|
Thread is about the various issues surrounding Japan in the aftermath of the recent earthquake. Don't bring the shit side of the internet to the thread, and post with the realization that this thread is very important, and very real, to your fellow members.
Do not post speculative and unconfirmed news you saw on TV or anywhere else. Generally the more dramatic it sounds the less likely it's true. |
On April 08 2011 01:40 red4ce wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2011 00:20 takoyaki wrote: I'm in Tokyo right now on vacation.
So far the news hasn't reported any tsunami damage - first waves were supposed to hit around 11:50 (30min ago) at a height of ~0.5m. Other prefectures warning times are for 0:20. Most warnings are for 0.5m with a 1m warning for miyagi prefecture.
No further damage/danger for the nuclear reactors reported at this point. Was the decision to vacation in Japan made before or after the disaster?
I am also interested.. thinking about going there in late July or early August if things will be okay by then.
|
As a warning to people - these aftershocks will likely continue for a while. If you don't want to experience an earthquake, you may want to consider not coming. That said, Japan is built to withstand earthquakes, so it is still pretty safe.
Great country and Tokyo is really worth visiting.
|
On April 08 2011 01:50 Hold-Lurker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2011 01:40 red4ce wrote:On April 08 2011 00:20 takoyaki wrote: I'm in Tokyo right now on vacation.
So far the news hasn't reported any tsunami damage - first waves were supposed to hit around 11:50 (30min ago) at a height of ~0.5m. Other prefectures warning times are for 0:20. Most warnings are for 0.5m with a 1m warning for miyagi prefecture.
No further damage/danger for the nuclear reactors reported at this point. Was the decision to vacation in Japan made before or after the disaster? I am also interested.. thinking about going there in late July or early August if things will be okay by then. I think radiation won't leave soon.
User was warned for this post
|
Sincerely hope that all this stupid Earthquakes decide to stop for a while.
|
Unless you're going to Fukushima prefecture, and then right up to the reactors, radiation is not a worry. There simply is not any amount around Japan that can be considered large enough to affect human health, now or later. Now, if you plan on a trip to Daiichi, you might want to hold off on that for the next few decades...
|
Personally I postponed my plans on going to Japan until the fall, worrying about electricity issues during summer. I can't stand the heat and humidity during summer in Japan so I need my AC to work. ^^
|
Sanya12364 Posts
This one looks like it was pretty close to where the Mar 11th earthquake centered. It's a big aftershock.
|
|
I'll add it to the OP wow this is unreal... It's just not fair..
|
I was under the impression that the tsunami warning concerning the big earthquake earlier today was taken down a while ago b/c it wasn't a threat.
|
Yeah wow please read the thread. Old news and no tsunami hit the shores.
It was "just an" aftershock. Not a second big earthquake or anything that critical. There's been a lot of big aftershocks the last month.
|
On April 08 2011 01:50 Hold-Lurker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2011 01:40 red4ce wrote:
Was the decision to vacation in Japan made before or after the disaster? I am also interested.. thinking about going there in late July or early August if things will be okay by then.
Made plans long before the disaster. After talking with folks in Japan and reading Japanese blogs I decided it wasn't enough to cancel the trip. Plus I was starting out in Kyoto (which, as expected, was pretty untouched by the disaster).
If you're planning on going during the summer, beware the heat/humidity. Due to the ongoing issues at the nuclear power plants, it's likely many folks/businesses will be reducing their AC usage to save power. 'course if ya don't mind I guess you won't notice. ^^
Can't remember the source but I thought I read that the power plants may take a long time to restore to normal so if you're waiting for a full recovery, it could be much later than this summer. If you plan on being in and out central Tokyo I must say it didn't really feel like the disaster affected things as much as one might think. Ueno park and other places with sakura were still packed with people. At night the city isn't as bright as usual since many businesses don't turn on signs to save power but, at least in akiba, stores are still open and doing business.
Personally if you are already waiting 'till summer I'd hold out for fall to experience the fall landscapes and cooler temperatures, but perhaps you have time constraints/are aiming for a particular event? For those unaware, I've found the following explanation of travel dates pretty good:
http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2273.html
|
The IAEA has released a set of presentations which show some of their monitoring of the surrounding areas and the amounts of radiation they found. A few of these pages are graphs which are impossible to understand if you dont know the safe limits, but they also provide maps and show where the measurements were taken and how they change over time.
Marine Environment Monitoring Monitoring of food and land around Fukushima
The new earthquake seems to have caused minor damages to other nuclear power plants:
IAEA 7 April NISA has confirmed that the Higashidori NPP was shutdown and in a maintenance outage at the time of the 7 April earthquake. Off-site power has been lost. Emergency power supply to the site is operating. All the fuel had been removed from the reactor core and stored in the spent fuel pool. Cooling of the spent fuel pool is operational. Nothing serious, but it wont help with the shortage of power if the power plants taken down for maintenance are being plagued by new eqrthquakes. http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/tsunamiupdate01.html
|
So a lot of people in Japan right now apparently believe that going near someone who's momentarily visited the Fukushima evacuation area is a significant health risk.
It's the information age and people still are still saying things that are as stupid as saying that touching an AIDS patient will transmit HIV.
Seriously depressing.
And yeah, pretty surprising that a 7 hit so long after the initial 9...
|
Not really so surprising that we got another big aftershock. Large aftershocks even can occur up to a year later. The Chilean earthquake had an aftershock around 7 a year later, for instance. I wouldn't be surprised if we get another 7+ earthquake within the year.
|
7.1 aftershock again? I heard there is a warning of tsunami.
|
Russian Federation154 Posts
|
holy fuck not again
|
This still need confirmation but seems that the center was inland, 10 km depth, under fukushima, so the tsunami risk is limited. Or if the tsunami warning is true, the center could be under sea then.
|
http://transmissionsfromtokyo.blogspot.com/
---
Quoting:
Monday evening Tokyo time. We just got rocked by yet another big earthquake 7.1 with the epicenter in Fukushima! This one lasted about two minutes. Tsunami warnings all along the coast. Because this hit Fukushima, there's going to be urgent concerns for the power plant. Stay tuned.
Update 5:40pm: Landslide in the Ibaraki area and one car with passengers is reported to have been caught in the landslide. Rescue workers on their way to the site now. In Ibaraki, boats are heading out into the ocean as I type to scout if any major waves are coming. Brave guys!!
Update 5:48pm: Major blackout reported in Iwaki City. Most news channels are showing footage inside their newsrooms as the quake struck. Power has been cut to the Fukushima Daiichi Power plant.
Update 6:01pm: NHK has an aerial view of the Fukushima power plant. Water supply and injection has currently been suspended due to lack of power.
|
|
|
|