UK Politics Mega-thread - Page 317
Forum Index > General Forum |
In order to ensure that this thread meets TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we ask that everyone please adhere to this mod note. Posts containing only Tweets or articles adds nothing to the discussions. Therefore, when providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments will be actioned upon. All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting. https://www.registertovote.service.gov.uk | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42694 Posts
| ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42694 Posts
On April 18 2017 23:50 ahswtini wrote: The Parliament Act 1911 set out the 5 year lifetime of parliament, not 5 years between a general election although the two effectively go hand in hand. So it's true the first piece of legislation to actually enforce calling an election was the Fixed-term parliaments act of 2011. The real purpose of that act was not to have the whole calling an election enshrined in law, but was to stop PMs calling tactical elections at times that suit them. With that act, there are now two ways an early election can be called - either a vote of no confidence in the government, or a two thirds majority of the commons vote for it There was no general election between 1935 and 1945, for what it's worth. Elections were postponed due to national emergency (obviously by-elections continued as required). | ||
ahswtini
Northern Ireland22208 Posts
On April 18 2017 23:54 KwarK wrote: There was no general election between 1935 and 1945, for what it's worth. Elections were postponed due to national emergency (obviously by-elections continued as required). well yeah parliament enacted special legislation during both world wars to extend the lives of those parliaments | ||
![]()
Pandemona
![]()
Charlie Sheens House51485 Posts
On April 18 2017 23:51 KwarK wrote: My constituency is the safest of safe seats (old Tory seat out in the shires, all farmers and army bases and the Conservative MP is a local GP who served as an army doctor in Afghanistan, I'd be surprised if he got less than 60% of the vote) but I think I'll vote Lib Dem against my Conservative inclinations. The lack of a functioning opposition is not healthy for democracy while it won't change my MP it may, at the very least, let him know that I'm worried about the NHS under Conservative management. Whilst this makes sense, i would rather see the conservatives get us into a brexit world over the next 4-5 years and then start fighting around after that. The brexit vote won, even me a person who voted to stay in can see that the best solution is for this to be sorted quickly so we can see what happens. Then the next election in 2021/22 we can start seeing what can be done and what not so that is why i hope May gets those 100 seats she is predicted to gain and we can get on with brexit at as fast as possible pace. | ||
RvB
Netherlands6211 Posts
| ||
farvacola
United States18828 Posts
| ||
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
On April 19 2017 00:40 RvB wrote: Sorted quickly? You're negotiating with the EU. CETA took 7 years and this isn't going to be any shorter. There is a fixed 2 year limit on the deal so it can't take any longer than that, if it does take 2 years than Britain just drops out of the EU without any deal. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42694 Posts
On April 19 2017 00:42 Zaros wrote: There is a fixed 2 year limit on the deal so it can't take any longer than that, if it does take 2 years than Britain just drops out of the EU without any deal. They'd almost certainly grant an extension. They have the power to. | ||
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
On April 19 2017 00:42 KwarK wrote: They'd almost certainly grant an extension. They have the power to. I assume they need all 27 to agree to the extension which i dont think will happen. | ||
farvacola
United States18828 Posts
| ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42694 Posts
On April 19 2017 00:45 farvacola wrote: Given how uncharted this territory is, whether or not the two year sunset period would pass without exception seems like more of an open question than you're making it seem. Every party has a vested interest in a smooth transition. There isn't going to be a period of uncertainty right up until the night before goods can no longer be freely moved from the UK to the EU at which point the negotiators finally get everyone to agree to extend the negotiation. There is far too much business being carried out for that kind of incompetence to actually happen, uncertainty is bad business. Whatever decisions are made, they will be made well in advance of any deadline, even if the decision is just to push back the deadline. Feel free to quote this post if it turns out I was wrong. | ||
farvacola
United States18828 Posts
![]() | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21687 Posts
On April 19 2017 00:44 Zaros wrote: I assume they need all 27 to agree to the extension which i dont think will happen. Yeah it requires a unanimous vote to extend. | ||
Ghostcom
Denmark4782 Posts
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
bardtown
England2313 Posts
Meanwhile DB are using the election as an excuse to start buying sterling again. The IMF have also revised growth for 2017. "In its latest assessment of prospects for global growth, published on Tuesday, the IMF predicted the UK economy will expand this year by 2 per cent, a sharp increase of 0.5 percentage points from the forecast it made in January." https://www.ft.com/content/5213d9fc-227c-11e7-8691-d5f7e0cd0a16 | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
bardtown
England2313 Posts
| ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9650 Posts
No awkward questions about all her lies then. | ||
showstealer1829
Australia3123 Posts
On April 18 2017 23:43 bardtown wrote: Tom Watson or Hilary Benn seem to be the best candidates off the top of my head. Neither stood last time but I think it was clear that the party was just going to vote Corbyn in again so that may have been a tactical decision. Maybe David Miliband could return. What I am concerned about is the far left, who still dominate the party membership, voting for Diane Abbott. That would be catastrophic. On the other hand I think the time is near for new parties. After Brexit, though, please. You mean Ed Milliband. Although I agree he was so similar to Cameron at the last election you may as well have called him David Milliband | ||
| ||