Views on construction of Mosque at Ground Zero - Page 23

On August 26 2010 13:09 FaZe wrote:
The NY'ers that are saying no to the Mosque are acting like children. They think the terrorists will feel like they've "won".

They have it backwards.

This arguement is letting the terrorists win.

This arguement is driving a wedge between local Muslims and their community, a community that should be supporting them in a time when a small group is nearly succeeding in irreperably tainting their reputation as a people.

Let them build their Mosque, the fact that humanity in the western world would be showing acceptance and compassion to one another would be the biggest spit in the face of all.

On August 26 2010 13:06 thesighter wrote:


No, homegrown terrorists inspired by Anwar al-Awlaki.

On August 26 2010 13:20 Koldblooded wrote:
Id like to know the actual exact size and location of the proposed mosque.

On August 26 2010 13:22 IntoTheBush wrote:

You're also saying that the British Govt had nothing to do with those bombings right? The U.S. was running an exercise on 9/11 that involved WTC 1, 2, the Pentagon, and the White House being attacked by commercial jets. I think it's kinda funny that in London they were doing an exercise that involved the same trains, and bus at the EXACT same time it happened just like 9/11. I'm guessing your response will be something like "They were doing exercises because they had knowledge of a possible attack."

I bet you watch FOX News a lot.

On August 26 2010 13:26 thesighter wrote:


I have no clue how you pulled that out of your ass. I didn't say anything. Aren't you the 911 conspiracy theorist?

On August 26 2010 13:50 IntoTheBush wrote:

I'm just trying to find out how informed you are. I didn't pull anything out of anywhere. I'm just stating facts and asking questions. I enjoy hearing other peoples views. Especially those who have been washed by our media, and false statements.

As far as me being a 9/11 conspiracy theorist you're once again wrong. It's not a theory, it has been proven more ways than 1. If you look at most polls when people are asked if they beleive there was a cover-up on 9/11 people who answered "yes" were around the 90% and that leaves the other 10% with "no." 9/11 isn't the first time the U.S. has used False Flagging as a technique to goto war. Look at the USS Liberty for example, or perheps the Gulf of Tonkin where a US Naval ship was "attacked" by Vietnamese troops. Reports that were released later stated that the accusations were false. In fact the U.S. fired on the Vietnamese, but they did not return fire. Over 50,000 U.S. Soldiers, and 1.2 million Vietnamese died over a lie. What makes you think our Govt. wouldn't do it again.. geez /rant =D

On August 26 2010 13:50 IntoTheBush wrote:

I'm just trying to find out how informed you are. I didn't pull anything out of anywhere. I'm just stating facts and asking questions. I enjoy hearing other peoples views. Especially those who have been washed by our media, and false statements.

As far as me being a 9/11 conspiracy theorist you're once again wrong. It's not a theory, it has been proven more ways than 1. If you look at most polls when people are asked if they beleive there was a cover-up on 9/11 people who answered "yes" were around the 90% and that leaves the other 10% with "no." 9/11 isn't the first time the U.S. has used False Flagging as a technique to goto war. Look at the USS Liberty for example, or perheps the Gulf of Tonkin where a US Naval ship was "attacked" by Vietnamese troops. Reports that were released later stated that the accusations were false. In fact the U.S. fired on the Vietnamese, but they did not return fire. Over 50,000 U.S. Soldiers, and 1.2 million Vietnamese died over a lie. What makes you think our Govt. wouldn't do it again.. geez /rant =D

On August 26 2010 12:19 TOloseGT wrote:


Nah, Christians have their crusades and "War on Terrorism".

On August 26 2010 13:17 thesighter wrote:


This view is incorrect. Islamic teachings are not 100% compatible with the western world. There has been a strong backlash against Muslims in France, Switzerland, Netherlands, etc. Muslim integration is not proceeding smoothly in many European countries.

http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/

On August 26 2010 13:09 FaZe wrote:
The NY'ers that are saying no to the Mosque are acting like children. They think the terrorists will feel like they've "won".

They have it backwards.

This arguement is letting the terrorists win.

This arguement is driving a wedge between local Muslims and their community, a community that should be supporting them in a time when a small group is nearly succeeding in irreperably tainting their reputation as a people.

Let them build their Mosque, the fact that humanity in the western world would be showing acceptance and compassion to one another would be the biggest spit in the face of all.

On August 26 2010 16:15 Deadlyfish wrote:
It's not about what is legal or not, it's just about not being total idiots. Same with the Muhammad drawings. Yes it is legal and technically there is nothing wrong with it, but that doesnt mean that you should just do whatever you want.

It's pretty simple. Radical Muslims killed thousands of people and started 2 wars, building a mosque close to the attack probably isnt the best idea.

It would be like if the German embassy was next to a Polish concentration camp. Yes the german people of today dont have anything to do with it, and it's probably legal, but that doesnt mean you have to be a dick about it.

On August 26 2010 16:15 Deadlyfish wrote:
It's pretty simple. Radical Muslims killed thousands of people and started 2 wars

On August 26 2010 16:25 KwarK wrote:
I thought everyone knew Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. In fact, I thought everyone knew that in 2003. Jesus!

On August 26 2010 16:25 KwarK wrote:

How do people still believe this? Even if you accept the tenuous logic that the Taliban in Afghanistan were sheltering Al Qaeda and therefore an attack from them is an attack by the Taliban and therefore invading Afghanistan is really self defence against the Taliban who knew some of the guys who actually started it then that still doesn't explain how Islamic extremism started the war in Iraq.

I thought everyone knew Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. In fact, I thought everyone knew that in 2003. Jesus!

On August 26 2010 15:00 Pandain wrote:


that source is questionable at best.
Just look at the latest opinion poll.
"Do moderate Muslims exist?"
It's true in france there have been debates over the limits of Islamic traditions but even so to say that Muslim intergration is "not proceeding smoothly" is misleading at best.