• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 06:52
CET 12:52
KST 20:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge1[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation13Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle What happened to TvZ on Retro? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine About SC2SEA.COM Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2317 users

NASA and the Private Sector - Page 139

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 137 138 139 140 141 250 Next
Keep debates civil.
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9005 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-28 01:19:58
September 28 2017 01:15 GMT
#2761
Sounds more like two agencies came together and made a deal, rather than two governments. Especially when in the article it brings up other projects falling from favor with this administration. Nice try though.

E: It also seems as that Russia gets more out of the deal than the US. We use their rockets, which we'll pay for. We'll also have to pay for the cargo we send up and the astronauts at a price far higher than normally acceptable. We have our own rockets that we could use, correct?
Also, blaming Obama for shooting for Mars and skipping the moon isn't fair and you should retract that. EVERYONE is shooting for Mars. NASA would rather go to Mars than back to the moon.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-28 02:50:12
September 28 2017 02:33 GMT
#2762
On September 28 2017 10:15 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
Sounds more like two agencies came together and made a deal, rather than two governments.

Wat? This is pretty much just nonsense.

On September 28 2017 10:15 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
Especially when in the article it brings up other projects falling from favor with this administration. Nice try though.

You mean reversing Obama's "Moon stupid, let's dick around with other stuff" plans? Yeah, the Trump administration did what any sane person would do. And suddenly Roscosmos and ESA are on board, surprise surprise.

On September 28 2017 10:15 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
E: It also seems as that Russia gets more out of the deal than the US. We use their rockets, which we'll pay for. We'll also have to pay for the cargo we send up and the astronauts at a price far higher than normally acceptable. We have our own rockets that we could use, correct?

Russian technology, American money. Same old story. As it so happens, Russian technology just so happens to be quite good for building a moon station compared to what the US has. Station building technology is just flat out superior in Russia, and as far as launching rockets go, using Proton and Angara makes more sense in a lot of situations than Atlas or Delta IV Heavy or SLS for moon missions. It's likely both will see light though, and maybe even some of the newer rockets if they ever develop the ability to launch those kinds of missions.

Also Energia 5 which is at least another decade off had seen some interest, though not mentioned in this article.

On September 28 2017 10:15 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
Also, blaming Obama for shooting for Mars and skipping the moon isn't fair and you should retract that. EVERYONE is shooting for Mars. NASA would rather go to Mars than back to the moon.

None of this is true, Obama was a dunce on space, and I take nothing back. Only Congress tempered Obama's stupidity in forgoing moon missions. Roscosmos and ESA didn't sign up on Obama's Mars stupidity because they rightly saw it as premature.

And besides, DSG is a great gateway to a future Mars launch, so it's not like it's even a setback to go Moon first.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9005 Posts
September 28 2017 03:08 GMT
#2763
Conversation is ended. We're never going to see eye to eye on anything space related. It was a pleasure thus far. Good day sir.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-28 03:51:29
September 28 2017 03:48 GMT
#2764
I mean, if you argue feels over reals then yes, I'm going to call you out on it. And that's sort of what you've been doing. The facts simply don't agree with what you've been saying, so there really isn't any "debate" per se here in the first place.

Yes, you like Obama and don't like to see his policies criticized. I get that. He was a pretty shitty space president though.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 28 2017 17:28 GMT
#2765
So apparently it's tonight, not tomorrow....

https://www.space.com/38299-elon-musk-spacex-lockheed-martin-mars-plans.html
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9005 Posts
September 28 2017 18:01 GMT
#2766
On September 29 2017 02:28 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
So apparently it's tonight, not tomorrow....

https://www.space.com/38299-elon-musk-spacex-lockheed-martin-mars-plans.html

I was seeing posts on FB about it and I was getting confused. I guess it's Friday over there, so it's correct?
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 28 2017 21:34 GMT
#2767
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9005 Posts
September 28 2017 23:40 GMT
#2768
On September 29 2017 06:34 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5V7R_se1Xc

I'm confused...6EDT has already passed, right?
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 28 2017 23:47 GMT
#2769
It's tonight at 0030 EST.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9005 Posts
September 28 2017 23:58 GMT
#2770
On September 29 2017 08:47 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
It's tonight at 0030 EST.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/913547943646580737

Thank you good sir. 2330 here I suppose then. Kinda excited.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-29 01:37:50
September 29 2017 01:37 GMT
#2771
So it seems Lockheed Martin is adopting Robert Zubrin's idea for Mars more less without the structures.

Mr. Musk’s tweets suggest that the giant rocket has slimmed to a diameter of 9 meters, or about 30 feet. The original design was 12 meters in diameter, with 42 individual engines powering the booster stage. His reference to “some unexpected applications” could be how SpaceX expects to generate enough revenue to pay for the rocket’s development.

SpaceX also will not be getting to Mars as quickly as Mr. Musk originally forecast. The company had planned to launch one of its Dragon 2 capsules without people, to Mars in 2018. (The capsule is under development for taking astronauts to the International Space Station.) This mission, called Red Dragon, was intended to demonstrate that SpaceX’s technique of using thrusters at supersonic speeds to slow down a spacecraft — essentially the same technology it uses to land the boosters of its Falcon 9 rockets — would work on Mars as well. The Red Dragon capsule was to be bigger and heavier than anything NASA has landed on Mars.

But in February, the launch date slipped to 2020. In July, Mr. Musk acknowledged that landing thrusters had been removed from the capsule design, and that appeared to mark the end of Red Dragon.

SpaceX is not the only company with proposals for the red planet. A few hours before Mr. Musk’s talk on Friday, Lockheed Martin provided an update of its own Mars mission vision, called Mars Base Camp. Compared to Mr. Musk’s ambitions, the Lockheed Martin plan seems quaint and slow. It would not head to Mars until 2028, it would take only six astronauts and the first trip would not even land on Mars but instead circle the red planet for a year before returning to Earth.

From Mars orbit, astronauts could control robotic explorers like rovers more easily.

Mars Base Camp is also more of a suggestion to NASA of what the agency could do than a corporate strategy for Lockheed Martin. And unlike Mr. Musk’s dreams, Mars Base Camp would not require new, unproven business plans or new technologies. Lockheed Martin officials said that their plans would fit within the NASA budget, building on the agency’s plans to put a space station high above the moon. This week, the Russian space agency announced that it would collaborate with NASA on this lunar space station, called the Deep Space Gateway.

In this year’s update, Lockheed Martin officials described a lander that would take astronauts to the Martian surface on a follow-up mission.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ShoCkeyy
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
7815 Posts
September 29 2017 02:44 GMT
#2772
Life?
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-29 03:33:52
September 29 2017 03:32 GMT
#2773
!!



"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-29 04:00:28
September 29 2017 03:45 GMT
#2774
Wow, those are certainly some artist impressions!

Rumor has it FH is delayed btw. Again.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 29 2017 04:07 GMT
#2775
about 20 minutes...

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 29 2017 04:38 GMT
#2776
It's started.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 29 2017 04:43 GMT
#2777
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-29 04:50:48
September 29 2017 04:49 GMT
#2778
Next version won't require legs, working on next version of dragon will simply dock on it's own.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 29 2017 05:02 GMT
#2779








"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 29 2017 05:16 GMT
#2780
The first BFR ship will start to be built next year and probably completed in about 5 years.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Prev 1 137 138 139 140 141 250 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Reynor 292
ProTech116
Rex 64
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 41934
Sea 9900
Calm 7416
Horang2 1555
Jaedong 825
EffOrt 329
Soma 327
Larva 276
Stork 261
Pusan 229
[ Show more ]
Light 196
Zeus 166
ZerO 117
Killer 106
Rush 90
ToSsGirL 71
Mind 69
scan(afreeca) 43
yabsab 34
Sea.KH 28
Liquid`Ret 21
Icarus 20
Hm[arnc] 16
ivOry 11
Noble 11
Dota 2
XaKoH 460
XcaliburYe121
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1735
shoxiejesuss868
x6flipin537
zeus296
allub163
Other Games
summit1g15678
B2W.Neo528
Pyrionflax403
crisheroes304
Fuzer 300
rGuardiaN157
ZerO(Twitch)13
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream9359
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream3667
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 101
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH266
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1288
League of Legends
• Stunt542
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
8m
Rex64
WardiTV37
Monday Night Weeklies
5h 8m
Replay Cast
11h 8m
ChoboTeamLeague
13h 8m
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d
BSL: GosuLeague
1d 9h
The PondCast
1d 22h
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Reynor
Maru vs SHIN
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
BSL: GosuLeague
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
IPSL
5 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
RSL Revival
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
IPSL
6 days
StRyKeR vs OldBoy
Sziky vs Tarson
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-14
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.