|
Off topic discussion and argumentative back and forth will not be tolerated. |
On September 14 2011 05:00 Ghad wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2011 02:26 GeyzeR wrote: In an interview inside his Northwest D.C. home last week, the noted civil rights leader, told the Afro that he watched French and Danish troops storm small villages late at night beheading, maiming and killing rebels and loyalists to show them who was in control." Are you fully aware how crazy that notion is? He took that quote straight from Fauntroy's interview with afro. The man was a congress man for 30 years, so it is hard for me to believe that he is making it up. Yet the claim is really far fetched.
|
On September 14 2011 05:04 muse5187 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2011 05:00 Ghad wrote:On September 14 2011 02:26 GeyzeR wrote: In an interview inside his Northwest D.C. home last week, the noted civil rights leader, told the Afro that he watched French and Danish troops storm small villages late at night beheading, maiming and killing rebels and loyalists to show them who was in control." Are you fully aware how crazy that notion is? He took that quote straight from Fauntroy's interview with afro. The man was a congress man for 30 years, so it is hard for me to believe that he is making it up. Yet the claim is really far fetched.
Eh "The Afro noted that it was unable to confirm any aspects of Fauntroy's story, and there has been no independent corroboration of his claims" so I doubt it. That would be big news, I don't know why some reporter wanting to make a name for him/herself wouldn't be all over that if that was the case.
Plus Fauntroy also says this is part of a plan to recolonize Africa which is laughable.
|
On September 14 2011 05:26 MattyClutch wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2011 05:04 muse5187 wrote:On September 14 2011 05:00 Ghad wrote:On September 14 2011 02:26 GeyzeR wrote: In an interview inside his Northwest D.C. home last week, the noted civil rights leader, told the Afro that he watched French and Danish troops storm small villages late at night beheading, maiming and killing rebels and loyalists to show them who was in control." Are you fully aware how crazy that notion is? He took that quote straight from Fauntroy's interview with afro. The man was a congress man for 30 years, so it is hard for me to believe that he is making it up. Yet the claim is really far fetched. Eh "The Afro noted that it was unable to confirm any aspects of Fauntroy's story, and there has been no independent corroboration of his claims" so I doubt it. That would be big news, I don't know why some reporter wanting to make a name for him/herself wouldn't be all over that if that was the case. Plus Fauntroy also says this is part of a plan to recolonize Africa which is laughable. Look I'm just playing the devils advocate. The man was in congress for a good bit. You're right though he does have questionable interests.
|
On September 14 2011 05:42 muse5187 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2011 05:26 MattyClutch wrote:On September 14 2011 05:04 muse5187 wrote:On September 14 2011 05:00 Ghad wrote:On September 14 2011 02:26 GeyzeR wrote: In an interview inside his Northwest D.C. home last week, the noted civil rights leader, told the Afro that he watched French and Danish troops storm small villages late at night beheading, maiming and killing rebels and loyalists to show them who was in control." Are you fully aware how crazy that notion is? He took that quote straight from Fauntroy's interview with afro. The man was a congress man for 30 years, so it is hard for me to believe that he is making it up. Yet the claim is really far fetched. Eh "The Afro noted that it was unable to confirm any aspects of Fauntroy's story, and there has been no independent corroboration of his claims" so I doubt it. That would be big news, I don't know why some reporter wanting to make a name for him/herself wouldn't be all over that if that was the case. Plus Fauntroy also says this is part of a plan to recolonize Africa which is laughable. Look I'm just playing the devils advocate. The man was in congress for a good bit. You're right though he does have questionable interests.
Lol Arnold Schwarzeneger was a governor and Ronald Reagan a president. Let's keep in mind that being in politics doesn't give that much more credit to someone, at least not enough to buy such bold and weird statements.
|
On September 14 2011 05:00 Ghad wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2011 02:26 GeyzeR wrote: In an interview inside his Northwest D.C. home last week, the noted civil rights leader, told the Afro that he watched French and Danish troops storm small villages late at night beheading, maiming and killing rebels and loyalists to show them who was in control." Are you fully aware how crazy that notion is?
I am not aware. I already have this information from many different and independent sources and I cannot find the reason why they all would make it up. I guess it will become public early or later. it is impossible to hide a thing that big for long time. It is not that important who will become the first to tell it, that man or somebody else and when exactly.
ALBA Countries Condemn Attacks against Libya and Propose Peace Initiative http://www.juventudrebelde.co.cu/international/2011-09-10/alba-countries-condemn-attacks-against-libya-and-propose-peace-initiative/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolivarian_Alliance_for_the_Americas ( Antigua and Barbuda, Bolivia, Cuba, Dominica, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Venezuela). I realize that the list of countries is laughable, but there are not that many left not controlled by western powers on this planet. BTW, "ALBA nations are in the process of introducing a new regional currency, the SUCRE. It is intended to be the common virtual currency by 2010 and eventually a hard currency. On Tuesday, July 6, 2010, Venezuela and Ecuador conducted the first bilateral trade deal between two ALBA countries using the new trading currency, the Sucre, instead of the US dollar."
|
On September 14 2011 06:53 GeyzeR wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2011 05:00 Ghad wrote:On September 14 2011 02:26 GeyzeR wrote: In an interview inside his Northwest D.C. home last week, the noted civil rights leader, told the Afro that he watched French and Danish troops storm small villages late at night beheading, maiming and killing rebels and loyalists to show them who was in control." Are you fully aware how crazy that notion is? I am not aware. I already have this information from many different and independent sources and I cannot find the reason why they all would make it up. I guess it will become public early or later. it is impossible to hide a thing that big for long time. It is not that important who will become the first to tell it, that man or somebody else and when exactly.
So you have multiple sources qouting the same guy then? If you actually have corroborative evidence then please present it because I would really like to see it.
|
The facts are the man was in Libya. He was a congressman. And he did say that in an interview. To be proved is if it really happened. Having many sources quoting something that is untrue doesn't make it true.
|
On September 14 2011 07:18 HellRoxYa wrote: So you have multiple sources qouting the same guy then? If you actually have corroborative evidence then please present it because I would really like to see it. I did not say "the same guy". From the very beginning of the conflict I understand that western media and al jazeera lie. At the very beginning it was even hard to prove that it is a civil war, not a popular uprising! I read reports of normal people who happens to witness something. They all are from different countries. Many reports of independent journalists like Mahdi Nazemroaya or Lizzie Phelan are already in the thread. Also not "mainstream" countries like those from ALBA describe the conflict completely different. You need a huge conspiracy theory backing why all of them are lying. Instead it is relatively easy to explain why would west lie. "Cui bono" helps a lot to understand events.
We must wait till NATO leaves. Then Libyans regain control over the country. Then the truth will pour. That's why I guess NATO will not leave.
|
I'm very unsure of what you're trying to say here. Does NATO control the news flow due to their fighter jets? Why would NATO leaving have any impact what-so-ever on any so-called western propaganda?
And you're right, you didn't say the same guy, I did.
On September 14 2011 07:39 muse5187 wrote: The facts are the man was in Libya. He was a congressman. And he did say that in an interview. To be proved is if it really happened. Having many sources quoting something that is untrue doesn't make it true. This guy here actually bothered to put it in writing, read the quote a few times until you understand what he's saying. After that, please show me corroborative sources confirming his claims to be true. I am genuinly interested in seeing them.
Lastly, you do realize that the ALBA countries have a political agenda, a much stronger and more cohesive one than the loosely common interested west, right? I have to admit that the fact that you just swallow whatever comes out of them is worrysome. Take note that I'm not saying they can't have a point here and there, but at least be critical. It's not really surprising that they have a completely different perspective as they're in bed with anyone and anything opposing the west on the whole.
|
Few updates from the past day:
Al Jazeera
19 hours 45 min ago - Libya NTC forces have given residents in Muammar Gaddafi's stronghold of Bani Walid two days to leave the area before they launch a major offensive, according to the Reuters news agency.
Along with Gaddafi's hometown Sirte on the central Mediterranean coast and Sabha in the remote southern desert, Bani Walid counts among the last strongholds of old regime fighters and their resistance has impeded NTC efforts to normalise life in the oil-producing North African state again.
4 hours 59 min ago - Libya Reuters - Libyan fighters are handing out free petrol to help hundreds of civilians flee a desert town held by Muammar Gaddafi's forces ahead of and onslaught aimed at capturing one of the ousted ruler's last bastions.
Complaining of hardship and intimidation, residents of Bani Walid headed to nearby towns or started the 180 km journey north towards Tripoli on Tuesday in cars packed with children and possessions.
Reuters
(Reuters) - Libyan transitional government forces handed out free petrol to help hundreds of civilians flee a desert town held by Muammar Gaddafi's loyalists ahead of an onslaught aimed at capturing one of the ousted ruler's last bastions.
Complaining of hardship and intimidation, residents of Bani Walid headed to nearby towns or started the 180 km (112-mile) journey north toward the capital Tripoli on Tuesday in cars packed with children and possessions. ...
...Residents escaping Bani Walid on Monday and Tuesday reported days of intense street-to-street fighting. They began to slip out after Gaddafi forces abandoned some checkpoints on the outskirts.
Bani Walid resident and NTC supporter Isa Amr, 35, said the town was running out of fuel, food and water, making it impossible for his family to stay any longer.
"Rebels gave us some petrol, enough to drive to Tripoli. The rebels are really helping us," he said, driving away with his wife and three young children.
Amr said the NTC was handing out free fuel at the northern entrance to Bani Walid to smooth the evacuation.
Abdulbaset Mohamed Mohamed, 25, another Bani Walid residents driving toward Tripoli, said it was too dangerous to venture outside in the town. Militia men are hiding around the city and (pro-Gaddafi) green flags are everywhere."
NTC field commanders said people in Bani Walid had been told via broadcast radio messages they had two days to leave town before it came under full-blown attack.
|
On September 14 2011 08:26 HellRoxYa wrote: I'm very unsure of what you're trying to say here. Does NATO control the news flow due to their fighter jets? Why would NATO leaving have any impact what-so-ever on any so-called western propaganda? Again, the free and independent western media? And a supposition that both NATO and media can be controlled by same force doesn't come into your mind?
On September 14 2011 07:39 muse5187 wrote: The facts are the man was in Libya. He was a congressman. And he did say that in an interview. To be proved is if it really happened. Having many sources quoting something that is untrue doesn't make it true.
If I claim that I saw a man killed another man and witness it in court, that man will go in jail unless proved otherwise. I do not have to prove that I am right, i just accept the responsibility of lying.
Lastly, you do realize that the ALBA countries have a political agenda
At this point I would trust ALBA more then west. Western information is not confirmed by independent sides. West in a big trouble right now and has to save the situation, if you look out side of Libya and see the general picture. Libya is just a piece of mosaic. Any thought why the West illegally intervene in the local conflict apart from the usual "saving civilians"? Common, it was never only for humanitarian reasons in the history.
|
On September 14 2011 19:04 GeyzeR wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2011 08:26 HellRoxYa wrote: I'm very unsure of what you're trying to say here. Does NATO control the news flow due to their fighter jets? Why would NATO leaving have any impact what-so-ever on any so-called western propaganda? Again, the free and independent western media? And a supposition that both NATO and media can be controlled by same force doesn't come into your mind?
Don't dodge the question. Why would NATO leaving change anything about the newsflow? That makes even less sense if NATO and the media were controlled by the same entity. Which is, by the way, such a redicolous idea that I'm tempted to label you insane.
On September 14 2011 19:04 GeyzeR wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2011 07:39 muse5187 wrote: The facts are the man was in Libya. He was a congressman. And he did say that in an interview. To be proved is if it really happened. Having many sources quoting something that is untrue doesn't make it true. If I claim that I saw a man killed another man and witness it in court, that man will go in jail unless proved otherwise. I do not have to prove that I am right, i just accept the responsibility of lying.
Wrong. At the very least you'd have to have a dead body and the accused needs to be missing an alibi, and even then it's not all that likely that he'll be convicted as it's not, as it's called, beyond resonable doubt that he's guilty. In the case of claims such as the congressman's it's actually necessary to have corroborative confirmation as it's a very large claim, and one that shouldn't be believed because of one supposed eye witness. Remember the Carl Sagan quote? "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"
Since you obviously can't produce any corroborative confirmation at all I'm going to go ahead and say that, as per Occam's Razor, the congressman is lying through his teeth or, slightly more unlikely, confused about what he saw.
On September 14 2011 19:04 GeyzeR wrote:At this point I would trust ALBA more then west. Western information is not confirmed by independent sides. West in a big trouble right now and has to save the situation, if you look out side of Libya and see the general picture. Libya is just a piece of mosaic. Any thought why the West illegally intervene in the local conflict apart from the usual "saving civilians"? Common, it was never only for humanitarian reasons in the history.
You really ought to stop looking at the west as a bloc or a country. You are also obviously confused as the intervention is perfectly legal. Whereas ALBA countries have an interest in claiming otherwise that doesn't make it true. I will agree on one thing in your post thought (congratulations), humanitarian interventions are rarely, if ever, performed unless they also serve in the wests interest somehow. As for Libya the intervention was quite cheap and there was a clear side to back, and the intervention had seemingly strong public support.
|
You know, it takes a few dollars per month to put up an "independent" source for information. It takes billions and thousands of employees to control the news.
And I second the poster above, the "West" is not united - ALBA is.
I'd suggest you take your NWO theories somewhere else.
Edit: btw, one thing I noted as a foreigner who entered the "West"... the west is never in trouble. Everyone else is. The problem of wealthy countries is never "how can I manage to get out of this shit", it's "how can I manage to keep on stepping on everyone's faces".
|
On September 14 2011 19:04 GeyzeR wrote: Again, the free and independent western media? And a supposition that both NATO and media can be controlled by same force doesn't come into your mind?
Do you realize that the "western media" is not a single organization but a conglomeration of very different organizations? Do you realize that they don't speak with a single voice, but that there is a constant discussion going on? Have you ever met a single journalist? To say they are all corruptible is not only a misanthropic view of the world but also insulting to these people!
|
Actually no, I just finished serving on my first America criminal case as a juror. If there is any doubt what so ever, he is walking free. A policeman testified that he saw the man. Guess what? That cop was lying and the man walked free. It takes a whole lot more than heresay.
|
Divisions grow in Libyan ranks after failed attack on loyalist stronghold
Rival factions turn on leadership after the attempt to secure Bani Walid ends in chaos. Kim Sengupta reports from Tripoli
The antipathy towards the unelected members of the TNC forming the new administration is increasingly widespread and vocal. Most of them are former members of the Gaddafi regime, viewed as opportunistic converts from the old order. There is also the charge that some of them have been in Europe, the US and the Gulf states while young volunteers had been dying in the cause of the revolution.
Abdulbasit Abu Muzairik, a senior member of the council of Misrata, the port city which withstood a siege from Gaddafi forces, expressed what he said was widespread frustration. "We are worried about a lot of things which are happening politically. We have not seen Jibril in Libya, he has spent all the time we were suffering outside the country. Suddenly he is here and we have to accept he is the Prime Minister.
"What are people trying to do about it? Well, he will have to be replaced. We are looking at ways this can be done. The people who actually fought for the revolution must be allowed to have a say in how the country is now being run."
Mr Belhaj, who, The Independent revealed, was subject to rendition and torture with the help of British intelligence, has been the focus of media attention. Mr Muzairik pointed out that Mr Belhaj, a former head of the LIFG (Libyan Islamist fighting Group), "is just in charge of fighters in Tripoli, that's all. He is not in charge of Libya, even if he thinks he is."
So far, Mustapah Abdul Jalil, head of the TNC, has escaped criticism. But he has his own concerns about the future. The former Justice Minister under Col Gaddafi has warned of the existence of "extremist fundamentalists within the ranks of the revolution" and threatened to resign unless they, and other armed groups, handed in their weapons.
Abdurrahman Shalgham, an ally of Mr Jalil who was Foreign Minister in the Gaddafi regime, focused on the role of Mr Belhaj and his conservative Muslim followers, maintaining that he was "just a preacher and not a military commander". Another TNC member, Othman Ben Sassi, insisted: "He [Belhaj] was nothing, nothing. He arrived at the last moment and organised some people."
But there has been little sign of organisation on the Bani Walid frontline. One TNC officer, Mohammed el-Fassi, said yesterday: "The problem is that now that Gaddafi has fled, people are just thinking about themselves, their tribes, their own cities. They are not thinking about Libya."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/divisions-grow-in-libyan-ranks-after-failed-attack-on-loyalist-stronghold-2353687.html
This report gives some insight about the division between the rebels
|
Exclusive: Libya's Agoco pledges half its early oil to Vitol
(Reuters) - Libyan oil firm Agoco has promised to give half its early crude oil production to trading firm Vitol as payment for fuel supplied to rebels during the uprising against Muammar Gaddafi.
Excerpt
Ahmed Majbri, chairman of the Arabian Gulf Oil Co. (Agoco), told Reuters Vitol had delivered more than $1 billion of fuel to the rebels, much of it during the first few months of fighting.
Agoco had already paid Vitol around $500 million in a mixture of cash, crude oil and supplies of the feedstock naphtha.
"We will give them 50 percent of production until we have paid them back," Majbri said in an interview after a visit to see infrastructure damage at the oil export terminal of Brega.
Agoco is among the first companies to resume oil production in Libya after nearly seven months of fighting and hopes to raise output fast, getting back to pre-war levels within a year.
The company, which before the uprising was responsible for at least a quarter of the Libya's 1.6 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil production, pumped its first oil since the uprising on Monday and has said it is now sending crude to the Mediterranean terminal of Tobruk.
Libya, a member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, holds Africa's largest crude oil reserves and sold about 85 percent of its oil exports to Europe before the uprising which toppled Gaddafi.
Vitol, along with Qatar, were the only fuel suppliers to Libya's rebels, now interim leaders, during the first few months of the revolt but Libya has since added several new suppliers including Glencore.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/13/us-libya-oil-agoco-idUSTRE78C3R420110913
|
Again, the free and independent western media? And a supposition that both NATO and media can be controlled by same force doesn't come into your mind?
If the media is controlled, why did the New York Times and hundreds of media organizations publish stories about blacks being rounded up as suspected Qaddafi mercenaries by the NTC, which you almost had an apoplexy over?
|
On September 15 2011 19:59 Saji wrote:Exclusive: Libya's Agoco pledges half its early oil to Vitol(Reuters) - Libyan oil firm Agoco has promised to give half its early crude oil production to trading firm Vitol as payment for fuel supplied to rebels during the uprising against Muammar Gaddafi. Excerpt Show nested quote +Ahmed Majbri, chairman of the Arabian Gulf Oil Co. (Agoco), told Reuters Vitol had delivered more than $1 billion of fuel to the rebels, much of it during the first few months of fighting.
Agoco had already paid Vitol around $500 million in a mixture of cash, crude oil and supplies of the feedstock naphtha.
"We will give them 50 percent of production until we have paid them back," Majbri said in an interview after a visit to see infrastructure damage at the oil export terminal of Brega.
Agoco is among the first companies to resume oil production in Libya after nearly seven months of fighting and hopes to raise output fast, getting back to pre-war levels within a year.
The company, which before the uprising was responsible for at least a quarter of the Libya's 1.6 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil production, pumped its first oil since the uprising on Monday and has said it is now sending crude to the Mediterranean terminal of Tobruk.
Libya, a member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, holds Africa's largest crude oil reserves and sold about 85 percent of its oil exports to Europe before the uprising which toppled Gaddafi.
Vitol, along with Qatar, were the only fuel suppliers to Libya's rebels, now interim leaders, during the first few months of the revolt but Libya has since added several new suppliers including Glencore. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/13/us-libya-oil-agoco-idUSTRE78C3R420110913
That's an excellent sensasionalist title.
What it should have been is: 'Rebels promise to refund Vitol for services rendered.'
On September 15 2011 22:58 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +Again, the free and independent western media? And a supposition that both NATO and media can be controlled by same force doesn't come into your mind? If the media is controlled, why did the New York Times and hundreds of media organizations publish stories about blacks being rounded up as suspected Qaddafi mercenaries by the NTC, which you almost had an apoplexy over?
The western media are obviously corrupt and state controlled unless they agree with his pov. Then they're suddenly quoted as 'proof' of his entire fringe position, and the argument gets hastily rewritten to include the new fact.
|
Massacre of Black people by « democratic rebels » - Investig’Action had met the victims.
The Associated Press coldly announced the massacre of a group of Black people who were settled in a camp in front of the Libyan official residence. Dozens of dead bodies were found, hands tied behind their backs. The American news agency pointed out that these people were not combatants. Michel Collon and the delegation who went to Libya in July had met these men who loved Libya.
Michel Collon : « I have met these people while on mission in Tripoli. I talked with some of them. Contrary to what the media and the rebels proclaimed, they were in no way « mercenaries ». Some were black skinned Libyans - as a matter of fact, a major part of the population in Libya is composed of Black African people - the others were civilians who came from sub-Saharan African countries and who had been living in Libya for a long time. They all supported Gaddafi for the very reason that he opposed racism and treated Arabs and Africans as equals. Unlike the « rebels » of Benghazi, who are well-known for their anti-Black racism and who made themselves guilty of dreadful and systematic atrocities from the very first days of the war. What is paradoxical is that NATO says it wants to bring democracy but allies itself with a Libyan branch of Al Qaeda and with a group of KKK-like racists ! »
All the team of Investig’Action is deeply distressed by this sad news.
Map indicating the Human Development Index in 2009, according to the United Nations. In Africa, Libya is the only country which level of development is close to the one of developed countries. For this reason, many African people emigrate in Libya in order to work and live there.
![[image loading]](http://www.michelcollon.info/local/cache-vignettes/L310xH404/afrique_idh_2f44-5f5a3.png)
Mohamed Hassan, an observer of Africa, with an African leader. Read his interview about the mission in Tripoli.
Tony Busselen, a journalist for the weekly newspaper Solidaire, took part in the mission a few weeks ago :
« Our photos show that these people were unarmed civilians, there were even many women and children. I talked with them, they joined forces against the war and did not understand what Europe wanted.
They told me : « Libya is working well, the achievements are far better than in Africa, it is very good for us, and Europe is this country ! It’s beyond understanding. » They were quite willing to defend Libya because they could compare it to their home country.
It is really barbarous to murder unarmed people, hands tied behind their backs, they were simply people, workers who came spontaneously to defend their new homeland. This is truly terrifying and I saw photographs showing the same deeds committed in Benghazi by the « rebels » who are clearly using terror. So, when I see people in Tripoli « applauding » the rebels, I believe that they are simply terrorized. NATO is bringing dread. http://www.michelcollon.info/Massacre-of-Black-people-by.html?lang=fr
|
|
|
|