EPT2009-2010 football (soccer) thread - Page 89
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
TonyL2
England1953 Posts
| ||
|
Fzero
United States1503 Posts
| ||
|
Vin{MBL}
5185 Posts
and the FA/referees do nothing about it, because, for some reason everyone loves to hate on arsenal | ||
|
MooCow
1434 Posts
Everyone loves to hate on Man U and Chelsea. | ||
|
Vin{MBL}
5185 Posts
"Fuller wants to flex his muscle against Wenger's kids, and for Stoke to flex theirs. "Arsenal are a great team with great players and a great manager, but they haven't managed to win a trophy for some time and football's about what happens on the day," he says. "It's not easy to come to the Britannia and play against Stoke and we all know Arsenal are not a team who deal with [physical] pressure too well. "Every time [Didier] Drogba roughs them up, Chelsea beat Arsenal. Bolton used to do it under Big Sam - Kevin Davies and all those guys roughed Arsenal up too. We've got to hit them with a bit of aggression" when u read something like this after seeing the injury live... its disgusting. i don't think anyone can deny that horrific injuries like this are a direct result of the mentality in that interview | ||
|
uberMatt
Canada659 Posts
On February 28 2010 07:00 Vin{MBL} wrote: the reason why arsenal has such an injury crisis is because all the teams think the "physical" tactic is arsenal's "weakness". (thanks to the media/football critics) and the FA/referees do nothing about it, because, for some reason everyone loves to hate on arsenal did you really just blame the media/football critics for arsenal's injury problems, lmao | ||
|
uberMatt
Canada659 Posts
On February 28 2010 10:39 Vin{MBL} wrote: Fuller in pre-match: when u read something like this after seeing the injury live... its disgusting. i don't think anyone can deny that horrific injuries like this are a direct result of the mentality in that interview 'physical pressure' is not bad tackles, when someone says physical pressure or physical presence they always mean upper body strength, in shoulder to shoulder challenges, or before set pieces in the box, defending the ball with your body when attacking etc the reason stoke is considered such a physical team is that they are so good at muscling their way into the position when attacking with or defending against set pieces and/or on delap's throws it's not pretty but players don't get seriously injured from that type of play, all serious injuries come from tackles in open play he named two strikers in his example, when was the last team you saw drogba make a tackle, let alone a 'bad tackle' it also doesnt explain shawcross going off the pitch on the edge of tears after his tackle i realize you're on "everyone hates arsenal, especially the fa" and you don't want to hear this but your argument is just too flawed to not respond to | ||
|
Vin{MBL}
5185 Posts
On February 28 2010 10:39 uberMatt wrote: did you really just blame the media/football critics for arsenal's injury problems, lmao not really, moreso on teams for purposefully being more aggressive during games against arsenal and getting away with it. and you saw the result of that today. | ||
|
Vin{MBL}
5185 Posts
| ||
|
uberMatt
Canada659 Posts
On February 28 2010 10:54 Vin{MBL} wrote: and shawcross crying doesnt make it not punishable. i understand and agree 100% that the tackle was not malicious, but when someone dies in a car accident, does the jury say "he didn't mean it, its ok?" you know what's funny as soon as i made that post i knew you were going to post that even though i didn't say that all he should be punished, his reaction should not make any difference at all your statement seemed to indicate that they went into the game with the mentality to injure arsenal players, and his reaction went against that that's all i'm saying | ||
|
Vin{MBL}
5185 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
ky[Z]
China1730 Posts
But seriously, refs in the EPL should have less tolerance on physical contacts and "technical" fouls! | ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9056 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Vin{MBL}
5185 Posts
On February 28 2010 14:53 zulu_nation8 wrote: haha, it would be very sad if he does give up a potential starting position on the England world cup squad over a personal grudge. Although what terry did is pretty lame. didnt he already give up his place on the WC squad?! IMO if anyone, terry should've been the one to give up his WC place, but we know that would never have happened also, from what i've read in articles/interviews... terry is a real **** off the pitch, all the fire he's getting is well deserved. | ||
|
craz3d
Bulgaria856 Posts
On the subject of Bridge, this is the best thing that could happen for England. The two other left backs Baines and Warnock are in my opinion of much better quality. | ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13535 Posts
Shawcross deserves whatever suspension he gets, but I don't think he should be vilified for the rest of his life for what happened. It's a risk everyone takes playing professional sport that you could be horribly injured and unfortunately for Ramsey he drew they short straw. I wish him a speedy recovery and hope he's able to get back to the top some day. | ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9056 Posts
| ||
|
MooCow
1434 Posts
On February 28 2010 15:58 craz3d wrote: On the subject of Bridge, this is the best thing that could happen for England. The two other left backs Baines and Warnock are in my opinion of much better quality. Agreed, if Bridge did go to WC he probably would of been on the bench. Baines is in great form and Cole should be back in time for WC. | ||
| ||
