• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:23
CEST 22:23
KST 05:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL19Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak15
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 19-25): Hindsight is 20/20?0DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack8[BSL20] RO20 Group Stage2EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)14Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN Can anyone explain to me why u cant veto a matchup The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL Karma, Domino Effect, and how it relates to SC2. Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator
Tourneys
DreamHack Dallas 2025 [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group B [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group A EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat
Brood War
General
Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? Battle.net is not working BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Practice Partners (Official)
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Monster Hunter Wilds Beyond All Reason Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread All you football fans (soccer)! European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Yes Sir! How Commanding Impr…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 14063 users

NASA and the Private Sector - Page 139

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 137 138 139 140 141 250 Next
Keep debates civil.
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
8961 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-28 01:19:58
September 28 2017 01:15 GMT
#2761
Sounds more like two agencies came together and made a deal, rather than two governments. Especially when in the article it brings up other projects falling from favor with this administration. Nice try though.

E: It also seems as that Russia gets more out of the deal than the US. We use their rockets, which we'll pay for. We'll also have to pay for the cargo we send up and the astronauts at a price far higher than normally acceptable. We have our own rockets that we could use, correct?
Also, blaming Obama for shooting for Mars and skipping the moon isn't fair and you should retract that. EVERYONE is shooting for Mars. NASA would rather go to Mars than back to the moon.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-28 02:50:12
September 28 2017 02:33 GMT
#2762
On September 28 2017 10:15 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
Sounds more like two agencies came together and made a deal, rather than two governments.

Wat? This is pretty much just nonsense.

On September 28 2017 10:15 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
Especially when in the article it brings up other projects falling from favor with this administration. Nice try though.

You mean reversing Obama's "Moon stupid, let's dick around with other stuff" plans? Yeah, the Trump administration did what any sane person would do. And suddenly Roscosmos and ESA are on board, surprise surprise.

On September 28 2017 10:15 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
E: It also seems as that Russia gets more out of the deal than the US. We use their rockets, which we'll pay for. We'll also have to pay for the cargo we send up and the astronauts at a price far higher than normally acceptable. We have our own rockets that we could use, correct?

Russian technology, American money. Same old story. As it so happens, Russian technology just so happens to be quite good for building a moon station compared to what the US has. Station building technology is just flat out superior in Russia, and as far as launching rockets go, using Proton and Angara makes more sense in a lot of situations than Atlas or Delta IV Heavy or SLS for moon missions. It's likely both will see light though, and maybe even some of the newer rockets if they ever develop the ability to launch those kinds of missions.

Also Energia 5 which is at least another decade off had seen some interest, though not mentioned in this article.

On September 28 2017 10:15 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
Also, blaming Obama for shooting for Mars and skipping the moon isn't fair and you should retract that. EVERYONE is shooting for Mars. NASA would rather go to Mars than back to the moon.

None of this is true, Obama was a dunce on space, and I take nothing back. Only Congress tempered Obama's stupidity in forgoing moon missions. Roscosmos and ESA didn't sign up on Obama's Mars stupidity because they rightly saw it as premature.

And besides, DSG is a great gateway to a future Mars launch, so it's not like it's even a setback to go Moon first.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
8961 Posts
September 28 2017 03:08 GMT
#2763
Conversation is ended. We're never going to see eye to eye on anything space related. It was a pleasure thus far. Good day sir.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-28 03:51:29
September 28 2017 03:48 GMT
#2764
I mean, if you argue feels over reals then yes, I'm going to call you out on it. And that's sort of what you've been doing. The facts simply don't agree with what you've been saying, so there really isn't any "debate" per se here in the first place.

Yes, you like Obama and don't like to see his policies criticized. I get that. He was a pretty shitty space president though.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 28 2017 17:28 GMT
#2765
So apparently it's tonight, not tomorrow....

https://www.space.com/38299-elon-musk-spacex-lockheed-martin-mars-plans.html
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
8961 Posts
September 28 2017 18:01 GMT
#2766
On September 29 2017 02:28 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
So apparently it's tonight, not tomorrow....

https://www.space.com/38299-elon-musk-spacex-lockheed-martin-mars-plans.html

I was seeing posts on FB about it and I was getting confused. I guess it's Friday over there, so it's correct?
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 28 2017 21:34 GMT
#2767
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
8961 Posts
September 28 2017 23:40 GMT
#2768
On September 29 2017 06:34 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5V7R_se1Xc

I'm confused...6EDT has already passed, right?
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 28 2017 23:47 GMT
#2769
It's tonight at 0030 EST.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
8961 Posts
September 28 2017 23:58 GMT
#2770
On September 29 2017 08:47 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
It's tonight at 0030 EST.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/913547943646580737

Thank you good sir. 2330 here I suppose then. Kinda excited.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-29 01:37:50
September 29 2017 01:37 GMT
#2771
So it seems Lockheed Martin is adopting Robert Zubrin's idea for Mars more less without the structures.

Mr. Musk’s tweets suggest that the giant rocket has slimmed to a diameter of 9 meters, or about 30 feet. The original design was 12 meters in diameter, with 42 individual engines powering the booster stage. His reference to “some unexpected applications” could be how SpaceX expects to generate enough revenue to pay for the rocket’s development.

SpaceX also will not be getting to Mars as quickly as Mr. Musk originally forecast. The company had planned to launch one of its Dragon 2 capsules without people, to Mars in 2018. (The capsule is under development for taking astronauts to the International Space Station.) This mission, called Red Dragon, was intended to demonstrate that SpaceX’s technique of using thrusters at supersonic speeds to slow down a spacecraft — essentially the same technology it uses to land the boosters of its Falcon 9 rockets — would work on Mars as well. The Red Dragon capsule was to be bigger and heavier than anything NASA has landed on Mars.

But in February, the launch date slipped to 2020. In July, Mr. Musk acknowledged that landing thrusters had been removed from the capsule design, and that appeared to mark the end of Red Dragon.

SpaceX is not the only company with proposals for the red planet. A few hours before Mr. Musk’s talk on Friday, Lockheed Martin provided an update of its own Mars mission vision, called Mars Base Camp. Compared to Mr. Musk’s ambitions, the Lockheed Martin plan seems quaint and slow. It would not head to Mars until 2028, it would take only six astronauts and the first trip would not even land on Mars but instead circle the red planet for a year before returning to Earth.

From Mars orbit, astronauts could control robotic explorers like rovers more easily.

Mars Base Camp is also more of a suggestion to NASA of what the agency could do than a corporate strategy for Lockheed Martin. And unlike Mr. Musk’s dreams, Mars Base Camp would not require new, unproven business plans or new technologies. Lockheed Martin officials said that their plans would fit within the NASA budget, building on the agency’s plans to put a space station high above the moon. This week, the Russian space agency announced that it would collaborate with NASA on this lunar space station, called the Deep Space Gateway.

In this year’s update, Lockheed Martin officials described a lander that would take astronauts to the Martian surface on a follow-up mission.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ShoCkeyy
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
7815 Posts
September 29 2017 02:44 GMT
#2772
Life?
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-29 03:33:52
September 29 2017 03:32 GMT
#2773
!!



"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-29 04:00:28
September 29 2017 03:45 GMT
#2774
Wow, those are certainly some artist impressions!

Rumor has it FH is delayed btw. Again.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 29 2017 04:07 GMT
#2775
about 20 minutes...

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 29 2017 04:38 GMT
#2776
It's started.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 29 2017 04:43 GMT
#2777
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-29 04:50:48
September 29 2017 04:49 GMT
#2778
Next version won't require legs, working on next version of dragon will simply dock on it's own.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 29 2017 05:02 GMT
#2779








"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
September 29 2017 05:16 GMT
#2780
The first BFR ship will start to be built next year and probably completed in about 5 years.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Prev 1 137 138 139 140 141 250 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 37m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 320
JuggernautJason81
ForJumy 72
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 11764
Calm 3569
Rain 1175
Soulkey 389
firebathero 272
Dewaltoss 187
Dota 2
canceldota92
BabyKnight26
Counter-Strike
apEX3500
Stewie2K995
Foxcn815
flusha475
byalli194
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox392
Mew2King131
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby3541
Liquid`Hasu547
Khaldor142
Other Games
summit1g6782
Beastyqt747
shahzam291
mouzStarbuck119
ToD108
NightEnD27
KnowMe16
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 26
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 103
• Adnapsc2 32
• Hupsaiya 24
• LUISG 14
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix8
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3760
• masondota21597
• WagamamaTV414
• Ler107
League of Legends
• TFBlade1827
• Shiphtur694
Other Games
• imaqtpie2396
Upcoming Events
Road to EWC
1h 37m
Road to EWC
12h 37m
Road to EWC
13h 37m
Road to EWC
1d 1h
Road to EWC
1d 12h
Road to EWC
1d 19h
Online Event
2 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Road to EWC
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

YSL S1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.