On July 08 2012 09:18 Assault_1 wrote: why is this gonna be the last batman movie? T_T
Wait, it's the last? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO... + Show Spoiler +
I am sure that there is already a reboot planned for a new Batman set of movies.
There is already plans of that. They want to reboot Batman in order to fit into The Justice league movie they've been talking about for years.
Oh no I hope they never go there. Stories with a bunch of superheroes working together to save the world and yadda yadda might work for comics. Especially after Nolan did such a good job of making a so believable story. I'd rather see something like batman forever and batman returns.
On July 08 2012 09:18 Assault_1 wrote: why is this gonna be the last batman movie? T_T
Wait, it's the last? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO... + Show Spoiler +
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s
I am sure that there is already a reboot planned for a new Batman set of movies.
There is already plans of that. They want to reboot Batman in order to fit into The Justice league movie they've been talking about for years.
Oh no I hope they never go there. Stories with a bunch of superheroes working together to save the world and yadda yadda might work for comics. Especially after Nolan did such a good job of making a so believable story. I'd rather see something like batman forever and batman returns.
Well, I thought The Avengers did a nice job of doing it justice while staying quite accurate to the comics. Nolan's Batman will always be Nolan's Batman. I remember they tried using his work in order to fit into the world of The Justice League, but it really doesn't work. Warner Brothers is trying to get Nolan to be the producer of the next Batman films. I think the new Superman movie (The Man of Steel) could be the entry to The Justice League movie.
Cant wait for the movie... Only sad thing is i'll have to watch it in german, since there is literally not one single cinema in the next 300km that shows the film in english...god damnit. Hate the lack of original soundtrack in gemany, be it in tv or cinema.
On July 08 2012 09:18 Assault_1 wrote: why is this gonna be the last batman movie? T_T
Wait, it's the last? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO... + Show Spoiler +
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s
I am sure that there is already a reboot planned for a new Batman set of movies.
There is already plans of that. They want to reboot Batman in order to fit into The Justice league movie they've been talking about for years.
Oh no I hope they never go there. Stories with a bunch of superheroes working together to save the world and yadda yadda might work for comics. Especially after Nolan did such a good job of making a so believable story. I'd rather see something like batman forever and batman returns.
They did a pretty good job of the Justice League in the animated series. Well, in about half of it anyways. It is a children's cartoon after all, though it did have its strong points.
This movie just looks so damn awesome. I almost never see movies on opening night, but this is just too irresistible. That featurette just makes my so much more pumped for this. Cant wait for the 20th!
Edit: omg that football field scene. I cant stand the Steelers but I woulda loved to be there.
It's funny, watching some of the non-CGI explosions I was thinking that they look less realistic than the CGI ones. Really impressed but also confused by Nolan's dedication to the real thing over CGI. Anyone know the reason behind his preference? Even inception was relatively light on the CGI, preferring difficult camera shots.
I seem to remember it was due to CGI feeling less tactile(?) and having physical effects made acting easier and therefore a better scene. Then again I could just be thinking of somebody else!
On July 09 2012 08:05 confusedcrib wrote: It's funny, watching some of the non-CGI explosions I was thinking that they look less realistic than the CGI ones. Really impressed but also confused by Nolan's dedication to the real thing over CGI. Anyone know the reason behind his preference? Even inception was relatively light on the CGI, preferring difficult camera shots.
really? His action sequence cinematography has always seemed realistic and have always had a certain charm I can't really describe. Just compare his cinematography with Michael bay's; they're just something more visually attractive about nolan's imperfect, subtle effects compared to the overly polished, superficial effects that CGI produces.
What's insane is that the hallway scene in Inception with joseph gordon levitt was all done without CGI, and it still manages to mindfuck us with the visuals. The entire scene was "real" in the sense that the set piece was literally a room that they rotated with machinery and levitt was really tumbling down the walls. I can't imagine it having the same effect if that was all done in a green room with the stunt doubles jumping with ropes attached to them.
On July 09 2012 08:05 confusedcrib wrote: It's funny, watching some of the non-CGI explosions I was thinking that they look less realistic than the CGI ones. Really impressed but also confused by Nolan's dedication to the real thing over CGI. Anyone know the reason behind his preference? Even inception was relatively light on the CGI, preferring difficult camera shots.
really? His action sequence cinematography has always seemed realistic and have always had a certain charm I can't really describe. Just compare his cinematography with Michael bay's; they're just something more visually attractive about nolan's imperfect, subtle effects compared to the overly polished, superficial effects that CGI produces.
What's insane is that the hallway scene in Inception with joseph gordon levitt was all done without CGI, and it still manages to mindfuck us with the visuals. The entire scene was "real" in the sense that the set piece was literally a room that they rotated with machinery and levitt was really tumbling down the walls. I can't imagine it having the same effect if that was all done in a green room with the stunt doubles jumping with ropes attached to them.
There's a certain quality you can extract from Actors in an actual situation, and not getting them to imagine what's happening by looking at random green or blue colored objects and stand-ins.
On July 09 2012 08:05 confusedcrib wrote: It's funny, watching some of the non-CGI explosions I was thinking that they look less realistic than the CGI ones. Really impressed but also confused by Nolan's dedication to the real thing over CGI. Anyone know the reason behind his preference? Even inception was relatively light on the CGI, preferring difficult camera shots.
really? His action sequence cinematography has always seemed realistic and have always had a certain charm I can't really describe. Just compare his cinematography with Michael bay's; they're just something more visually attractive about nolan's imperfect, subtle effects compared to the overly polished, superficial effects that CGI produces.
What's insane is that the hallway scene in Inception with joseph gordon levitt was all done without CGI, and it still manages to mindfuck us with the visuals. The entire scene was "real" in the sense that the set piece was literally a room that they rotated with machinery and levitt was really tumbling down the walls. I can't imagine it having the same effect if that was all done in a green room with the stunt doubles jumping with ropes attached to them.
Yea, I didn't think about how much better actors can respond to things that are actually happening rather than just being in a green screen. That seems to be a very solid reason in itself.
EPT
