence, it's shown they're being more honest than the other group involved. Also depends on the person : with Carlson, I believe an antifa group was present and did something that could have been interpreted as negative. If it were Hannity, I wouldn't believe anything without external proof). It's still probably a bit far since Hawley wasn't in residence : if he had been there, I think it would have at least made sense, though maybe been a bit past what I would consider to be fair game (and honestly, they may not have known he wasn't there). I can get why his family would feel threatened, even if that wasn't the intention. But, honestly, it's small potatoes to what has happened to health officials across the country : Ohio's most effective person resigned after her family received repeated death threats and the response then fell from one of the best to below average. She's hardly alone : it's been especially prominent as a reaction to female health advisors. Gretchen Whitmer has had actual assassination plots against her and their congress threatened with loaded weapons. So now the antifa group is calling Hawley a snowflake and taking pride in being called antifascists. I don't entirely think they're wrong : if you don't want to be called a fascist, maybe consider, don't act like a fascist? (as this whole thing is in response to Hawley leading an effort to overturn the electoral vote) WAPO writeup: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/05/hawley-protest-antifa-scumbags-virginia/?itid=hp_MM - LIVE ON HP I question your approach of siding with Antifa, unless video is shown of an event happening at night, suddenly and unexpectantly, when (your sources) his wife is home and he is not. It’s perfectly tailored to give undue credency to one other side (imagine a right winger here saying they’ll believe a proud boys description of the event, and video taken by them, unless and until specific video evidence is taken by the target of the protest, and of course worse things are happening in a state thousands of miles away anyways).
Carlson involved video, and uncontested testimony of the group actually damaging his front door in an attempt to gain entry into the house containing his wife (who was cowering in fear in a pantry).
You all have fun fighting fascism by showing up at the homes of senators and opinion journalists in DC at night with bullhorns.
Like, seriously, the most empathy you can summon up is “I can see why his family would feel threatened.” Will it take a mon with bullhorns at night ringing your doorbell (video from antifa) for you to change your mind about intentions in protest, or will you come out into the mob to film vandalism (as several people allege he would vandalize himself as a false flag—so you’re demanding this action) so people by-default siding with Antifa will persuade themselves to abandon their initial assumptions?
|
What some republicans are doing in this election is unforgiveable.
They actually frighten me and make me fear for my family and the future of our country. I dont mean in a broad sense like republicans fear about god in the classroom, gay marriage,etc. I mean that they will actually eliminate democracy and come after people who didnt vote for Trump.
These people are nut jobs. Somehow they need to be brought back to reality or be ruined.
|
|
On January 06 2021 03:23 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2021 01:25 Nevuk wrote:So, Hawley's family residence got visited by an antifa group last night. (They live in a DC suburb, which the group points out to be a little strange, but he's not at all alone in that being the case). Now, I'm not totally sure how I feel about this. Hawley is definitely misrepresenting the situation. He claims there was vandalism and threats, but he wasn't actually there. The group released a stream of what happened and there's definitely no vandalism and no overt threats. (They sang some songs and left a copy of the constitution). (This is part of why I take Carlson's and others claims with a massive grain of salt : if there's no video evidence, I will ALWAYS take the antifa group's word, as whenever there HAS been video evidence, it's shown they're being more honest than the other group involved. Also depends on the person : with Carlson, I believe an antifa group was present and did something that could have been interpreted as negative. If it were Hannity, I wouldn't believe anything without external proof). It's still probably a bit far since Hawley wasn't in residence : if he had been there, I think it would have at least made sense, though maybe been a bit past what I would consider to be fair game (and honestly, they may not have known he wasn't there). I can get why his family would feel threatened, even if that wasn't the intention. But, honestly, it's small potatoes to what has happened to health officials across the country : Ohio's most effective person resigned after her family received repeated death threats and the response then fell from one of the best to below average. She's hardly alone : it's been especially prominent as a reaction to female health advisors. Gretchen Whitmer has had actual assassination plots against her and their congress threatened with loaded weapons. So now the antifa group is calling Hawley a snowflake and taking pride in being called antifascists. I don't entirely think they're wrong : if you don't want to be called a fascist, maybe consider, don't act like a fascist? (as this whole thing is in response to Hawley leading an effort to overturn the electoral vote) https://twitter.com/ShutDown_DC/status/1346343350312595456https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1346461242119106561WAPO writeup: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/05/hawley-protest-antifa-scumbags-virginia/?itid=hp_MM - LIVE ON HP I question your approach of siding with Antifa, unless video is shown of an event happening at night, suddenly and unexpectantly, when (your sources) his wife is home and he is not. It’s perfectly tailored to give undue credency to one other side (imagine a right winger here saying they’ll believe a proud boys description of the event, and video taken by them, unless and until specific video evidence is taken by the target of the protest, and of course worse things are happening in a state thousands of miles away anyways). Carlson involved video, and uncontested testimony of the group actually damaging his front door in an attempt to gain entry into the house containing his wife (who was cowering in fear in a pantry). You all have fun fighting fascism by showing up at the homes of senators and opinion journalists in DC at night with bullhorns. Like, seriously, the most empathy you can summon up is “I can see why his family would feel threatened.” Will it take a mon with bullhorns at night ringing your doorbell (video from antifa) for you to change your mind about intentions in protest, or will you come out into the mob to film vandalism (as several people allege he would vandalize himself as a false flag—so you’re demanding this action) so people by-default siding with Antifa will persuade themselves to abandon their initial assumptions? I did say that I felt it was over the line, even if Hawley had been there. Without Hawley there my opinion is that it's pointlessly petty.
The only actual ill-effect on Hawley was of Hawley own-goaling himself, by lying about vandalism, as there's video showing 0 vandalism already up.
I have very little sympathy for Hawley himself : he's exposed himself as either a boot-licking fascist or craven opportunist willing to pretend to be one. Once you start ignoring public opinion entirely, this is what happens. Feel free to try to destroy society, but don't be surprised when society pushes back.
I would prefer his family be left out, but these are much more polite tactics than are already being used by conservatives, so my empathy is pretty minor for them: the aim wasn't to threaten them, nor were they directly threatened, which cannot be said of the supporters of his goal (see all the death threats election officials have gotten in GA). Accidental/negligent vs Intentional, it does matter.
edit: I dunno, if it helps, my family has a history of having over/underdeveloped empathy at odd situations. So I frequently sound absurdly callous when I'm not trying to.
|
On January 06 2021 01:49 Slydie wrote: If you want to blame specific groups, you can also very easily turn on ethnic and religious minorities, with official statistics in hand. I would not go there, even to take a potshot at "nazis."
Blame should land where blame is due. If left voting people would be responsible for spreading a deadly disease, this would have to be criticized in the same way as right leaning folks. Or christians, or people of french descent. You shouldn't be afraid to scrutinize structural and willful behaviour it it is harmful just because of the affiliation of the people behind it. And no one is advocating scrutinizing all (neo)nazis for spreading corona, that would be wrong. But knowing that a lot of them helped spread the virus through ignorance or spitefulness would help the population understand them better.
|
What is the timetable for Wednesday? is this an all day thing, or is there a time when they vote and stuff?
|
Police disagree with Hawley's description. To me this indicates he is being a dumbass.
Officers were called to Hawley’s home in Vienna, a Washington suburb, around 7:45 p.m. after someone reported that there were “people protesting in front of the house.” Officers who responded to the scene found that the “people were peaceful,” said Master Police Officer Juan Vazquez, a spokesman for the Town of Vienna Police Department.
The demonstrators said they went to Hawley’s home because he said he would object when Congress convenes Wednesday to affirm Joe Biden’s election victory.
Vazquez said the protesters had been violating several laws, including a Virginia code about picketing in front of a house, a town ordinance about making noise in front of a home and a littering code. But he said the officers explained the violations and “everyone just left.”
“There were no issues, no arrests,” he said. “We didn’t think it was that big of a deal.”
Hawley accused the group of threatening his family.
“Tonight while I was in Missouri, Antifa scumbags came to our place in DC and threatened my wife and newborn daughter, who can’t travel,” Hawley wrote on Twitter. “They screamed threats, vandalized, and tried to pound open our door. Let me be clear: My family & I will not be intimidated by leftwing violence.”
https://www.stltoday.com/news/national/govt-and-politics/hawley-says-antifa-scumbags-threatened-his-wife-and-baby-protesters-say-visit-to-his-d/article_f5adb15c-171b-542d-85ce-236579716c2d.html
|
Haha that’s right down the street from me
|
On January 06 2021 04:09 Broetchenholer wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2021 01:49 Slydie wrote: If you want to blame specific groups, you can also very easily turn on ethnic and religious minorities, with official statistics in hand. I would not go there, even to take a potshot at "nazis." Blame should land where blame is due. If left voting people would be responsible for spreading a deadly disease, this would have to be criticized in the same way as right leaning folks. Or christians, or people of french descent. You shouldn't be afraid to scrutinize structural and willful behaviour it it is harmful just because of the affiliation of the people behind it. And no one is advocating scrutinizing all (neo)nazis for spreading corona, that would be wrong. But knowing that a lot of them helped spread the virus through ignorance or spitefulness would help the population understand them better. I am unaware of any indication that people of French descent (a curious phrase; wouldn't they just be ethnically French or Walloon in the case of Belgium?) were ignoring regulations for reducing the spread of coronavirus.
|
United States10031 Posts
ALRIGHT GUYS GALS AND NONBINARY PALS OF TEAMLIQUID! The Teamliquid Decision Desk is back for an exciting double header in Georgia with the Georgia special elections! Stay tuned as results begin to trickle in later tonight!
|
Norway28558 Posts
On January 06 2021 06:00 Dangermousecatdog wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2021 04:09 Broetchenholer wrote:On January 06 2021 01:49 Slydie wrote: If you want to blame specific groups, you can also very easily turn on ethnic and religious minorities, with official statistics in hand. I would not go there, even to take a potshot at "nazis." Blame should land where blame is due. If left voting people would be responsible for spreading a deadly disease, this would have to be criticized in the same way as right leaning folks. Or christians, or people of french descent. You shouldn't be afraid to scrutinize structural and willful behaviour it it is harmful just because of the affiliation of the people behind it. And no one is advocating scrutinizing all (neo)nazis for spreading corona, that would be wrong. But knowing that a lot of them helped spread the virus through ignorance or spitefulness would help the population understand them better. I am unaware of any indication that people of French descent (a curious phrase; wouldn't they just be ethnically French or Walloon in the case of Belgium?) were ignoring regulations for reducing the spread of coronavirus.
It was just a hypothetical example, he did not say that people of French descent are ignoring regulations for reducing the spread of coronavirus.
|
Seems oddly targeted combined with the odd phrasing. Was wondering what brought that about.
American conservatives, European far left, strong far right, anti Corona measures community, Nazi, right leaning folks, Christians are all specific groups which people would identify themselves as such. People of French descent, not so much. A French person would not describe themselves as a person of French descent, much like you wouldn't describe yourself as a person of norwegian descent.
Who knows, maybe people of French descent, whatever that supposed to be meant, have a greater propensity in Germany to ignore coronvirus regulations.
|
On January 06 2021 03:43 Nevuk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2021 03:23 Danglars wrote:On January 06 2021 01:25 Nevuk wrote:So, Hawley's family residence got visited by an antifa group last night. (They live in a DC suburb, which the group points out to be a little strange, but he's not at all alone in that being the case). Now, I'm not totally sure how I feel about this. Hawley is definitely misrepresenting the situation. He claims there was vandalism and threats, but he wasn't actually there. The group released a stream of what happened and there's definitely no vandalism and no overt threats. (They sang some songs and left a copy of the constitution). (This is part of why I take Carlson's and others claims with a massive grain of salt : if there's no video evidence, I will ALWAYS take the antifa group's word, as whenever there HAS been video evidence, it's shown they're being more honest than the other group involved. Also depends on the person : with Carlson, I believe an antifa group was present and did something that could have been interpreted as negative. If it were Hannity, I wouldn't believe anything without external proof). It's still probably a bit far since Hawley wasn't in residence : if he had been there, I think it would have at least made sense, though maybe been a bit past what I would consider to be fair game (and honestly, they may not have known he wasn't there). I can get why his family would feel threatened, even if that wasn't the intention. But, honestly, it's small potatoes to what has happened to health officials across the country : Ohio's most effective person resigned after her family received repeated death threats and the response then fell from one of the best to below average. She's hardly alone : it's been especially prominent as a reaction to female health advisors. Gretchen Whitmer has had actual assassination plots against her and their congress threatened with loaded weapons. So now the antifa group is calling Hawley a snowflake and taking pride in being called antifascists. I don't entirely think they're wrong : if you don't want to be called a fascist, maybe consider, don't act like a fascist? (as this whole thing is in response to Hawley leading an effort to overturn the electoral vote) https://twitter.com/ShutDown_DC/status/1346343350312595456https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1346461242119106561WAPO writeup: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/05/hawley-protest-antifa-scumbags-virginia/?itid=hp_MM - LIVE ON HP I question your approach of siding with Antifa, unless video is shown of an event happening at night, suddenly and unexpectantly, when (your sources) his wife is home and he is not. It’s perfectly tailored to give undue credency to one other side (imagine a right winger here saying they’ll believe a proud boys description of the event, and video taken by them, unless and until specific video evidence is taken by the target of the protest, and of course worse things are happening in a state thousands of miles away anyways). Carlson involved video, and uncontested testimony of the group actually damaging his front door in an attempt to gain entry into the house containing his wife (who was cowering in fear in a pantry). You all have fun fighting fascism by showing up at the homes of senators and opinion journalists in DC at night with bullhorns. Like, seriously, the most empathy you can summon up is “I can see why his family would feel threatened.” Will it take a mon with bullhorns at night ringing your doorbell (video from antifa) for you to change your mind about intentions in protest, or will you come out into the mob to film vandalism (as several people allege he would vandalize himself as a false flag—so you’re demanding this action) so people by-default siding with Antifa will persuade themselves to abandon their initial assumptions? I did say that I felt it was over the line, even if Hawley had been there. You said you weren't totally sure how I feel about this, that Antifa did something that could have been interpreted as negative, and it was probably a bit far. Are you now making it less weasely and declaring that it was over the line?
Without Hawley there my opinion is that it's pointlessly petty. They're going somewhere that politicians sometimes live, and their families generally live. They can't know for sure if Josh Hawley will be home when they go to his house, but they do know it's very likely that his wife and young child will be there. Politicians don't publish where they will sleep each night; word up to all you late-night protest-their-living-quarters bullhorn groups out there.
The only actual ill-effect on Hawley was of Hawley own-goaling himself, by lying about vandalism, as there's video showing 0 vandalism already up.
I have very little sympathy for Hawley himself : he's exposed himself as either a boot-licking fascist or craven opportunist willing to pretend to be one. Once you start ignoring public opinion entirely, this is what happens. Feel free to try to destroy society, but don't be surprised when society pushes back.
I would prefer his family be left out, but these are much more polite tactics than are already being used by conservatives, so my empathy is pretty minor for them: the aim wasn't to threaten them, nor were they directly threatened, which cannot be said of the supporters of his goal (see all the death threats election officials have gotten in GA). Accidental/negligent vs Intentional, it does matter.
edit: I dunno, if it helps, my family has a history of having over/underdeveloped empathy at odd situations. So I frequently sound absurdly callous when I'm not trying to. The groups instigating a night protest with bullhorn and ringing the doorbell cannot be trusted to not start the stream after the more egregious instances of intimidation have passed, or end the stream before things turn worse. They can't be the default of trust any more than Hawley's word can be the default of trust. Ask yourself if you'd trust a stream of Proud Boys doing something similar, when nobody else has video except the group itself. Simultaneously, you've heard allegations that Hawley would self-vandalize to help his cause, so tell me right now that you'd expect his wife with small child to go outside the house to videotape their actions as they were taking place, so that nobody would blame them for doing it themselves for sympathy. Tell me, I'm serious.
I'm not all that interested in what you'd prefer not to happen, just whether external climate would lead you to justify intimidation against his family's residence (compared to protesting at his workplace) if someone sincerely believes what you believe about him. It's all about conditioning your own personal morals with whatever "extreme situation" you think justifies a change from your morals. Compare with, "Normally I wouldn't condone harassing his wife out gardening, but her husband is doing dangerous things with votes in the Senate and other actions haven't produced the results I hoped for..."
|
|
The trickle on effects of Hawley's attempt are making Republicans think it is acceptable to openly refuse to seat certified elected officials in some states. PA, today, refused to seat an elected democrat and removed their majority leader (overseeing president, the lt democratic governor, actually : not a republican) since he was refusing that proposal. It's dangerous to give fascists room just out of politeness.
This is the kind of hardball the democrats could play in the house if they wanted to : expel every republican. They haven't been doing that. via Philly Inquirer reporter
Full writeup: https://www.inquirer.com/politics/pennsylvania/spl/john-fetterman-pennsylvania-senate-removed-republicans-jim-brewster-20210105.html
|
At what point does directly and actively attacking democracy in the US become a crime?
Because this will not stop until people are being send to jail.
And @danglers, you still think this is all a joke that Democrats are taking way to seriously?
|
I have an intensely difficult time feeling bad for what happened at Hawley's house when he works so hard to undermine democracy alongside so many other Republicans.
Frankly I hope we see significantly more of that at politicians homes, they're clearly satisfied to ignore any and all protest that doesn't immediately inconvenience them. Protest at their houses, give them no comfort while Americans are suffering.
|
On January 06 2021 06:41 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On January 06 2021 03:43 Nevuk wrote:On January 06 2021 03:23 Danglars wrote:On January 06 2021 01:25 Nevuk wrote:So, Hawley's family residence got visited by an antifa group last night. (They live in a DC suburb, which the group points out to be a little strange, but he's not at all alone in that being the case). Now, I'm not totally sure how I feel about this. Hawley is definitely misrepresenting the situation. He claims there was vandalism and threats, but he wasn't actually there. The group released a stream of what happened and there's definitely no vandalism and no overt threats. (They sang some songs and left a copy of the constitution). (This is part of why I take Carlson's and others claims with a massive grain of salt : if there's no video evidence, I will ALWAYS take the antifa group's word, as whenever there HAS been video evidence, it's shown they're being more honest than the other group involved. Also depends on the person : with Carlson, I believe an antifa group was present and did something that could have been interpreted as negative. If it were Hannity, I wouldn't believe anything without external proof). It's still probably a bit far since Hawley wasn't in residence : if he had been there, I think it would have at least made sense, though maybe been a bit past what I would consider to be fair game (and honestly, they may not have known he wasn't there). I can get why his family would feel threatened, even if that wasn't the intention. But, honestly, it's small potatoes to what has happened to health officials across the country : Ohio's most effective person resigned after her family received repeated death threats and the response then fell from one of the best to below average. She's hardly alone : it's been especially prominent as a reaction to female health advisors. Gretchen Whitmer has had actual assassination plots against her and their congress threatened with loaded weapons. So now the antifa group is calling Hawley a snowflake and taking pride in being called antifascists. I don't entirely think they're wrong : if you don't want to be called a fascist, maybe consider, don't act like a fascist? (as this whole thing is in response to Hawley leading an effort to overturn the electoral vote) https://twitter.com/ShutDown_DC/status/1346343350312595456https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1346461242119106561WAPO writeup: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/05/hawley-protest-antifa-scumbags-virginia/?itid=hp_MM - LIVE ON HP I question your approach of siding with Antifa, unless video is shown of an event happening at night, suddenly and unexpectantly, when (your sources) his wife is home and he is not. It’s perfectly tailored to give undue credency to one other side (imagine a right winger here saying they’ll believe a proud boys description of the event, and video taken by them, unless and until specific video evidence is taken by the target of the protest, and of course worse things are happening in a state thousands of miles away anyways). Carlson involved video, and uncontested testimony of the group actually damaging his front door in an attempt to gain entry into the house containing his wife (who was cowering in fear in a pantry). You all have fun fighting fascism by showing up at the homes of senators and opinion journalists in DC at night with bullhorns. Like, seriously, the most empathy you can summon up is “I can see why his family would feel threatened.” Will it take a mon with bullhorns at night ringing your doorbell (video from antifa) for you to change your mind about intentions in protest, or will you come out into the mob to film vandalism (as several people allege he would vandalize himself as a false flag—so you’re demanding this action) so people by-default siding with Antifa will persuade themselves to abandon their initial assumptions? I did say that I felt it was over the line, even if Hawley had been there. You said you weren't totally sure how I feel about this, that Antifa did something that could have been interpreted as negative, and it was probably a bit far. Are you now making it less weasely and declaring that it was over the line? If there is one area where you ought to take a good chunk of time and do some serious reflection, it's consider what kind of bad faith it takes to assign this kind of nefarious intent to someone who's trying to have a genuine discussion with you. If you continue to make people feel like they're wasting their time, they're not going to bother. Good faith in discussion is a given until it isn't.
I will also comment on the fabulous irony of calling someone else weasely when I have difficulty remembering the last time you directly answered someone else's question without first launching into a condescending wall of text. It will do you well to set an example of accountability for the things you say if you want to start leveraging it on others.
|
United States10031 Posts
Polls are starting to close. Time to see these results come in.
|
|
|
|